[Geoserver-devel] [JIRA] (GEOS-8236) VT: When a Style has no active rules, incorrect query is sent to the data source

2017-07-27 Thread David Blasby (JIRA) 
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 David Blasby created an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 GeoServer /  GEOS-8236  
 
 
  VT: When a Style has no active rules, incorrect query is sent to the data source   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Issue Type: 
  Bug  
 
 
Assignee: 
 David Blasby  
 
 
Components: 
 Vector Tiles  
 
 
Created: 
 28/Jul/17 12:23 AM  
 
 
Priority: 
  Medium  
 
 
Reporter: 
 David Blasby  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 cf discussion; http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Hide-layers-in-layer-group-td5328765.html http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Re-Hide-layers-in-layer-group-for-vector-tiles-td5329226.html When no rules are active in a Style, the incorrect query is sent to the data source.  
 

  
 
 
  
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
 

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Supported development platforms

2017-07-27 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies 

[This thread has changed topic and should be on the geoserver-devel list.]

On 28/07/17 10:05, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:

Aaron,

there is, as far as I know, no list of supported development platforms. 
I use Debian sid amd64 with OpenJDK 8u141, I know that others use 
Ubuntu, which is probably most popular, and I expect all Debian 
downstreams to work. I expect that Fedora, CentOS, and relatives will 
work. I think we have a couple of MacOS developers (but I will let them 
speak for themselves). The last few Windows developers stopped 
contributing bug fixes for the Windows build and have not been seen for 
a while; this is how the Windows build stopped working. Perhaps they 
switched to Ubuntu? Ubuntu is popular for cloud deployments (Amazon and 
Google Compute).


Oracle JDK 8 and OpenJDK 8 are both supported.

Kind regards,
Ben.

On 28/07/17 09:52, Aaron Edwards wrote:

Ha!  Windows.

I thought I was doing this the hard way.  For example, GeoServer for 
windows needs a 32 bit JRE, but you need the 64 bit to set up 
Eclipse.  And Java_Home needs to be set to the 32 bit JRE for 
GeoServer, but the 64 bit JDK for Maven.  Also, as I mentioned, even 
with skipping the unit tests, Eclipse still showed a bunch of errors 
and wouldn't actually start up.


So this explains a lot. I'm surprised that I missed it in the 
documentation.


Is there a list of supported Dev platforms?  I code on a Mac, but 
usually in Windows within Parallels.  I also have a Debian VM available.


Thanks, Ben.

Aaron

-Original Message-
From: Ben Caradoc-Davies [mailto:b...@transient.nz]
Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 3:46 PM
To: Aaron Edwards 
Cc: geoserver-us...@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Geoserver-users] Repeat Labels Inside of Polygons

Aaron,

unit tests are not expected to fail on supported development platforms 
(i.e. not Windows). We have had reports of failures on Windows but no 
Windows developers to investigate them. What is your development 
platform?


Kind regards,
Ben.

On 28/07/17 03:22, FunkMonkey33 wrote:

I did also notice that the unit tests fail when building with Maven.
I disabled them and it builds, but is that expected?


--
Ben Caradoc-Davies 
Director
Transient Software Limited  New Zealand





--
Ben Caradoc-Davies 
Director
Transient Software Limited 
New Zealand

--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
___
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Crazy idea... what about GeoPackage straight in core for 2.12?

2017-07-27 Thread Andrea Aime 
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 12:40 PM, Brad Hards  wrote:

> I worry about the stability of the format. GeoPackage 1.2 isn't actually
> approved yet, and the changes from 1.1 are substantive (not just a patch):
> https://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=74224&version=1 for
> the
> release notes.
>

Oh dear... and it will take some time before someone funds support for 1.2
once is out.
However, OGC cannot really expect people to just throw away all the 1.1
geopackages
or suddenly have all software switch to that version no?

The adoption of 1.2 in actual software as the preferred version might take
years, should
we really treat that a concern not to have it as supported?
If it goes like with other specs, by the time one gets some significant
foothold in the market, OGC
has created the N+1 version... it just never ends :-p

Cheers
Andrea



-- 

Regards,

Andrea Aime

==
GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit http://goo.gl/it488V
for more information.
==

Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical Lead

GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via di Montramito 3/A
55054  Massarosa (LU)
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob: +39  339 8844549

http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it

AVVERTENZE AI SENSI DEL D.Lgs. 196/2003

Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica e/o
nel/i file/s allegato/i sono da considerarsi strettamente riservate. Il
loro utilizzo è consentito esclusivamente al destinatario del messaggio,
per le finalità indicate nel messaggio stesso. Qualora riceviate questo
messaggio senza esserne il destinatario, Vi preghiamo cortesemente di
darcene notizia via e-mail e di procedere alla distruzione del messaggio
stesso, cancellandolo dal Vostro sistema. Conservare il messaggio stesso,
divulgarlo anche in parte, distribuirlo ad altri soggetti, copiarlo, od
utilizzarlo per finalità diverse, costituisce comportamento contrario ai
principi dettati dal D.Lgs. 196/2003.

The information in this message and/or attachments, is intended solely for
the attention and use of the named addressee(s) and may be confidential or
proprietary in nature or covered by the provisions of privacy act
(Legislative Decree June, 30 2003, no.196 - Italy's New Data Protection
Code).Any use not in accord with its purpose, any disclosure, reproduction,
copying, distribution, or either dissemination, either whole or partial, is
strictly forbidden except previous formal approval of the named
addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please contact
immediately the sender by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the
information in this message that has been received in error. The sender
does not give any warranty or accept liability as the content, accuracy or
completeness of sent messages and accepts no responsibility  for changes
made after they were sent or for other risks which arise as a result of
e-mail transmission, viruses, etc.
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Crazy idea... what about GeoPackage straight in core for 2.12?

2017-07-27 Thread Brad Hards 
>   Hi,
>   I was thinking about the current idea of splitting the geopackage
> support into several
>   modules, one store, one WFS output (extension), one WPS output
> (extension), one WMS output
>   (community, as written its dangerous for the server stability).
>
>   Well, given the importance of the format... what about having the
> store part as a core component
>   starting with 2.12? Given it's an OGC standard, it's a bridge we'll have
> to cross anyways.
>
>   Opinions?
I worry about the stability of the format. GeoPackage 1.2 isn't actually 
approved yet, and the changes from 1.1 are substantive (not just a patch): 
https://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=74224&version=1 for the 
release notes.

I think that extension would be better for 2.12 for store, and the outputs 
might even be better as remaining in community given the 1.1 -> 1.2 
transition.

Brad




--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
___
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Crazy idea... what about GeoPackage straight in core for 2.12?

2017-07-27 Thread Andrea Aime 
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 1:57 AM, Ben Caradoc-Davies 
wrote:

> Makes sense to me. Can we get it done before the freeze?
>

Well, the nice thing is that we really just need to add a dependency to the
store in core
to have a basic setup going.
And maybe a custom panel (reusing  the shapefile one) to point have a file
browser
allowing the usage of .gpkg files?

Cheers
Andrea

-- 

Regards,

Andrea Aime

==
GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit http://goo.gl/it488V
for more information.
==

Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical Lead

GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via di Montramito 3/A
55054  Massarosa (LU)
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob: +39  339 8844549

http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it

AVVERTENZE AI SENSI DEL D.Lgs. 196/2003

Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica e/o
nel/i file/s allegato/i sono da considerarsi strettamente riservate. Il
loro utilizzo è consentito esclusivamente al destinatario del messaggio,
per le finalità indicate nel messaggio stesso. Qualora riceviate questo
messaggio senza esserne il destinatario, Vi preghiamo cortesemente di
darcene notizia via e-mail e di procedere alla distruzione del messaggio
stesso, cancellandolo dal Vostro sistema. Conservare il messaggio stesso,
divulgarlo anche in parte, distribuirlo ad altri soggetti, copiarlo, od
utilizzarlo per finalità diverse, costituisce comportamento contrario ai
principi dettati dal D.Lgs. 196/2003.

The information in this message and/or attachments, is intended solely for
the attention and use of the named addressee(s) and may be confidential or
proprietary in nature or covered by the provisions of privacy act
(Legislative Decree June, 30 2003, no.196 - Italy's New Data Protection
Code).Any use not in accord with its purpose, any disclosure, reproduction,
copying, distribution, or either dissemination, either whole or partial, is
strictly forbidden except previous formal approval of the named
addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please contact
immediately the sender by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the
information in this message that has been received in error. The sender
does not give any warranty or accept liability as the content, accuracy or
completeness of sent messages and accepts no responsibility  for changes
made after they were sent or for other risks which arise as a result of
e-mail transmission, viruses, etc.
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel