Re: [gentoo-user] Deluge of emerge failures (ACCESS DENIED open_wr: /etc/passwd)

2007-11-09 Thread felix
On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 01:28:36AM +0100, Bo ?rsted Andresen wrote:
> On Saturday 10 November 2007 00:13:56 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I just tried and got this:
> >
> > ? ? checking for C compiler default output file name... configure: error: C
> > compiler cannot create executables See `config.log' for more details.
> >
> > and the log file says
> >
> > ? ? gcc-config error: i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc wrapper: Could not determine
> > which compiler to use. ?Invalid CTARGET or CTARGET has no selected profile.
> 
> This is unrelated. eselect-compiler really sucked.. :p
> 
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135688
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=182361#c21

Thanks.  Sandbox has now recompiled, and one package has recompiled.
I'll see if everything ele recompiles next.

-- 
... _._. ._ ._. . _._. ._. ___ .__ ._. . .__. ._ .. ._.
 Felix Finch: scarecrow repairman & rocket surgeon / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  GPG = E987 4493 C860 246C 3B1E  6477 7838 76E9 182E 8151 ITAR license #4933
I've found a solution to Fermat's Last Theorem but I see I've run out of room o
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Deluge of emerge failures (ACCESS DENIED open_wr: /etc/passwd)

2007-11-09 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Saturday 10 November 2007 00:13:56 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I just tried and got this:
>
>     checking for C compiler default output file name... configure: error: C
> compiler cannot create executables See `config.log' for more details.
>
> and the log file says
>
>     gcc-config error: i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc wrapper: Could not determine
> which compiler to use.  Invalid CTARGET or CTARGET has no selected profile.

This is unrelated. eselect-compiler really sucked.. :p

https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135688
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=182361#c21

-- 
Bo Andresen


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: [gentoo-user] Deluge of emerge failures (ACCESS DENIED open_wr: /etc/passwd)

2007-11-09 Thread felix
On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 01:11:23AM +0100, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> On Samstag, 10. November 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 02:50:36PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 11:17:33PM +0100, Bo ?rsted Andresen wrote:
> > > > On Friday 09 November 2007 23:11:26 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 10:36:48PM +0100, Bo ?rsted Andresen wrote:
> > > > > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196720 ?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Upgrade sandbox to -r2 ?
> > > > >
> > > > > Any idea how to actually do that, since the bug prevents me from
> > > > > upgrading?  Is there some temp hack I can edit or patch to get around
> > > > > the problem for now?  The bug itself isn't described very clearly,
> > > > > not the comments with it.
> > > >
> > > > FEATURES=-sandbox emerge -1 sandbox
> > >
> > > Thanks, I will try that as soon as I can, but unfortuanetly some other
> > > pickles popped up :-( I think it's time to fill some milk jugs and
> > > shoot them before recycling them.
> >
> > I just tried and got this:
> >
> > checking for C compiler default output file name... configure: error: C
> > compiler cannot create executables See `config.log' for more details.
> >
> > and the log file says
> >
> > gcc-config error: i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc wrapper: Could not determine
> > which compiler to use.  Invalid CTARGET or CTARGET has no selected profile.
> 
> maybe, just maybe you should set your gcc with gcc-config

Maybe I did :-)

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~(1)
# gcc-config -l
 [1] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-4.2.2 *

-- 
... _._. ._ ._. . _._. ._. ___ .__ ._. . .__. ._ .. ._.
 Felix Finch: scarecrow repairman & rocket surgeon / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  GPG = E987 4493 C860 246C 3B1E  6477 7838 76E9 182E 8151 ITAR license #4933
I've found a solution to Fermat's Last Theorem but I see I've run out of room o
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Deluge of emerge failures (ACCESS DENIED open_wr: /etc/passwd)

2007-11-09 Thread Hemmann, Volker Armin
On Samstag, 10. November 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 02:50:36PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 11:17:33PM +0100, Bo ?rsted Andresen wrote:
> > > On Friday 09 November 2007 23:11:26 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 10:36:48PM +0100, Bo ?rsted Andresen wrote:
> > > > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196720 ?
> > > > >
> > > > > Upgrade sandbox to -r2 ?
> > > >
> > > > Any idea how to actually do that, since the bug prevents me from
> > > > upgrading?  Is there some temp hack I can edit or patch to get around
> > > > the problem for now?  The bug itself isn't described very clearly,
> > > > not the comments with it.
> > >
> > > FEATURES=-sandbox emerge -1 sandbox
> >
> > Thanks, I will try that as soon as I can, but unfortuanetly some other
> > pickles popped up :-( I think it's time to fill some milk jugs and
> > shoot them before recycling them.
>
> I just tried and got this:
>
> checking for C compiler default output file name... configure: error: C
> compiler cannot create executables See `config.log' for more details.
>
> and the log file says
>
> gcc-config error: i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc wrapper: Could not determine
> which compiler to use.  Invalid CTARGET or CTARGET has no selected profile.

maybe, just maybe you should set your gcc with gcc-config

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Deluge of emerge failures (ACCESS DENIED open_wr: /etc/passwd)

2007-11-09 Thread felix
On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 02:50:36PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 11:17:33PM +0100, Bo ?rsted Andresen wrote:
> > On Friday 09 November 2007 23:11:26 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 10:36:48PM +0100, Bo ?rsted Andresen wrote:
> > > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196720 ?
> > > >
> > > > Upgrade sandbox to -r2 ?
> > >
> > > Any idea how to actually do that, since the bug prevents me from
> > > upgrading?  Is there some temp hack I can edit or patch to get around
> > > the problem for now?  The bug itself isn't described very clearly, not
> > > the comments with it.
> > 
> > FEATURES=-sandbox emerge -1 sandbox
> 
> Thanks, I will try that as soon as I can, but unfortuanetly some other
> pickles popped up :-( I think it's time to fill some milk jugs and
> shoot them before recycling them.

I just tried and got this:

checking for C compiler default output file name... configure: error: C 
compiler cannot create executables
See `config.log' for more details.

and the log file says

gcc-config error: i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc wrapper: Could not determine which 
compiler to use.  Invalid CTARGET or CTARGET has no selected profile.

A quick (dialup) search only shows how CTARGET is used, and I get the
strong impression it is meant for cross compiling.

-- 
... _._. ._ ._. . _._. ._. ___ .__ ._. . .__. ._ .. ._.
 Felix Finch: scarecrow repairman & rocket surgeon / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  GPG = E987 4493 C860 246C 3B1E  6477 7838 76E9 182E 8151 ITAR license #4933
I've found a solution to Fermat's Last Theorem but I see I've run out of room o
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Deluge of emerge failures (ACCESS DENIED open_wr: /etc/passwd)

2007-11-09 Thread Hemmann, Volker Armin
On Freitag, 9. November 2007, Albert Hopkins wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 23:09 +0100, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> [...]
>
> > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196720 ?
> > >
> > > Upgrade sandbox to -r2 ?
> >
> > -r2 is bugged too:
> > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198509
>
> BTW I was not able to reproduce #19850 on ~x86.

it works fine for me too, but hey, this is the fun side of bugs. Not everybody 
is affected. 

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Deluge of emerge failures (ACCESS DENIED open_wr: /etc/passwd)

2007-11-09 Thread felix
On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 11:17:33PM +0100, Bo ?rsted Andresen wrote:
> On Friday 09 November 2007 23:11:26 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 10:36:48PM +0100, Bo ?rsted Andresen wrote:
> > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196720 ?
> > >
> > > Upgrade sandbox to -r2 ?
> >
> > Any idea how to actually do that, since the bug prevents me from
> > upgrading?  Is there some temp hack I can edit or patch to get around
> > the problem for now?  The bug itself isn't described very clearly, not
> > the comments with it.
> 
> FEATURES=-sandbox emerge -1 sandbox

Thanks, I will try that as soon as I can, but unfortuanetly some other
pickles popped up :-( I think it's time to fill some milk jugs and
shoot them before recycling them.

-- 
... _._. ._ ._. . _._. ._. ___ .__ ._. . .__. ._ .. ._.
 Felix Finch: scarecrow repairman & rocket surgeon / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  GPG = E987 4493 C860 246C 3B1E  6477 7838 76E9 182E 8151 ITAR license #4933
I've found a solution to Fermat's Last Theorem but I see I've run out of room o
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Deluge of emerge failures (ACCESS DENIED open_wr: /etc/passwd)

2007-11-09 Thread Albert Hopkins

On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 23:09 +0100, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
[...]
> > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196720 ?
> >
> > Upgrade sandbox to -r2 ?
> 
> -r2 is bugged too:
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198509


BTW I was not able to reproduce #19850 on ~x86.

-a

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Deluge of emerge failures (ACCESS DENIED open_wr: /etc/passwd)

2007-11-09 Thread Albert Hopkins

On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 14:11 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Any idea how to actually do that, since the bug prevents me from
> upgrading?  Is there some temp hack I can edit or patch to get around
> the problem for now?  The bug itself isn't described very clearly, not
> the comments with it.

FEATURES=-sandbox emerge sandbox



-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Deluge of emerge failures (ACCESS DENIED open_wr: /etc/passwd)

2007-11-09 Thread Hemmann, Volker Armin
On Freitag, 9. November 2007, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
> On Friday 09 November 2007 21:55:20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >   [ ok ] ACCESS DENIED  open_wr:   /etc/passwd
> > ...
> > ACCESS DENIED  open_wr:   /etc/passwd
> > --- ACCESS VIOLATION SUMMARY
> > --- LOG FILE =
> > "/var/log/sandbox/sandbox-dev-libs_-_glib-2.14.3-11618.log"
> >
> > open_wr:   /etc/passwd
> > ...
> > open_wr:   /etc/passwd
>
> [SNIP]
>
> >  emerge --info
> > Portage 2.1.3.19 (default-linux/amd64/2006.1, gcc-4.2.2, glibc-2.7-r0,
> > 2.6.23-gentoo-r1 x86_64)
>
> [SNIP]
>
> > sys-apps/sandbox:1.2.18.1
>
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196720 ?
>
> Upgrade sandbox to -r2 ?

-r2 is bugged too:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198509

-- 
Conclusions 
 In a straight-up fight, the Empire squashes the Federation like a bug. Even 
with its numerical advantage removed, the Empire would still squash the 
Federation like a bug. Accept it. -Michael Wong 
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Deluge of emerge failures (ACCESS DENIED open_wr: /etc/passwd)

2007-11-09 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Friday 09 November 2007 23:11:26 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 10:36:48PM +0100, Bo ?rsted Andresen wrote:
> > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196720 ?
> >
> > Upgrade sandbox to -r2 ?
>
> Any idea how to actually do that, since the bug prevents me from
> upgrading?  Is there some temp hack I can edit or patch to get around
> the problem for now?  The bug itself isn't described very clearly, not
> the comments with it.

FEATURES=-sandbox emerge -1 sandbox

-- 
Bo Andresen


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: [gentoo-user] Deluge of emerge failures (ACCESS DENIED open_wr: /etc/passwd)

2007-11-09 Thread Hemmann, Volker Armin
On Freitag, 9. November 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> If you mean what emerge --info reports, that too was in my original
> email:

oops...

here is a bug that sounds exactly like your problem :
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198509

you can add yourself to it or post a me too ;)
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Deluge of emerge failures (ACCESS DENIED open_wr: /etc/passwd)

2007-11-09 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Friday 09 November 2007 21:55:20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>   [ ok ] ACCESS DENIED  open_wr:   /etc/passwd
> ...
> ACCESS DENIED  open_wr:   /etc/passwd
> --- ACCESS VIOLATION SUMMARY
> --- LOG FILE =
> "/var/log/sandbox/sandbox-dev-libs_-_glib-2.14.3-11618.log"
>
> open_wr:   /etc/passwd
> ...
> open_wr:   /etc/passwd
[SNIP]
>  emerge --info
> Portage 2.1.3.19 (default-linux/amd64/2006.1, gcc-4.2.2, glibc-2.7-r0, 
> 2.6.23-gentoo-r1 x86_64)
[SNIP]
> sys-apps/sandbox:1.2.18.1

https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196720 ?

Upgrade sandbox to -r2 ?

-- 
Bo Andresen


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: [gentoo-user] Deluge of emerge failures (ACCESS DENIED open_wr: /etc/passwd)

2007-11-09 Thread felix
On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 10:51:55PM +0100, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> On Freitag, 9. November 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >  or some other access error. ?But I don't
> > have anything else to go on.
> >
> > As for portage,
> >
> > On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 12:55 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >  emerge --info
> > > Portage 2.1.3.19 (default-linux/amd64/2006.1, gcc-4.2.2, glibc-2.7-r0,
> > > 2.6.23-gentoo-r1 x86_64)
> 
> and your libsandbox?

If you mean what emerge --info reports, that too was in my original
email:

On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 12:55 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> sys-apps/sandbox:1.2.18.1

-- 
... _._. ._ ._. . _._. ._. ___ .__ ._. . .__. ._ .. ._.
 Felix Finch: scarecrow repairman & rocket surgeon / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  GPG = E987 4493 C860 246C 3B1E  6477 7838 76E9 182E 8151 ITAR license #4933
I've found a solution to Fermat's Last Theorem but I see I've run out of room o
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Deluge of emerge failures (ACCESS DENIED open_wr: /etc/passwd)

2007-11-09 Thread Hemmann, Volker Armin
On Freitag, 9. November 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>  or some other access error.  But I don't
> have anything else to go on.
>
> As for portage,
>
> On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 12:55 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >  emerge --info
> > Portage 2.1.3.19 (default-linux/amd64/2006.1, gcc-4.2.2, glibc-2.7-r0,
> > 2.6.23-gentoo-r1 x86_64)

and your libsandbox?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Deluge of emerge failures (ACCESS DENIED open_wr: /etc/passwd)

2007-11-09 Thread felix
On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 03:08:53PM -0600, Albert Hopkins wrote:
> > ACCESS DENIED  open_wr:   /etc/passwd
> > ...
> > ACCESS DENIED  open_wr:   /etc/passwd
> > --- ACCESS VIOLATION SUMMARY 
> > ---
> > LOG FILE = "/var/log/sandbox/sandbox-dev-libs_-_glib-2.14.3-11618.log"
> > 
> > open_wr:   /etc/passwd
> > ...
> > open_wr:   /etc/passwd
> 
> Wow, I don't understand how running checksums on the distfile would
> attempt to open /etc/passwd :|  What version of portage are you running?

That named log file has nothing but the open_wr errors.  They all fail
pretty quickly too.

Now it may be that the open_wr logs entries are not errors, but that
something else got a segv or some other access error.  But I don't
have anything else to go on.

As for portage, 

On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 12:55 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>  emerge --info
> Portage 2.1.3.19 (default-linux/amd64/2006.1, gcc-4.2.2, glibc-2.7-r0, 
> 2.6.23-gentoo-r1 x86_64)


-- 
... _._. ._ ._. . _._. ._. ___ .__ ._. . .__. ._ .. ._.
 Felix Finch: scarecrow repairman & rocket surgeon / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  GPG = E987 4493 C860 246C 3B1E  6477 7838 76E9 182E 8151 ITAR license #4933
I've found a solution to Fermat's Last Theorem but I see I've run out of room o
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Deluge of emerge failures (ACCESS DENIED open_wr: /etc/passwd)

2007-11-09 Thread Albert Hopkins

On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 12:55 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> An esync and emerge resulted in 62 out of 113 packages failing emerge
> with errors about no write access to /etc/passwd and /etc/group.  This
> is a dual opteron system, ~amd64, with both kernels 2.6.22-gentoo-r8
> and 2.6.23-gentoo-r1.  This particular esync began fine, 113 packages
> to build.  The last package to build before the first failure was
> glib-2.7.  The system seems to be running fine; I have rebooted,
> logged in, etc.  Is this some glib 2.7 feature?  Should I just keep
> running and wait for glib-2.7-r1?
> 
> 
> 
>  example emerge log
> >>> Emerging (1 of 62) dev-libs/glib-2.14.3 to /
>  * glib-2.14.3.tar.bz2 RMD160 SHA1 SHA256 size ;-) ...[ 
> ok ]
>  * checking ebuild checksums ;-) ...  [ 
> ok ]
>  * checking auxfile checksums ;-) ... [ 
> ok ]
>  * checking miscfile checksums ;-) ...[ 
> ok ]
>  * checking glib-2.14.3.tar.bz2 ;-) ...   [ 
> ok ]
> ACCESS DENIED  open_wr:   /etc/passwd
> ...
> ACCESS DENIED  open_wr:   /etc/passwd
> --- ACCESS VIOLATION SUMMARY 
> ---
> LOG FILE = "/var/log/sandbox/sandbox-dev-libs_-_glib-2.14.3-11618.log"
> 
> open_wr:   /etc/passwd
> ...
> open_wr:   /etc/passwd
> 

Wow, I don't understand how running checksums on the distfile would
attempt to open /etc/passwd :|  What version of portage are you running?

Nevertheless, I was able to able to emerge dev-libs/glib-2.14.3 just
fine, and I'm running glibc 2.7.

-a

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list