Re: [Geotools-devel] A bunch of color operation functions

2017-04-25 Thread Jody Garnett 
Wonder if we split the "hint" into two - one for evaluating and one for
writing.

I am saying evaluating (rather than parsing) since the issue is found when
mbstyle constructs a filterfactory.literal("red").  The mbstyle parser
cannot control the use of hints when the renderer uses the resulting
Expression - literal.evaluates( feature, Color.class);

Looking at SLDTransformer encodeValue, there does not appear to be a place
to pass in a hint.

if (expression instanceof Literal) {
// use more compact encoding
element(elementName, expression.evaluate(null,
String.class), atts);
} else {
start(elementName, atts);
filterTranslator.encode(expression);
end(elementName);
}

Actually for expression evaluation I do not see a way to pass in a hint to
Converters.


--
Jody Garnett

On 25 April 2017 at 07:46, Andrea Aime  wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Jody Garnett 
> wrote:
>
>> I do not mind, it has the "danger" of making people write non standard
>> SLD files.
>>
>
> I don't see it as a big problem per se, we are not OGC cops (otherwise we
> would not have any vendor option),
> as long as the documentation is clear that using named color is a vendor
> extension.
>
>
>>
>> I know the SLD spec says it supports SvgParameters but they only have
>> examples of hex:
>>
>> *The “stroke” SvgParameter element gives the solid color that will be
>> used for a stroke. The color value is RGB-encoded using two hexadecimal
>> digits per primary-color component, in the order Red, Green, Blue, prefixed
>> with a hash (#) sign. The hexadecimal digits between A and F may be in
>> either uppercase or lowercase. For example, full red is encoded as
>> “#ff” (with no quotation marks). If the “stroke” SvgParameter element
>> is absent, the default color is defined to be black (“#00”) in the
>> context of the LineSymbolizer. *
>>
>> I am sure for SVG based rendering engines they just pass the
>> SvgParameters through. So I do not see any harm in being more relaxed on
>> parsing.
>>
>> As for converting to a string, writing out Color.RED as "red", what are
>> your thoughts?
>>
>
> Now that is more problematic, and should be controllable, e.g., when
> writing SLD
> we should (imho) try to stick to a compliant color expression.
> And well, having multiple choices, I guess one should be preferred (the
> current one?) unless a hint is passed to the converter?
>
> Cheers
> Andrea
>
>
> --
> ==
> GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit
> http://goo.gl/it488V for more information.
> ==
>
> Ing. Andrea Aime
> @geowolf
> Technical Lead
>
> GeoSolutions S.A.S.
> Via di Montramito 3/A
> 55054  Massarosa (LU)
> phone: +39 0584 962313 <+39%200584%20962313>
> fax: +39 0584 1660272 <+39%200584%20166%200272>
> mob: +39  339 8844549 <+39%20339%20884%204549>
>
> http://www.geo-solutions.it
> http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
>
> *AVVERTENZE AI SENSI DEL D.Lgs. 196/2003*
>
> Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica e/o
> nel/i file/s allegato/i sono da considerarsi strettamente riservate. Il
> loro utilizzo è consentito esclusivamente al destinatario del messaggio,
> per le finalità indicate nel messaggio stesso. Qualora riceviate questo
> messaggio senza esserne il destinatario, Vi preghiamo cortesemente di
> darcene notizia via e-mail e di procedere alla distruzione del messaggio
> stesso, cancellandolo dal Vostro sistema. Conservare il messaggio stesso,
> divulgarlo anche in parte, distribuirlo ad altri soggetti, copiarlo, od
> utilizzarlo per finalità diverse, costituisce comportamento contrario ai
> principi dettati dal D.Lgs. 196/2003.
>
>
>
> The information in this message and/or attachments, is intended solely for
> the attention and use of the named addressee(s) and may be confidential or
> proprietary in nature or covered by the provisions of privacy act
> (Legislative Decree June, 30 2003, no.196 - Italy's New Data Protection
> Code).Any use not in accord with its purpose, any disclosure, reproduction,
> copying, distribution, or either dissemination, either whole or partial, is
> strictly forbidden except previous formal approval of the named
> addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please contact
> immediately the sender by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the
> information in this message that has been received in error. The sender
> does not give any warranty or accept liability as the content, accuracy or
> completeness of sent messages and accepts no responsibility  for changes
> made after they were sent or for other risks which arise as a result of
> e-mail transmission, viruses, etc.
>
> ---
>
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most

Re: [Geotools-devel] A bunch of color operation functions

2017-04-25 Thread Andrea Aime 
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Jody Garnett 
wrote:

> I do not mind, it has the "danger" of making people write non standard SLD
> files.
>

I don't see it as a big problem per se, we are not OGC cops (otherwise we
would not have any vendor option),
as long as the documentation is clear that using named color is a vendor
extension.


>
> I know the SLD spec says it supports SvgParameters but they only have
> examples of hex:
>
> *The “stroke” SvgParameter element gives the solid color that will be used
> for a stroke. The color value is RGB-encoded using two hexadecimal digits
> per primary-color component, in the order Red, Green, Blue, prefixed with a
> hash (#) sign. The hexadecimal digits between A and F may be in either
> uppercase or lowercase. For example, full red is encoded as “#ff” (with
> no quotation marks). If the “stroke” SvgParameter element is absent, the
> default color is defined to be black (“#00”) in the context of the
> LineSymbolizer. *
>
> I am sure for SVG based rendering engines they just pass the SvgParameters
> through. So I do not see any harm in being more relaxed on parsing.
>
> As for converting to a string, writing out Color.RED as "red", what are
> your thoughts?
>

Now that is more problematic, and should be controllable, e.g., when
writing SLD
we should (imho) try to stick to a compliant color expression.
And well, having multiple choices, I guess one should be preferred (the
current one?) unless a hint is passed to the converter?

Cheers
Andrea


-- 
==
GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit
http://goo.gl/it488V for more information.
==

Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical Lead

GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via di Montramito 3/A
55054  Massarosa (LU)
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob: +39  339 8844549

http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it

*AVVERTENZE AI SENSI DEL D.Lgs. 196/2003*

Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica e/o
nel/i file/s allegato/i sono da considerarsi strettamente riservate. Il
loro utilizzo è consentito esclusivamente al destinatario del messaggio,
per le finalità indicate nel messaggio stesso. Qualora riceviate questo
messaggio senza esserne il destinatario, Vi preghiamo cortesemente di
darcene notizia via e-mail e di procedere alla distruzione del messaggio
stesso, cancellandolo dal Vostro sistema. Conservare il messaggio stesso,
divulgarlo anche in parte, distribuirlo ad altri soggetti, copiarlo, od
utilizzarlo per finalità diverse, costituisce comportamento contrario ai
principi dettati dal D.Lgs. 196/2003.



The information in this message and/or attachments, is intended solely for
the attention and use of the named addressee(s) and may be confidential or
proprietary in nature or covered by the provisions of privacy act
(Legislative Decree June, 30 2003, no.196 - Italy's New Data Protection
Code).Any use not in accord with its purpose, any disclosure, reproduction,
copying, distribution, or either dissemination, either whole or partial, is
strictly forbidden except previous formal approval of the named
addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please contact
immediately the sender by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the
information in this message that has been received in error. The sender
does not give any warranty or accept liability as the content, accuracy or
completeness of sent messages and accepts no responsibility  for changes
made after they were sent or for other risks which arise as a result of
e-mail transmission, viruses, etc.

---
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Re: [Geotools-devel] A bunch of color operation functions

2017-04-25 Thread Jody Garnett 
I do not mind, it has the "danger" of making people write non standard SLD
files.

I know the SLD spec says it supports SvgParameters but they only have
examples of hex:

*The “stroke” SvgParameter element gives the solid color that will be used
for a stroke. The color value is RGB-encoded using two hexadecimal digits
per primary-color component, in the order Red, Green, Blue, prefixed with a
hash (#) sign. The hexadecimal digits between A and F may be in either
uppercase or lowercase. For example, full red is encoded as “#ff” (with
no quotation marks). If the “stroke” SvgParameter element is absent, the
default color is defined to be black (“#00”) in the context of the
LineSymbolizer. *

I am sure for SVG based rendering engines they just pass the SvgParameters
through. So I do not see any harm in being more relaxed on parsing.

As for converting to a string, writing out Color.RED as "red", what are
your thoughts?



--
Jody Garnett

On 24 April 2017 at 23:42, Andrea Aime  wrote:

> Wondering if there is an actual need for a function to start with.
> What's the harm in just allowing the CSS color converter to be used as
> normal?
> it would allow named color usage in all styling languages.
>
> Cheers
> Andrea
>
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Re: [Geotools-devel] A bunch of color operation functions

2017-04-25 Thread Andrea Aime 
Wondering if there is an actual need for a function to start with.
What's the harm in just allowing the CSS color converter to be used as
normal?
it would allow named color usage in all styling languages.

Cheers
Andrea
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Re: [Geotools-devel] A bunch of color operation functions

2017-04-24 Thread Jody Garnett 
I do want to move that function into the mix - but wanted to ask about
naming it correctly first. Now that you have a bunch more functions the
conversation becomes more important :)

I was thinking about naming it "css" (since it speaks a wide range of css
string representations), rather than "color".

I will rename, and make a PR to remove this to main alongside your new
functions.

I also liked your percentage converter, nice.
--
Jody

On 24 April 2017 at 00:52, Andrea Aime  wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 7:34 AM, Jody Garnett 
> wrote:
>
>> That is interesting, I just made a function similar in nature here:
>>
>> - https://github.com/geotools/geotools/blob/master/modules/u
>> nsupported/mbstyle/src/main/java/org/geotools/mbstyle/functi
>> on/ColorFunction.java
>>
>> We should combine forces.
>>
>
> On my side I'm done, feel free to use what I contributed for the benefit
> of all styling languages for mbstyle too.
> Maybe you want to move that function where other styling languages can use
> it too? :-P
>
> Cheers
> Andrea
>
> --
> ==
> GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit
> http://goo.gl/it488V for more information.
> ==
>
> Ing. Andrea Aime
> @geowolf
> Technical Lead
>
> GeoSolutions S.A.S.
> Via di Montramito 3/A
> 55054  Massarosa (LU)
> phone: +39 0584 962313 <+39%200584%20962313>
> fax: +39 0584 1660272 <+39%200584%20166%200272>
> mob: +39  339 8844549 <+39%20339%20884%204549>
>
> http://www.geo-solutions.it
> http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
>
> *AVVERTENZE AI SENSI DEL D.Lgs. 196/2003*
>
> Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica e/o
> nel/i file/s allegato/i sono da considerarsi strettamente riservate. Il
> loro utilizzo è consentito esclusivamente al destinatario del messaggio,
> per le finalità indicate nel messaggio stesso. Qualora riceviate questo
> messaggio senza esserne il destinatario, Vi preghiamo cortesemente di
> darcene notizia via e-mail e di procedere alla distruzione del messaggio
> stesso, cancellandolo dal Vostro sistema. Conservare il messaggio stesso,
> divulgarlo anche in parte, distribuirlo ad altri soggetti, copiarlo, od
> utilizzarlo per finalità diverse, costituisce comportamento contrario ai
> principi dettati dal D.Lgs. 196/2003.
>
>
>
> The information in this message and/or attachments, is intended solely for
> the attention and use of the named addressee(s) and may be confidential or
> proprietary in nature or covered by the provisions of privacy act
> (Legislative Decree June, 30 2003, no.196 - Italy's New Data Protection
> Code).Any use not in accord with its purpose, any disclosure, reproduction,
> copying, distribution, or either dissemination, either whole or partial, is
> strictly forbidden except previous formal approval of the named
> addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please contact
> immediately the sender by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the
> information in this message that has been received in error. The sender
> does not give any warranty or accept liability as the content, accuracy or
> completeness of sent messages and accepts no responsibility  for changes
> made after they were sent or for other risks which arise as a result of
> e-mail transmission, viruses, etc.
>
> ---
>
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Re: [Geotools-devel] A bunch of color operation functions

2017-04-24 Thread Andrea Aime 
On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 7:34 AM, Jody Garnett 
wrote:

> That is interesting, I just made a function similar in nature here:
>
> - https://github.com/geotools/geotools/blob/master/modules/
> unsupported/mbstyle/src/main/java/org/geotools/mbstyle/
> function/ColorFunction.java
>
> We should combine forces.
>

On my side I'm done, feel free to use what I contributed for the benefit of
all styling languages for mbstyle too.
Maybe you want to move that function where other styling languages can use
it too? :-P

Cheers
Andrea

-- 
==
GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit
http://goo.gl/it488V for more information.
==

Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical Lead

GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via di Montramito 3/A
55054  Massarosa (LU)
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob: +39  339 8844549

http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it

*AVVERTENZE AI SENSI DEL D.Lgs. 196/2003*

Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica e/o
nel/i file/s allegato/i sono da considerarsi strettamente riservate. Il
loro utilizzo è consentito esclusivamente al destinatario del messaggio,
per le finalità indicate nel messaggio stesso. Qualora riceviate questo
messaggio senza esserne il destinatario, Vi preghiamo cortesemente di
darcene notizia via e-mail e di procedere alla distruzione del messaggio
stesso, cancellandolo dal Vostro sistema. Conservare il messaggio stesso,
divulgarlo anche in parte, distribuirlo ad altri soggetti, copiarlo, od
utilizzarlo per finalità diverse, costituisce comportamento contrario ai
principi dettati dal D.Lgs. 196/2003.



The information in this message and/or attachments, is intended solely for
the attention and use of the named addressee(s) and may be confidential or
proprietary in nature or covered by the provisions of privacy act
(Legislative Decree June, 30 2003, no.196 - Italy's New Data Protection
Code).Any use not in accord with its purpose, any disclosure, reproduction,
copying, distribution, or either dissemination, either whole or partial, is
strictly forbidden except previous formal approval of the named
addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please contact
immediately the sender by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the
information in this message that has been received in error. The sender
does not give any warranty or accept liability as the content, accuracy or
completeness of sent messages and accepts no responsibility  for changes
made after they were sent or for other risks which arise as a result of
e-mail transmission, viruses, etc.

---
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Re: [Geotools-devel] A bunch of color operation functions

2017-04-23 Thread Jody Garnett 
That is interesting, I just made a function similar in nature here:

-
https://github.com/geotools/geotools/blob/master/modules/unsupported/mbstyle/src/main/java/org/geotools/mbstyle/function/ColorFunction.java

We should combine forces.

--
Jody Garnett

On 23 April 2017 at 02:46, Andrea Aime  wrote:

> Hi,
> this pull request adds a bunch of lesscss.org color operation functions:
> https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/1562
>
> At first I was thinking to add them in the CSS module, but realized I
> could actually
> just make them standard GeoTools functions and add some syntactic sugar to
> the
> CSS module to make them look as native ones.
>
> Mind, it's not the full set of lesscss.org color functions, the blending
> functions
> are not there (volunteers welcomed) and those manipulating the alpha
> channel
> are also missing as opacity is handled in a different way in SLD
>
> Cheers
> Andrea
>
> --
> ==
> GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit
> http://goo.gl/it488V for more information.
> ==
>
> Ing. Andrea Aime
> @geowolf
> Technical Lead
>
> GeoSolutions S.A.S.
> Via di Montramito 3/A
> 55054  Massarosa (LU)
> phone: +39 0584 962313 <+39%200584%20962313>
> fax: +39 0584 1660272 <+39%200584%20166%200272>
> mob: +39  339 8844549 <+39%20339%20884%204549>
>
> http://www.geo-solutions.it
> http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
>
> *AVVERTENZE AI SENSI DEL D.Lgs. 196/2003*
>
> Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica e/o
> nel/i file/s allegato/i sono da considerarsi strettamente riservate. Il
> loro utilizzo è consentito esclusivamente al destinatario del messaggio,
> per le finalità indicate nel messaggio stesso. Qualora riceviate questo
> messaggio senza esserne il destinatario, Vi preghiamo cortesemente di
> darcene notizia via e-mail e di procedere alla distruzione del messaggio
> stesso, cancellandolo dal Vostro sistema. Conservare il messaggio stesso,
> divulgarlo anche in parte, distribuirlo ad altri soggetti, copiarlo, od
> utilizzarlo per finalità diverse, costituisce comportamento contrario ai
> principi dettati dal D.Lgs. 196/2003.
>
>
>
> The information in this message and/or attachments, is intended solely for
> the attention and use of the named addressee(s) and may be confidential or
> proprietary in nature or covered by the provisions of privacy act
> (Legislative Decree June, 30 2003, no.196 - Italy's New Data Protection
> Code).Any use not in accord with its purpose, any disclosure, reproduction,
> copying, distribution, or either dissemination, either whole or partial, is
> strictly forbidden except previous formal approval of the named
> addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please contact
> immediately the sender by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the
> information in this message that has been received in error. The sender
> does not give any warranty or accept liability as the content, accuracy or
> completeness of sent messages and accepts no responsibility  for changes
> made after they were sent or for other risks which arise as a result of
> e-mail transmission, viruses, etc.
>
> ---
>
> 
> --
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> ___
> GeoTools-Devel mailing list
> GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
>
>
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Re: [Geotools-devel] A bunch of color operation functions

2017-04-23 Thread Justin Deoliveira 
A big +1 on making them central, give in that we now have sld, css, and
ysld I think as much as we can share among them the better!

On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 3:46 AM Andrea Aime 
wrote:

> Hi,
> this pull request adds a bunch of lesscss.org color operation functions:
> https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/1562
>
> At first I was thinking to add them in the CSS module, but realized I
> could actually
> just make them standard GeoTools functions and add some syntactic sugar to
> the
> CSS module to make them look as native ones.
>
> Mind, it's not the full set of lesscss.org color functions, the blending
> functions
> are not there (volunteers welcomed) and those manipulating the alpha
> channel
> are also missing as opacity is handled in a different way in SLD
>
> Cheers
> Andrea
>
> --
> ==
> GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit
> http://goo.gl/it488V for more information.
> ==
>
> Ing. Andrea Aime
> @geowolf
> Technical Lead
>
> GeoSolutions S.A.S.
> Via di Montramito 3/A
> 55054  Massarosa (LU)
> phone: +39 0584 962313 <+39%200584%20962313>
> fax: +39 0584 1660272 <+39%200584%20166%200272>
> mob: +39  339 8844549 <+39%20339%20884%204549>
>
> http://www.geo-solutions.it
> http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
>
> *AVVERTENZE AI SENSI DEL D.Lgs. 196/2003*
>
> Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica e/o
> nel/i file/s allegato/i sono da considerarsi strettamente riservate. Il
> loro utilizzo è consentito esclusivamente al destinatario del messaggio,
> per le finalità indicate nel messaggio stesso. Qualora riceviate questo
> messaggio senza esserne il destinatario, Vi preghiamo cortesemente di
> darcene notizia via e-mail e di procedere alla distruzione del messaggio
> stesso, cancellandolo dal Vostro sistema. Conservare il messaggio stesso,
> divulgarlo anche in parte, distribuirlo ad altri soggetti, copiarlo, od
> utilizzarlo per finalità diverse, costituisce comportamento contrario ai
> principi dettati dal D.Lgs. 196/2003.
>
>
>
> The information in this message and/or attachments, is intended solely for
> the attention and use of the named addressee(s) and may be confidential or
> proprietary in nature or covered by the provisions of privacy act
> (Legislative Decree June, 30 2003, no.196 - Italy's New Data Protection
> Code).Any use not in accord with its purpose, any disclosure, reproduction,
> copying, distribution, or either dissemination, either whole or partial, is
> strictly forbidden except previous formal approval of the named
> addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please contact
> immediately the sender by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the
> information in this message that has been received in error. The sender
> does not give any warranty or accept liability as the content, accuracy or
> completeness of sent messages and accepts no responsibility  for changes
> made after they were sent or for other risks which arise as a result of
> e-mail transmission, viruses, etc.
>
> ---
>
> --
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> ___
> GeoTools-Devel mailing list
> GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
>
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

[Geotools-devel] A bunch of color operation functions

2017-04-23 Thread Andrea Aime 
Hi,
this pull request adds a bunch of lesscss.org color operation functions:
https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/1562

At first I was thinking to add them in the CSS module, but realized I could
actually
just make them standard GeoTools functions and add some syntactic sugar to
the
CSS module to make them look as native ones.

Mind, it's not the full set of lesscss.org color functions, the blending
functions
are not there (volunteers welcomed) and those manipulating the alpha channel
are also missing as opacity is handled in a different way in SLD

Cheers
Andrea

-- 
==
GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit
http://goo.gl/it488V for more information.
==

Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical Lead

GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via di Montramito 3/A
55054  Massarosa (LU)
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob: +39  339 8844549

http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it

*AVVERTENZE AI SENSI DEL D.Lgs. 196/2003*

Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica e/o
nel/i file/s allegato/i sono da considerarsi strettamente riservate. Il
loro utilizzo è consentito esclusivamente al destinatario del messaggio,
per le finalità indicate nel messaggio stesso. Qualora riceviate questo
messaggio senza esserne il destinatario, Vi preghiamo cortesemente di
darcene notizia via e-mail e di procedere alla distruzione del messaggio
stesso, cancellandolo dal Vostro sistema. Conservare il messaggio stesso,
divulgarlo anche in parte, distribuirlo ad altri soggetti, copiarlo, od
utilizzarlo per finalità diverse, costituisce comportamento contrario ai
principi dettati dal D.Lgs. 196/2003.



The information in this message and/or attachments, is intended solely for
the attention and use of the named addressee(s) and may be confidential or
proprietary in nature or covered by the provisions of privacy act
(Legislative Decree June, 30 2003, no.196 - Italy's New Data Protection
Code).Any use not in accord with its purpose, any disclosure, reproduction,
copying, distribution, or either dissemination, either whole or partial, is
strictly forbidden except previous formal approval of the named
addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please contact
immediately the sender by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the
information in this message that has been received in error. The sender
does not give any warranty or accept liability as the content, accuracy or
completeness of sent messages and accepts no responsibility  for changes
made after they were sent or for other risks which arise as a result of
e-mail transmission, viruses, etc.

---
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel