Re: [gentoo-user] libmad.la missing
* Uwe Thiem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi folks, libmad-0.2.1 doens't install libmad.la. Programs linking to it fail during link stage. Is it a known issue? Solution: fix the importing package and rip off the libtool crap. Which package is it ? cu -- - Enrico Weigelt== metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/ - Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce: http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions: http://patches.metux.de/ - -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] libmad.la missing
On Wednesday 14 May 2008, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: On Mittwoch, 14. Mai 2008, Uwe Thiem wrote: Hi folks, libmad-0.2.1 doens't install libmad.la. Programs linking to it fail during link stage. Is it a known issue? there is no 'libmad-0.2.1' on my system. It's weird. libmad-0.15.1b-r5 installs as libmad-0.2.1. From the emerge output: Merging media-libs/libmad-0.15.1b-r5 to / --- /usr/ --- /usr/lib/ /usr/lib/libmad.so - libmad.so.0.2.1 --- /usr/lib/pkgconfig/ /usr/lib/pkgconfig/mad.pc /usr/lib/libmad.a /usr/lib/libmad.so.0.2.1 /usr/lib/libmad.so.0 - libmad.so.0.2.1 And indeed: uwix uwe # ls -l /usr/lib/libmad* -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 101062 May 15 09:10 /usr/lib/libmad.a lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 May 15 09:10 /usr/lib/libmad.so - libmad.so.0.2.1 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 May 15 09:10 /usr/lib/libmad.so.0 - libmad.so.0.2.1 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 91472 May 15 09:10 /usr/lib/libmad.so.0.2.1 Still, no libmad.la. ??? Uwe -- Ignorance killed the cat, sir, curiosity was framed! -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] libmad.la missing
On Donnerstag, 15. Mai 2008, Uwe Thiem wrote: On Wednesday 14 May 2008, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: On Mittwoch, 14. Mai 2008, Uwe Thiem wrote: Hi folks, libmad-0.2.1 doens't install libmad.la. Programs linking to it fail during link stage. Is it a known issue? there is no 'libmad-0.2.1' on my system. It's weird. libmad-0.15.1b-r5 installs as libmad-0.2.1. From the emerge output: Merging media-libs/libmad-0.15.1b-r5 to / --- /usr/ --- /usr/lib/ /usr/lib/libmad.so - libmad.so.0.2.1 --- /usr/lib/pkgconfig/ /usr/lib/pkgconfig/mad.pc /usr/lib/libmad.a /usr/lib/libmad.so.0.2.1 /usr/lib/libmad.so.0 - libmad.so.0.2.1 And indeed: uwix uwe # ls -l /usr/lib/libmad* -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 101062 May 15 09:10 /usr/lib/libmad.a lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 May 15 09:10 /usr/lib/libmad.so - libmad.so.0.2.1 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 May 15 09:10 /usr/lib/libmad.so.0 - libmad.so.0.2.1 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 91472 May 15 09:10 /usr/lib/libmad.so.0.2.1 Still, no libmad.la. hm, you are right. But revdep-rebuilt should solve that problem. Not by creating the la file but by rebuilding the apps needing it. -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] libmad.la missing
On Thursday 15 May 2008, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: On Donnerstag, 15. Mai 2008, Uwe Thiem wrote: On Wednesday 14 May 2008, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: On Mittwoch, 14. Mai 2008, Uwe Thiem wrote: Hi folks, libmad-0.2.1 doens't install libmad.la. Programs linking to it fail during link stage. Is it a known issue? there is no 'libmad-0.2.1' on my system. It's weird. libmad-0.15.1b-r5 installs as libmad-0.2.1. From the emerge output: Merging media-libs/libmad-0.15.1b-r5 to / --- /usr/ --- /usr/lib/ /usr/lib/libmad.so - libmad.so.0.2.1 --- /usr/lib/pkgconfig/ /usr/lib/pkgconfig/mad.pc /usr/lib/libmad.a /usr/lib/libmad.so.0.2.1 /usr/lib/libmad.so.0 - libmad.so.0.2.1 And indeed: uwix uwe # ls -l /usr/lib/libmad* -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 101062 May 15 09:10 /usr/lib/libmad.a lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 May 15 09:10 /usr/lib/libmad.so - libmad.so.0.2.1 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 May 15 09:10 /usr/lib/libmad.so.0 - libmad.so.0.2.1 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 91472 May 15 09:10 /usr/lib/libmad.so.0.2.1 Still, no libmad.la. hm, you are right. But revdep-rebuilt should solve that problem. Not by creating the la file but by rebuilding the apps needing it. How? If the build system of a package uses libtool and insists on the existence of this la file, revdep-rebuild wouldn't help. Actually I tried to re-emerge failing package with --oneshot (not different from what revdep-rebuild does) and it failed again due to the missing la. I could, of course, write the la file myself. In the end, it is just a text file describing some properties of the liberary. But that seems a very hackish work-around. I don't want to do a revdep-rebuild right now because I have a half-baked update. And from my POV, it wouldn't help at all. Uwe -- Ignorance killed the cat, sir, curiosity was framed! -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] libmad.la missing
On Donnerstag, 15. Mai 2008, Uwe Thiem wrote: On Thursday 15 May 2008, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: On Donnerstag, 15. Mai 2008, Uwe Thiem wrote: On Wednesday 14 May 2008, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: On Mittwoch, 14. Mai 2008, Uwe Thiem wrote: Hi folks, libmad-0.2.1 doens't install libmad.la. Programs linking to it fail during link stage. Is it a known issue? there is no 'libmad-0.2.1' on my system. It's weird. libmad-0.15.1b-r5 installs as libmad-0.2.1. From the emerge output: Merging media-libs/libmad-0.15.1b-r5 to / --- /usr/ --- /usr/lib/ /usr/lib/libmad.so - libmad.so.0.2.1 --- /usr/lib/pkgconfig/ /usr/lib/pkgconfig/mad.pc /usr/lib/libmad.a /usr/lib/libmad.so.0.2.1 /usr/lib/libmad.so.0 - libmad.so.0.2.1 And indeed: uwix uwe # ls -l /usr/lib/libmad* -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 101062 May 15 09:10 /usr/lib/libmad.a lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 May 15 09:10 /usr/lib/libmad.so - libmad.so.0.2.1 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 May 15 09:10 /usr/lib/libmad.so.0 - libmad.so.0.2.1 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 91472 May 15 09:10 /usr/lib/libmad.so.0.2.1 Still, no libmad.la. hm, you are right. But revdep-rebuilt should solve that problem. Not by creating the la file but by rebuilding the apps needing it. How? If the build system of a package uses libtool and insists on the existence of this la file, revdep-rebuild wouldn't help. Actually I tried to re-emerge failing package with --oneshot (not different from what revdep-rebuild does) and it failed again due to the missing la. I could, of course, write the la file myself. In the end, it is just a text file describing some properties of the liberary. But that seems a very hackish work-around. I don't want to do a revdep-rebuild right now because I have a half-baked update. And from my POV, it wouldn't help at all. Uwe -- Ignorance killed the cat, sir, curiosity was framed! http://blog.flameeyes.eu/articles/2008/04/14/what-about-those-la-files https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218286 just run revdep-rebuilt. The la file is not really needed at all. But somewhere something 'thinks' to depend on it. revdep-rebuilt will fix that. -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] libmad.la missing
On Mittwoch, 14. Mai 2008, Uwe Thiem wrote: Hi folks, libmad-0.2.1 doens't install libmad.la. Programs linking to it fail during link stage. Is it a known issue? there is no 'libmad-0.2.1' on my system. But probably you are hit by flameeyes test. Just revdep-rebuilt. Or install libmad-0.15.1b-r5 -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
