Re: [geos-devel] Pending Commit: changes to single sided buffering & ogc validity checking

2010-07-19 Thread Paul Ramsey
This may be why PostgreSQL chooses to use the fictitious "PostgreSQL
Developers Group" for their copyright, however, I think we can cross
the bridge when we come to it. Doesn't seem to be slowing down Linux
at all.
P

On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Andrew Ross  wrote:
> Thanks.
>
> Does it make sense to include copyright notices for each change? If they
> build up to the point people ignore them, if they aren't already ignoring
> them ;-),  then it negates any value from having them there in the first
> place.
>
> On 16 July 2010 15:39, strk  wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 02:38:52PM -0400, Andrew Ross wrote:
>> > Thanks for the explanation Paul. Very much appreciated.
>> >
>> > My apologies for prolonging this thread with one more question. In terms
>> > of
>> > coding style, does it make sense to have the copyright notices for each
>> > change in the code as this example? Should copyright notices from
>> > previous
>> > modifications ever be removed? Please point me at the style guidelines
>> > if
>> > this is already defined. Thanks again.
>>
>> There's no official style guidelines as far as I know
>> (but could be wrong). What I try to do is follow the style
>> I find in the file being edited.
>> I started with TAB indenting for instance, but as others prefer
>> spaces we're somewhere slowly moving there, for new code.
>> You'll find a mix of TAB and spaces but hopefully only in different
>> files.
>> Changing the style of files has a bad effect on history tracking
>> and regression debugging.
>>
>> About copyright, old notices shouldnt' be removed unless
>> you're sure nothing is left from the original author.
>>
>> --strk;
>>
>>  ()   Free GIS & Flash consultant/developer
>>  /\   http://strk.keybit.net/services.html
>> ___
>> geos-devel mailing list
>> geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel
>
>
>
> --
> Andrew
> http://bit.ly/geodb
>
> ___
> geos-devel mailing list
> geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel
>
___
geos-devel mailing list
geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel


Re: [geos-devel] Pending Commit: changes to single sided buffering & ogc validity checking

2010-07-19 Thread Andrew Ross
Thanks.

Does it make sense to include copyright notices for each change? If they
build up to the point people ignore them, if they aren't already ignoring
them ;-),  then it negates any value from having them there in the first
place.

On 16 July 2010 15:39, strk  wrote:

> On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 02:38:52PM -0400, Andrew Ross wrote:
> > Thanks for the explanation Paul. Very much appreciated.
> >
> > My apologies for prolonging this thread with one more question. In terms
> of
> > coding style, does it make sense to have the copyright notices for each
> > change in the code as this example? Should copyright notices from
> previous
> > modifications ever be removed? Please point me at the style guidelines if
> > this is already defined. Thanks again.
>
> There's no official style guidelines as far as I know
> (but could be wrong). What I try to do is follow the style
> I find in the file being edited.
> I started with TAB indenting for instance, but as others prefer
> spaces we're somewhere slowly moving there, for new code.
> You'll find a mix of TAB and spaces but hopefully only in different
> files.
> Changing the style of files has a bad effect on history tracking
> and regression debugging.
>
> About copyright, old notices shouldnt' be removed unless
> you're sure nothing is left from the original author.
>
> --strk;
>
>  ()   Free GIS & Flash consultant/developer
>  /\   http://strk.keybit.net/services.html
> ___
> geos-devel mailing list
> geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel
>



-- 
Andrew
http://bit.ly/geodb
___
geos-devel mailing list
geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel