Re: [geo] Report of Negative Emissions seminar

2016-11-14 Thread Ronal W . Larson
nt)
> AND satisfy growing land based food, fiber and fuel production. Feasibility?
[RWL:   Absolutely.
> Otherwise how/why can we ignore C management potential and food, fiber and 
> fuel production in the ocean?
[RWL:  We shouldn’t ignore.  And we are in danger of doing so by 
relying on “experts” who fail to bring it up.

Greg - thanks for staying on top of this.

Ron
> 
> 
> 
> 
> From: 'Motoko' via geoengineering <geoengineering@googlegroups.com 
> <mailto:geoengineering@googlegroups.com>>
> To: geoengineering@googlegroups.com <mailto:geoengineering@googlegroups.com> 
> Sent: Monday, November 14, 2016 11:03 AM
> Subject: [geo] Report of Negative Emissions seminar
> 
> Fern (2016): Report of the seminar 'Negative Emissions' facilitated by Fern. 
> Brussels. 
>  
> http://www.fern.org/sites/fern.org/files/Negative%20emissions%20seminar.pdf 
> <http://www.fern.org/sites/fern.org/files/Negative%20emissions%20seminar.pdf>
>  
> This seminar held in May 2016 brought key scientists together with 
> environmental, development and human rights NGOs to understand the Paris 
> Agreement’s implications for forests and land use.
>  
>  
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "geoengineering" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to geoengineering+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> <mailto:geoengineering+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
> To post to this group, send email to geoengineering@googlegroups.com 
> <mailto:geoengineering@googlegroups.com>.
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering 
> <https://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
> <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "geoengineering" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to geoengineering+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> <mailto:geoengineering+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
> To post to this group, send email to geoengineering@googlegroups.com 
> <mailto:geoengineering@googlegroups.com>.
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering 
> <https://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
> <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to geoengineering+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to geoengineering@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [geo] Report of Negative Emissions seminar

2016-11-14 Thread Greg Rau
Report bullet points:"Urgent need to increase carbon sequestration in land and 
forests. With only 200GtCO2 left until the global carbon budget for 1.5°C is 
blown, it is highly likely that therewill be a need to increase removals of CO2 
from the atmosphere to limit warmingto 1.5°C or even 2°C. This could be done 
through halting deforestation and forestdegradation, restoring degraded 
forests, and reforesting previously deforested land.These actions would go some 
way to restoring historically depleted land carbon stocks."
GR Why isn't there also an urgent need to increase marine carbon sequestration, 
which = 70% of the Earth's surface, half the annual C cycle, and the vast 
majority of C stored on the Earth surface. Ocean C = 16 X land biomass + soil 
C!? How do we manage atmospheric C by ignoring the ocean? 
"Forests and land do not offset fossil fuel emissions. Plants, trees and soils 
removeCO2 from the atmosphere, but this does not offset the release of CO2 when 
fossil fuelsare burnt. Increasing carbon sequestration in plants, trees and 
soils repays the landcarbon debt accumulated from historical land use change, 
but does not compensateon-going emissions. To mitigate climate change we must 
reduce emissions from thefossil fuel and the land sector, not offset one 
against the other."
GR - Forests and land do offset about 1/4 - 1/3 of fossil fuel emissions, as 
does the ocean. Great if we can repay the land C debt (how big relative to 
excess CO2?) AND satisfy growing land based food, fiber and fuel production. 
Feasibility? Otherwise how/why can we ignore C management potential and food, 
fiber and fuel production in the ocean?



 
  From: 'Motoko' via geoengineering <geoengineering@googlegroups.com>
 To: geoengineering@googlegroups.com 
 Sent: Monday, November 14, 2016 11:03 AM
 Subject: [geo] Report of Negative Emissions seminar
   
Fern 
(2016): Report of the seminar 'Negative Emissions' facilitated by Fern. 
Brussels.   
http://www.fern.org/sites/fern.org/files/Negative%20emissions%20seminar.pdf  
This seminar held in May 2016 brought key scientists together with 
environmental, development and human rights NGOs to understand the Paris 
Agreement’s implications for forests and land use.     -- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to geoengineering+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to geoengineering@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


   
 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to geoengineering+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to geoengineering@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[geo] Report of Negative Emissions seminar

2016-11-14 Thread 'Motoko' via geoengineering
Fern (2016): Report of the seminar 'Negative Emissions' facilitated by Fern.
Brussels. 

 

http://www.fern.org/sites/fern.org/files/Negative%20emissions%20seminar.pdf

 

This seminar held in May 2016 brought key scientists together with
environmental, development and human rights NGOs to understand the Paris
Agreement's implications for forests and land use.

 

 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to geoengineering+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to geoengineering@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.