Re: [gentoo-user] Digest verification failed:
On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 06:52:20PM -0400, Valmor de Almeida wrote: >Hello, >I have done several >emerge --sync >today but the digest verification problem below does not go away. >Any thoughts? >Thank you. This has been reported in Bug 579204 [0] and, as far as I am aware, was either caused by bad timing between commits and rsync metadata generation or some other factor in generating the metadata being pushed out to rsync servers; though from what I've seen it seems to only affect some mirrors. 0: https://bugs.gentoo.org/579204 -- Sam Jorna (wraeth) GnuPG Key: D6180C26 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [gentoo-user] Digest verification failed
On Saturday 29 Oct 2016 12:56:46 Andrew Lowe wrote: > Anyone seeing this again? I've just sync'd to two servers in Australia, > and then, for the hell of it, one in Canada and am getting it for: > > dev-libs/botan > app-arch/tar > media-video/libav > app-crypt/qca > net-print/cups-filters 38,000 files were sync'd today here in UK, nearly all of them changelogs and manifests, and I now get three of your verification failures. The other ten upgrades are in progress at the moment. > I suppose time will sort it out. Indeed. -- Regards Peter
RE: [gentoo-user] Digest verification Failed
> Anyone know why the digests are failing so frequently? Are they packaged > poorly? Is it the mirror I'm getting them from? But then that begs the > question, aren't the mirrors synchronized and MD5 verified with each > other? > Shouldn't TCP/IP be safe in that it retries a packet until it gets it -- > and > therefore, why is the MD5 different? I haven't had any issues with md5 sums on recent packages and my systems are updated pretty much daily (thus requiring frequent downloads). When it has happened I had to delete the file from /usr/portage/distfiles in order to fetch a clean copy. And since I'm running http-replicator I will also remove any cached copy and recycle http-replicator to ensure it is starting from a clean state. If you're using this or another cache/proxy you'll want to ensure that you clean it out before retrying the fetch. I'm not sure how the mirrors are synchronized but I would guess it's rsync based. There should not be any problems there. I don't know if they check the md5 sums on files pulled into the mirror, but I would guess they do not. I'd look at your /var/log/emerge.log for errors dealing with the fetch. Also check for filesystem errors if you're using a separate FS for the /usr/portage space; it could be a read/write error associated with the disk itself. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Digest verification Failed
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 10:48:10 -0700, Daevid Vincent wrote: > I would use --skipfirst, but that doesn't work with "emerge -Davu > world"... *sigh*. --skipfirst only works in conjunction with --resume emerge -avuD world something fails emerge --resume --skipfirst -- Neil Bothwick Another casualty of applied metaphysics. pgp9Egfat4BRm.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] Digest verification Failed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Daevid Vincent wrote: > It seems lately (within the past few months), I am seeing a lot more of > these: > > !!! Digest verification Failed: > !!!/usr/portage/distfiles/foo-1.2.3.tar.gz > !!! Reason: Failed on MD5 verification > This is probably because FEATURES="strict" is now the default. If the is cvs commit going on when the sync from cvs to rsync happens you could have wrong manifest and so on. Developers could also forget to run ebuild digest but that should not happen very often (the devs should know how to do things). Maybe moving the svn could help these problems because you have atomic operations. Usually these problems are solved by waiting a while and syncing again. Regards, Petteri Räty -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFC3oT1cxLzpIGCsLQRAszFAJ0XpnW7pX2+qr8wjQFy9M1/34kLywCbB5pE cwOlw0CX8/xyT/330zuBPEE= =OkLR -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
RE: [gentoo-user] Digest verification failed!
> I can't figure out how to get past it. After changing the ebuild, type "ebuild mailman-xxx.ebuild digest". This fixes the digest values. You should then be able to emerge mailman w/o resync. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
RE: [gentoo-user] Digest verification failed!
On Mon, 2005-10-03 at 14:29 -0400, Dave Nebinger wrote: > > I can't figure out how to get past it. > > After changing the ebuild, type "ebuild mailman-xxx.ebuild digest". This > fixes the digest values. > > You should then be able to emerge mailman w/o resync. > > or type emerge --digest mailman -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Digest verification failed:
On Thursday 06 November 2008 19:14:57 de Almeida, Valmor F. wrote: > Hello, > > Any inputs on what this problem might be? Any use of --searchdesc will > result in a similar output. > > Thanks, > > -- > Valmor > > -> emerge --searchdesc eclipse > Searching... \!!! Digest verification failed: > !!! /usr/portage/app-backup/bacula/bacula-2.4.1-r1.ebuild > !!! Reason: Filesize does not match recorded size > !!! Got: 15696 > !!! Expected: 15693 > /!!! Digest verification failed: > !!! > /usr/portage/local/layman/science/dev-cpp/growler-core/growler-core-0.3. > 7.ebuild > !!! Reason: Filesize does not match recorded size > !!! Got: 793 > !!! Expected: 916 > emerge: search: aux_get() failed, skipping > > |!!! Digest verification failed: > > !!! > /usr/portage/local/layman/science/dev-cpp/growler-link/growler-link-0.3. > 7.ebuild > !!! Reason: Filesize does not match recorded size > !!! Got: 817 > !!! Expected: 940 > emerge: search: aux_get() failed, skipping > /!!! Digest verification failed: > !!! > /usr/portage/local/layman/science/dev-cpp/growler-math/growler-math-0.3. > 4.1.ebuild > !!! Reason: Filesize does not match recorded size > !!! Got: 695 > > - > Valmor de Almeida, Ph.D. > Oak Ridge National Laboratory > 1 Bethel Valley Road > PO Box 2008 > Oak Ridge TN 37831-6181 > > url: dealmeidav.ornl.gov > tel: 865-241-2906 > fax: 865-241-4829 > - Try layman -S later. growler-math seems to have wrong manifest. It should be fixed very soon else contact the maintener. You can find maintainers e-mail on /usr/portage/local/layman/science/dev-cpp/growler-math/ChangeLog file -- Markos Chandras
Re: [gentoo-user] Digest verification failed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Robert Stockdale IV wrote: | * checking firefox-2.0.0.11-source.tar.bz2 ;-) | ... | [ !! ] | | !!! Digest verification failed: | !!! /usr/portage/distfiles/firefox-2.0.0.11-source.tar.bz2 | !!! Reason: Filesize does not match recorded size | !!! Got: 37480419 | !!! Expected: 6794016 | | Is there a problem with the digest? Is there a work around? Any help | would be appreciated. If this is a bug, I'll report it. | Bob Maybe you should try emerge --sync before emerging firefox. Regards, acm. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHuDGcYCx19pTB5PERAp7OAJ4/I2X0c9QewMTNonz1CBQsh/0EuACePrhC 8qR4bYIiHGLikM6CEo/vRm8= =SU1q -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Digest verification failed
On Feb 17, 2008 8:07 AM, Alexander Meinke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Robert Stockdale IV wrote: > | * checking firefox-2.0.0.11-source.tar.bz2 ;-) > | ... > > | [ !! ] > | > | !!! Digest verification failed: > | !!! /usr/portage/distfiles/firefox-2.0.0.11-source.tar.bz2 > | !!! Reason: Filesize does not match recorded size > | !!! Got: 37480419 > | !!! Expected: 6794016 > | > | Is there a problem with the digest? Is there a work around? Any help > | would be appreciated. If this is a bug, I'll report it. > | Bob > > Maybe you should try emerge --sync before emerging firefox. > > > Regards, > > acm. > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFHuDGcYCx19pTB5PERAp7OAJ4/I2X0c9QewMTNonz1CBQsh/0EuACePrhC > 8qR4bYIiHGLikM6CEo/vRm8= > =SU1q > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > -- > gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list > > I did "emerge --sync" I also ran eix-sync as well which does that and more.Still have the same issue. Bob
Re: [gentoo-user] Digest verification failed
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 08:03:21 -0500 "Robert Stockdale IV" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have been trying to complete a > glsa-check -f affected > for the past 2 days. > The latest problem I have encountered is: > > >>> Downloading ' > http://distfiles.gentoo.org/distfiles/firefox-2.0.0.11-source.tar.bz2' > --02:17:55-- > http://distfiles.gentoo.org/distfiles/firefox-2.0.0.11-source.tar.bz2 >=> `/usr/portage/distfiles/firefox-2.0.0.11-source.tar.bz2' > Resolving distfiles.gentoo.org... 156.56.247.195, 140.211.166.134, > 216.165.129.135, ... > Connecting to distfiles.gentoo.org|156.56.247.195|:80... connected. > HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK > Length: 37,480,419 (36M) [application/x-tar] > > 100%[>] > 37,480,419 236.84K/sETA 00:00 > > 02:20:36 (228.12 KB/s) - `/usr/portage/distfiles/firefox- > 2.0.0.11-source.tar.bz2' saved [37480419/37480419] > > * mozilla-firefox-2.0.0.11-patches-0.5.tar.bz2 RMD160 SHA1 SHA256 > size ;-) ... > [ ok ] > * checking ebuild checksums ;-) > ... > [ ok ] > * checking auxfile checksums ;-) > ... > [ ok ] > * checking miscfile checksums ;-) > ... > [ ok ] > * checking firefox-2.0.0.11-source.tar.bz2 ;-) > ... > [ !! ] > > !!! Digest verification failed: > !!! /usr/portage/distfiles/firefox-2.0.0.11-source.tar.bz2 > !!! Reason: Filesize does not match recorded size > !!! Got: 37480419 > !!! Expected: 6794016 > > Is there a problem with the digest? Is there a work around? Any help > would be appreciated. If this is a bug, I'll report it. > Bob A temporary solution: cd /usr/portage/www-client/mozilla-firefox/ && rm Manifest && ebuild mozilla-firefox-2.0.0.12.ebuild manifest Then try to emerge it. -- Ken69267 Gentoo AMD64 AT signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] Digest verification failed
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 09:15:06 -0500, Kenneth Prugh wrote: > A temporary solution: > > cd /usr/portage/www-client/mozilla-firefox/ && rm Manifest && ebuild > mozilla-firefox-2.0.0.12.ebuild manifest s/temporary/terrible/ This message means that either the portage tree contains the wrong checksum for a valid file, or that the file on your mirror has been replaced by an altered version. Redigesting to fix this problem is like fixing low oil pressure in your car by disconnecting the warning light. By all means feel free to take his risk on your own system, but please don't recommend others to do it without at least pointing out the potentially serious consequences. To the OP, it is possible that the Firefox archive was updated and you still have an older one in $DISTDIR. Try deleting your copy and emerging again. You could also try using a different mirror. -- Neil Bothwick "F*ck it" said Pooh, being more forthright than usual. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] Digest verification failed
On Sunday 17 February 2008, Kenneth Prugh wrote: > > !!! Digest verification failed: > > !!! /usr/portage/distfiles/firefox-2.0.0.11-source.tar.bz2 > > !!! Reason: Filesize does not match recorded size > > !!! Got: 37480419 > > !!! Expected: 6794016 > > > > Is there a problem with the digest? Is there a work around? Any help > > would be appreciated. If this is a bug, I'll report it. > > Bob > > A temporary solution: > > cd /usr/portage/www-client/mozilla-firefox/ && rm Manifest && ebuild > mozilla-firefox-2.0.0.12.ebuild manifest - he is having problem with 2.0.0.11, not 2.0.0.12 - wasn't manual digest regeneration considered a very Bad Thing? - look at the expected size. It's much bigger than the actual size. This might be caused by a partially downloaded tarball in /usr/portage/distfiles. He might try rm /usr/portage/distfiles/firefox-2.0.0.11-source.tar.bz2 and try reemerging. That should download the correct tarball. To the OP: if you just synced, you can do "emerge mozilla-firefox" and get version 2.0.0.12, which is the current stable version, which I suppose also fixes the glsa problems (if the glsa is 200712-21). -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Digest verification failed
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 14:25:11 + Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 09:15:06 -0500, Kenneth Prugh wrote: > > > A temporary solution: > > > > cd /usr/portage/www-client/mozilla-firefox/ && rm Manifest && ebuild > > mozilla-firefox-2.0.0.12.ebuild manifest > > s/temporary/terrible/ > > This message means that either the portage tree contains the wrong > checksum for a valid file, or that the file on your mirror has been > replaced by an altered version. Redigesting to fix this problem is > like fixing low oil pressure in your car by disconnecting the warning > light. > > By all means feel free to take his risk on your own system, but please > don't recommend others to do it without at least pointing out the > potentially serious consequences. > > To the OP, it is possible that the Firefox archive was updated and you > still have an older one in $DISTDIR. Try deleting your copy and > emerging again. You could also try using a different mirror. > > yawn, and if the download was invalid it would most likely fail to untar or something similar. I fail to see the point. Either way, he can delete it in distfiles and just remerge/remanifest so it grabs it off the mirrors. I also remember why I hate this mailing list and usually just mark all read. -- Ken69267 Gentoo AMD64 AT signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] Digest verification failed
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 14:47:36 + Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 09:32:25 -0500, Kenneth Prugh wrote: > > > yawn, and if the download was invalid it would most likely fail to > > untar or something similar. I fail to see the point. > > That's because you are assuming that all file corruption is > accidental, whereas the manifest system is designed to protect > against malicious corruption. > > > I also remember why I hate this mailing list and usually just mark > > all read. > > That is safer that advising people to override portage's security > precautions. > > You're right I was assuming it was accidental. I also falsely assumed he already tried another mirror of the file. I also don't think straight without breakfast, so I'm sorry about the last email.. it wasn't very professional of me :> On a side note: the reason I hate -user is it completely breaks claws when it tries to thread it if there are unread :9. May need to nuke it and regenerate everything from scratch. -- Ken69267 Gentoo AMD64 AT signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] Digest verification failed
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 09:32:25 -0500, Kenneth Prugh wrote: > yawn, and if the download was invalid it would most likely fail to > untar or something similar. I fail to see the point. That's because you are assuming that all file corruption is accidental, whereas the manifest system is designed to protect against malicious corruption. > I also remember why I hate this mailing list and usually just mark all > read. That is safer that advising people to override portage's security precautions. -- Neil Bothwick Paranoia: A healthy understanding of the nature of the universe. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] Digest verification failed
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 09:57:13 -0500, Kenneth Prugh wrote: > I also don't think straight without breakfast, so I'm sorry about the > last email.. it wasn't very professional of me :> How does that differ from the rest of us? :-) > On a side note: the reason I hate -user is it completely breaks claws > when it tries to thread it if there are unread I have no such problem here, but I have Claws set to show only unread messages. -- Neil Bothwick "Bad dog! Leave that wire [EMAIL PROTECTED] TERRIER signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] Digest verification failed
On Feb 17, 2008 7:15 PM, Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 09:57:13 -0500, Kenneth Prugh wrote: > > > I also don't think straight without breakfast, so I'm sorry about the > > last email.. it wasn't very professional of me :> > > How does that differ from the rest of us? :-) > > > On a side note: the reason I hate -user is it completely breaks claws > > when it tries to thread it if there are unread > > I have no such problem here, but I have Claws set to show only unread > messages. > > > -- > Neil Bothwick > > "Bad dog! Leave that wire [EMAIL PROTECTED] TERRIER > Thanks to everyone who helped. I realizes that a more recent version was available and I'm emerging it now. When it is done I'll rerun glsa-check again and let you know if it worked. I't has been some time since I ran a Gentoo based system and I'm hoping I don't do something to break it. I hate reinstalling as I usually loose files and time. Bob
Re: [gentoo-user] Digest verification failed
On Feb 19, 2008 7:25 AM, Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 07:08:41 -0500, Robert Stockdale IV wrote: > > > I't has been some time since I ran a > > Gentoo based system and I'm hoping I don't do something to break it. I > > hate reinstalling as I usually loose files and time. > > With the time it takes for a full reinstall and the amount of > documentation available to help fix problems, I find it difficult to > think of a problem not involving dense smoke or horrible grinding noises > that is best fixed with a reinstall. > > > -- > Neil Bothwick > > Real women don't have hot flashes, they have power surges. > Sabayon takes about 3 hours for a complete install and most of it is performed automatically. I run the setup configuration at the beginning and it lets me know when to reboot into the fresh install. Correcting a trashed system could take days. Bob
Re: [gentoo-user] Digest verification failed
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 07:08:41 -0500, Robert Stockdale IV wrote: > I't has been some time since I ran a > Gentoo based system and I'm hoping I don't do something to break it. I > hate reinstalling as I usually loose files and time. With the time it takes for a full reinstall and the amount of documentation available to help fix problems, I find it difficult to think of a problem not involving dense smoke or horrible grinding noises that is best fixed with a reinstall. -- Neil Bothwick Real women don't have hot flashes, they have power surges. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] Digest verification failed:
David Relson wrote: > Greetings, > > In the last few days I've been encountering lots of "Digest > verification failed" messages indicating SHA256 verification > problems (see below). > > Searching the web, I've found the "generate your own" digest solution, > i.e. "ebuild ...package...ebuild digest". Since the checksums are > present to ensure integrity, this seems like a bad idea. > > Is it a bad idea to generate my own digest values? > > If so, what are the alternatives? > > Thanks. > > David > > ... emerge gettext > > Calculating dependencies ... done! > > Emerging (1 of 1) sys-devel/gettext-0.15 to / Downloading 'http://distfiles.gentoo.org/distfiles/gettext-0.15.tar.gz' > --20:18:41-- http://distfiles.gentoo.org/distfiles/gettext-0.15.tar.gz >=> `/usr/portage/distfiles/gettext-0.15.tar.gz' > Resolving distfiles.gentoo.org... 216.165.129.135, 156.56.247.195, > 64.50.238.52, ... Connecting to > distfiles.gentoo.org|216.165.129.135|:80... connected. > HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 > OK Length: 8,081,941 (7.7M) > [application/x-gzip] > > 100%[>] 8,081,941142.51K/s > ETA 00:00 > > 20:19:36 (144.45 KB/s) - `/usr/portage/distfiles/gettext-0.15.tar.gz' > saved [8081941/8081941] > > * checking ebuild checksums ;-) ... [ ok ] > * checking auxfile checksums ;-) ... [ !! ] > > !!! Digest verification failed: > !!! /usr/portage/sys-devel/gettext/files/gettext-0.12.1-without_java.patch > !!! Reason: Failed on SHA256 verification > !!! Got: > 6dfefe191bc9435a957f7f6ff0658a771cf6ccffbaf169cae79ce7017a0421ee > !!! Expected: > c5a6a223c8be6ba11f1c180c7f381914abe127c0dffb0ec91d2e0a8e06892c92 > I usually delete the offender from distfiles and let it download again. If it still fails, try sync'ing again. After that, wait until portage gets updated and try again. You could also be nice and see if there is a bug report about the offender and file one if not so the maintainer knows about it. That said, it could be that the server you are getting them from is having problems. I have ran into that a time or two as well. Switching servers may help. That's my thoughts at least. Dale :-) :-) -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Digest verification failed:
On Sunday 01 October 2006 02:23, David Relson wrote: > In the last few days I've been encountering lots of "Digest > verification failed" messages indicating SHA256 verification > problems (see below). > > Searching the web, I've found the "generate your own" digest solution, > i.e. "ebuild ...package...ebuild digest". Since the checksums are > present to ensure integrity, this seems like a bad idea. > > Is it a bad idea to generate my own digest values? Yes. There is now a section about it in the handbook [1]. > If so, what are the alternatives? [SNIP] > !!! Digest verification failed: > !!! /usr/portage/sys-devel/gettext/files/gettext-0.12.1-without_java.patch > !!! Reason: Failed on SHA256 verification > !!! Got: > 6dfefe191bc9435a957f7f6ff0658a771cf6ccffbaf169cae79ce7017a0421ee > !!! Expected: > c5a6a223c8be6ba11f1c180c7f381914abe127c0dffb0ec91d2e0a8e06892c92 Since the offending file is in the portage tree rather than in distfiles it doesn't make a lot of sense to delete it since only a sync will be able to refetch it anyway. Had it been in distfiles then Dales suggestions are correct. In this case, however, the problem isn't with the file rather it's with dev-util/pycrypto (which calculates the hash) [2]. And wow, that bug is really old by now! ;P The solution: # emerge -va1 =dev-python/pycrypto-2.0.1-r5 [1] http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-amd64.xml?part=2&chap=1#doc_chap4 [2] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131293 -- Bo Andresen pgpNFNyfLTT20.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] Digest verification failed:
On Sun, 1 Oct 2006 03:41:39 +0200 Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote: ...[snip]... > Since the offending file is in the portage tree rather than in > distfiles it doesn't make a lot of sense to delete it since only a > sync will be able to refetch it anyway. Had it been in distfiles then > Dales suggestions are correct. > > In this case, however, the problem isn't with the file rather it's > with dev-util/pycrypto (which calculates the hash) [2]. And wow, that > bug is really old by now! ;P The solution: > > # emerge -va1 =dev-python/pycrypto-2.0.1-r5 > > [1] > http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-amd64.xml?part=2&chap=1#doc_chap4 > [2] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131293 > > -- > Bo Andresen Bo, You've provided the solution! Thanks. David -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] digest verification failed for libgsf
On Tuesday 20 March 2007 19:28:26 Vikas Kumar wrote: > today after emerge --sync when i did emerge -pvuDN world, i got this > > # emerge -pvuDN world > > These are the packages that would be merged, in order: > > Calculating world dependencies \!!! Digest verification failed: > !!! /usr/portage/gnome-extra/libgsf/libgsf-1.14.0.ebuild > !!! Reason: Filesize does not match recorded size > !!! Got: 1441 > !!! Expected: 1472 >/!!! Digest verification failed: !!! [SNIP] Wow, what are the odds of that... The updated Manifest is shown in cvs as committed 9 seconds after the updated ebuild. Yet you seem to have the updated ebuild but the old Manifest... Just sync again. -- Bo Andresen pgphq1tSQ4oBh.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] digest verification failed for libgsf
On 19:54 Tue 20 Mar , Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote: > On Tuesday 20 March 2007 19:28:26 Vikas Kumar wrote: > > today after emerge --sync when i did emerge -pvuDN world, i got this > > > > # emerge -pvuDN world > > > > These are the packages that would be merged, in order: > > > > Calculating world dependencies \!!! Digest verification failed: > > !!! /usr/portage/gnome-extra/libgsf/libgsf-1.14.0.ebuild > > !!! Reason: Filesize does not match recorded size > > !!! Got: 1441 > > !!! Expected: 1472 > >/!!! Digest verification failed: !!! > [SNIP] > > Wow, what are the odds of that... The updated Manifest is shown in cvs as > committed 9 seconds after the updated ebuild. Yet you seem to have the > updated ebuild but the old Manifest... Just sync again. thanks Andresen. the local server i use to sync syncs once in 24 hrs due to bandwidth limitations. i'll sync again tomorrow. -- THE LESSER-KNOWN PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES #16: C- This language was named for the grade received by its creator when he submitted it as a class project in a graduate programming class. C- is best described as a "low-level" programming language. In fact, the language generally requires more C- statements than machine-code statements to execute a given task. In this respect, it is very similar to COBOL. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Digest verification failed: Filesize does not match recorded size
On 08/10/16 15:59, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: I've been getting this output since last night. Calculating dependencies ... ... done! [ebuild U ] app-shells/bash-4.3_p48 [4.3_p46-r1] [snip] ... ... [snip] Or is there some other way to fix this, like running 'ebuild /path/to/ebuild manifest', as suggested here: https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-7414010.html Thanks. Unless Alexander is in Perth, Australia, I can confirm the same thing, exactly as Alexander described, is happening here - Perth that is. Andrew
Re: [gentoo-user] Digest verification failed: Filesize does not match recorded size
On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Andrew Lowe wrote: > On 08/10/16 15:59, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: >> >> I've been getting this output since last night. >> >> Calculating dependencies ... ... done! >> [ebuild U ] app-shells/bash-4.3_p48 [4.3_p46-r1] > > [snip] > ... > ... > [snip] >> >> Or is there some other way to fix this, like running 'ebuild >> /path/to/ebuild manifest', as suggested here: >> https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-7414010.html >> >> Thanks. >> >> > > Unless Alexander is in Perth, Australia, I can confirm the same > thing, exactly as Alexander described, is happening here - Perth that is. > > Andrew > > Ha, ha. I'm not that Down Under. Pun intended. I used a European mirror.
Re: [gentoo-user] Digest verification failed: Filesize does not match recorded size
On Saturday 08 Oct 2016 11:45:05 Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Andrew Lowe wrote: > > On 08/10/16 15:59, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > >> I've been getting this output since last night. > >> > >> Calculating dependencies ... ... done! > >> [ebuild U ] app-shells/bash-4.3_p48 [4.3_p46-r1] > > > > [snip] > > ... > > ... > > [snip] > > > >> Or is there some other way to fix this, like running 'ebuild > >> /path/to/ebuild manifest', as suggested here: > >> https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-7414010.html > >> > >> Thanks. > >> > > Unless Alexander is in Perth, Australia, I can confirm the same > > > > thing, exactly as Alexander described, is happening here - Perth that is. > > > > Andrew > > Ha, ha. I'm not that Down Under. Pun intended. > > I used a European mirror. I'm getting the same on a UK mirror this morning. -- Regards, Mick signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-user] Digest verification failed: Filesize does not match recorded size
On 08/10/16 16:49, Mick wrote: > On Saturday 08 Oct 2016 11:45:05 Alexander Kapshuk wrote: >> On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Andrew Lowe wrote: >>> On 08/10/16 15:59, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: I've been getting this output since last night. Calculating dependencies ... ... done! [ebuild U ] app-shells/bash-4.3_p48 [4.3_p46-r1] >>> >>> [snip] >>> ... >>> ... >>> [snip] >>> Or is there some other way to fix this, like running 'ebuild /path/to/ebuild manifest', as suggested here: https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-7414010.html Thanks. >>> Unless Alexander is in Perth, Australia, I can confirm the same >>> >>> thing, exactly as Alexander described, is happening here - Perth that is. >>> >>> Andrew >> >> Ha, ha. I'm not that Down Under. Pun intended. >> >> I used a European mirror. > > I'm getting the same on a UK mirror this morning. > Worked for me - iinet mirror, Perth Australia. Tried that one? BillK
Re: [gentoo-user] Digest verification failed: Filesize does not match recorded size
Den 08. okt. 2016 11:24, skrev Bill Kenworthy: > On 08/10/16 16:49, Mick wrote: >> On Saturday 08 Oct 2016 11:45:05 Alexander Kapshuk wrote: >>> On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Andrew Lowe wrote: On 08/10/16 15:59, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > I've been getting this output since last night. > > Calculating dependencies ... ... done! > [ebuild U ] app-shells/bash-4.3_p48 [4.3_p46-r1] [snip] ... ... [snip] > Or is there some other way to fix this, like running 'ebuild > /path/to/ebuild manifest', as suggested here: > https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-7414010.html > > Thanks. > Unless Alexander is in Perth, Australia, I can confirm the same thing, exactly as Alexander described, is happening here - Perth that is. Andrew >>> Ha, ha. I'm not that Down Under. Pun intended. >>> >>> I used a European mirror. >> I'm getting the same on a UK mirror this morning. >> > Worked for me - iinet mirror, Perth Australia. > > Tried that one? > > BillK > > > Same here, from Norway. I did not want to force accept of potentially bad .emerge by running "emerge .emerge digest". Rather I deleted the Manifest in the affected directories, and ran emerge --sync again. Fixed.
Re: [gentoo-user] Digest verification failed: Filesize does not match recorded size
On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 1:03 PM, Håkon Alstadheim wrote: > Den 08. okt. 2016 11:24, skrev Bill Kenworthy: >> On 08/10/16 16:49, Mick wrote: >>> On Saturday 08 Oct 2016 11:45:05 Alexander Kapshuk wrote: On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Andrew Lowe wrote: > On 08/10/16 15:59, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: >> I've been getting this output since last night. >> >> Calculating dependencies ... ... done! >> [ebuild U ] app-shells/bash-4.3_p48 [4.3_p46-r1] > [snip] > ... > ... > [snip] > >> Or is there some other way to fix this, like running 'ebuild >> /path/to/ebuild manifest', as suggested here: >> https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-7414010.html >> >> Thanks. >> > Unless Alexander is in Perth, Australia, I can confirm the same > > thing, exactly as Alexander described, is happening here - Perth that is. > > Andrew Ha, ha. I'm not that Down Under. Pun intended. I used a European mirror. >>> I'm getting the same on a UK mirror this morning. >>> >> Worked for me - iinet mirror, Perth Australia. >> >> Tried that one? >> >> BillK >> >> >> > Same here, from Norway. I did not want to force accept of potentially > bad .emerge by running "emerge .emerge digest". Rather I > deleted the Manifest in the affected directories, and ran emerge --sync > again. Fixed. > > > > This solution did not work for me unfortunately.
Re: [gentoo-user] Digest verification failed: Filesize does not match recorded size
On 08/10/16 20:59, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 1:03 PM, Håkon Alstadheim wrote: Den 08. okt. 2016 11:24, skrev Bill Kenworthy: On 08/10/16 16:49, Mick wrote: On Saturday 08 Oct 2016 11:45:05 Alexander Kapshuk wrote: On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Andrew Lowe wrote: On 08/10/16 15:59, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: I've been getting this output since last night. Calculating dependencies ... ... done! [ebuild U ] app-shells/bash-4.3_p48 [4.3_p46-r1] [snip] ... ... [snip] Or is there some other way to fix this, like running 'ebuild /path/to/ebuild manifest', as suggested here: https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-7414010.html Thanks. Unless Alexander is in Perth, Australia, I can confirm the same thing, exactly as Alexander described, is happening here - Perth that is. Andrew Ha, ha. I'm not that Down Under. Pun intended. I used a European mirror. I'm getting the same on a UK mirror this morning. Worked for me - iinet mirror, Perth Australia. Tried that one? BillK Same here, from Norway. I did not want to force accept of potentially bad .emerge by running "emerge .emerge digest". Rather I deleted the Manifest in the affected directories, and ran emerge --sync again. Fixed. This solution did not work for me unfortunately. Me neither. I also tried Bill K's suggestion, changing to iinet instead of Swinburne but maybe because I'm south of the river, that didn't work either. I think I'm going to let it rest for another 24 hours. In the past these sort of things manage to sort themselves out given time. Andrew
Re: [gentoo-user] Digest verification failed: Filesize does not match recorded size
On Saturday 08 Oct 2016 15:59:59 Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 1:03 PM, Håkon Alstadheim > > wrote: > > Den 08. okt. 2016 11:24, skrev Bill Kenworthy: > >> On 08/10/16 16:49, Mick wrote: > >>> On Saturday 08 Oct 2016 11:45:05 Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Andrew Lowe wrote: > > On 08/10/16 15:59, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > >> I've been getting this output since last night. > >> > >> Calculating dependencies ... ... done! > >> [ebuild U ] app-shells/bash-4.3_p48 [4.3_p46-r1] > > > > [snip] > > ... > > ... > > [snip] > > > >> Or is there some other way to fix this, like running 'ebuild > >> /path/to/ebuild manifest', as suggested here: > >> https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-7414010.html > >> > >> Thanks. > >> > > Unless Alexander is in Perth, Australia, I can confirm the > > same > > > > thing, exactly as Alexander described, is happening here - Perth that > > is. > > > > Andrew > > Ha, ha. I'm not that Down Under. Pun intended. > > I used a European mirror. > >>> > >>> I'm getting the same on a UK mirror this morning. > >> > >> Worked for me - iinet mirror, Perth Australia. > >> > >> Tried that one? > >> > >> BillK > >> > > Same here, from Norway. I did not want to force accept of potentially > > > > bad .emerge by running "emerge .emerge digest". Rather I > > deleted the Manifest in the affected directories, and ran emerge --sync > > again. Fixed. > > This solution did not work for me unfortunately. I didn't even try it. I'll do what I've always done: re-sync later and try running emerge again. -- Regards, Mick signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-user] Digest verification failed: Filesize does not match recorded size
Here in Toronto at c 2016-10-08 20:30 EDT , I successfully emerged Bash Man-pages Cronbase , but ran into the digest problem with 7 'libX...' pkgs. I've no idea which mirror it used for 'eix-sync', but the source was probably downloaded from Waterloo Ont. I'll simply leave them till next Sat, when hopefully the mirrors wb ok. -- ,, SUPPORT ___//___, Philip Webb ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Cities Centre, University of Toronto TRANSIT`-O--O---' purslowatchassdotutorontodotca
Re: [gentoo-user] Digest verification failed: qt-x11-opensource-src-4.1.4.tar.gz
On 10/25/06, Meino Christian Cramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I got this: >>> Downloading 'ftp://sunsite.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/pub/Linux/gentoo/distfiles/qt-x11-opensource-src-4.1.4.tar.gz' --06:23:28-- ftp://sunsite.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/pub/Linux/gentoo/distfiles/qt-x11-opensource-src-4.1.4.tar.gz => `/usr/portage/distfiles/qt-x11-opensource-src-4.1.4.tar.gz' Resolving sunsite.informatik.rwth-aachen.de... 137.226.34.227 Connecting to sunsite.informatik.rwth-aachen.de|137.226.34.227|:21... connected. Logging in as anonymous ... Logged in! ==> SYST ... done.==> PWD ... done. ==> TYPE I ... done. ==> CWD /pub/Linux/gentoo/distfiles ... done. ==> PASV ... done.==> RETR qt-x11-opensource-src-4.1.4.tar.gz ... done. Length: 32,174,985 (31M) (unauthoritative) 100%[>] 32,174,985 122.99K/sETA 00:00 06:27:46 (122.36 KB/s) - `/usr/portage/distfiles/qt-x11-opensource-src-4.1.4.tar.gz' saved [32174985] * checking ebuild checksums ;-) ... [ ok ] * checking auxfile checksums ;-) ... [ ok ] * checking miscfile checksums ;-) ...[ ok ] * checking qt-x11-opensource-src-4.1.4.tar.gz ;-) ...[ !! ] !!! Digest verification failed: !!! /usr/portage/distfiles/qt-x11-opensource-src-4.1.4.tar.gz !!! Reason: Filesize does not match recorded size !!! Got: 32174985 !!! Expected: 409784 Hello, From Trolltech: STORED: ftp://ftp.trolltech.com/qt/source/qt-x11-opensource-src-4.1.4.tar.gz 88f8c9c4622108baca2950baac3c02d6 qt-x11-opensource-src-4.1.4.tar.gz Size: 32174985 bytes So I'd say there is a problem in the ebuild. Maybe you should copy the ebuild in an overlay directory and regenerate it with ebuild qt-x11-opensource-src-4.1.4.ebuild digest -- Régis http://regis.decamps.info/blog/ -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Digest verification failed: qt-x11-opensource-src-4.1.4.tar.gz
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 12:08:42 +0200, Régis Décamps wrote: > So I'd say there is a problem in the ebuild. Maybe you should copy the > ebuild in an overlay directory and regenerate it with > ebuild qt-x11-opensource-src-4.1.4.ebuild digest You don;t need to copy an ebuild to an overlay to re-digest it, you can do it with the version i the portage tree. You can even do it when emerging, with emerge --digest, but be aware this will redigest all packages emerged, including dependencies. However you do it, think very carefully first. Package digests are a security measure, to ensure none of the files you are installing have been tampered with. By regdigesting a package, you're discarding this check. Before considering this, remove the file(s) from $DISTDIR, sync again and try to emerge the package normally. -- Neil Bothwick WinErr 01F: Reserved for future mistakes of our developers. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] Digest verification failed: qt-x11-opensource-src-4.1.4.tar.gz
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149809 Have a look at this, should help On 25/10/06, Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 12:08:42 +0200, Régis Décamps wrote: > So I'd say there is a problem in the ebuild. Maybe you should copy the > ebuild in an overlay directory and regenerate it with > ebuild qt-x11-opensource-src-4.1.4.ebuild digest You don;t need to copy an ebuild to an overlay to re-digest it, you can do it with the version i the portage tree. You can even do it when emerging, with emerge --digest, but be aware this will redigest all packages emerged, including dependencies. However you do it, think very carefully first. Package digests are a security measure, to ensure none of the files you are installing have been tampered with. By regdigesting a package, you're discarding this check. Before considering this, remove the file(s) from $DISTDIR, sync again and try to emerge the package normally. -- Neil Bothwick WinErr 01F: Reserved for future mistakes of our developers. -- "There are 10 types of people in this world: those who understand binary, those who don't" --Unknown -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Digest verification failed: qt-x11-opensource-src-4.1.4.tar.gz
From: "Stuart Howard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Digest verification failed: qt-x11-opensource-src-4.1.4.tar.gz Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 11:55:50 +0100 Thanks a lot! qt is currently compiling! :) Keep hacking! mcc > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149809 > > Have a look at this, should help > > On 25/10/06, Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 12:08:42 +0200, Régis Décamps wrote: > > > > > So I'd say there is a problem in the ebuild. Maybe you should copy the > > > ebuild in an overlay directory and regenerate it with > > > ebuild qt-x11-opensource-src-4.1.4.ebuild digest > > > > You don;t need to copy an ebuild to an overlay to re-digest it, you can > > do it with the version i the portage tree. You can even do it when > > emerging, with emerge --digest, but be aware this will redigest all > > packages emerged, including dependencies. > > > > However you do it, think very carefully first. Package digests are a > > security measure, to ensure none of the files you are installing have > > been tampered with. By regdigesting a package, you're discarding this > > check. Before considering this, remove the file(s) from $DISTDIR, sync > > again and try to emerge the package normally. > > > > > > -- > > Neil Bothwick > > > > WinErr 01F: Reserved for future mistakes of our developers. > > > > > > > > > -- > "There are 10 types of people in this world: those who understand > binary, those who don't" > > --Unknown > > -- > gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list > -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list