Re: [gentoo-user] glibc-2.18 build problem
On Fri, 7 Mar 2014 18:43:27 +0800 microcai wrote: > I'm having trouble compiling glibc. No matter I tried with binutils > 2.23 2.24. or - live version, I got ld internal error in > x86_64_relocation . And the same error repeated with glibc-2.18 and > glibc-2.19 . > > Don't know why . The google bring me a old bug report about > x86_64_relocation internal error when used conjunction with > IFUNC, but that doesn't seems to be related with mine problem. > > When I first try to update glibc to 2.18, it's fine. but then the > attempt to update glibc to 2.18-r1 failed with ld internal > error. This error remains with glibc-2.16-r2 and glibc-2.19, > regardless of binutils version. > > Does anyone have had the same problem? > Can you file a bug at https://bugs.gentoo.org such that the maintainers are aware of this? That is, only if it is still reproducible today. -- With kind regards, Tom Wijsman (TomWij) Gentoo Developer E-mail address : tom...@gentoo.org GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D
Re: [gentoo-user] glibc-2.18 build problem
2014-03-21 23:44 GMT+08:00 Tom Wijsman : > On Fri, 7 Mar 2014 18:43:27 +0800 > microcai wrote: > >> I'm having trouble compiling glibc. No matter I tried with binutils >> 2.23 2.24. or - live version, I got ld internal error in >> x86_64_relocation . And the same error repeated with glibc-2.18 and >> glibc-2.19 . >> >> Don't know why . The google bring me a old bug report about >> x86_64_relocation internal error when used conjunction with >> IFUNC, but that doesn't seems to be related with mine problem. >> >> When I first try to update glibc to 2.18, it's fine. but then the >> attempt to update glibc to 2.18-r1 failed with ld internal >> error. This error remains with glibc-2.16-r2 and glibc-2.19, >> regardless of binutils version. >> >> Does anyone have had the same problem? >> > > Can you file a bug at https://bugs.gentoo.org such that the maintainers > are aware of this? That is, only if it is still reproducible today. fixed. it's because of a wired CFLAGS -Bsymblic-functions that I put into make.conf once for testing but forget to remove afterwards. > > -- > With kind regards, > > Tom Wijsman (TomWij) > Gentoo Developer > > E-mail address : tom...@gentoo.org > GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D > GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D >