Re: [Geoserver-devel] [GSIP-164] Promoting geofence and geofence-server as extensions modules
> >>>> >>> >>>> Il giorno mer 5 set 2018 alle ore 09:59 Simone Giannecchini < >>> simone.giannecch...@geo-solutions.it> ha scritto: >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> +1 with a gentle requirement to bump coverage to 60% >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> Regards, >>> >>>>> Simone Giannecchini >>> >>>>> == >>> >>>>> GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! >>> >>>>> Visit http://goo.gl/it488V for more information. >>> >>>>> == >>> >>>>> Ing. Simone Giannecchini >>> >>>>> @simogeo >>> >>>>> Founder/Director >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> GeoSolutions S.A.S. >>> >>>>> Via di Montramito 3/A >>> >>>>> 55054 Massarosa (LU) >>> >>>>> Italy >>> >>>>> phone: +39 0584 962313 >>> >>>>> fax: +39 0584 1660272 >>> >>>>> mob: +39 333 8128928 >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> http://www.geo-solutions.it >>> >>>>> http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> --------------- >>> >>>>> Con riferimento alla normativa sul trattamento dei dati personali >>> >>>>> (Reg. UE 2016/679 - Regolamento generale sulla protezione dei dati >>> >>>>> “GDPR”), si precisa che ogni circostanza inerente alla presente >>> email >>> >>>>> (il suo contenuto, gli eventuali allegati, etc.) è un dato la cui >>> >>>>> conoscenza è riservata al/i solo/i destinatario/i indicati dallo >>> >>>>> scrivente. Se il messaggio Le è giunto per errore, è tenuta/o a >>> >>>>> cancellarlo, ogni altra operazione è illecita. Le sarei comunque >>> grato >>> >>>>> se potesse darmene notizia. >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> This email is intended only for the person or entity to which it is >>> >>>>> addressed and may contain information that is privileged, >>> confidential >>> >>>>> or otherwise protected from disclosure. We remind that - as >>> provided >>> >>>>> by European Regulation 2016/679 “GDPR” - copying, dissemination or >>> use >>> >>>>> of this e-mail or the information herein by anyone other than the >>> >>>>> intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email >>> by >>> >>>>> mistake, please notify us immediately by telephone or e-mail. >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 11:44 PM wrote: >>> >>>>> > >>> >>>>> > Alessio: thanks – that answers my question and allays my >>> concerns. I am still +1 in any case. >>> >>>>> > >>> >>>>> > >>> >>>>> > >>> >>>>> > Brad >>> >>>>> > >>> >>>>> > >>> >>>>> > >>> >>>>> > From: Alessio Fabiani >>> >>>>> > Sent: Friday, 31 August 2018 10:43 PM >>> >>>>> > To: Brad Hards ; Emanuele Tajariol < >>> e...@geo-solutions.it> >>> >>>>> > Cc: Andrea Aime ; Alessio Fabiani >>> ; Geoserver-devel < >>> geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> >>> >>>>> > Subject: Re: [Geoserver-devel] [GSIP-164] Promoting geofence and >>> geofence-server as extensions modules >>> >>>>> > >>> >>>>> > >>> >>>>> > >>> >>>>> > Dear all, >>> >>>>> > >>> >>>>> > I agree that the test coverage might be indeed increased, >>> nevertheless even if the percentage is not so high, notice that the core >>> classes have a very good coverage. >>> >>>>> > >>> >>>>> > >>> >>>>> > >>> >>>>> > As an instance the lower value (15%) on GeoFence module regards >>> a package containing just POJOs used by the client to unma
Re: [Geoserver-devel] [GSIP-164] Promoting geofence and geofence-server as extensions modules
i >> >>>>> @simogeo >> >>>>> Founder/Director >> >>>>> >> >>>>> GeoSolutions S.A.S. >> >>>>> Via di Montramito 3/A >> >>>>> 55054 Massarosa (LU) >> >>>>> Italy >> >>>>> phone: +39 0584 962313 >> >>>>> fax: +39 0584 1660272 >> >>>>> mob: +39 333 8128928 >> >>>>> >> >>>>> http://www.geo-solutions.it >> >>>>> http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it >> >>>>> >> >>>>> --- >> >>>>> Con riferimento alla normativa sul trattamento dei dati personali >> >>>>> (Reg. UE 2016/679 - Regolamento generale sulla protezione dei dati >> >>>>> “GDPR”), si precisa che ogni circostanza inerente alla presente >> email >> >>>>> (il suo contenuto, gli eventuali allegati, etc.) è un dato la cui >> >>>>> conoscenza è riservata al/i solo/i destinatario/i indicati dallo >> >>>>> scrivente. Se il messaggio Le è giunto per errore, è tenuta/o a >> >>>>> cancellarlo, ogni altra operazione è illecita. Le sarei comunque >> grato >> >>>>> se potesse darmene notizia. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> This email is intended only for the person or entity to which it is >> >>>>> addressed and may contain information that is privileged, >> confidential >> >>>>> or otherwise protected from disclosure. We remind that - as provided >> >>>>> by European Regulation 2016/679 “GDPR” - copying, dissemination or >> use >> >>>>> of this e-mail or the information herein by anyone other than the >> >>>>> intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email by >> >>>>> mistake, please notify us immediately by telephone or e-mail. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 11:44 PM wrote: >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > Alessio: thanks – that answers my question and allays my >> concerns. I am still +1 in any case. >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > Brad >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > From: Alessio Fabiani >> >>>>> > Sent: Friday, 31 August 2018 10:43 PM >> >>>>> > To: Brad Hards ; Emanuele Tajariol < >> e...@geo-solutions.it> >> >>>>> > Cc: Andrea Aime ; Alessio Fabiani < >> alessio.fabi...@geo-solutions.it>; Geoserver-devel < >> geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> >> >>>>> > Subject: Re: [Geoserver-devel] [GSIP-164] Promoting geofence and >> geofence-server as extensions modules >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > Dear all, >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > I agree that the test coverage might be indeed increased, >> nevertheless even if the percentage is not so high, notice that the core >> classes have a very good coverage. >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > As an instance the lower value (15%) on GeoFence module regards a >> package containing just POJOs used by the client to unmarshal instances >> through Spring Remoting. They are just plain classes representing some >> GeoFence objects ( org.geoserver.geofence.rest.xml). >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > On the other side most of the core classes have almost 100% >> coverage. >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > I would love (and for sure I will) add more tests on the rules >> and roles caching features and on the AuthenticationManager. >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > Until now the tests I have added should also cover: >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > 1. The
Re: [Geoserver-devel] [GSIP-164] Promoting geofence and geofence-server as extensions modules
PR”), si precisa che ogni circostanza inerente alla presente email > >>>>> (il suo contenuto, gli eventuali allegati, etc.) è un dato la cui > >>>>> conoscenza è riservata al/i solo/i destinatario/i indicati dallo > >>>>> scrivente. Se il messaggio Le è giunto per errore, è tenuta/o a > >>>>> cancellarlo, ogni altra operazione è illecita. Le sarei comunque > grato > >>>>> se potesse darmene notizia. > >>>>> > >>>>> This email is intended only for the person or entity to which it is > >>>>> addressed and may contain information that is privileged, > confidential > >>>>> or otherwise protected from disclosure. We remind that - as provided > >>>>> by European Regulation 2016/679 “GDPR” - copying, dissemination or > use > >>>>> of this e-mail or the information herein by anyone other than the > >>>>> intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email by > >>>>> mistake, please notify us immediately by telephone or e-mail. > >>>>> > >>>>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 11:44 PM wrote: > >>>>> > > >>>>> > Alessio: thanks – that answers my question and allays my concerns. > I am still +1 in any case. > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > Brad > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > From: Alessio Fabiani > >>>>> > Sent: Friday, 31 August 2018 10:43 PM > >>>>> > To: Brad Hards ; Emanuele Tajariol < > e...@geo-solutions.it> > >>>>> > Cc: Andrea Aime ; Alessio Fabiani < > alessio.fabi...@geo-solutions.it>; Geoserver-devel < > geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> > >>>>> > Subject: Re: [Geoserver-devel] [GSIP-164] Promoting geofence and > geofence-server as extensions modules > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > Dear all, > >>>>> > > >>>>> > I agree that the test coverage might be indeed increased, > nevertheless even if the percentage is not so high, notice that the core > classes have a very good coverage. > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > As an instance the lower value (15%) on GeoFence module regards a > package containing just POJOs used by the client to unmarshal instances > through Spring Remoting. They are just plain classes representing some > GeoFence objects ( org.geoserver.geofence.rest.xml). > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > On the other side most of the core classes have almost 100% > coverage. > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > I would love (and for sure I will) add more tests on the rules and > roles caching features and on the AuthenticationManager. > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > Until now the tests I have added should also cover: > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > 1. The load of the context from spring > >>>>> > > >>>>> > 2. All the possible REST operations that can be done through the > APIs > >>>>> > > >>>>> > 3. Most of the operations that currently are possible via the WEB > GUI > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > For sue something missing would be: > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > 1. More tests on the Limits filters by area > >>>>> > > >>>>> > 2. Tests on the possibility of making specific attributes > hidden/read-only/writable > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > Especially for those two, manual testing of course has been done > successfully. Automatic testing should be added. > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > If you think that it would be better to add them at this stage, I
Re: [Geoserver-devel] [GSIP-164] Promoting geofence and geofence-server as extensions modules
just asking, did you update the doc as well? Regards, Simone Giannecchini == GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit http://goo.gl/it488V for more information. == Ing. Simone Giannecchini @simogeo Founder/Director GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via di Montramito 3/A 55054 Massarosa (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 1660272 mob: +39 333 8128928 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it --- Con riferimento alla normativa sul trattamento dei dati personali (Reg. UE 2016/679 - Regolamento generale sulla protezione dei dati “GDPR”), si precisa che ogni circostanza inerente alla presente email (il suo contenuto, gli eventuali allegati, etc.) è un dato la cui conoscenza è riservata al/i solo/i destinatario/i indicati dallo scrivente. Se il messaggio Le è giunto per errore, è tenuta/o a cancellarlo, ogni altra operazione è illecita. Le sarei comunque grato se potesse darmene notizia. This email is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. We remind that - as provided by European Regulation 2016/679 “GDPR” - copying, dissemination or use of this e-mail or the information herein by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email by mistake, please notify us immediately by telephone or e-mail. On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 10:18 AM Alessio Fabiani wrote: > > Thanks everyone, > > * merged the related PR https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/3058 > * updated the wiki page https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/GSIP-164 > * updated the proposal page > https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/Proposals > > > Il giorno mer 5 set 2018 alle ore 10:09 Andrea Aime > ha scritto: >> >> According to the rules at: >> http://docs.geoserver.org/latest/en/developer/policies/gsip.html#voting-on-a-gsip >> >> At least 30% +1 votes (4 > 10 / 3, check) >> A quorum of at least 50% +1”/”+0”/”0”/”-0” (5 is 50%, check) >> No -1 votes (check) >> >> So yes, it's passed >> >> Cheers >> Andrea >> >> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 10:05 AM Alessio Fabiani >> wrote: >>> >>> Errata corrige: 4 +1 and 1 +0 >>> >>> Il giorno mer 5 set 2018 alle ore 10:03 Alessio Fabiani >>> ha scritto: >>>> >>>> Thanks Simone, >>>> I opened a JIRA specific for that >>>> >>>> https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/browse/GEOS-8917 >>>> >>>> we have now 3 +1 and 1 +0 on this. Are those sufficient to proceed? >>>> >>>> Il giorno mer 5 set 2018 alle ore 09:59 Simone Giannecchini >>>> ha scritto: >>>>> >>>>> +1 with a gentle requirement to bump coverage to 60% >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Simone Giannecchini >>>>> == >>>>> GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! >>>>> Visit http://goo.gl/it488V for more information. >>>>> == >>>>> Ing. Simone Giannecchini >>>>> @simogeo >>>>> Founder/Director >>>>> >>>>> GeoSolutions S.A.S. >>>>> Via di Montramito 3/A >>>>> 55054 Massarosa (LU) >>>>> Italy >>>>> phone: +39 0584 962313 >>>>> fax: +39 0584 1660272 >>>>> mob: +39 333 8128928 >>>>> >>>>> http://www.geo-solutions.it >>>>> http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it >>>>> >>>>> --- >>>>> Con riferimento alla normativa sul trattamento dei dati personali >>>>> (Reg. UE 2016/679 - Regolamento generale sulla protezione dei dati >>>>> “GDPR”), si precisa che ogni circostanza inerente alla presente email >>>>> (il suo contenuto, gli eventuali allegati, etc.) è un dato la cui >>>>> conoscenza è riservata al/i solo/i destinatario/i indicati dallo >>>>> scrivente. Se il messaggio Le è giunto per errore, è tenuta/o a >>>>> cancellarlo, ogni altra operazione è illecita. Le sarei comunque grato >>>>> se potesse darmene notizia. >>>>> >>>>> This email is intended only for the person or entity to which it is >>>>> addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential >>>>> or otherwise protected from disclosure. We remind that - as provided >>>>> by European Regulation 2016/679 “GDPR” - copying, di
Re: [Geoserver-devel] [GSIP-164] Promoting geofence and geofence-server as extensions modules
Thanks everyone, * merged the related PR https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/3058 * updated the wiki page https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/GSIP-164 * updated the proposal page https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/Proposals Il giorno mer 5 set 2018 alle ore 10:09 Andrea Aime < andrea.a...@geo-solutions.it> ha scritto: > According to the rules at: > http://docs.geoserver.org/latest/en/developer/policies/gsip.html#voting-on-a-gsip > >- At least 30% +1 votes (4 > 10 / 3, check) >- A quorum of at least 50% +1”/”+0”/”0”/”-0” (5 is 50%, check) >- No -1 votes (check) > > So yes, it's passed > > Cheers > Andrea > > On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 10:05 AM Alessio Fabiani < > alessio.fabi...@geo-solutions.it> wrote: > >> Errata corrige: 4 +1 and 1 +0 >> >> Il giorno mer 5 set 2018 alle ore 10:03 Alessio Fabiani < >> alessio.fabi...@geo-solutions.it> ha scritto: >> >>> Thanks Simone, >>> I opened a JIRA specific for that >>> >>> https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/browse/GEOS-8917 >>> >>> we have now 3 +1 and 1 +0 on this. Are those sufficient to proceed? >>> >>> Il giorno mer 5 set 2018 alle ore 09:59 Simone Giannecchini < >>> simone.giannecch...@geo-solutions.it> ha scritto: >>> >>>> +1 with a gentle requirement to bump coverage to 60% >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Simone Giannecchini >>>> == >>>> GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! >>>> Visit http://goo.gl/it488V for more information. >>>> == >>>> Ing. Simone Giannecchini >>>> @simogeo >>>> Founder/Director >>>> >>>> GeoSolutions S.A.S. >>>> Via di Montramito 3/A >>>> 55054 Massarosa (LU) >>>> Italy >>>> phone: +39 0584 962313 >>>> fax: +39 0584 1660272 >>>> mob: +39 333 8128928 >>>> >>>> http://www.geo-solutions.it >>>> http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it >>>> >>>> --- >>>> Con riferimento alla normativa sul trattamento dei dati personali >>>> (Reg. UE 2016/679 - Regolamento generale sulla protezione dei dati >>>> “GDPR”), si precisa che ogni circostanza inerente alla presente email >>>> (il suo contenuto, gli eventuali allegati, etc.) è un dato la cui >>>> conoscenza è riservata al/i solo/i destinatario/i indicati dallo >>>> scrivente. Se il messaggio Le è giunto per errore, è tenuta/o a >>>> cancellarlo, ogni altra operazione è illecita. Le sarei comunque grato >>>> se potesse darmene notizia. >>>> >>>> This email is intended only for the person or entity to which it is >>>> addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential >>>> or otherwise protected from disclosure. We remind that - as provided >>>> by European Regulation 2016/679 “GDPR” - copying, dissemination or use >>>> of this e-mail or the information herein by anyone other than the >>>> intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email by >>>> mistake, please notify us immediately by telephone or e-mail. >>>> >>>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 11:44 PM wrote: >>>> > >>>> > Alessio: thanks – that answers my question and allays my concerns. I >>>> am still +1 in any case. >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > Brad >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > From: Alessio Fabiani >>>> > Sent: Friday, 31 August 2018 10:43 PM >>>> > To: Brad Hards ; Emanuele Tajariol < >>>> e...@geo-solutions.it> >>>> > Cc: Andrea Aime ; Alessio Fabiani < >>>> alessio.fabi...@geo-solutions.it>; Geoserver-devel < >>>> geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> >>>> > Subject: Re: [Geoserver-devel] [GSIP-164] Promoting geofence and >>>> geofence-server as extensions modules >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > Dear all, >>>> > >>>> > I agree that the test coverage might be indeed increased, >>>> nevertheless even if the percentage is not so high, notice that the core >>>> classes have a very good coverage. >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > As an instance the lower value (15%) on GeoFence module regard
Re: [Geoserver-devel] [GSIP-164] Promoting geofence and geofence-server as extensions modules
According to the rules at: http://docs.geoserver.org/latest/en/developer/policies/gsip.html#voting-on-a-gsip - At least 30% +1 votes (4 > 10 / 3, check) - A quorum of at least 50% +1”/”+0”/”0”/”-0” (5 is 50%, check) - No -1 votes (check) So yes, it's passed Cheers Andrea On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 10:05 AM Alessio Fabiani < alessio.fabi...@geo-solutions.it> wrote: > Errata corrige: 4 +1 and 1 +0 > > Il giorno mer 5 set 2018 alle ore 10:03 Alessio Fabiani < > alessio.fabi...@geo-solutions.it> ha scritto: > >> Thanks Simone, >> I opened a JIRA specific for that >> >> https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/browse/GEOS-8917 >> >> we have now 3 +1 and 1 +0 on this. Are those sufficient to proceed? >> >> Il giorno mer 5 set 2018 alle ore 09:59 Simone Giannecchini < >> simone.giannecch...@geo-solutions.it> ha scritto: >> >>> +1 with a gentle requirement to bump coverage to 60% >>> >>> Regards, >>> Simone Giannecchini >>> == >>> GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! >>> Visit http://goo.gl/it488V for more information. >>> == >>> Ing. Simone Giannecchini >>> @simogeo >>> Founder/Director >>> >>> GeoSolutions S.A.S. >>> Via di Montramito 3/A >>> 55054 Massarosa (LU) >>> Italy >>> phone: +39 0584 962313 >>> fax: +39 0584 1660272 >>> mob: +39 333 8128928 >>> >>> http://www.geo-solutions.it >>> http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it >>> >>> --- >>> Con riferimento alla normativa sul trattamento dei dati personali >>> (Reg. UE 2016/679 - Regolamento generale sulla protezione dei dati >>> “GDPR”), si precisa che ogni circostanza inerente alla presente email >>> (il suo contenuto, gli eventuali allegati, etc.) è un dato la cui >>> conoscenza è riservata al/i solo/i destinatario/i indicati dallo >>> scrivente. Se il messaggio Le è giunto per errore, è tenuta/o a >>> cancellarlo, ogni altra operazione è illecita. Le sarei comunque grato >>> se potesse darmene notizia. >>> >>> This email is intended only for the person or entity to which it is >>> addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential >>> or otherwise protected from disclosure. We remind that - as provided >>> by European Regulation 2016/679 “GDPR” - copying, dissemination or use >>> of this e-mail or the information herein by anyone other than the >>> intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email by >>> mistake, please notify us immediately by telephone or e-mail. >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 11:44 PM wrote: >>> > >>> > Alessio: thanks – that answers my question and allays my concerns. I >>> am still +1 in any case. >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > Brad >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > From: Alessio Fabiani >>> > Sent: Friday, 31 August 2018 10:43 PM >>> > To: Brad Hards ; Emanuele Tajariol < >>> e...@geo-solutions.it> >>> > Cc: Andrea Aime ; Alessio Fabiani < >>> alessio.fabi...@geo-solutions.it>; Geoserver-devel < >>> geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> >>> > Subject: Re: [Geoserver-devel] [GSIP-164] Promoting geofence and >>> geofence-server as extensions modules >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > Dear all, >>> > >>> > I agree that the test coverage might be indeed increased, nevertheless >>> even if the percentage is not so high, notice that the core classes have a >>> very good coverage. >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > As an instance the lower value (15%) on GeoFence module regards a >>> package containing just POJOs used by the client to unmarshal instances >>> through Spring Remoting. They are just plain classes representing some >>> GeoFence objects ( org.geoserver.geofence.rest.xml). >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > On the other side most of the core classes have almost 100% coverage. >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > I would love (and for sure I will) add more tests on the rules and >>> roles caching features and on the AuthenticationManager. >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > Until now the tests I have added should also cover: >>> > >>> > >>> > >>
Re: [Geoserver-devel] [GSIP-164] Promoting geofence and geofence-server as extensions modules
Errata corrige: 4 +1 and 1 +0 Il giorno mer 5 set 2018 alle ore 10:03 Alessio Fabiani < alessio.fabi...@geo-solutions.it> ha scritto: > Thanks Simone, > I opened a JIRA specific for that > > https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/browse/GEOS-8917 > > we have now 3 +1 and 1 +0 on this. Are those sufficient to proceed? > > Il giorno mer 5 set 2018 alle ore 09:59 Simone Giannecchini < > simone.giannecch...@geo-solutions.it> ha scritto: > >> +1 with a gentle requirement to bump coverage to 60% >> >> Regards, >> Simone Giannecchini >> == >> GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! >> Visit http://goo.gl/it488V for more information. >> == >> Ing. Simone Giannecchini >> @simogeo >> Founder/Director >> >> GeoSolutions S.A.S. >> Via di Montramito 3/A >> 55054 Massarosa (LU) >> Italy >> phone: +39 0584 962313 >> fax: +39 0584 1660272 >> mob: +39 333 8128928 >> >> http://www.geo-solutions.it >> http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it >> >> --- >> Con riferimento alla normativa sul trattamento dei dati personali >> (Reg. UE 2016/679 - Regolamento generale sulla protezione dei dati >> “GDPR”), si precisa che ogni circostanza inerente alla presente email >> (il suo contenuto, gli eventuali allegati, etc.) è un dato la cui >> conoscenza è riservata al/i solo/i destinatario/i indicati dallo >> scrivente. Se il messaggio Le è giunto per errore, è tenuta/o a >> cancellarlo, ogni altra operazione è illecita. Le sarei comunque grato >> se potesse darmene notizia. >> >> This email is intended only for the person or entity to which it is >> addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential >> or otherwise protected from disclosure. We remind that - as provided >> by European Regulation 2016/679 “GDPR” - copying, dissemination or use >> of this e-mail or the information herein by anyone other than the >> intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email by >> mistake, please notify us immediately by telephone or e-mail. >> >> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 11:44 PM wrote: >> > >> > Alessio: thanks – that answers my question and allays my concerns. I am >> still +1 in any case. >> > >> > >> > >> > Brad >> > >> > >> > >> > From: Alessio Fabiani >> > Sent: Friday, 31 August 2018 10:43 PM >> > To: Brad Hards ; Emanuele Tajariol < >> e...@geo-solutions.it> >> > Cc: Andrea Aime ; Alessio Fabiani < >> alessio.fabi...@geo-solutions.it>; Geoserver-devel < >> geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> >> > Subject: Re: [Geoserver-devel] [GSIP-164] Promoting geofence and >> geofence-server as extensions modules >> > >> > >> > >> > Dear all, >> > >> > I agree that the test coverage might be indeed increased, nevertheless >> even if the percentage is not so high, notice that the core classes have a >> very good coverage. >> > >> > >> > >> > As an instance the lower value (15%) on GeoFence module regards a >> package containing just POJOs used by the client to unmarshal instances >> through Spring Remoting. They are just plain classes representing some >> GeoFence objects ( org.geoserver.geofence.rest.xml). >> > >> > >> > >> > On the other side most of the core classes have almost 100% coverage. >> > >> > >> > >> > I would love (and for sure I will) add more tests on the rules and >> roles caching features and on the AuthenticationManager. >> > >> > >> > >> > Until now the tests I have added should also cover: >> > >> > >> > >> > 1. The load of the context from spring >> > >> > 2. All the possible REST operations that can be done through the APIs >> > >> > 3. Most of the operations that currently are possible via the WEB GUI >> > >> > >> > >> > For sue something missing would be: >> > >> > >> > >> > 1. More tests on the Limits filters by area >> > >> > 2. Tests on the possibility of making specific attributes >> hidden/read-only/writable >> > >> > >> > >> > Especially for those two, manual testing of course has been done >> successfully. Automatic testing should be added. >> > >> > >> > >> > If you think that it would be
Re: [Geoserver-devel] [GSIP-164] Promoting geofence and geofence-server as extensions modules
Thanks Simone, I opened a JIRA specific for that https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/browse/GEOS-8917 we have now 3 +1 and 1 +0 on this. Are those sufficient to proceed? Il giorno mer 5 set 2018 alle ore 09:59 Simone Giannecchini < simone.giannecch...@geo-solutions.it> ha scritto: > +1 with a gentle requirement to bump coverage to 60% > > Regards, > Simone Giannecchini > == > GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! > Visit http://goo.gl/it488V for more information. > == > Ing. Simone Giannecchini > @simogeo > Founder/Director > > GeoSolutions S.A.S. > Via di Montramito 3/A > 55054 Massarosa (LU) > Italy > phone: +39 0584 962313 > fax: +39 0584 1660272 > mob: +39 333 8128928 > > http://www.geo-solutions.it > http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it > > --- > Con riferimento alla normativa sul trattamento dei dati personali > (Reg. UE 2016/679 - Regolamento generale sulla protezione dei dati > “GDPR”), si precisa che ogni circostanza inerente alla presente email > (il suo contenuto, gli eventuali allegati, etc.) è un dato la cui > conoscenza è riservata al/i solo/i destinatario/i indicati dallo > scrivente. Se il messaggio Le è giunto per errore, è tenuta/o a > cancellarlo, ogni altra operazione è illecita. Le sarei comunque grato > se potesse darmene notizia. > > This email is intended only for the person or entity to which it is > addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential > or otherwise protected from disclosure. We remind that - as provided > by European Regulation 2016/679 “GDPR” - copying, dissemination or use > of this e-mail or the information herein by anyone other than the > intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email by > mistake, please notify us immediately by telephone or e-mail. > > On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 11:44 PM wrote: > > > > Alessio: thanks – that answers my question and allays my concerns. I am > still +1 in any case. > > > > > > > > Brad > > > > > > > > From: Alessio Fabiani > > Sent: Friday, 31 August 2018 10:43 PM > > To: Brad Hards ; Emanuele Tajariol < > e...@geo-solutions.it> > > Cc: Andrea Aime ; Alessio Fabiani < > alessio.fabi...@geo-solutions.it>; Geoserver-devel < > geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> > > Subject: Re: [Geoserver-devel] [GSIP-164] Promoting geofence and > geofence-server as extensions modules > > > > > > > > Dear all, > > > > I agree that the test coverage might be indeed increased, nevertheless > even if the percentage is not so high, notice that the core classes have a > very good coverage. > > > > > > > > As an instance the lower value (15%) on GeoFence module regards a > package containing just POJOs used by the client to unmarshal instances > through Spring Remoting. They are just plain classes representing some > GeoFence objects ( org.geoserver.geofence.rest.xml). > > > > > > > > On the other side most of the core classes have almost 100% coverage. > > > > > > > > I would love (and for sure I will) add more tests on the rules and roles > caching features and on the AuthenticationManager. > > > > > > > > Until now the tests I have added should also cover: > > > > > > > > 1. The load of the context from spring > > > > 2. All the possible REST operations that can be done through the APIs > > > > 3. Most of the operations that currently are possible via the WEB GUI > > > > > > > > For sue something missing would be: > > > > > > > > 1. More tests on the Limits filters by area > > > > 2. Tests on the possibility of making specific attributes > hidden/read-only/writable > > > > > > > > Especially for those two, manual testing of course has been done > successfully. Automatic testing should be added. > > > > > > > > If you think that it would be better to add them at this stage, I can > spend some more time before promoting the module, otherwise I can collect > all those observations on some specific JIRAs. > > > > > > > > Thoughts? Feedbacks? > > > > > > > > Also @Emanuele Tajariol as the original author of the GSIP, what do you > think about that? > > > > > > > > Thanks everyone for dedicating time to this topic. > > > > > > > > Alessio. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Re: [Geoserver-devel] [GSIP-164] Promoting geofence and geofence-server as extensions modules
+1 with a gentle requirement to bump coverage to 60% Regards, Simone Giannecchini == GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit http://goo.gl/it488V for more information. == Ing. Simone Giannecchini @simogeo Founder/Director GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via di Montramito 3/A 55054 Massarosa (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 1660272 mob: +39 333 8128928 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it --- Con riferimento alla normativa sul trattamento dei dati personali (Reg. UE 2016/679 - Regolamento generale sulla protezione dei dati “GDPR”), si precisa che ogni circostanza inerente alla presente email (il suo contenuto, gli eventuali allegati, etc.) è un dato la cui conoscenza è riservata al/i solo/i destinatario/i indicati dallo scrivente. Se il messaggio Le è giunto per errore, è tenuta/o a cancellarlo, ogni altra operazione è illecita. Le sarei comunque grato se potesse darmene notizia. This email is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. We remind that - as provided by European Regulation 2016/679 “GDPR” - copying, dissemination or use of this e-mail or the information herein by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email by mistake, please notify us immediately by telephone or e-mail. On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 11:44 PM wrote: > > Alessio: thanks – that answers my question and allays my concerns. I am still > +1 in any case. > > > > Brad > > > > From: Alessio Fabiani > Sent: Friday, 31 August 2018 10:43 PM > To: Brad Hards ; Emanuele Tajariol > > Cc: Andrea Aime ; Alessio Fabiani > ; Geoserver-devel > > Subject: Re: [Geoserver-devel] [GSIP-164] Promoting geofence and > geofence-server as extensions modules > > > > Dear all, > > I agree that the test coverage might be indeed increased, nevertheless even > if the percentage is not so high, notice that the core classes have a very > good coverage. > > > > As an instance the lower value (15%) on GeoFence module regards a package > containing just POJOs used by the client to unmarshal instances through > Spring Remoting. They are just plain classes representing some GeoFence > objects ( org.geoserver.geofence.rest.xml). > > > > On the other side most of the core classes have almost 100% coverage. > > > > I would love (and for sure I will) add more tests on the rules and roles > caching features and on the AuthenticationManager. > > > > Until now the tests I have added should also cover: > > > > 1. The load of the context from spring > > 2. All the possible REST operations that can be done through the APIs > > 3. Most of the operations that currently are possible via the WEB GUI > > > > For sue something missing would be: > > > > 1. More tests on the Limits filters by area > > 2. Tests on the possibility of making specific attributes > hidden/read-only/writable > > > > Especially for those two, manual testing of course has been done > successfully. Automatic testing should be added. > > > > If you think that it would be better to add them at this stage, I can spend > some more time before promoting the module, otherwise I can collect all those > observations on some specific JIRAs. > > > > Thoughts? Feedbacks? > > > > Also @Emanuele Tajariol as the original author of the GSIP, what do you > think about that? > > > > Thanks everyone for dedicating time to this topic. > > > > Alessio. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Il giorno sab 25 ago 2018 alle ore 01:21 ha scritto: > > I should have noted I already added my vote on the GSIP. > > > > I was looking for Alessio’s opinion on the quality of the tests – test > coverage (especially by line) isn’t the only thing that adds to value. > > > > Brad > > > > From: Andrea Aime > Sent: Saturday, 25 August 2018 12:02 AM > To: Brad Hards > Cc: Alessio Fabiani ; Geoserver-devel > > Subject: Re: [Geoserver-devel] [GSIP-164] Promoting geofence and > geofence-server as extensions modules > > > > Hi Brad, > > the test coverage requirements are indeed on the low side, maybe we should > discuss a separate GSIP about increasing them. > > But as far as rules go, Alessio's proposal is within them. > > > > Cheers > > Andrea > > > > On Sat, Aug 18, 2018 at 3:38 AM wrote: > > The proposal wiki page still says 2.13. Are you targeting 2.14 or 2.15? > > > >
Re: [Geoserver-devel] [GSIP-164] Promoting geofence and geofence-server as extensions modules
Alessio: thanks – that answers my question and allays my concerns. I am still +1 in any case. Brad From: Alessio Fabiani Sent: Friday, 31 August 2018 10:43 PM To: Brad Hards ; Emanuele Tajariol Cc: Andrea Aime ; Alessio Fabiani ; Geoserver-devel Subject: Re: [Geoserver-devel] [GSIP-164] Promoting geofence and geofence-server as extensions modules Dear all, I agree that the test coverage might be indeed increased, nevertheless even if the percentage is not so high, notice that the core classes have a very good coverage. As an instance the lower value (15%) on GeoFence module regards a package containing just POJOs used by the client to unmarshal instances through Spring Remoting. They are just plain classes representing some GeoFence objects ( org.geoserver.geofence.rest.xml). On the other side most of the core classes have almost 100% coverage. I would love (and for sure I will) add more tests on the rules and roles caching features and on the AuthenticationManager. Until now the tests I have added should also cover: 1. The load of the context from spring 2. All the possible REST operations that can be done through the APIs 3. Most of the operations that currently are possible via the WEB GUI For sue something missing would be: 1. More tests on the Limits filters by area 2. Tests on the possibility of making specific attributes hidden/read-only/writable Especially for those two, manual testing of course has been done successfully. Automatic testing should be added. If you think that it would be better to add them at this stage, I can spend some more time before promoting the module, otherwise I can collect all those observations on some specific JIRAs. Thoughts? Feedbacks? Also @Emanuele Tajariol <mailto:e...@geo-solutions.it> as the original author of the GSIP, what do you think about that? Thanks everyone for dedicating time to this topic. Alessio. Il giorno sab 25 ago 2018 alle ore 01:21 mailto:br...@frogmouth.net> > ha scritto: I should have noted I already added my vote on the GSIP. I was looking for Alessio’s opinion on the quality of the tests – test coverage (especially by line) isn’t the only thing that adds to value. Brad From: Andrea Aime mailto:andrea.a...@geo-solutions.it> > Sent: Saturday, 25 August 2018 12:02 AM To: Brad Hards mailto:br...@frogmouth.net> > Cc: Alessio Fabiani mailto:alessio.fabi...@geo-solutions.it> >; Geoserver-devel mailto:geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> > Subject: Re: [Geoserver-devel] [GSIP-164] Promoting geofence and geofence-server as extensions modules Hi Brad, the test coverage requirements are indeed on the low side, maybe we should discuss a separate GSIP about increasing them. But as far as rules go, Alessio's proposal is within them. Cheers Andrea On Sat, Aug 18, 2018 at 3:38 AM mailto:br...@frogmouth.net> > wrote: The proposal wiki page still says 2.13. Are you targeting 2.14 or 2.15? Also code coverage still seems pretty low for a security feature. Are you satisfied that the important parts have appropriate validation? Brad From: Alessio Fabiani mailto:alessio.fabi...@geo-solutions.it> > Sent: Friday, 17 August 2018 1:57 AM To: Geoserver-devel mailto:geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> > Subject: [Geoserver-devel] [GSIP-164] Promoting geofence and geofence-server as extensions modules Dear PSC, recently I worked on making geofence modules stable and complete enough to be evaluated as official GeoServer extensions. Currently I have updated the checklist here https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/GSIP-164 and pushed a set of PRs [1][2][3][4] resulting in the following code coverage results [1] https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/3058 [2] https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/3052 [3] https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/3046 [4] https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/3024 -- == GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit http://goo.gl/it488V for more information. == Ing. Alessio Fabiani @alfa7691 Founder/Technical Lead GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via di Montramito 3/A - 55054 Massarosa (LU) - Italy phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 1660272 mob: +39 331 6233686 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it --- Con riferimento alla normativa sul trattamento dei dati personali (Reg. UE 2016/679 - Regolamento generale sulla protezione dei dati “GDPR”), si precisa che ogni circostanza inerente alla presente email (il suo contenuto, gli eventuali allegati, etc.) è un dato la cui conoscenza è riservata al/i solo/i destinatario/i indicati dallo scrivente. Se il messaggio Le è giunto per errore, è tenuta/o a cancellarlo, ogni altra operazione è illecita. Le sarei comunque
Re: [Geoserver-devel] [GSIP-164] Promoting geofence and geofence-server as extensions modules
Dear all, I agree that the test coverage might be indeed increased, nevertheless even if the percentage is not so high, notice that the core classes have a very good coverage. As an instance the lower value (15%) on GeoFence module regards a package containing just POJOs used by the client to unmarshal instances through Spring Remoting. They are just plain classes representing some GeoFence objects ( org.geoserver.geofence.rest.xml). On the other side most of the core classes have almost 100% coverage. I would love (and for sure I will) add more tests on the rules and roles caching features and on the AuthenticationManager. Until now the tests I have added should also cover: 1. The load of the context from spring 2. All the possible REST operations that can be done through the APIs 3. Most of the operations that currently are possible via the WEB GUI For sue something missing would be: 1. More tests on the Limits filters by area 2. Tests on the possibility of making specific attributes hidden/read-only/writable Especially for those two, manual testing of course has been done successfully. Automatic testing should be added. If you think that it would be better to add them at this stage, I can spend some more time before promoting the module, otherwise I can collect all those observations on some specific JIRAs. Thoughts? Feedbacks? Also @Emanuele Tajariol as the original author of the GSIP, what do you think about that? Thanks everyone for dedicating time to this topic. Alessio. Il giorno sab 25 ago 2018 alle ore 01:21 ha scritto: > I should have noted I already added my vote on the GSIP. > > > > I was looking for Alessio’s opinion on the quality of the tests – test > coverage (especially by line) isn’t the only thing that adds to value. > > > > Brad > > > > *From:* Andrea Aime > *Sent:* Saturday, 25 August 2018 12:02 AM > *To:* Brad Hards > *Cc:* Alessio Fabiani ; Geoserver-devel > > *Subject:* Re: [Geoserver-devel] [GSIP-164] Promoting geofence and > geofence-server as extensions modules > > > > Hi Brad, > > the test coverage requirements are indeed on the low side, maybe we should > discuss a separate GSIP about increasing them. > > But as far as rules go, Alessio's proposal is within them. > > > > Cheers > > Andrea > > > > On Sat, Aug 18, 2018 at 3:38 AM wrote: > > The proposal wiki page still says 2.13. Are you targeting 2.14 or 2.15? > > > > Also code coverage still seems pretty low for a security feature. Are you > satisfied that the important parts have appropriate validation? > > > > Brad > > > > *From:* Alessio Fabiani > *Sent:* Friday, 17 August 2018 1:57 AM > *To:* Geoserver-devel > *Subject:* [Geoserver-devel] [GSIP-164] Promoting geofence and > geofence-server as extensions modules > > > > Dear PSC, > > recently I worked on making geofence modules stable and complete enough to > be evaluated as official GeoServer extensions. > > > > Currently I have updated the checklist here > > > > https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/GSIP-164 > > > > and pushed a set of PRs [1][2][3][4] resulting in the following code > coverage results > > > > [image: image.png] > > [image: image.png] > > > > [1] https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/3058 > > [2] https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/3052 > > [3] https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/3046 > > [4] https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/3024 > > > > -- > > == > > GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit > http://goo.gl/it488V for more information. > == > Ing. Alessio Fabiani > > @alfa7691 > Founder/Technical Lead > > > > GeoSolutions S.A.S. > Via di Montramito 3/A - 55054 Massarosa (LU) - Italy > phone: +39 0584 962313 > fax: +39 0584 1660272 > mob: +39 331 6233686 > > > http://www.geo-solutions.it > http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it > --- > > *Con riferimento alla normativa sul trattamento dei dati personali (Reg. > UE 2016/679 - Regolamento generale sulla protezione dei dati “GDPR”), si > precisa che ogni circostanza inerente alla presente email (il suo > contenuto, gli eventuali allegati, etc.) è un dato la cui conoscenza è > riservata al/i solo/i destinatario/i indicati dallo scrivente. Se il > messaggio Le è giunto per errore, è tenuta/o a cancellarlo, ogni altra > operazione è illecita. Le sarei comunque grato se potesse darmene notizia.* > > > *This email is intended only for the person or entity to which it is > addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or > otherwise protected from dis
Re: [Geoserver-devel] [GSIP-164] Promoting geofence and geofence-server as extensions modules
I should have noted I already added my vote on the GSIP. I was looking for Alessio’s opinion on the quality of the tests – test coverage (especially by line) isn’t the only thing that adds to value. Brad From: Andrea Aime Sent: Saturday, 25 August 2018 12:02 AM To: Brad Hards Cc: Alessio Fabiani ; Geoserver-devel Subject: Re: [Geoserver-devel] [GSIP-164] Promoting geofence and geofence-server as extensions modules Hi Brad, the test coverage requirements are indeed on the low side, maybe we should discuss a separate GSIP about increasing them. But as far as rules go, Alessio's proposal is within them. Cheers Andrea On Sat, Aug 18, 2018 at 3:38 AM mailto:br...@frogmouth.net> > wrote: The proposal wiki page still says 2.13. Are you targeting 2.14 or 2.15? Also code coverage still seems pretty low for a security feature. Are you satisfied that the important parts have appropriate validation? Brad From: Alessio Fabiani mailto:alessio.fabi...@geo-solutions.it> > Sent: Friday, 17 August 2018 1:57 AM To: Geoserver-devel mailto:geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> > Subject: [Geoserver-devel] [GSIP-164] Promoting geofence and geofence-server as extensions modules Dear PSC, recently I worked on making geofence modules stable and complete enough to be evaluated as official GeoServer extensions. Currently I have updated the checklist here https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/GSIP-164 and pushed a set of PRs [1][2][3][4] resulting in the following code coverage results [1] https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/3058 [2] https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/3052 [3] https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/3046 [4] https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/3024 -- == GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit http://goo.gl/it488V for more information. == Ing. Alessio Fabiani @alfa7691 Founder/Technical Lead GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via di Montramito 3/A - 55054 Massarosa (LU) - Italy phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 1660272 mob: +39 331 6233686 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it --- Con riferimento alla normativa sul trattamento dei dati personali (Reg. UE 2016/679 - Regolamento generale sulla protezione dei dati “GDPR”), si precisa che ogni circostanza inerente alla presente email (il suo contenuto, gli eventuali allegati, etc.) è un dato la cui conoscenza è riservata al/i solo/i destinatario/i indicati dallo scrivente. Se il messaggio Le è giunto per errore, è tenuta/o a cancellarlo, ogni altra operazione è illecita. Le sarei comunque grato se potesse darmene notizia. This email is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. We remind that - as provided by European Regulation 2016/679 “GDPR” - copying, dissemination or use of this e-mail or the information herein by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email by mistake, please notify us immediately by telephone or e-mail. -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___ Geoserver-devel mailing list Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net <mailto:Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel -- Regards, Andrea Aime == GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit http://goo.gl/it488V for more information. == Ing. Andrea Aime @geowolf Technical Lead GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via di Montramito 3/A 55054 Massarosa (LU) phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 1660272 mob: +39 339 8844549 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it --- Con riferimento alla normativa sul trattamento dei dati personali (Reg. UE 2016/679 - Regolamento generale sulla protezione dei dati “GDPR”), si precisa che ogni circostanza inerente alla presente email (il suo contenuto, gli eventuali allegati, etc.) è un dato la cui conoscenza è riservata al/i solo/i destinatario/i indicati dallo scrivente. Se il messaggio Le è giunto per errore, è tenuta/o a cancellarlo, ogni altra operazione è illecita. Le sarei comunque grato se potesse darmene notizia. This email is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. We remind that - as provided by European Regulation 2016/679 “GDPR” - copying, dissemination or use of this e-mail or the information herein by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibite
Re: [Geoserver-devel] [GSIP-164] Promoting geofence and geofence-server as extensions modules
Hi Alessio, thanks for your work on the GSIP. I will take a look to the PRs within today. Thanks, Emanuele Alle 17:57:12 di Thursday 16 August 2018, Alessio Fabiani ha scritto: > Dear PSC, > recently I worked on making geofence modules stable and complete enough to > be evaluated as official GeoServer extensions. > > Currently I have updated the checklist here > > https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/GSIP-164 > > and pushed a set of PRs [1][2][3][4] resulting in the following code > coverage results > > [image: image.png] > [image: image.png] > > [1] https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/3058 > [2] https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/3052 > [3] https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/3046 > [4] https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/3024 -- Regards, Emanuele Tajariol == GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit http://goo.gl/it488V for more information. == Ing. Emanuele Tajariol Technical Lead GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via di Montramito 3/A 55054 Massarosa (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 1660272 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it --- Con riferimento alla normativa sul trattamento dei dati personali (Reg. UE 2016/679 - Regolamento generale sulla protezione dei dati “GDPR”), si precisa che ogni circostanza inerente alla presente email (il suo contenuto, gli eventuali allegati, etc.) è un dato la cui conoscenza è riservata al/i solo/i destinatario/i indicati dallo scrivente. Se il messaggio Le è giunto per errore, è tenuta/o a cancellarlo, ogni altra operazione è illecita. Le sarei comunque grato se potesse darmene notizia. This email is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. We remind that - as provided by European Regulation 2016/679 “GDPR” - copying, dissemination or use of this e-mail or the information herein by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email by mistake, please notify us immediately by telephone or e-mail. -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot ___ Geoserver-devel mailing list Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
