Change in osmo-bts[master]: A-bis/RSL: refactor handling of BS Power IE (power reduction)
laforge has submitted this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/18835 ) Change subject: A-bis/RSL: refactor handling of BS Power IE (power reduction) .. A-bis/RSL: refactor handling of BS Power IE (power reduction) According to 3GPP TS 08.58, section 9.3.4, BS Power IE indicates the transmission power attenuation on a particular channel: +--+-+-+ | Reserved (3) | FPC (1) | Power level (4) | +--+-+-+ so let's change handling of this IE as follows: - s/bs_power/bs_power_red/g, so it reflects 'reduction'; - store power attenuation value in dB, not in 2 db steps; - get rid of ms_power_ctrl.bts_tx_pwr, it's always 0 anyway; - fix rsl_tx_meas_res(): use lchan->bs_power_red; - always check if FPC (Fast Power Control) flag is set; - we don't support it, so reject messages containing it; - fix rsl_rx_chan_activ(): properly apply the bitmask. Change-Id: I16cc50dfca102030380a06e16c234d5f6698f38f --- M include/osmo-bts/gsm_data_shared.h M include/osmo-bts/tx_power.h M src/common/rsl.c M src/common/scheduler.c M src/common/tx_power.c M src/common/vty.c M tests/tx_power/tx_power_test.c 7 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-) Approvals: pespin: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve laforge: Looks good to me, approved Jenkins Builder: Verified fixeria: Verified diff --git a/include/osmo-bts/gsm_data_shared.h b/include/osmo-bts/gsm_data_shared.h index 7cfbfeb..bbc1bd4 100644 --- a/include/osmo-bts/gsm_data_shared.h +++ b/include/osmo-bts/gsm_data_shared.h @@ -193,8 +193,6 @@ uint8_t flags; /* RSL measurement result number, 0 at lchan_act */ uint8_t res_nr; - /* current Tx power level of the BTS */ - uint8_t bts_tx_pwr; /* number of measurements stored in array below */ uint8_t num_ul_meas; struct bts_ul_meas uplink[MAX_NUM_UL_MEAS]; @@ -267,8 +265,9 @@ uint8_t max; bool fixed; } ms_power_ctrl; - /* Power levels for BTS */ - uint8_t bs_power; + + /* BTS power reduction (in dB) */ + uint8_t bs_power_red; struct msgb *pending_rel_ind_msg; diff --git a/include/osmo-bts/tx_power.h b/include/osmo-bts/tx_power.h index 10129eb..8f33100 100644 --- a/include/osmo-bts/tx_power.h +++ b/include/osmo-bts/tx_power.h @@ -62,15 +62,15 @@ int get_p_nominal_mdBm(struct gsm_bts_trx *trx); -int get_p_target_mdBm(struct gsm_bts_trx *trx, uint8_t bs_power_ie); +int get_p_target_mdBm(struct gsm_bts_trx *trx, uint8_t bs_power_red); int get_p_target_mdBm_lchan(struct gsm_lchan *lchan); int get_p_actual_mdBm(struct gsm_bts_trx *trx, int p_target_mdBm); -int get_p_trxout_target_mdBm(struct gsm_bts_trx *trx, uint8_t bs_power_ie); +int get_p_trxout_target_mdBm(struct gsm_bts_trx *trx, uint8_t bs_power_red); int get_p_trxout_target_mdBm_lchan(struct gsm_lchan *lchan); -int get_p_trxout_actual_mdBm(struct gsm_bts_trx *trx, uint8_t bs_power_ie); +int get_p_trxout_actual_mdBm(struct gsm_bts_trx *trx, uint8_t bs_power_red); int get_p_trxout_actual_mdBm_lchan(struct gsm_lchan *lchan); int power_ramp_start(struct gsm_bts_trx *trx, int p_total_tgt_mdBm, int bypass); diff --git a/src/common/rsl.c b/src/common/rsl.c index f057a89..b518245 100644 --- a/src/common/rsl.c +++ b/src/common/rsl.c @@ -60,6 +60,9 @@ //#define FAKE_CIPH_MODE_COMPL +/* Parse power attenuation (in dB) from BS Power IE (see 9.3.4) */ +#define BS_POWER2DB(bs_power) \ + ((bs_power & 0x0f) * 2) static int rsl_tx_error_report(struct gsm_bts_trx *trx, uint8_t cause, const uint8_t *chan_nr, const uint8_t *link_id, const struct msgb *orig_msg); @@ -1001,7 +1004,7 @@ lchan->tch_mode = 0; memset(>encr, 0, sizeof(lchan->encr)); memset(>ho, 0, sizeof(lchan->ho)); - lchan->bs_power = 0; + lchan->bs_power_red = 0; memset(>ms_power_ctrl, 0, sizeof(lchan->ms_power_ctrl)); lchan->rqd_ta = 0; copy_sacch_si_to_lchan(lchan); @@ -1146,8 +1149,18 @@ } /* 9.3.4 BS Power */ - if (TLVP_PRES_LEN(, RSL_IE_BS_POWER, 1)) - lchan->bs_power = *TLVP_VAL(, RSL_IE_BS_POWER); + if (TLVP_PRES_LEN(, RSL_IE_BS_POWER, 1)) { + if (*TLVP_VAL(, RSL_IE_BS_POWER) & (1 << 4)) { + LOGPLCHAN(lchan, DRSL, LOGL_NOTICE, + "Fast Power Control is not supported\n"); + return rsl_tx_chan_act_nack(lchan, RSL_ERR_SERV_OPT_UNIMPL); + } + + lchan->bs_power_red = BS_POWER2DB(*TLVP_VAL(, RSL_IE_BS_POWER)); + LOGPLCHAN(lchan, DRSL, LOGL_DEBUG, "BS Power attenuation %u dB\n", + lchan->bs_power_red); + } + /*
Change in osmo-bts[master]: A-bis/RSL: refactor handling of BS Power IE (power reduction)
laforge has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/18835 ) Change subject: A-bis/RSL: refactor handling of BS Power IE (power reduction) .. Patch Set 2: Code-Review+2 -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/18835 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: osmo-bts Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I16cc50dfca102030380a06e16c234d5f6698f38f Gerrit-Change-Number: 18835 Gerrit-PatchSet: 2 Gerrit-Owner: fixeria Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 08:32:04 + Gerrit-HasComments: No Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Change in osmo-bts[master]: A-bis/RSL: refactor handling of BS Power IE (power reduction)
fixeria has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/18835 ) Change subject: A-bis/RSL: refactor handling of BS Power IE (power reduction) .. Patch Set 2: Verified+1 Makes both BTS_Tests.TC_rsl_bs_pwr_static_ass and BTS_Tests.TC_rsl_bs_pwr_static_power_control pass. -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/18835 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: osmo-bts Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I16cc50dfca102030380a06e16c234d5f6698f38f Gerrit-Change-Number: 18835 Gerrit-PatchSet: 2 Gerrit-Owner: fixeria Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 18:45:34 + Gerrit-HasComments: No Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Change in osmo-bts[master]: A-bis/RSL: refactor handling of BS Power IE (power reduction)
pespin has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/18835 ) Change subject: A-bis/RSL: refactor handling of BS Power IE (power reduction) .. Patch Set 2: Code-Review+1 -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/18835 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: osmo-bts Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I16cc50dfca102030380a06e16c234d5f6698f38f Gerrit-Change-Number: 18835 Gerrit-PatchSet: 2 Gerrit-Owner: fixeria Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 15:57:13 + Gerrit-HasComments: No Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Change in osmo-bts[master]: A-bis/RSL: refactor handling of BS Power IE (power reduction)
Hello Jenkins Builder, I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/18835 to look at the new patch set (#2). Change subject: A-bis/RSL: refactor handling of BS Power IE (power reduction) .. A-bis/RSL: refactor handling of BS Power IE (power reduction) According to 3GPP TS 08.58, section 9.3.4, BS Power IE indicates the transmission power attenuation on a particular channel: +--+-+-+ | Reserved (3) | FPC (1) | Power level (4) | +--+-+-+ so let's change handling of this IE as follows: - s/bs_power/bs_power_red/g, so it reflects 'reduction'; - store power attenuation value in dB, not in 2 db steps; - get rid of ms_power_ctrl.bts_tx_pwr, it's always 0 anyway; - fix rsl_tx_meas_res(): use lchan->bs_power_red; - always check if FPC (Fast Power Control) flag is set; - we don't support it, so reject messages containing it; - fix rsl_rx_chan_activ(): properly apply the bitmask. Change-Id: I16cc50dfca102030380a06e16c234d5f6698f38f --- M include/osmo-bts/gsm_data_shared.h M include/osmo-bts/tx_power.h M src/common/rsl.c M src/common/scheduler.c M src/common/tx_power.c M src/common/vty.c M tests/tx_power/tx_power_test.c 7 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-) git pull ssh://gerrit.osmocom.org:29418/osmo-bts refs/changes/35/18835/2 -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/18835 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: osmo-bts Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I16cc50dfca102030380a06e16c234d5f6698f38f Gerrit-Change-Number: 18835 Gerrit-PatchSet: 2 Gerrit-Owner: fixeria Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria Gerrit-CC: pespin Gerrit-MessageType: newpatchset
Change in osmo-bts[master]: A-bis/RSL: refactor handling of BS Power IE (power reduction)
fixeria has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/18835 ) Change subject: A-bis/RSL: refactor handling of BS Power IE (power reduction) .. Patch Set 1: (2 comments) https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/18835/1/include/osmo-bts/gsm_data_shared.h File include/osmo-bts/gsm_data_shared.h: https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/18835/1/include/osmo-bts/gsm_data_shared.h@269 PS1, Line 269: /* BTS power reduction (2 dB steps) */ > I think it makes more sense to keep it in dB internally, like we do for all > other power, pwr reducti […] ACK. https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/18835/1/src/common/tx_power.c File src/common/tx_power.c: https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/18835/1/src/common/tx_power.c@116 PS1, Line 116: int get_p_trxout_target_mdBm(struct gsm_bts_trx *trx, uint8_t bs_power_ie) I'll change it in the next patch set. > but not sure if this code is actually expecting 1dB unit instead 2db step. The code does * 2, so it's correct. I'll change it too. -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/18835 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: osmo-bts Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I16cc50dfca102030380a06e16c234d5f6698f38f Gerrit-Change-Number: 18835 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Owner: fixeria Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria Gerrit-CC: pespin Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 15:52:51 + Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Change in osmo-bts[master]: A-bis/RSL: refactor handling of BS Power IE (power reduction)
pespin has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/18835 ) Change subject: A-bis/RSL: refactor handling of BS Power IE (power reduction) .. Patch Set 1: (2 comments) https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/18835/1/include/osmo-bts/gsm_data_shared.h File include/osmo-bts/gsm_data_shared.h: https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/18835/1/include/osmo-bts/gsm_data_shared.h@269 PS1, Line 269: /* BTS power reduction (2 dB steps) */ I think it makes more sense to keep it in dB internally, like we do for all other power, pwr reduction/attenuations. https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/18835/1/src/common/tx_power.c File src/common/tx_power.c: https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/18835/1/src/common/tx_power.c@116 PS1, Line 116: int get_p_trxout_target_mdBm(struct gsm_bts_trx *trx, uint8_t bs_power_ie) here too: bs_power_red_ie. BTW, current name may be wrong too, as in it says "ie" meaning it's 2db step, but not sure if this code is actually expecting 1dB unit instead 2db step. -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/18835 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: osmo-bts Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I16cc50dfca102030380a06e16c234d5f6698f38f Gerrit-Change-Number: 18835 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Owner: fixeria Gerrit-CC: pespin Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 15:12:59 + Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Change in osmo-bts[master]: A-bis/RSL: refactor handling of BS Power IE (power reduction)
fixeria has uploaded this change for review. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/18835 ) Change subject: A-bis/RSL: refactor handling of BS Power IE (power reduction) .. A-bis/RSL: refactor handling of BS Power IE (power reduction) According to 3GPP TS 08.58, section 9.3.4, BS Power IE indicates the transmission power attenuation on a particular channel: +--+-+-+ | Reserved (3) | FPC (1) | Power level (4) | +--+-+-+ so let's change handling of this IE as follows: - s/bs_power/bs_power_red/g, so it reflects 'reduction'; - get rid of ms_power_ctrl.bts_tx_pwr, it's always 0 anyway; - fix rsl_tx_meas_res(): use lchan->bs_power_red; - always check if FPC (Fast Power Control) flag is set; - we don't support it, so reject messages containing it; - fix rsl_rx_chan_activ(): properly apply the bitmask. Change-Id: I16cc50dfca102030380a06e16c234d5f6698f38f --- M include/osmo-bts/gsm_data_shared.h M src/common/rsl.c M src/common/tx_power.c M src/common/vty.c 4 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) git pull ssh://gerrit.osmocom.org:29418/osmo-bts refs/changes/35/18835/1 diff --git a/include/osmo-bts/gsm_data_shared.h b/include/osmo-bts/gsm_data_shared.h index 7cfbfeb..c3dba3c 100644 --- a/include/osmo-bts/gsm_data_shared.h +++ b/include/osmo-bts/gsm_data_shared.h @@ -193,8 +193,6 @@ uint8_t flags; /* RSL measurement result number, 0 at lchan_act */ uint8_t res_nr; - /* current Tx power level of the BTS */ - uint8_t bts_tx_pwr; /* number of measurements stored in array below */ uint8_t num_ul_meas; struct bts_ul_meas uplink[MAX_NUM_UL_MEAS]; @@ -267,8 +265,9 @@ uint8_t max; bool fixed; } ms_power_ctrl; - /* Power levels for BTS */ - uint8_t bs_power; + + /* BTS power reduction (2 dB steps) */ + uint8_t bs_power_red; struct msgb *pending_rel_ind_msg; diff --git a/src/common/rsl.c b/src/common/rsl.c index f057a89..b9c9695 100644 --- a/src/common/rsl.c +++ b/src/common/rsl.c @@ -1001,7 +1001,7 @@ lchan->tch_mode = 0; memset(>encr, 0, sizeof(lchan->encr)); memset(>ho, 0, sizeof(lchan->ho)); - lchan->bs_power = 0; + lchan->bs_power_red = 0; memset(>ms_power_ctrl, 0, sizeof(lchan->ms_power_ctrl)); lchan->rqd_ta = 0; copy_sacch_si_to_lchan(lchan); @@ -1146,8 +1146,15 @@ } /* 9.3.4 BS Power */ - if (TLVP_PRES_LEN(, RSL_IE_BS_POWER, 1)) - lchan->bs_power = *TLVP_VAL(, RSL_IE_BS_POWER); + if (TLVP_PRES_LEN(, RSL_IE_BS_POWER, 1)) { + if (*TLVP_VAL(, RSL_IE_BS_POWER) & (1 << 4)) { + LOGPLCHAN(lchan, DRSL, LOGL_NOTICE, "Fast Power Control is not supported\n"); + return rsl_tx_chan_act_nack(lchan, RSL_ERR_SERV_OPT_UNIMPL); + } + + lchan->bs_power_red = *TLVP_VAL(, RSL_IE_BS_POWER) & 0x0f; + } + /* 9.3.13 MS Power */ if (TLVP_PRES_LEN(, RSL_IE_MS_POWER, 1)) { lchan->ms_power_ctrl.max = *TLVP_VAL(, RSL_IE_MS_POWER) & 0x1F; @@ -1664,21 +1671,13 @@ return 0; } -/* See TS 48.058 Section 9.3.4 */ -static int bs_power_attenuation_dB(uint8_t bs_power) -{ - /* the lower nibble contains the number of 2dB steps that the BS power is reduced compared -* to its nominal transmit power */ - return - ((bs_power & 0xF) *2); -} - /* 8.4.16 BS POWER CONTROL */ static int rsl_rx_bs_pwr_ctrl(struct msgb *msg) { struct abis_rsl_dchan_hdr *dch = msgb_l2(msg); struct gsm_lchan *lchan = msg->lchan; struct tlv_parsed tp; - uint8_t new_bs_power; + uint8_t old_bs_power_red; rsl_tlv_parse(, msgb_l3(msg), msgb_l3len(msg)); @@ -1686,12 +1685,16 @@ if (!TLVP_PRES_LEN(, RSL_IE_BS_POWER, 1)) return rsl_tx_error_report(msg->trx, RSL_ERR_MAND_IE_ERROR, >chan_nr, NULL, msg); - new_bs_power = *TLVP_VAL(, RSL_IE_BS_POWER); + if (*TLVP_VAL(, RSL_IE_BS_POWER) & (1 << 4)) { + LOGPLCHAN(lchan, DRSL, LOGL_NOTICE, "Fast Power Control is not supported\n"); + return rsl_tx_error_report(msg->trx, RSL_ERR_SERV_OPT_UNIMPL, >chan_nr, NULL, msg); + } + + old_bs_power_red = lchan->bs_power_red; + lchan->bs_power_red = *TLVP_VAL(, RSL_IE_BS_POWER) & 0x0f; LOGPLCHAN(lchan, DRSL, LOGL_INFO, "BS POWER CONTROL Attenuation %d -> %d dB\n", - bs_power_attenuation_dB(lchan->bs_power), bs_power_attenuation_dB(new_bs_power)); - - lchan->bs_power = new_bs_power; + old_bs_power_red * 2, lchan->bs_power_red * 2); /* 9.3.31 MS Power Parameters (O) */ if