[MERGED] libosmocore[master]: osmo_sock_get_name(): clearly indicate local and remote
Neels Hofmeyr has submitted this change and it was merged. Change subject: osmo_sock_get_name(): clearly indicate local and remote .. osmo_sock_get_name(): clearly indicate local and remote In a string like 127.0.0.1:2905<->127.0.0.1:60661 it is hard to tell which is the local part. I'd have expected it on the left, but it is actually on the right. To avoid doubt and bypass bikesheds on which side should be what, clearly mark the two sides as remote and local. (r=127.0.0.1:2905<->l=127.0.0.1:60661) Change-Id: I43dcc6a1906429bd0955fd7fe2eb5b8495b592d8 --- M src/socket.c M tests/socket/socket_test.c 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) Approvals: Harald Welte: Looks good to me, approved Jenkins Builder: Verified diff --git a/src/socket.c b/src/socket.c index b74edd4..28d9b1c 100644 --- a/src/socket.c +++ b/src/socket.c @@ -607,11 +607,11 @@ if (rc < 0) goto local_only; - return talloc_asprintf(ctx, "(%s:%s<->%s:%s)", hostbuf_r, portbuf_r, + return talloc_asprintf(ctx, "(r=%s:%s<->l=%s:%s)", hostbuf_r, portbuf_r, hostbuf_l, portbuf_l); local_only: - return talloc_asprintf(ctx, "(NULL<->%s:%s)", hostbuf_l, portbuf_l); + return talloc_asprintf(ctx, "(r=NULL<->l=%s:%s)", hostbuf_l, portbuf_l); } #endif /* HAVE_SYS_SOCKET_H */ diff --git a/tests/socket/socket_test.c b/tests/socket/socket_test.c index b56d50c..11ef8da 100644 --- a/tests/socket/socket_test.c +++ b/tests/socket/socket_test.c @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ * as apparently that won't work on FreeBSD if there's only one * address (e.g. 127.0.0.1) assigned to the entire system, like * the Osmocom FreeBSD build slaves */ - OSMO_ASSERT(!strncmp(name, "(NULL<->", 7)); + OSMO_ASSERT(!strncmp(name, "(r=NULL<->", 9)); talloc_free(name); /* expect it to be blocking */ rc = fcntl(fd, F_GETFL); @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ * as apparently that won't work on FreeBSD if there's only one * address (e.g. 127.0.0.1) assigned to the entire system, like * the Osmocom FreeBSD build slaves */ - OSMO_ASSERT(!strncmp(name, "(NULL<->", 7)); + OSMO_ASSERT(!strncmp(name, "(r=NULL<->", 9)); talloc_free(name); /* expect it to be blocking */ rc = fcntl(fd, F_GETFL); @@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ /* For some reason, on the jenkins.osmocom.org build slave with * FreeBSD 10 inside a jail, it fails. Works fine on laforge's * FreeBSD 10 or 11 VM at home */ - OSMO_ASSERT(!strncmp(name, "(127.0.0.1:53<->127.0.0.1", 25)); + OSMO_ASSERT(!strncmp(name, "(r=127.0.0.1:53<->l=127.0.0.1", 29)); #endif talloc_free(name); -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/3000 To unsubscribe, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-MessageType: merged Gerrit-Change-Id: I43dcc6a1906429bd0955fd7fe2eb5b8495b592d8 Gerrit-PatchSet: 3 Gerrit-Project: libosmocore Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Owner: Neels HofmeyrGerrit-Reviewer: Harald Welte Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: Neels Hofmeyr
[ABANDON] libosmocore[master]: osmo_sock_get_name(): clearly indicate local and remote
Neels Hofmeyr has abandoned this change. Change subject: osmo_sock_get_name(): clearly indicate local and remote .. Abandoned for benefit of #3000 -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/3001 To unsubscribe, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-MessageType: abandon Gerrit-Change-Id: Id3e32de19fe07ed5b19ee5e67494926a511266b5 Gerrit-PatchSet: 2 Gerrit-Project: libosmocore Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Owner: Neels HofmeyrGerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: Neels Hofmeyr
[PATCH] libosmocore[master]: osmo_sock_get_name(): clearly indicate local and remote
Hello Jenkins Builder, I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/3000 to look at the new patch set (#2). osmo_sock_get_name(): clearly indicate local and remote In a string like 127.0.0.1:2905<->127.0.0.1:60661 it is hard to tell which is the local part. I'd have expected it on the left, but it is actually on the right. To avoid doubt and bypass bikesheds on which side should be what, clearly mark the two sides as remote and local. (r=127.0.0.1:2905<->l=127.0.0.1:60661) Change-Id: I43dcc6a1906429bd0955fd7fe2eb5b8495b592d8 --- M src/socket.c M tests/socket/socket_test.c 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) git pull ssh://gerrit.osmocom.org:29418/libosmocore refs/changes/00/3000/2 diff --git a/src/socket.c b/src/socket.c index 6fa05a8..940fc6f 100644 --- a/src/socket.c +++ b/src/socket.c @@ -608,11 +608,11 @@ if (rc < 0) goto local_only; - return talloc_asprintf(ctx, "(%s:%s<->%s:%s)", hostbuf_r, portbuf_r, + return talloc_asprintf(ctx, "(r=%s:%s<->l=%s:%s)", hostbuf_r, portbuf_r, hostbuf_l, portbuf_l); local_only: - return talloc_asprintf(ctx, "(NULL<->%s:%s)", hostbuf_l, portbuf_l); + return talloc_asprintf(ctx, "(r=NULL<->l=%s:%s)", hostbuf_l, portbuf_l); } #endif /* HAVE_SYS_SOCKET_H */ diff --git a/tests/socket/socket_test.c b/tests/socket/socket_test.c index b56d50c..11ef8da 100644 --- a/tests/socket/socket_test.c +++ b/tests/socket/socket_test.c @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ * as apparently that won't work on FreeBSD if there's only one * address (e.g. 127.0.0.1) assigned to the entire system, like * the Osmocom FreeBSD build slaves */ - OSMO_ASSERT(!strncmp(name, "(NULL<->", 7)); + OSMO_ASSERT(!strncmp(name, "(r=NULL<->", 9)); talloc_free(name); /* expect it to be blocking */ rc = fcntl(fd, F_GETFL); @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ * as apparently that won't work on FreeBSD if there's only one * address (e.g. 127.0.0.1) assigned to the entire system, like * the Osmocom FreeBSD build slaves */ - OSMO_ASSERT(!strncmp(name, "(NULL<->", 7)); + OSMO_ASSERT(!strncmp(name, "(r=NULL<->", 9)); talloc_free(name); /* expect it to be blocking */ rc = fcntl(fd, F_GETFL); @@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ /* For some reason, on the jenkins.osmocom.org build slave with * FreeBSD 10 inside a jail, it fails. Works fine on laforge's * FreeBSD 10 or 11 VM at home */ - OSMO_ASSERT(!strncmp(name, "(127.0.0.1:53<->127.0.0.1", 25)); + OSMO_ASSERT(!strncmp(name, "(r=127.0.0.1:53<->l=127.0.0.1", 29)); #endif talloc_free(name); -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/3000 To unsubscribe, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-MessageType: newpatchset Gerrit-Change-Id: I43dcc6a1906429bd0955fd7fe2eb5b8495b592d8 Gerrit-PatchSet: 2 Gerrit-Project: libosmocore Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Owner: Neels HofmeyrGerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: Neels Hofmeyr
libosmocore[master]: osmo_sock_get_name(): clearly indicate local and remote
Patch Set 1: Code-Review+1 I prefer this one. -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/3001 To unsubscribe, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-MessageType: comment Gerrit-Change-Id: Id3e32de19fe07ed5b19ee5e67494926a511266b5 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Project: libosmocore Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Owner: Neels HofmeyrGerrit-Reviewer: Neels Hofmeyr Gerrit-HasComments: No
libosmocore[master]: osmo_sock_get_name(): clearly indicate local and remote
Patch Set 1: Another contestant for this change is https://gerrit.osmocom.org/3001 -- let the votes decide which one wins. -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/3000 To unsubscribe, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-MessageType: comment Gerrit-Change-Id: I43dcc6a1906429bd0955fd7fe2eb5b8495b592d8 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Project: libosmocore Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Owner: Neels HofmeyrGerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: Neels Hofmeyr Gerrit-HasComments: No