Re: [gentoo-user] wiki software

2005-05-24 Thread Pingveno

Antoine wrote:


Mediawiki also powers the following:

http://gentoo-wiki.com/
http://en.wikipedia.org/
   



Two very big-name sites! I haven't done any wiki editing or dev before -
not ever having had the urge. At the moment the intranet is in
pseudo-html (basically ie-only, with lots of doze file links, etc), and
is about as standardised as apple pie. The problem is that there are
only a few of us (basically the IT dept) that are brave enough to code
the html (and I am the only one who even tries to make it valid), so no
one else changes anything. All the others write word files, and then
just put them in known directories.
Basically we have to have a wisiwig environment for there to be any
interest. Even minimal tags will be too much for some of the
long-toothers in the company. I had a quick look at wikiwig, which looks
pretty much like it fits the bill. Has anyone used it seriously?
Maintained it? I just might be able to get Gentoo on one of our servers
if I can get a really polished wisiwig interface that won't crash every
ten minutes... having locking is also (now I think about it) going to be
necessary (almost got subversion for the intranet, but the lack of
locking was not a plus... I know you can do it with cvs but anyway).
Thanks for the suggestions so far
Cheers
Antoine
 

Plone/Zope, while a CMS instead of a wiki, does have a WYSIWYG editor 
(two, actually). You might have to disable some of the features, but the 
software's reasonably powerful and flexible. The one real problem with 
the WYSIWYG editor is that it requires a component in the browser - a 
component only present in Gecko (aka Mozilla) and MSIE. If the browser 
doesn't have the component, happy HTMLing.


www-zope has all the Zope software from that is in the Gentoo repository.

-Pingveno

--
Linux User #340304

--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] wiki software

2005-05-24 Thread Peng

On 05/23/05 19:26, Ric de France wrote:

On 5/24/05, Antoine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Basically we have to have a wisiwig environment for there to be any
interest. Even minimal tags will be too much for some of the
long-toothers in the company. I had a quick look at wikiwig, which looks
pretty much like it fits the bill. Has anyone used it seriously?
Maintained it? I just might be able to get Gentoo on one of our servers
if I can get a really polished wisiwig interface that won't crash every
ten minutes... having locking is also (now I think about it) going to be
necessary (almost got subversion for the intranet, but the lack of
locking was not a plus... I know you can do it with cvs but anyway).



Unfortunately, wikipedia does not come with a WYSIWYG code editor.
Saying that, the deployment I made was into an area where some people
have not ever coded in HTML or wiki-markup, and there aren't many
people that haven't picked it up in the space of about half a day. I'd
be guessing it would take that long to pick up Openoffice.org Writer
or MS Office Word if you have never used either application before.

It is differrent, but it's not any more difficult. The editor comes
with some buttons above the text entry box that markup the code that
you highlight. Give it a go sometime. You can always edit a page on
gentoo-wiki or wikipedia, and click on the preview button as many
times as you like without it actually commiting to the database.

HTH,

...Ric


Or use the sandbox...

URL:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sandbox
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] wiki software

2005-05-23 Thread Qian Qiao
On 22/05/05, Antoine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi,
 I am looking for wiki software to install for our company intranet and I
 see that twiki is masked. Is this not the main wiki software? What do
 others use? We would want the possibility to restrict write access but
 apart from that we are very flexible. What would be the lowest
 maintenace OSS software?
 Cheers
 Antoine

What about www-apps/mediawiki?

-- Joe

-- 
Money can't buy everything.
Sometimes money can't even buy a gun...

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] wiki software

2005-05-23 Thread Antoine

 Mediawiki also powers the following:
 
 http://gentoo-wiki.com/
 http://en.wikipedia.org/

Two very big-name sites! I haven't done any wiki editing or dev before -
not ever having had the urge. At the moment the intranet is in
pseudo-html (basically ie-only, with lots of doze file links, etc), and
is about as standardised as apple pie. The problem is that there are
only a few of us (basically the IT dept) that are brave enough to code
the html (and I am the only one who even tries to make it valid), so no
one else changes anything. All the others write word files, and then
just put them in known directories.
Basically we have to have a wisiwig environment for there to be any
interest. Even minimal tags will be too much for some of the
long-toothers in the company. I had a quick look at wikiwig, which looks
pretty much like it fits the bill. Has anyone used it seriously?
Maintained it? I just might be able to get Gentoo on one of our servers
if I can get a really polished wisiwig interface that won't crash every
ten minutes... having locking is also (now I think about it) going to be
necessary (almost got subversion for the intranet, but the lack of
locking was not a plus... I know you can do it with cvs but anyway).
Thanks for the suggestions so far
Cheers
Antoine
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] wiki software

2005-05-23 Thread Ric de France
On 5/24/05, Antoine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Basically we have to have a wisiwig environment for there to be any
 interest. Even minimal tags will be too much for some of the
 long-toothers in the company. I had a quick look at wikiwig, which looks
 pretty much like it fits the bill. Has anyone used it seriously?
 Maintained it? I just might be able to get Gentoo on one of our servers
 if I can get a really polished wisiwig interface that won't crash every
 ten minutes... having locking is also (now I think about it) going to be
 necessary (almost got subversion for the intranet, but the lack of
 locking was not a plus... I know you can do it with cvs but anyway).

Unfortunately, wikipedia does not come with a WYSIWYG code editor.
Saying that, the deployment I made was into an area where some people
have not ever coded in HTML or wiki-markup, and there aren't many
people that haven't picked it up in the space of about half a day. I'd
be guessing it would take that long to pick up Openoffice.org Writer
or MS Office Word if you have never used either application before.

It is differrent, but it's not any more difficult. The editor comes
with some buttons above the text entry box that markup the code that
you highlight. Give it a go sometime. You can always edit a page on
gentoo-wiki or wikipedia, and click on the preview button as many
times as you like without it actually commiting to the database.

HTH,

...Ric
-- 
Ric de France
Ph: +61412945554 (international) or 0412945554 (Australia)
== Do you, uh... Gentoo? Gent-hooo!! ==

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] wiki software

2005-05-23 Thread A. Khattri
On Mon, 23 May 2005, Antoine wrote:

 Basically we have to have a wisiwig environment for there to be any
 interest. Even minimal tags will be too much for some of the
 long-toothers in the company. I had a quick look at wikiwig, which looks
 pretty much like it fits the bill. Has anyone used it seriously?
 Maintained it? I just might be able to get Gentoo on one of our servers
 if I can get a really polished wisiwig interface that won't crash every
 ten minutes... having locking is also (now I think about it) going to be
 necessary (almost got subversion for the intranet, but the lack of
 locking was not a plus... I know you can do it with cvs but anyway).

You dont need to know any markup language to edit a wiki especially not
HTML. But you have the option of doing very simple markup using ordinary
characters. For example, in phpwiki:

*this
*causes
*each
*line
*to
*be a
*bullet
*list

gives you a bullet list. After a few mins playing around with the crib
sheet it becomes pretty easy to work with. You dont really need any
unstable WYSISYG editor. Phpwiki comes with help built-in.


-- 

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] wiki software

2005-05-23 Thread Marshal Newrock

On Tue, 24 May 2005, Ric de France wrote:


Unfortunately, wikipedia does not come with a WYSIWYG code editor.
Saying that, the deployment I made was into an area where some people
have not ever coded in HTML or wiki-markup, and there aren't many
people that haven't picked it up in the space of about half a day. I'd
be guessing it would take that long to pick up Openoffice.org Writer
or MS Office Word if you have never used either application before.


If it's internal deployment, there's a mediawiki toolbar plugin for 
firefox.


--
That which does not kill me makes me stranger
()  The ASCII Ribbon Campaign against HTML Email,
/\  vCards, and proprietary formats.
  http://www.georgedillon.com/web/html_email_is_evil.shtml
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] wiki software

2005-05-22 Thread Bob Sanders
On Sun, 22 May 2005 16:57:58 +0200
Antoine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi,
 I am looking for wiki software to install for our company intranet and I
 see that twiki is masked. Is this not the main wiki software? What do
 others use? We would want the possibility to restrict write access but
 apart from that we are very flexible. What would be the lowest
 maintenace OSS software?

We've been using pmwiki for our group, no ebuild - 

http://www.pmwiki.org/

Pretty straight forward, no need for a database, easy to maintain.

Bob
-- 
-  
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list