Post #2 from Mr. McKinnon is the question.
If, as it sounds like, you didn't let revdep-rebuild go ahead and
reemerge those packages itself, but rather you reemerged them
yourself, then I believe you will need to `revdep-rebuild -i` (see
manpage) to see if it has any other complaints. And there's nothing
unusual about broken dependencies after library upgrades... just let
revdep-rebuild rebuild the necessary packages for you, that's why it's
there.
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 11:04 AM, waltw41...@gmail.com wrote:
On 09/03/2009 07:39 AM, econti wrote:
Hi all
after two months I made a world upgrade. All went well, but when I ran
revdep-rebuild I received this:
localhost ~ # revdep-rebuild
* Configuring search environment for revdep-rebuild
* Checking reverse dependencies
* Packages containing binaries and libraries broken by a package update
* will be emerged.
* Collecting system binaries and libraries
* Generated new 1_files.rr
* Collecting complete LD_LIBRARY_PATH
* Generated new 2_ldpath.rr
* Checking dynamic linking consistency
[ 46% ] * broken
/usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.4/32/libstdc++.la (requires
-lgcc_s_32)
* broken /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.4/32/libsupc++.la
(requires -lgcc_s_32)
[ 51% ] * broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libcircogen.la (requires -lneatogen)
* broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libcircogen.la (requires -lgvrender)
* broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libcircogen.la (requires -lcommon)
* broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libdotgen.la (requires -lgvrender)
* broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libdotgen.la (requires -lcommon)
* broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libdotneato.la (requires -ldotgen)
* broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libdotneato.la (requires -ltwopigen)
* broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libdotneato.la (requires -lfdpgen)
* broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libdotneato.la (requires -lcircogen)
* broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libdotneato.la (requires -lneatogen)
* broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libdotneato.la (requires -lgvrender)
* broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libdotneato.la (requires -lcommon)
* broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libfdpgen.la (requires -lneatogen)
* broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libfdpgen.la (requires -lgvrender)
* broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libfdpgen.la (requires -lcommon)
* broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libgdtclft.la (requires -ltclstub8.4)
* broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libgvrender.la (requires -lcommon)
* broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libneatogen.la (requires -lgvrender)
* broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libneatogen.la (requires -lcommon)
* broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libtcldot.la (requires -ltclstub8.4)
* broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libtcldot.la (requires -ldotgen)
* broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libtcldot.la (requires -ltwopigen)
* broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libtcldot.la (requires -lfdpgen)
* broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libtcldot.la (requires -lcircogen)
* broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libtcldot.la (requires -lneatogen)
* broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libtcldot.la (requires -lgvrender)
* broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libtcldot.la (requires -lcommon)
* broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libtclplan.la (requires -ltclstub8.4)
* broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libtkspline.la (requires -ltkstub8.4)
* broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libtkspline.la (requires -ltclstub8.4)
* broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libtwopigen.la (requires -lneatogen)
* broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libtwopigen.la (requires -lgvrender)
* broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libtwopigen.la (requires -lcommon)
[ 64% ] * broken /usr/lib64/libgnomeprint.la (requires -ldb1)
* broken /usr/lib64/libgnomeprint.la (requires -lxml)
Looks like all of those files are left over from older versions
and need to be deleted. If you check the dates on those files
I think you will see that they are very old, and there are no
libraries that match those *la files.
