On Friday 29 Mar 2013 20:36:40 Pandu Poluan wrote:
On Mar 30, 2013 2:54 AM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
A few months ago I got some errors about the match option in some
iptables rules that I was running at the time. I modified these to
remove match
and
add conntrack and all went well.
Now I am trying to run this:
/sbin/iptables -t nat -A OUTPUT -v -p tcp --dport 1935 -j REDIRECT
but it fails to load and it does not give me any particularly informative
message:
# /sbin/iptables -t nat -A OUTPUT -v -p tcp --dport 1935 -j REDIRECT
REDIRECT tcp opt -- in * out * 0.0.0.0/0 - 0.0.0.0/0 tcp dpt:1935
# /sbin/iptables -L -v -n | grep 1935
#
Any idea how I should rewrite this rule? I was using it to redirect the
output to rtmpsrv to capture the address of a rtmpe stream, but now it
does not work.
--
Regards,
Mick
IIRC, iptables -L by default only dumps the filter table.
Just use iptables-save and pipe the result through less (more info there;
you can ensure that the rule gets inserted to the proper table and chain).
Hmm... the rule is saved, but searching for the port number does not bring up
anything, hence I assumed that it is not accepted.
Isn't a port number in this case '1935' interpreted as a search string on the
shell? Quotes don't work.
--
Regards,
Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
