RE: [gentoo-user] Re: lots of broken/missing dependencies when starting w/ stage1

2007-05-14 Thread burlingk
If the tests are failing, then perhaps they are needed even more.
Also, if you are building from a stage1, you are not dealing with
non-dev builds at all.
^^;;



-Original Message-
From: Enrico Weigelt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 9:27 PM
To: gentoo-user
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: lots of broken/missing dependencies when
starting w/ stage1


* Enrico Weigelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> Yet another error:
> 
> While building coreutils, it fails when making tests/sort:
> 
> Can't locate auto/POSIX/assert.al
> 
> There's no assert.al nor an assert.pl file on my disk.
> 

Obviously the tests fail. Is there any way to skip them 
(without touching the ebuild file) ?


IMHO, on normal installations (non-dev), they shouldn't be 
needed at all.


cu
-- 
-
 Enrico Weigelt==   metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/
-
 Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce:
http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce
 Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions:
http://patches.metux.de/
-
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: lots of broken/missing dependencies when starting w/ stage1

2007-05-14 Thread Mick
On Monday 14 May 2007 13:27, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> * Enrico Weigelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yet another error:
> >
> > While building coreutils, it fails when making tests/sort:
> >
> > Can't locate auto/POSIX/assert.al
> >
> > There's no assert.al nor an assert.pl file on my disk.
>
> Obviously the tests fail. Is there any way to skip them
> (without touching the ebuild file) ?

I have not seen a --no-test flag in emerge, but don't know if there is an 
undocumented option for this, or if it can be set as an ENV variable. There 
should be no harm in trying, but first someone more knowledgeable in the 
workings of gentoo better advise.
-- 
Regards,
Mick


pgp4fIHNYgSRZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Re: lots of broken/missing dependencies when starting w/ stage1

2007-05-14 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hi,

> If the tests are failing, then perhaps they are needed even more.

No, the tests fail because some perl modules are missing, which
are required to run the tests, but not for coreutils itself.


cu
-- 
-
 Enrico Weigelt==   metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/
-
 Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce:
http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce
 Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions:
http://patches.metux.de/
-
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: lots of broken/missing dependencies when starting w/ stage1

2007-05-14 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Mon, 14 May 2007 14:44:55 +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote:

> No, the tests fail because some perl modules are missing, which
> are required to run the tests, but not for coreutils itself.

If the test is optional then FEATURES="-test" should skip it.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

** I'm not going to get married again **
** I'll just find a woman I don't like and give her a house **


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Re: lots of broken/missing dependencies when starting w/ stage1

2007-05-14 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 14 May 2007 14:44:55 +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> 
> > No, the tests fail because some perl modules are missing, which
> > are required to run the tests, but not for coreutils itself.
> 
> If the test is optional then FEATURES="-test" should skip it.

Ah, I though is was enough, not adding "test" to FEATURES.
(in other words: it has to be enabled explicitly)


cu
-- 
-
 Enrico Weigelt==   metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/
-
 Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce:
http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce
 Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions:
http://patches.metux.de/
-
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: lots of broken/missing dependencies when starting w/ stage1

2007-05-14 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Mon, 14 May 2007 15:14:40 +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote:

> > If the test is optional then FEATURES="-test" should skip it.  
> 
> Ah, I though is was enough, not adding "test" to FEATURES.
> (in other words: it has to be enabled explicitly)

It should but you haven't posted your emerge --info. In this case, the
test must be explicitly enabled in the ebuild, which gives you two
choices: edit the ebuild or use a more up to date installation
environment.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

PC DOS Error #01: Windows loading, come back tomorrow


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


RE: [gentoo-user] Re: lots of broken/missing dependencies when starting w/ stage1

2007-05-14 Thread burlingk
If you have an active internet environment, use the knopix disk to
download an iso for one of the live CD's, such as the actual liveCD or
the minimal CD, and then burn to disk, and get the stage3 tarball.  Or,
if you are on a different machine now, use the machine you are on now to
get the ISO if you are able.

If you have enough of an internet connection to use emerge, then odds
are you can download files.


-Original Message-
From: Neil Bothwick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 10:45 PM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: lots of broken/missing dependencies when
starting w/ stage1


On Mon, 14 May 2007 15:14:40 +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote:

> > If the test is optional then FEATURES="-test" should skip it.
> 
> Ah, I though is was enough, not adding "test" to FEATURES. (in other 
> words: it has to be enabled explicitly)

It should but you haven't posted your emerge --info. In this case, the
test must be explicitly enabled in the ebuild, which gives you two
choices: edit the ebuild or use a more up to date installation
environment.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

PC DOS Error #01: Windows loading, come back tomorrow
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: lots of broken/missing dependencies when starting w/ stage1

2007-05-14 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hi,

> If you have an active internet environment, use the knopix disk to
> download an iso for one of the live CD's, such as the actual liveCD or
> the minimal CD, and then burn to disk, and get the stage3 tarball.  

I would have done so, if I had an burner aailavailable right now ...

If I knew that bootstrapping had become so unstable and complicated, 
I did an complete backup instead of just the configs ;-O

Last time I did an fresh install (w/ 2006.1 stage1 image) it ran
through w/o major problems.


cu
-- 
-
 Enrico Weigelt==   metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/
-
 Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce:
http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce
 Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions:
http://patches.metux.de/
-
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: lots of broken/missing dependencies when starting w/ stage1

2007-05-15 Thread Michal 'vorner' Vaner
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 01:44:49PM +0100, Mick wrote:
> On Monday 14 May 2007 13:27, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> > * Enrico Weigelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Yet another error:
> > >
> > > While building coreutils, it fails when making tests/sort:
> > >
> > > Can't locate auto/POSIX/assert.al
> > >
> > > There's no assert.al nor an assert.pl file on my disk.
> >
> > Obviously the tests fail. Is there any way to skip them
> > (without touching the ebuild file) ?

emerge --skipfirst

> I have not seen a --no-test flag in emerge, but don't know if there is an 
> undocumented option for this, or if it can be set as an ENV variable. There 
> should be no harm in trying, but first someone more knowledgeable in the 
> workings of gentoo better advise.

man make.conf, section FEATURES

-- 
"Don't worry about people stealing your ideas.   If your ideas are any good, 
you'll have to ram them down people's throats."
-- Howard Aiken

Michal 'vorner' Vaner


pgpIybteJLVsU.pgp
Description: PGP signature