Re: [gentoo-user] how to check package/installation integrity

2007-05-15 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* Vikas Kumar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On 03:51 Tue 15 May , Enrico Weigelt wrote:
  
  Hi folks,
  
  
  I've seen my system misses some files from the readline package.
  /var/db/pkg/... contains an good-looking entry for it.
  
  How can I run an automatic check for such missing files ?
  
 Have you tried,
 
 # equery check package_name
 
 'equery' comes with 'app-portage/gentoolkit'

THX, but does not really solve my problem: i need to check for 
any broken package. I have no idea which one could be broken.

--all or * does not work.

cu
-- 
-
 Enrico Weigelt==   metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/
-
 Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce:
http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce
 Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions:
http://patches.metux.de/
-
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] how to check package/installation integrity

2007-05-15 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Tuesday 15 May 2007 14:12:52 Enrico Weigelt wrote:
  # equery check package_name
 
  'equery' comes with 'app-portage/gentoolkit'

 THX, but does not really solve my problem: i need to check for
 any broken package. I have no idea which one could be broken.

 --all or * does not work.

# qcheck --all

http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/portage-utils.xml

-- 
Bo Andresen


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: [gentoo-user] how to check package/installation integrity

2007-05-14 Thread Vikas Kumar
On 03:51 Tue 15 May , Enrico Weigelt wrote:
 
 Hi folks,
 
 
 I've seen my system misses some files from the readline package.
 /var/db/pkg/... contains an good-looking entry for it.
 
 How can I run an automatic check for such missing files ?
 
Have you tried,

# equery check package_name

'equery' comes with 'app-portage/gentoolkit'

-- 
I don't know why, but first C programs tend to look a lot worse than
first programs in any other language (maybe except for fortran, but then
I suspect all fortran programs look like `firsts')
(By Olaf Kirch)

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list