Re: [gentoo-user] partitioning for multimedia performance and dual-booting linux/windex

2006-05-10 Thread Liviu

1. install the windows ext2/3 driver.2. install rfsd (http://rfsd.sourceforge.net) to access reiserfs partitions.
An alternative for accessing in read-only mode Linux drives is Total Commander's Ext2+Reiser plugin. Ext2 and ext3 work fine. Never tried ReiserFS. 
 "Plugin to open Ext2 and Reiser file systems on your own machine! This is useful when you have Linux installed on the same machine (multi-boot) and want to access your files. For security reasons, this plugin is read-only. It combines two open source projects to access Ext2 partitions and Reiser partitions. This plugin is Open-Source (GPL).
Version 1.3 fixes read errors with newer ReiserFS partitions."-- Liviu  


Re: [gentoo-user] partitioning for multimedia performance and dual-booting linux/windex

2006-05-08 Thread Robert Persson
On Sunday 23 April 2006 03:00 Neil Bothwick was like:
> On Sat, 22 Apr 2006 23:05:37 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
> >   Howsabout using FAT32 (aka vfat) for the data partitions that need to
> > be accessed by both Windows and Linux?  Both Windows and Linux can read
> > and write easily to vfat.
>
> FAT has a 4GB file size limit under Windows, 2GB under Linux, which makes
> it unsuitable for most multimedia usage.

Thanks very much Neil and Walter for your advice.

I think Neil is right about fat32. It also has other problems such as lack of 
permissions or journaling, as well as performance issues. However it is 
certainly the simplest way of sharing a partition between operating systems.

I have installed rfsd in windows. It seems to work very well, but, unless I 
have missed something, it is a read-only driver. That can actually be useful 
if you want to access stuff from within windows without putting it at risk of 
virus damage. If I also mount my windows installation using the (read-only) 
ntfs driver under linux, then I have a way to share files in both directions, 
albeit not an ideal one. (I have considered using captive-ntfs for full r/w 
access, but I find the windows permissions don't work under linux, as far as 
I can tell.)

I'll get around to trying out crossmeta for xfs read/write at some point soon 
and let you all know how it goes.

Robert
-- 
Robert Persson

Conspiracy Bears:
Once upon a time there were lots of conspiracy bears...

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] partitioning for multimedia performance and dual-booting linux/windex

2006-04-23 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Sat, 22 Apr 2006 23:05:37 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:

>   Howsabout using FAT32 (aka vfat) for the data partitions that need to
> be accessed by both Windows and Linux?  Both Windows and Linux can read
> and write easily to vfat.

FAT has a 4GB file size limit under Windows, 2GB under Linux, which makes
it unsuitable for most multimedia usage.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

Remember the good old days, when CPU was singular?


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] partitioning for multimedia performance and dual-booting linux/windex

2006-04-22 Thread Walter Dnes
On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 06:11:55PM -0700, Robert Persson wrote

> The questions I have are:
> 1. What file system should I use for shared storage and scratchspace between 
> the two OSs?
> 2. Would it be feasible and worthwhile to stripe a linux scratchspace volume 
> across both disks?
> 
> QUESTION 1:
> As far as the dual-booting is concerned, I will need to do it sometimes when 
> there isn't a reliable *ix tool for the job, but I don't want to find myself 
> trapped into using Windows for day-to-day stuff. For instance I may find 
> myself forced to use Adobe Premiere for video editing now and then for the 
> moment, but I would want to be gravitate back to Cinelerra as soon as some of 
> the more serious bugs have been ironed out.
> 
> For this reason, and also because I remember from my own past experience that 
> NTFS is an unspeakable atrocity (even when accessed under windows) I have 
> been thinking of keeping the Windows partition fairly small and of installing 
> third-party driver(s) to access linux-native filesystems to share data, 
> rather than the other way round.
> 
> The three options I have for this are:
> 1. install the windows ext2/3 driver.
> 2. install rfsd (http://rfsd.sourceforge.net) to access reiserfs partitions.
> 3. Install the crossmeta XFS driver if I can get hold of it (I'm not sure 
> whether it's part of the free NFS driver download on the website or not).

  Howsabout using FAT32 (aka vfat) for the data partitions that need to
be accessed by both Windows and Linux?  Both Windows and Linux can read
and write easily to vfat.

-- 
Walter Dnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> In linux /sbin/init is Job #1
My musings on technology and security at http://tech_sec.blog.ca
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] partitioning for multimedia performance and dual-booting linux/windex

2006-04-20 Thread Robert Persson
On Thursday 20 April 2006 00:46 Neil Bothwick was like:
> > Am I correct in understanding that I can use LVM2 to stripe a volume
> > across more than one disk, just like a raid 0 setup, even if the disks
> > are quite dissimilar? Would it be possible (or worthwhile) to allocate
> > my old 40GB disk and a portion of my new disk (say another 40GB) to a
> > single logical volume to be used as a fast audio and video
> > scratchspace? (For Linux, that is -- I am aware that it wouldn't be
> > accessible from Windows). I would keep the rest of disk in normal
> > partitions to reduce the risk of losing all my data to disk failure.
>
> It is perfectly possible, but performance may suffer if one disk is
> slower than the other, compared with using the fast disk alone. Another
> option may be to use the old disk for the operating systems and the new
> one for data. Speed of the OS disk only affects program loading time,
> you would then get maximum performance when using the programs.  

Thanks for your help once again, Neil.

The problem I am trying to solve is less about getting best all-round disk 
performance than it is to get super-duper disk performance when doing 
extremely disk intensive tasks such as video and audio editing. I'm not sure 
that having the OS or the swap on different disks because if I have enough 
memory I shouldn't need to access them very much while doing the audio and 
video stuff.

The disks are probably not too dissimilar in terms of read and write speed 
(I'll need to look up the specs to verify this). However the cache sizes are 
quite different: 1MB as opposed to 8MB. Would the smaller cache make the 
older disk much slower in practice when it comes to writing or reading very 
large files -- slow enough to bog down the other one if a volume was striped 
across them?

Robert

-- 
Robert Persson

Conspiracy Bears:
Once upon a time there were lots of conspiracy bears...


-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] partitioning for multimedia performance and dual-booting linux/windex

2006-04-20 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Wed, 19 Apr 2006 18:11:55 -0700, Robert Persson wrote:

> Am I correct in understanding that I can use LVM2 to stripe a volume
> across more than one disk, just like a raid 0 setup, even if the disks
> are quite dissimilar? Would it be possible (or worthwhile) to allocate
> my old 40GB disk and a portion of my new disk (say another 40GB) to a
> single logical volume to be used as a fast audio and video
> scratchspace? (For Linux, that is -- I am aware that it wouldn't be
> accessible from Windows). I would keep the rest of disk in normal
> partitions to reduce the risk of losing all my data to disk failure.

It is perfectly possible, but performance may suffer if one disk is
slower than the other, compared with using the fast disk alone. Another
option may be to use the old disk for the operating systems and the new
one for data. Speed of the OS disk only affects program loading time,
you would then get maximum performance when using the programs.  


-- 
Neil Bothwick

Hot glass looks exactly the same as cold glass.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature