[Geotools-devel] Reminder: GeoTools / GeoServer Meeting at 19:30 UTC on Tuesday

[Ben Caradoc-Davies]

GeoTools / GeoServer committee meeting on Skype at 19:30 UTC on Tuesday:
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=GeoTools+%2F+GeoServer+Meeting=2017=2=21=19=30=0=1

Please note my apologies: I will be unable to attend this meeting.

-- 
Ben Caradoc-Davies 
Director
Transient Software Limited 
New Zealand

--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
___
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Re: [Geotools-devel] Next skype meeting?

[Ben Caradoc-Davies]

Yes, the next one is 19:30 UTC. They alternate 19:30 UTC / 16:30 UTC. I 
will be away and unable to attend this one, but will send out an early 
reminder to day, for your convenience.

Kind regards,
Ben.

On 18/02/17 04:26, Ian Turton wrote:
> According to my calendar that one is at 19:30 utc, would I missed the last
> one as I was ill so I may be wrong.
>
> Ian
>
> On 17 February 2017 at 13:32, Justin Deoliveira  wrote:
>
>> Hey folks,
>>
>> I am going to make an effort to try and attend the bi-weekly skype
>> meetings. Based on the last reminder email from Ben the next meeting will
>> be Tuesday, Feb 21, at 16:30 UTC? Do I have that right?
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> -Justin
>>
>> 
>> --
>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>> engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>> ___
>> GeoTools-Devel mailing list
>> GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>
>
>
> ___
> GeoTools-Devel mailing list
> GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
>

-- 
Ben Caradoc-Davies 
Director
Transient Software Limited 
New Zealand

--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
___
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

[Geotools-devel] removing abstract datastore and support classes

[Jody Garnett]

PR available here: Remove AbstractDataStore and support classes (GEOT-5649)


Please review :)
--
Jody Garnett
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Re: [Geotools-devel] Mollweide misses parameter

[Jody Garnett]

Moved it for you here https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/browse/GEOT-5652

The release schedule is available online
, next
releases scheduled for the 20th (due to holiday). There is usually a
release every two months; if you do get close to a deadline you can always
volunteer to issue an extra release.

--
Jody Garnett

On 10 February 2017 at 01:59, Marco Peters  wrote:

> OK. I’ve created a ticket for it (https://osgeo-org.atlassian.n
> et/browse/GEOT-5641).
>
> Accidentally I’ve created another issue in the wrong project. (
> https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/browse/GEO-260). This can be deleted.
>
>
>
> The pull request is also created.
>
> https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/1473
>
>
>
> Currently we are not close to a deadline, but do you already have an idea
> when you will release the next version?
>
>
>
> Cheers
>
>   Marco
>
>
>
>
>
> *Von:* Jody Garnett [mailto:jody.garn...@gmail.com]
> *Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 9. Februar 2017 20:55
> *An:* Marco Peters 
> *Cc:* GeoTools Developers 
> *Betreff:* Re: [Geotools-devel] Mollweide misses parameter
>
>
>
> Thank you that would be appreciated, are you in position to work on this
> issue yourself? The number of volunteers interested in working on projects
> is ... limited (so you may need to look at support options if you are close
> to a deadline).
>
>
> --
>
> Jody Garnett
>
>
>
> On 9 February 2017 at 02:54, Marco Peters  t.de> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I just noticed that the Mollweide projection misses two parameters. Namely
> the parameters *False_Easting* and *False_Northing*.
>
>
>
> Following some links where these parameters are listed.
>
>
>
> http://spatialreference.org/ref/esri/54009/
>
> http://www.bluemarblegeo.com/knowledgebase/geocalc/classdef/
> projection/projections/molleweide.html
>
> http://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/latest/map/projections/mollweide.htm
>
>
>
> I’m not sure about the Wagner projections. So, I would leave them
> unchanged.
>
>
>
> Shall I create a ticket for it?
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 
> --
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> ___
> GeoTools-Devel mailing list
> GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
>
>
>
> 
> --
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> ___
> GeoTools-Devel mailing list
> GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
>
>
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Re: [Geotools-devel] WFS-NG testing issue

[Andrea Aime]

On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 4:52 PM, Ian Turton  wrote:

> I've been poking at the WFS-NG module to look at the issues with sorting
> and paging.
>
> While doing this I came across a nasty issue with the WFS 2.0.0 bboxes, I
> needed to reverse the axis order of the bbox in
> testFeatureReaderWithFilterBBox()
>
> @Test
> public void testFeatureReaderWithFilterBBox() throws Exception {
> if (Boolean.FALSE.equals(serviceAvailable)) {
> return;
> }
> ReferencedEnvelope bbox = wfs.getFeatureSource(testType.
> FEATURETYPENAME).getBounds();
> ReferencedEnvelope env = new ReferencedEnvelope(bbox.minY(),
> bbox.minX(), bbox.maxY(), bbox.maxX(), bbox.crs());
> WFSOnlineTestSupport.doFeatureReaderWithBBox(wfs,
> testType.FEATURETYPENAME, env);
> }
>
> while this passes it doesn't seem right.
>
> I suspect that the real answer is to append the crs to the end of the bbox
> in the filter that's sent, but I'm not completely sure.
>

If you are doing GET requests by all means add the CRS as the 5th element
of the bbox spec, the specification
is pretty horrible with the 4 elements version, while most implementation
treat that as a bbox in the native CRS,
the letter of the spec actually says to treat it as WGS84 coordinates (!!!)

Cheers
Andrea


-- 
==
GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit
http://goo.gl/it488V for more information.
==

Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical Lead

GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via di Montramito 3/A
55054  Massarosa (LU)
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob: +39  339 8844549

http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it

*AVVERTENZE AI SENSI DEL D.Lgs. 196/2003*

Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica e/o
nel/i file/s allegato/i sono da considerarsi strettamente riservate. Il
loro utilizzo è consentito esclusivamente al destinatario del messaggio,
per le finalità indicate nel messaggio stesso. Qualora riceviate questo
messaggio senza esserne il destinatario, Vi preghiamo cortesemente di
darcene notizia via e-mail e di procedere alla distruzione del messaggio
stesso, cancellandolo dal Vostro sistema. Conservare il messaggio stesso,
divulgarlo anche in parte, distribuirlo ad altri soggetti, copiarlo, od
utilizzarlo per finalità diverse, costituisce comportamento contrario ai
principi dettati dal D.Lgs. 196/2003.



The information in this message and/or attachments, is intended solely for
the attention and use of the named addressee(s) and may be confidential or
proprietary in nature or covered by the provisions of privacy act
(Legislative Decree June, 30 2003, no.196 - Italy's New Data Protection
Code).Any use not in accord with its purpose, any disclosure, reproduction,
copying, distribution, or either dissemination, either whole or partial, is
strictly forbidden except previous formal approval of the named
addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please contact
immediately the sender by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the
information in this message that has been received in error. The sender
does not give any warranty or accept liability as the content, accuracy or
completeness of sent messages and accepts no responsibility  for changes
made after they were sent or for other risks which arise as a result of
e-mail transmission, viruses, etc.

---
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

[Geotools-devel] WFS-NG testing issue

[Ian Turton]

I've been poking at the WFS-NG module to look at the issues with sorting
and paging.

While doing this I came across a nasty issue with the WFS 2.0.0 bboxes, I
needed to reverse the axis order of the bbox
in testFeatureReaderWithFilterBBox()

@Test
public void testFeatureReaderWithFilterBBox() throws Exception {
if (Boolean.FALSE.equals(serviceAvailable)) {
return;
}
ReferencedEnvelope bbox =
wfs.getFeatureSource(testType.FEATURETYPENAME).getBounds();
ReferencedEnvelope env = new ReferencedEnvelope(bbox.minY(),
bbox.minX(), bbox.maxY(), bbox.maxX(), bbox.crs());
WFSOnlineTestSupport.doFeatureReaderWithBBox(wfs,
testType.FEATURETYPENAME, env);
}

while this passes it doesn't seem right.

I suspect that the real answer is to append the crs to the end of the bbox
in the filter that's sent, but I'm not completely sure.

Can anyone confirm I'm on the right track before I head off down the rabbit
hole?

cheers

Ian

-- 
Ian Turton
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Re: [Geotools-devel] Next skype meeting?

[Ian Turton]

According to my calendar that one is at 19:30 utc, would I missed the last
one as I was ill so I may be wrong.

Ian

On 17 February 2017 at 13:32, Justin Deoliveira  wrote:

> Hey folks,
>
> I am going to make an effort to try and attend the bi-weekly skype
> meetings. Based on the last reminder email from Ben the next meeting will
> be Tuesday, Feb 21, at 16:30 UTC? Do I have that right?
>
> Thanks!
>
> -Justin
>
> 
> --
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> ___
> GeoTools-Devel mailing list
> GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
>
>


-- 
Ian Turton
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

[Geotools-devel] Next skype meeting?

[Justin Deoliveira]

Hey folks,

I am going to make an effort to try and attend the bi-weekly skype
meetings. Based on the last reminder email from Ben the next meeting will
be Tuesday, Feb 21, at 16:30 UTC? Do I have that right?

Thanks!

-Justin
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

[Geotools-devel] [JIRA] (GEOT-5650) WFS-NG ignores sortby for 1.0.0 & 2.0.0

[Ian Turton (JIRA)]

Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Ian Turton created an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 GeoTools /  GEOT-5650  
 
 
  WFS-NG ignores sortby for 1.0.0 & 2.0.0   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Issue Type: 
  Bug  
 
 
Affects Versions: 
 16.1  
 
 
Assignee: 
 Unassigned  
 
 
Components: 
 wfs-ng  
 
 
Created: 
 17/Feb/17 11:35 AM  
 
 
Priority: 
  Medium  
 
 
Reporter: 
 Ian Turton  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 If you pass a sorted query to a WFSFeatureSource it is ignored if the request version is 1.0.0 or 2.0.0 but not 1.1.0. The response at GeoServer is  

Request: getFeature
 

handle = GeoTools 17-SNAPSHOT(75b7dedf87aec993a92e924ccf1d9ac4053a9434) WFS 2.0.0 DataStore @astun-desktop#1
 

service = WFS
 

version = 2.0.0
 

baseUrl = http://localhost:8080/geoserver/
 

count = 10