Re: [Geoserver-devel] OSGeo Incubation Reminder
> 2) Review of New York City, States and Tasmania data distributed with >> GeoServer. >> > > Done for the most part, the only one data that we don't have confirmation > about is > States, asked around, while people believe it's Census data we have no > direct > confirmation. Chris, I believe the dataset was added to GeoServer back > when you > were actively coding against the project, any more precise memory? > > Another avenue that we can pursue is look into GeoTools, as far as I > remember > States comes from the GeoTools test data, that was already vetted when > GeoTools > itself graduated which is here: > > https://github.com/geotools/geotools/blob/master/modules/library/sample-data/src/site/apt/review.apt > > Yeah, I just lifted it from GeoTools, no more precise memory than that. Oh, except that I'm pretty sure James Macgill was the one to add it. At the very least I'm quite sure he created the infamous sld for it, so likely added the data too. I think at some point I did subset the fields of the state pop layer, to make it less big. It had to have been from US Census. But I didn't actually download it, so don't know for sure. But yeah, if things are transitive from GeoTools we should be fine - if it's not the exact same data layer then it's a subset of the data that I did. C > It says the origin of that "statepop" dataset is unknown... a possible > hint that vetting is all that > is required, since GeoTools graduated with that assesment? > > >> 3) Code contribution procedure. >> > > This one is completely new to me, or at least, I can't remember about it > off the top of my head. > We do have code contribution procedures already in place, what was found > that is not ok in them? > http://docs.geoserver.org/latest/en/docguide/contributing.html > > http://docs.geoserver.org/2.1.x/en/developer/policies/community-modules.html > > http://geoserver.org/download/attachments/819262/assignment_agreement.pdf?version=1 > > > Cheers > Andrea > > -- > == > Our support, Your Success! Visit http://opensdi.geo-solutions.it for more > information. > == > > Ing. Andrea Aime > @geowolf > Technical Lead > > GeoSolutions S.A.S. > Via Poggio alle Viti 1187 > 55054 Massarosa (LU) > Italy > phone: +39 0584 962313 > fax: +39 0584 1660272 > mob: +39 339 8844549 > > http://www.geo-solutions.it > http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it > > --- > -- Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. SALE $99.99 this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122912___ Geoserver-devel mailing list Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
Re: [Geoserver-devel] OSGeo Incubation Reminder
Andrea: Let me respond to all of your comments. You wrote: "It was not clear to me that we _had_ to choose a license. It was a suggestion from the code sprint team that did the checks, but Jody told us it is sufficient to locate any potential issue, not to fix it. Jody and Landon, please clarify and give us a definitive direction?" I'm not sure if this is required. I don't think it is, but I will double check with the incubation committee. If it is not required, then I'll I need to know is that you guys don't want to hassle with it at this point in time. Having said that, I think anytime you can clear up licensing issues, its a good thing. :] You wrote: "Done for the most part, the only one data that we don't have confirmation about is States, asked around, while people believe it's Census data we have no direct confirmation. Chris, I believe the dataset was added to GeoServer back when you were actively coding against the project, any more precise memory? Another avenue that we can pursue is look into GeoTools, as far as I remember States comes from the GeoTools test data, that was already vetted when GeoTools itself graduated which is here: https://github.com/geotools/geotools/blob/master/modules/library/sample-data/src/site/apt/review.apt It says the origin of that "statepop" dataset is unknown... a possible hint that vetting is all that is required, since GeoTools graduated with that assesment?" So GeoTools shares the same datasets? If that is the case, this shouldn't be a big deal. Let me know. If the datasets aren't shared by GeoTools, we may just need to note that the source and licensing of the sample data is unknown. Is the sample data deeply integrated into project documentaiton and tutorials, and therefore hard to replace? You wrote: "This one is completely new to me, or at least, I can't remember about it off the top of my head. We do have code contribution procedures already in place, what was found that is not ok in them?" Code contribution procedures was just one of the items on my checklist. I think the Incubation Committee just wants to know that some procedures are in place. I'll review the links and then document (somewhere) that the project has completed that item of the incubation checklist. I appreciate your patience as I try to tie up these loose ends. I'm learning the incubation process with you. Landon On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Andrea Aime wrote: > It was not clear to me that we _had_ to choose a license. It was a > suggestion from > the code sprint team that did the checks, but Jody told us it is sufficient > to locate > any potential issue, not to fix it. Jody and Landon, please clarify and give > us a > definitive direction? > > Regardless, this one requires a GSIP, so it cannot be addressed until we > have again > all hands on deck, say January 7th? -- Master HTML5, CSS3, ASP.NET, MVC, AJAX, Knockout.js, Web API and much more. Get web development skills now with LearnDevNow - 350+ hours of step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. SALE $99.99 this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122812 ___ Geoserver-devel mailing list Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
Re: [Geoserver-devel] OSGeo Incubation Reminder
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 10:03 PM, Landon Blake wrote: > Geoserver Team: > > I just want to follow-up on my e-mail from a few weeks ago. Based upon > my last review, we only had these three (3) outstanding items for > Geoserver incubation: > > 1) Selection of Geoserver documentation license. > It was not clear to me that we _had_ to choose a license. It was a suggestion from the code sprint team that did the checks, but Jody told us it is sufficient to locate any potential issue, not to fix it. Jody and Landon, please clarify and give us a definitive direction? Regardless, this one requires a GSIP, so it cannot be addressed until we have again all hands on deck, say January 7th? > 2) Review of New York City, States and Tasmania data distributed with > GeoServer. > Done for the most part, the only one data that we don't have confirmation about is States, asked around, while people believe it's Census data we have no direct confirmation. Chris, I believe the dataset was added to GeoServer back when you were actively coding against the project, any more precise memory? Another avenue that we can pursue is look into GeoTools, as far as I remember States comes from the GeoTools test data, that was already vetted when GeoTools itself graduated which is here: https://github.com/geotools/geotools/blob/master/modules/library/sample-data/src/site/apt/review.apt It says the origin of that "statepop" dataset is unknown... a possible hint that vetting is all that is required, since GeoTools graduated with that assesment? > 3) Code contribution procedure. > This one is completely new to me, or at least, I can't remember about it off the top of my head. We do have code contribution procedures already in place, what was found that is not ok in them? http://docs.geoserver.org/latest/en/docguide/contributing.html http://docs.geoserver.org/2.1.x/en/developer/policies/community-modules.html http://geoserver.org/download/attachments/819262/assignment_agreement.pdf?version=1 Cheers Andrea -- == Our support, Your Success! Visit http://opensdi.geo-solutions.it for more information. == Ing. Andrea Aime @geowolf Technical Lead GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via Poggio alle Viti 1187 55054 Massarosa (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 1660272 mob: +39 339 8844549 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it --- -- Master HTML5, CSS3, ASP.NET, MVC, AJAX, Knockout.js, Web API and much more. Get web development skills now with LearnDevNow - 350+ hours of step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. SALE $99.99 this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122812___ Geoserver-devel mailing list Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
Re: [Geoserver-devel] OSGeo Incubation Reminder
Geoserver Team: I just want to follow-up on my e-mail from a few weeks ago. Based upon my last review, we only had these three (3) outstanding items for Geoserver incubation: 1) Selection of Geoserver documentation license. 2) Review of New York City, States and Tasmania data distributed with GeoServer. 3) Code contribution procedure. Have any of these issues been fixed or resolved? Has the project decided not to address any of them? I'd like to provide the incubation committee with an update, and then find out what remains to get you guys graduated. Thanks for the help and your patience with the incubation process. Landon On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 7:12 AM, Landon Blake wrote: > OK. I did a litle poking around on the OSGeo Incubation web site. > According to this web page > (http://www.osgeo.org/incubator/process/codereview.html) if the code > review is complete by the GeoServer Team then I need to look over two > documents. The first is the document that captured the result of the > Library/Component Review. The second is the document that captured the > result of the Code Copyright Review. Have those documents been > assembled? If not, can they be created from the data at this page?: > http://geoserver.org/display/GEOS/GeoServer+Provenance+Review > > I think I should be able to provide the incubation committee with > links to those documents when they are complete and I have reviewed > them. > > After reviewing the meeting minutes, Provenance Review Page, and > incubation documents from OSGeo, I'm not sure if we have addressed > these items: > > 1) Selection of Geoserver documentation license. > 2) Review of New York City, States and Tasmania data distributed with > GeoServer. > 3) Code contribution procedure. > > Please forgive me if these things have already been addressed and I > have missed it. > > Landon > > On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 6:54 AM, Landon Blake > wrote: >> Andrea: >> >> Let me check. I'm still a bit new with the OSGeo incubation process, >> so give me a day or two to figure out. I'll get back to the list. >> >> Landon >> >> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 6:35 AM, Andrea Aime >> wrote: >>> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 2:04 AM, Landon Blake >>> wrote: Ok. I'm just trying to give friendly nudges. I know everyone is busy. >>> >>> See the last meeting minutes sent a few minutes ago on this ml, it seems >>> provenance review >>> is almost complete. >>> Afaik that was the last item we were missing? >>> >>> Landon, do you know if there is anything else we should look at? >>> >>> Cheers >>> Andrea >>> >>> -- >>> == >>> Our support, Your Success! Visit http://opensdi.geo-solutions.it for more >>> information. >>> == >>> >>> Ing. Andrea Aime >>> @geowolf >>> Technical Lead >>> >>> GeoSolutions S.A.S. >>> Via Poggio alle Viti 1187 >>> 55054 Massarosa (LU) >>> Italy >>> phone: +39 0584 962313 >>> fax: +39 0584 1660272 >>> mob: +39 339 8844549 >>> >>> http://www.geo-solutions.it >>> http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it >>> >>> --- >>> -- Master HTML5, CSS3, ASP.NET, MVC, AJAX, Knockout.js, Web API and much more. Get web development skills now with LearnDevNow - 350+ hours of step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. SALE $99.99 this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122812 ___ Geoserver-devel mailing list Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
