Re: [Geotools-devel] hudson sphinx 0.6.1 vs 0.6.7

2010-07-13 Thread David Winslow
On 07/13/2010 02:54 AM, Andrea Aime wrote:
> Jody Garnett ha scritto:
>
>> I have commented out part of the docs build; the only clue I have is a
>> different version number of sphinx being used by Hudson.
>>
>> Q1:  Can I ask someone with sphinx 0.6.1 to try builds docs? You will
>> need to uncomment some lines from build.xml. In testing on my own
>> using sphinx 0.6.7 docs builds fine.
>>  
> I only had 0.6.4, trying a "sudo easy_install -U sphinx" upgraded
> me to 1.0b2. Both build the documents fine (but that also means
> I now of no way to upgrade to 0.6.7)
>
>
>> Q2: How to we raise an issue to upgrade sphinx to 0.6.7 on hudson
>>  
> Someone has to double check all documentation, geotools and geoserver,
> can be still properly built with 1.0b2, and then we can run easy_install
> there.
>
> I have no time to double check though (and I'm also assuming the
> build server uses easy_install, which I think it's likely, but
> I don't know for sure, I did not install it).
>
> Cheers
> Andrea
>
>
just fyi: You can specify a version number when using easy_install like so:

easy_install sphinx==0.6.7

--
David Winslow
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org/

--
This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
___
Geotools-devel mailing list
Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel


Re: [Geotools-devel] hudson sphinx 0.6.1 vs 0.6.7

2010-07-13 Thread Jody Garnett
Cool; I think I am going to let hudson have a crack at it - perhaps the change 
to conf.py will be enough.

Jody

On 13/07/2010, at 6:48 PM, Andrea Aime wrote:

> Jody Garnett ha scritto:
>> On 13/07/2010, at 4:54 PM, Andrea Aime wrote:
>>> Jody Garnett ha scritto:
 I have commented out part of the docs build; the only clue I have is a
 different version number of sphinx being used by Hudson.
 Q1:  Can I ask someone with sphinx 0.6.1 to try builds docs? You will
 need to uncomment some lines from build.xml. In testing on my own
 using sphinx 0.6.7 docs builds fine.
>>> I only had 0.6.4, trying a "sudo easy_install -U sphinx" upgraded
>>> me to 1.0b2. Both build the documents fine (but that also means
>>> I now of no way to upgrade to 0.6.7)
>> Did you uncomment the section of build.xml causing trouble?
>>   
>>  
>>  
>>
> 
> Nope, I did not. Updated once more to get your latest
> changes, uncommented the html part. It seems to be working fine
> 
> Cheers
> Andrea
> 
> -- 
> Andrea Aime
> OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
> Expert service straight from the developers.


--
This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
___
Geotools-devel mailing list
Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel


Re: [Geotools-devel] hudson sphinx 0.6.1 vs 0.6.7

2010-07-13 Thread Andrea Aime
Jody Garnett ha scritto:
> On 13/07/2010, at 4:54 PM, Andrea Aime wrote:
> 
>> Jody Garnett ha scritto:
>>> I have commented out part of the docs build; the only clue I have is a
>>> different version number of sphinx being used by Hudson.
>>> Q1:  Can I ask someone with sphinx 0.6.1 to try builds docs? You will
>>> need to uncomment some lines from build.xml. In testing on my own
>>> using sphinx 0.6.7 docs builds fine.
>> I only had 0.6.4, trying a "sudo easy_install -U sphinx" upgraded
>> me to 1.0b2. Both build the documents fine (but that also means
>> I now of no way to upgrade to 0.6.7)
> 
> Did you uncomment the section of build.xml causing trouble?
> 
>
>   
>   
> 

Nope, I did not. Updated once more to get your latest
changes, uncommented the html part. It seems to be working fine

Cheers
Andrea

-- 
Andrea Aime
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Expert service straight from the developers.

--
This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
___
Geotools-devel mailing list
Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel


Re: [Geotools-devel] hudson sphinx 0.6.1 vs 0.6.7

2010-07-13 Thread Jody Garnett
On 13/07/2010, at 4:54 PM, Andrea Aime wrote:

> Jody Garnett ha scritto:
>> I have commented out part of the docs build; the only clue I have is a
>> different version number of sphinx being used by Hudson.
>> Q1:  Can I ask someone with sphinx 0.6.1 to try builds docs? You will
>> need to uncomment some lines from build.xml. In testing on my own
>> using sphinx 0.6.7 docs builds fine.
> 
> I only had 0.6.4, trying a "sudo easy_install -U sphinx" upgraded
> me to 1.0b2. Both build the documents fine (but that also means
> I now of no way to upgrade to 0.6.7)

Did you uncomment the section of build.xml causing trouble?

   
  
  



Jody

>> Q2: How to we raise an issue to upgrade sphinx to 0.6.7 on hudson
> 
> Someone has to double check all documentation, geotools and geoserver,
> can be still properly built with 1.0b2, and then we can run easy_install
> there.
> 
> I have no time to double check though (and I'm also assuming the build server 
> uses easy_install, which I think it's likely, but
> I don't know for sure, I did not install it).

I can check that it builds before hand; I want to make sure upgrading solves 
the problem first.

Jody
--
This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
___
Geotools-devel mailing list
Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel


Re: [Geotools-devel] hudson sphinx 0.6.1 vs 0.6.7

2010-07-12 Thread Andrea Aime
Jody Garnett ha scritto:
> I have commented out part of the docs build; the only clue I have is a
> different version number of sphinx being used by Hudson.
> 
> Q1:  Can I ask someone with sphinx 0.6.1 to try builds docs? You will
> need to uncomment some lines from build.xml. In testing on my own
> using sphinx 0.6.7 docs builds fine.

I only had 0.6.4, trying a "sudo easy_install -U sphinx" upgraded
me to 1.0b2. Both build the documents fine (but that also means
I now of no way to upgrade to 0.6.7)

> Q2: How to we raise an issue to upgrade sphinx to 0.6.7 on hudson

Someone has to double check all documentation, geotools and geoserver,
can be still properly built with 1.0b2, and then we can run easy_install
there.

I have no time to double check though (and I'm also assuming the
build server uses easy_install, which I think it's likely, but
I don't know for sure, I did not install it).

Cheers
Andrea

-- 
Andrea Aime
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Expert service straight from the developers.

--
This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
___
Geotools-devel mailing list
Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel


[Geotools-devel] hudson sphinx 0.6.1 vs 0.6.7

2010-07-12 Thread Jody Garnett
I have commented out part of the docs build; the only clue I have is a
different version number of sphinx being used by Hudson.

Q1:  Can I ask someone with sphinx 0.6.1 to try builds docs? You will
need to uncomment some lines from build.xml. In testing on my own
using sphinx 0.6.7 docs builds fine.

Q2: How to we raise an issue to upgrade sphinx to 0.6.7 on hudson

--
This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
___
Geotools-devel mailing list
Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel