Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposal: upgrading the shapefile module to shapefile NG

2013-04-08 Thread Andrea Aime 
On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 4:22 PM, Andrea Aime wrote:

> Hi all,
> here is a proposal to upgrade the shapefile-ng module to supported status,
> and make shapefile become (temporarily) an unsupported module named
> shapefile-old:
> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Migrate+shapefile+to+shapefile-ng
>

Thanks Ian and Christian for adding the vote on the wiki page

Cheers
Andrea

-- 
==
GeoServer training in Milan, 6th & 7th June 2013!  Visit
http://geoserver.geo-solutions.it for more information.
==

Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical Lead

GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054  Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob: +39  339 8844549

http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it

---
--
Precog is a next-generation analytics platform capable of advanced
analytics on semi-structured data. The platform includes APIs for building
apps and a phenomenal toolset for data science. Developers can use
our toolset for easy data analysis & visualization. Get a free account!
http://www2.precog.com/precogplatform/slashdotnewsletter___
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

[Geotools-devel] [Hudson] Build failed in Hudson: geotools-8.x-nightly #273

2013-04-08 Thread Hudson 
See 

--
[...truncated 245 lines...]
[INFO] Retrieving previous metadata from opengeo
[INFO] Uploading repository metadata for: 'snapshot 
org.geotools.maven:jar-collector:8-SNAPSHOT'
[INFO] Retrieving previous metadata from opengeo
[INFO] Uploading repository metadata for: 'artifact 
org.geotools.maven:jar-collector'
[INFO] Retrieving previous metadata from opengeo
[INFO] Uploading repository metadata for: 'org.geotools.maven'
[INFO] Retrieving previous build number from opengeo
Uploading: 
http://repo.opengeo.org/org/geotools/maven/jar-collector/8-SNAPSHOT/jar-collector-8-SNAPSHOT-sources.jar
2833/?
  
[INFO] 
[INFO] Building Cross-modules javadoc
[INFO]task-segment: [clean, deploy]
[INFO] 
[INFO] [clean:clean {execution: default-clean}]
[INFO] Deleting directory 

[INFO] [git-commit-id:revision {execution: default}]
[INFO] [resources:resources {execution: default-resources}]
[INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources.
[INFO] skip non existing resourceDirectory 

[INFO] [compiler:compile {execution: default-compile}]
[INFO] Compiling 3 source files to 

[INFO] [resources:testResources {execution: default-testResources}]
[INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources.
[INFO] skip non existing resourceDirectory 

[INFO] [compiler:testCompile {execution: default-testCompile}]
[INFO] Compiling 1 source file to 

[INFO] [surefire:test {execution: default-test}]
[INFO] Tests are skipped.
[INFO] [jar:jar {execution: default-jar}]
[INFO] Building jar: 

[INFO] Preparing source:jar
[WARNING] Removing: jar from forked lifecycle, to prevent recursive invocation.
[INFO] [git-commit-id:revision {execution: default}]
[INFO] [source:jar {execution: attach-sources}]
[INFO] Building jar: 

[INFO] [install:install {execution: default-install}]
[INFO] Installing 

 to 
/usr/share/jetty/.m2/repository/org/geotools/maven/javadoc/8-SNAPSHOT/javadoc-8-SNAPSHOT.jar
[INFO] Installing 

 to 
/usr/share/jetty/.m2/repository/org/geotools/maven/javadoc/8-SNAPSHOT/javadoc-8-SNAPSHOT-sources.jar
[INFO] [deploy:deploy {execution: default-deploy}]
[INFO] Retrieving previous build number from opengeo
Uploading: 
http://repo.opengeo.org/org/geotools/maven/javadoc/8-SNAPSHOT/javadoc-8-SNAPSHOT.jar
4096/?
8192/?
11788/?
   
[INFO] Retrieving previous metadata from opengeo
[INFO] Uploading repository metadata for: 'snapshot 
org.geotools.maven:javadoc:8-SNAPSHOT'
[INFO] Uploading project information for javadoc 8-SNAPSHOT
[INFO] Retrieving previous metadata from opengeo
[INFO] Uploading repository metadata for: 'artifact org.geotools.maven:javadoc'
[INFO] Retrieving previous build number from opengeo
Uploading: 
http://repo.opengeo.org/org/geotools/maven/javadoc/8-SNAPSHOT/javadoc-8-SNAPSHOT-sources.jar
4096/?
8192/?
10454/?
   
[INFO] 
[INFO] Building JJTree and JavaCC compilers plugin
[INFO]task-segment: [clean, deploy]
[INFO] 
[INFO] [clean:clean {execution: default-clean}]
[INFO] Deleting directory 

[INFO] [git-commit-id:revision {execution: default}]
[WARNING] While downloading javacc:javacc:4.0
  This artifact has been relocated to net.java.dev.javacc:javacc:4.0.


[INFO] [plugin:descriptor {execution: default-descriptor}]
[INFO] Using 2 extractors.
[INFO] Applying extractor for language: java
[INFO] Extractor for language: java found 1 mojo descriptors.
[INFO] Applying extractor for language: bsh
[INFO] Extractor for language: bsh found 0 mojo descriptors.
[INFO] [resources:resources {execution: default-resources}]
[INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources.
[INFO

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geoserver-devel] NetCDF Plugin

2013-04-08 Thread Jody Garnett 
So I have reviewed https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/166  

And it looks good, I have provided some feedback as I went through the code - 
more the kind of stuff you would need to do to bring it up to supported status.

Any word on your paperwork?  

--  
Jody Garnett


On Tuesday, 19 March 2013 at 5:00 PM, Jody Garnett wrote:

> Sounds good, the pull-request provides a good venue for review/feedback.  
>  
> --  
> Jody Garnett
>  
>  
> On Tuesday, 19 March 2013 at 4:49 PM, Yancy Matherne wrote:
>  
> > Thanks Jody.  
> >  
> > I have passed the contribution agreement up the ladder. Hopefully the 
> > bosses can take care of that quickly. Should I get a pull request going now 
> > so people can start reviewing it?
> >  
> >  
> >  
> > Thanks,
> > Yancy Matherne
> > Software Developer
> >  
> > Geocent, LLC
> > 111 Veterans Blvd., Suite 1600
> > Metairie, LA  70005
> > O:  (504) 831-1900
> > E:  yancy.mathe...@geocent.com (mailto:yancy.mathe...@geocent.com)
> > http://www.geocent.com  
> > From: Jody Garnett [jody.garn...@gmail.com (mailto:jody.garn...@gmail.com)]
> > Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 11:38 PM
> > To: Yancy Matherne
> > Cc: Justin Deoliveira; geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net 
> > (mailto:geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net)
> > Subject: Re: [Geoserver-devel][Geotools-devel] NetCDF Plugin
> >  
> > Other than that I will take that as a request for commit access for a new 
> > unsupported module[1]. With justin's support you have a +1 that the module 
> > is a good idea :)  
> >  
> > We do ask that module maintainers sign (even for unsupported modules) sign 
> > a code contribution license (so the OSGeo Foundation can have copyright on 
> > the code). The above link has fairly clear instructions, and there is a bit 
> > more on the website[2], but since you already have a fork going it may be 
> > old news to you.  
> >  
> > If you need to bounce that contribution agreement off your employer, or 
> > have any questions, pleas ask. It is a new contribution agreement so we are 
> > keen for any feedback.  
> > --  
> > Jody Garnett
> > [1] http://docs.geotools.org/latest/developer/roles/commit.html  
> > [2] http://docs.geotools.org/latest/developer/procedures/create.html
> >  
> >  
> > On Saturday, 16 March 2013 at 11:10 AM, Yancy Matherne wrote:
> >  
> > > Hi All,
> > >  
> > > This is a continuation of a thread started in Geoserver-Devel list. I'm 
> > > adding the Geotools-Devel list since it was suggested that my code 
> > > changes are be suited in the GeoTools repository.  
> > >  
> > > A little background for the new list of people. We are working on a 
> > > NetCDF coverage store plugin for GeoServer/GeoTools and would like to 
> > > give it to the open source community. NetCDF is a gridded data format 
> > > used in the meteorology and oceanography communities.  
> > >  
> > > I made the suggested changes and moved it to my GeoTools fork:  
> > > https://github.com/geocent-yancy/geotools/tree/netcdf
> > >  
> > > I still need to update the README, just noticed it's a bit outdated. I 
> > > may get to it over the weekend, more likely on Monday. I also have to 
> > > make another branch or whatever for the GeoServer changes that will use 
> > > the GeoTools NetCDF plugin.
> > >  
> > >  
> > > Thanks,
> > > Yancy Matherne
> > > Software Developer
> > >  
> > > Geocent, LLC
> > > 111 Veterans Blvd., Suite 1600
> > > Metairie, LA  70005
> > > O:  (504) 831-1900
> > > E:  yancy.mathe...@geocent.com (mailto:yancy.mathe...@geocent.com)
> > > http://www.geocent.com  
> > > From: Justin Deoliveira [jdeol...@opengeo.org 
> > > (mailto:jdeol...@opengeo.org)]
> > > Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 10:38 AM
> > > To: Yancy Matherne
> > > Cc: Jody Garnett; geoserver-de...@lists.sourceforge.net 
> > > (mailto:geoserver-de...@lists.sourceforge.net)
> > > Subject: Re: [Geoserver-devel] NetCDF Plugin
> > >  
> > > Hey Yancy,  
> > >  
> > > Adding to Jody's comments I to think this makes more sense as a GeoTools 
> > > pull request. The only parts that need to remain in GeoServer could be 
> > > the profile that engates the dependency.  
> > >  
> > > Also, I suggest you follow the packaging naming convention of 
> > > org.geotools.gce.netcdf.   
> > >  
> > > -Justin  
> > >  
> > >  
> > >  
> > > On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 5:31 PM, Yancy Matherne 
> > > mailto:yancy.mathe...@geocent.com)> wrote:
> > > > Thanks for the feedback. We can certainly make those changes. We were 
> > > > trying to keep things simpler by having everything in one place. The 
> > > > NetCDFFormat can be moved to geotools if that is appropriate, the 
> > > > licenses do not matter to us. We actually have more test data but the 
> > > > files are unfortunately pretty big. We are going to try to get some 
> > > > more test files that are slices of the big data.  
> > > >  
> > > >  
> > > >  
> > > >  
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Yancy Matherne
> > > > Software Developer
> > > >  
> > > > Geocent, LLC
> > > > 111 Veterans

[Geotools-devel] [jira] (GEOT-4445) GML (& OSGB?) parser bug

2013-04-08 Thread A Melchior (JIRA) 














































A Melchior
 created  GEOT-4445


GML (& OSGB?) parser bug















Issue Type:


Bug



Assignee:


Unassigned


Attachments:


test.gml



Components:


xml



Created:


08/Apr/13 5:20 PM



Description:


The parser is unable to cast an int to a String when trying to create a SimpleFeature from a GML file containing OS Mastermap Topographic layer data.

Code:


 public static void main( String[] args ) throws Exception
{
System.out.println( "Hello World!" );

InputStream in = new FileInputStream("C:\\tmp\\Download_small+testset_63185\\mastermap-topo_150544\\test.gml");

GML gml = new GML(Version.WFS1_1);
CRSAuthorityFactory crsFac = ReferencingFactoryFinder.getCRSAuthorityFactory("EPSG", null);
CoordinateReferenceSystem osgbCrs = crsFac.createCoordinateReferenceSystem("EPSG:27700");
gml.setCoordinateReferenceSystem(osgbCrs);

SimpleFeatureIterator iter = gml.decodeFeatureIterator(in);
while (iter.hasNext())
{
	System.out.println(iter.next());
	break;
}

System.out.println("done!");
 }


Error log:

 
Hello World!
Apr 08, 2013 11:07:40 PM org.geotools.xml.impl.HTTPURIHandler createInputStream
INFO: http://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/xml/schema/v6/OSDNFFeatures.xsd
Apr 08, 2013 11:07:43 PM org.geotools.xml.Schemas getImports
INFO: Schema import wasn't resolved: http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink declared location: null
done!
Exception in thread "Thread-2" java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.RuntimeException: Parsing failed for featureCode: java.lang.ClassCastException: java.lang.Integer cannot be cast to java.lang.String
	at org.geotools.xml.StreamingParser$1.run(StreamingParser.java:250)
	at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: Parsing failed for featureCode: java.lang.ClassCastException: java.lang.Integer cannot be cast to java.lang.String
	at org.geotools.xml.impl.ParseExecutor.visit(ParseExecutor.java:164)
	at org.geotools.xml.impl.BindingWalker$BindingExecutionChain.execute(BindingWalker.java:227)
	at org.geotools.xml.impl.BindingWalker.walk(BindingWalker.java:186)
	at org.geotools.xml.impl.ElementHandlerImpl.endElement(ElementHandlerImpl.java:236)
	at org.geotools.xml.impl.ParserHandler.endElement(ParserHandler.java:719)
	at org.apache.xerces.parsers.AbstractSAXParser.endElement(Unknown Source)
	at org.apache.xerces.impl.XMLNSDocumentScannerImpl.scanEndElement(Unknown Source)
	at org.apache.xerces.impl.XMLDocumentFragmentScannerImpl$FragmentContentDispatcher.dispatch(Unknown Source)
	at org.apache.xerces.impl.XMLDocumentFragmentScannerImpl.scanDocument(Unknown Source)
	at org.apache.xerces.parsers.XML11Configuration.parse(Unknown Source)
	at org.apache.xerces.parsers.DTDConfiguration.parse(Unknown Source)
	at org.apache.xerces.parsers.XMLParser.parse(Unknown Source)
	at org.apache.xerces.parsers.AbstractSAXParser.parse(Unknown Source)
	at javax.xml.parsers.SAXParser.parse(Unknown Source)
	at javax.xml.parsers.SAXParser.parse(Unknown Source)
	at org.geotools.xml.StreamingParser$1.run(StreamingParser.java:246)
	... 1 more
Caused by: java.lang.ClassCastException: java.lang.Integer cannot be cast to java.lang.String
	at org.geotools.xs.bindings.XSUnsignedLongBinding.parse(XSUnsignedLongBinding.java:93)
	at org.geotools.xml.impl.ParseExecutor.visit(ParseExecutor.java:153)
	... 16 more



Most relevant part of the GML (see attachment for more):


"osgb101161051405">
10066
3
2008-04-27
Terrain And Height



And relevant part of the XSD (http://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/xml/schema/v6/OSDNFFeatures.xsd):


This defines the properties common to all Ordnance Survey features.



"featureCode" type="unsignedInt" minOccurs="0"/>
"version" type="unsignedInt"/>
"versionDate" type="date"/>
"theme" type="osgb:themeType" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>


"AbstractFeatureType">

"en">
Abstract base type for all ordnance survey features.  Extends the gml abstract
feature in o

Re: [Geotools-devel] Tentative release schedule for the next 6 months

2013-04-08 Thread Andrea Aime 
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 2:02 PM, Ian Turton  wrote:

> Thanks Jody, I've put my name down against  9.4 2.3.42013-07-18 Ian Turton
>

Thanks a lot :-)

Cheers
Andrea


-- 
==
GeoServer training in Milan, 6th & 7th June 2013!  Visit
http://geoserver.geo-solutions.it for more information.
==

Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical Lead

GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054  Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob: +39  339 8844549

http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it

---
--
Minimize network downtime and maximize team effectiveness.
Reduce network management and security costs.Learn how to hire 
the most talented Cisco Certified professionals. Visit the 
Employer Resources Portal
http://www.cisco.com/web/learning/employer_resources/index.html___
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Re: [Geotools-devel] Tentative release schedule for the next 6 months

2013-04-08 Thread Ian Turton 
Thanks Jody, I've put my name down against 9.42.3.42013-07-18Ian Turton
I'll be sure to yell (loudly ) if I get stuck

Ian


On 8 April 2013 12:21, Jody Garnett  wrote:

> Ian I would be happy to shadow you for one - it is automated abut someone
> still needs to drive.
>
> I would recommend signing up for a stable release as the most effort needs
> to go into making up the release announcement.
>
> --
> Jody Garnett
>
> On 08/04/2013, at 6:41 PM, Ian Turton  wrote:
>
> how much work is involved - if it isn't too much I can probably do one.
>
> Ian
>
>
> On 6 April 2013 13:31, Andrea Aime  wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Mark Prins  wrote:
>>
>>> a typo snuck in there, second row of the first table says:
>>>  9.1 2.2.12013-04-18 Andrea Aimethat should be geoserver 2.3.1
>>>
>>
>> Right, fixed. And actually there were two, I already made 2.3.0 and meant
>> to do
>> 2.3.2 not 2.3.1
>>
>> Soo... three days, and only me and Jody filled some slots? Anybody else?
>>
>> Cheers
>> Andrea
>>
>> --
>> ==
>> Our support, Your Success! Visit http://opensdi.geo-solutions.it for
>> more information.
>> ==
>>
>> Ing. Andrea Aime
>> @geowolf
>> Technical Lead
>>
>> GeoSolutions S.A.S.
>> Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
>> 55054  Massarosa (LU)
>> Italy
>> phone: +39 0584 962313
>> fax: +39 0584 1660272
>> mob: +39  339 8844549
>>
>> http://www.geo-solutions.it
>> http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
>>
>> ---
>>
>>
>> --
>> Minimize network downtime and maximize team effectiveness.
>> Reduce network management and security costs.Learn how to hire
>> the most talented Cisco Certified professionals. Visit the
>> Employer Resources Portal
>> http://www.cisco.com/web/learning/employer_resources/index.html
>> ___
>> GeoTools-Devel mailing list
>> GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Ian Turton
>
>
> --
> Minimize network downtime and maximize team effectiveness.
> Reduce network management and security costs.Learn how to hire
> the most talented Cisco Certified professionals. Visit the
> Employer Resources Portal
> http://www.cisco.com/web/learning/employer_resources/index.html
>
> ___
> GeoTools-Devel mailing list
> GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
>
>


-- 
Ian Turton
--
Minimize network downtime and maximize team effectiveness.
Reduce network management and security costs.Learn how to hire 
the most talented Cisco Certified professionals. Visit the 
Employer Resources Portal
http://www.cisco.com/web/learning/employer_resources/index.html___
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Re: [Geotools-devel] Tentative release schedule for the next 6 months

2013-04-08 Thread Jody Garnett 
Ian I would be happy to shadow you for one - it is automated abut someone still 
needs to drive. 

I would recommend signing up for a stable release as the most effort needs to 
go into making up the release announcement.  

--
Jody Garnett

On 08/04/2013, at 6:41 PM, Ian Turton  wrote:

> how much work is involved - if it isn't too much I can probably do one.
> 
> Ian
> 
> 
> On 6 April 2013 13:31, Andrea Aime  wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Mark Prins  wrote:
>>> a typo snuck in there, second row of the first table says:
>>> 9.1  2.2.1  2013-04-18   Andrea Aime
>>> that should be geoserver 2.3.1
>> 
>> Right, fixed. And actually there were two, I already made 2.3.0 and meant to 
>> do
>> 2.3.2 not 2.3.1
>> 
>> Soo... three days, and only me and Jody filled some slots? Anybody else?
>> 
>> Cheers
>> Andrea
>>  
>> -- 
>> ==
>> Our support, Your Success! Visit http://opensdi.geo-solutions.it for more 
>> information.
>> ==
>> 
>> Ing. Andrea Aime 
>> @geowolf
>> Technical Lead
>> 
>> GeoSolutions S.A.S.
>> Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
>> 55054  Massarosa (LU)
>> Italy
>> phone: +39 0584 962313
>> fax: +39 0584 1660272
>> mob: +39  339 8844549
>> 
>> http://www.geo-solutions.it
>> http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
>> 
>> ---
>> 
>> --
>> Minimize network downtime and maximize team effectiveness.
>> Reduce network management and security costs.Learn how to hire
>> the most talented Cisco Certified professionals. Visit the
>> Employer Resources Portal
>> http://www.cisco.com/web/learning/employer_resources/index.html
>> ___
>> GeoTools-Devel mailing list
>> GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Ian Turton
> --
> Minimize network downtime and maximize team effectiveness.
> Reduce network management and security costs.Learn how to hire 
> the most talented Cisco Certified professionals. Visit the 
> Employer Resources Portal
> http://www.cisco.com/web/learning/employer_resources/index.html
> ___
> GeoTools-Devel mailing list
> GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
--
Minimize network downtime and maximize team effectiveness.
Reduce network management and security costs.Learn how to hire 
the most talented Cisco Certified professionals. Visit the 
Employer Resources Portal
http://www.cisco.com/web/learning/employer_resources/index.html___
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Re: [Geotools-devel] Tentative release schedule for the next 6 months

2013-04-08 Thread Andrea Aime 
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Ian Turton  wrote:

> how much work is involved - if it isn't too much I can probably do one.
>

Not too much, it's normally mostly a run script and wait thing, then write
wiki
pages, blogs and mails around to tell the world about it.

That said, it also sometimes happens it gets more involved, if something in
the
scripts is not working. It's possible to get out of it, all the release
scripts are
in github so one can go and fix them directly

Release guides here:
http://docs.geotools.org/latest/userguide/
http://docs.geoserver.org/latest/en/developer/release-guide/index.html

Cheers
Andrea

-- 
==
GeoServer training in Milan, 6th & 7th June 2013!  Visit
http://geoserver.geo-solutions.it for more information.
==

Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical Lead

GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054  Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob: +39  339 8844549

http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it

---
--
Minimize network downtime and maximize team effectiveness.
Reduce network management and security costs.Learn how to hire 
the most talented Cisco Certified professionals. Visit the 
Employer Resources Portal
http://www.cisco.com/web/learning/employer_resources/index.html___
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Re: [Geotools-devel] Tentative release schedule for the next 6 months

2013-04-08 Thread Ian Turton 
how much work is involved - if it isn't too much I can probably do one.

Ian


On 6 April 2013 13:31, Andrea Aime  wrote:

> On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Mark Prins  wrote:
>
>> a typo snuck in there, second row of the first table says:
>>  9.1 2.2.12013-04-18 Andrea Aimethat should be geoserver 2.3.1
>>
>
> Right, fixed. And actually there were two, I already made 2.3.0 and meant
> to do
> 2.3.2 not 2.3.1
>
> Soo... three days, and only me and Jody filled some slots? Anybody else?
>
> Cheers
> Andrea
>
> --
> ==
> Our support, Your Success! Visit http://opensdi.geo-solutions.it for more
> information.
> ==
>
> Ing. Andrea Aime
> @geowolf
> Technical Lead
>
> GeoSolutions S.A.S.
> Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
> 55054  Massarosa (LU)
> Italy
> phone: +39 0584 962313
> fax: +39 0584 1660272
> mob: +39  339 8844549
>
> http://www.geo-solutions.it
> http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
>
> ---
>
>
> --
> Minimize network downtime and maximize team effectiveness.
> Reduce network management and security costs.Learn how to hire
> the most talented Cisco Certified professionals. Visit the
> Employer Resources Portal
> http://www.cisco.com/web/learning/employer_resources/index.html
> ___
> GeoTools-Devel mailing list
> GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
>
>


-- 
Ian Turton
--
Minimize network downtime and maximize team effectiveness.
Reduce network management and security costs.Learn how to hire 
the most talented Cisco Certified professionals. Visit the 
Employer Resources Portal
http://www.cisco.com/web/learning/employer_resources/index.html___
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposal: upgrading the shapefile module to shapefile NG

2013-04-08 Thread Andrea Aime 
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 1:34 AM, Jody Garnett  wrote:

>  I tried to provide word from uDig - we already use shapefile-ng in order
> to take advantage of sorting.
>
> I have filled in a few tasks on your proposal (to specific code examples
> needing updating).
>

Ah, sorry, I updated the docs as well but forgot to re-push after the
changes.
Updated the pull request, doc changes in particular are here:
https://github.com/aaime/geotools/commit/d67d4d2b871dd4c06f8c7303a5cda4e318114e48


>
> Thoughts:
> - tempted to introduce matching constructors, and marking them deprecated
> to give client code a chance to clean up? I don't think we deprecated this
> constructors previously?
>

I had the same thought, but the old situation was so messy that I preferred
to just break compatibility
(it's still less of a hassle as the other API changes that we routinely
make imho).
I'm good with adding back the old methods in deprecated form if people
prefer to.


> - Code examples still make use of ShapefileDataStore.forceCRS method -
> other than that we should be good.
>

That method is still there, no changes.

Cheers
Andrea


-- 
==
Our support, Your Success! Visit http://opensdi.geo-solutions.it for more
information.
==

Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical Lead

GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054  Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob: +39  339 8844549

http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it

---
--
Minimize network downtime and maximize team effectiveness.
Reduce network management and security costs.Learn how to hire 
the most talented Cisco Certified professionals. Visit the 
Employer Resources Portal
http://www.cisco.com/web/learning/employer_resources/index.html___
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel