Re: [gentoo-user] rpm-4.4.6-r3 install error
emerge neon fixed my issue.. Thank you Alan Takk for hjelpen Bo On 06/09/07, Bo Ørsted Andresen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thursday 06 September 2007 12:25:10 Alan McKinnon wrote: so the gentoo maintainer can help get to the bottom of this. What gentoo maintainer? ;) Ah yes, I kinda just assumed that *someone* was maintaining the ebuild. Then I realised that we are talking about rpm. So, did I make a really really stupid assumption? If you look in metadata.xml in /usr/portage/app-arch/rpm/ (or use e.g. herdstat to query it for you) you'll see that the maintainer is 'maintainer-needed'. So yes, currently it has no maintainer. In my latest sync 498 out of 11901 packages have that status. -- Bo Andresen
Re: [gentoo-user] rpm-4.4.6-r3 install error
On Wednesday 05 September 2007 14:25:09 emerge.gentoo wrote: rpmdav.c:526: error: `ne_propfind_handler' undeclared (first use in this function) rpmdav.c:526: error: `pfh' undeclared (first use in this function) # emerge -1 neon https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=187740 -- Bo Andresen signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-user] rpm-4.4.6-r3 install error
On Thursday 06 September 2007, emerge.gentoo wrote: I tried to emerge the r4 version of the same package and got same error as before. Please don't top post. I suggest you file a bug so the gentoo maintainer can help get to the bottom of this. alan On 05/09/07, Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wednesday 05 September 2007, emerge.gentoo wrote: Your problems start here (line 10 of the output you posted), and just gets worse from there: rpmdav.c:526: error: `ne_propfind_handler' undeclared (first use in this function) This package is package.masked since 16 Jan 2007 (!) for testing by the developer, so you should submit the bug report to him/her to fix these compile errors. It doesn't surprise me that it has been masked for so long, it must be a rare system indeed that has rpm installed on a portage box :-) Why don't you emerge 4.4.6-r4 instead, which is keyworded ~ on all arches? or 4.4.6-r3 which is stable on all arches alan -- Optimists say the glass is half full, Pessimists say the glass is half empty, Developers say wtf is the glass twice as big as it needs to be? Alan McKinnon alan at linuxholdings dot co dot za +27 82, double three seven, one nine three five -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list -- Optimists say the glass is half full, Pessimists say the glass is half empty, Developers say wtf is the glass twice as big as it needs to be? Alan McKinnon alan at linuxholdings dot co dot za +27 82, double three seven, one nine three five -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] rpm-4.4.6-r3 install error
On Thursday 06 September 2007 10:14:17 Alan McKinnon wrote: I tried to emerge the r4 version of the same package and got same error as before. [SNIP] I suggest you file a bug As said in another reply a bug already exists (#187740). so the gentoo maintainer can help get to the bottom of this. What gentoo maintainer? ;) -- Bo Andresen signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-user] rpm-4.4.6-r3 install error
On Thursday 06 September 2007, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote: On Thursday 06 September 2007 10:14:17 Alan McKinnon wrote: I tried to emerge the r4 version of the same package and got same error as before. [SNIP] so the gentoo maintainer can help get to the bottom of this. What gentoo maintainer? ;) Ah yes, I kinda just assumed that *someone* was maintaining the ebuild. Then I realised that we are talking about rpm. So, did I make a really really stupid assumption? alan -- Optimists say the glass is half full, Pessimists say the glass is half empty, Developers say wtf is the glass twice as big as it needs to be? Alan McKinnon alan at linuxholdings dot co dot za +27 82, double three seven, one nine three five -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] rpm-4.4.6-r3 install error
On Thursday 06 September 2007 12:25:10 Alan McKinnon wrote: so the gentoo maintainer can help get to the bottom of this. What gentoo maintainer? ;) Ah yes, I kinda just assumed that *someone* was maintaining the ebuild. Then I realised that we are talking about rpm. So, did I make a really really stupid assumption? If you look in metadata.xml in /usr/portage/app-arch/rpm/ (or use e.g. herdstat to query it for you) you'll see that the maintainer is 'maintainer-needed'. So yes, currently it has no maintainer. In my latest sync 498 out of 11901 packages have that status. -- Bo Andresen signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-user] rpm-4.4.6-r3 install error
On Wednesday 05 September 2007, emerge.gentoo wrote: I am trying to run revdep-rebuild and can't get passed by this package rpm-4.4.6-r3. Compiling ends up in error which you can see at the end of this email. Need some input on this issue. We need more info. The actual error message is before the bit you pasted. Please resend with about 20 lines before alan Thanks - - make[2]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/app-arch/rpm-4.4.6-r3/work/rpm- 4.4.6/rpmio' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/app-arch/rpm-4.4.6-r3/work/rpm- 4.4.6 ' make: *** [all] Error 2 !!! ERROR: app-arch/rpm-4.4.6-r3 failed. Call stack: ebuild.sh, line 1638: Called dyn_compile ebuild.sh, line 985: Called qa_call 'src_compile' ebuild.sh , line 44: Called src_compile rpm-4.4.6-r3.ebuild, line 70: Called die !!! emake failed !!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call stack if relevant. !!! A complete build log is located at '/var/tmp/portage/app-arch/rpm- 4.4.6-r3/temp/build.log'. -- Optimists say the glass is half full, Pessimists say the glass is half empty, Developers say wtf is the glass twice as big as it needs to be? Alan McKinnon alan at linuxholdings dot co dot za +27 82, double three seven, one nine three five -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] rpm-4.4.6-r3 install error
On Wednesday 05 September 2007, emerge.gentoo wrote: Your problems start here (line 10 of the output you posted), and just gets worse from there: rpmdav.c:526: error: `ne_propfind_handler' undeclared (first use in this function) This package is package.masked since 16 Jan 2007 (!) for testing by the developer, so you should submit the bug report to him/her to fix these compile errors. It doesn't surprise me that it has been masked for so long, it must be a rare system indeed that has rpm installed on a portage box :-) Why don't you emerge 4.4.6-r4 instead, which is keyworded ~ on all arches? or 4.4.6-r3 which is stable on all arches alan -- Optimists say the glass is half full, Pessimists say the glass is half empty, Developers say wtf is the glass twice as big as it needs to be? Alan McKinnon alan at linuxholdings dot co dot za +27 82, double three seven, one nine three five -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] rpm-4.4.6-r3 install error
I tried to emerge the r4 version of the same package and got same error as before. On 05/09/07, Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wednesday 05 September 2007, emerge.gentoo wrote: Your problems start here (line 10 of the output you posted), and just gets worse from there: rpmdav.c:526: error: `ne_propfind_handler' undeclared (first use in this function) This package is package.masked since 16 Jan 2007 (!) for testing by the developer, so you should submit the bug report to him/her to fix these compile errors. It doesn't surprise me that it has been masked for so long, it must be a rare system indeed that has rpm installed on a portage box :-) Why don't you emerge 4.4.6-r4 instead, which is keyworded ~ on all arches? or 4.4.6-r3 which is stable on all arches alan -- Optimists say the glass is half full, Pessimists say the glass is half empty, Developers say wtf is the glass twice as big as it needs to be? Alan McKinnon alan at linuxholdings dot co dot za +27 82, double three seven, one nine three five -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
