Gre and two lists:

        1..This mainly to save others time (and wondering why eenews and 
similar usually find it hard to give the original cite)..     The article is 
non-fee at:
                
https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2020GL091805#:~:text=The%20COVID%E2%80%9019%20pandemic%20changed%20emissions%20of%20gases%20and%20particulates.&text=COVID%E2%80%9019%20induced%20lockdowns%20led,the%20earth%20in%20spring%202020.
        First author Andrew Gettelman

        2.  This is the first paragraph in the final section:

>       ”In this work we have estimated the effects of COVID‐19 affected 
> emissions changes in 2020. We use two ESMs with similar complexity of their 
> cloud and aerosol schemes, but very different implementations. The two 
> models, CESM and ECHAM‐HAM, yield very similar quantitative responses to the 
> same emissions perturbations. The unique aspect of this study is we use 
> simulations constrained by actual meteorology over 2020 to remove the effects 
> of meteorological noise from the simulations. This results in the ability to 
> find statistically significant changes much smaller than could be seen in 
> observations (Diamond & Wood, 2020 
> <https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2020GL091805#grl61813-bib-0004>),
>  and differs in that regard from previous work. The limitation of the study 
> is to use one set of emissions perturbation estimates from Forster et al. 
> (2020 
> <https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2020GL091805#grl61813-bib-0005>),
>  though that estimate has been compared to observations.”

        3.  So I conclude the results likely to be pretty accurate (besides the 
UCAR team has lots of experience). 

          And this phenomenon makes our CDR job harder, not easier.

Ron

        

> On Feb 6, 2021, at 12:58 PM, Greg Rau <gh...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> 
> 
>> https://www.eenews.net/stories/1063724319 
>> <https://www.eenews.net/stories/1063724319>
> 
> "While levels of CO2 and other gaseous pollutants were falling, so were 
> emissions of aerosols that contain particles of sulfates, nitrates, black 
> carbon and dust.
> When economies are roaring along, aerosols, led by soot and sulfate ions, 
> tend to brighten clouds. That helps them reflect the sun's heat back into 
> space.
> 
> So with the absence of aerosols more sunlight fell on Earth. That made the 
> planet slightly warmer, especially near industrial countries like the U.S. 
> and Russia."
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Carbon Dioxide Removal" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to carbondioxideremoval+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> <mailto:carbondioxideremoval+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/CarbonDioxideRemoval/EFA6099E-2C66-4C74-84A8-C9180803B004%40sbcglobal.net
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/CarbonDioxideRemoval/EFA6099E-2C66-4C74-84A8-C9180803B004%40sbcglobal.net?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to geoengineering+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/E69EA737-6A25-4302-B0C6-D5C515AD8D48%40comcast.net.

Reply via email to