Re: Fw: RadioArchive.cc - RIP

2013-01-19 Thread Peter S Kirk
Jon,

Calm down. I've uploaded two get_i to TPB in the last year, both for
Arrse members who are posted overseas. Links are only mentioned on
Arrse and broadcasts are of little interest to general public.
RadioArchive.cc was a good place to put them until their admin went on
a power trip. Unfortunately, hotfiles etc are not viable as connection
speed/quality for heroes is poor.

Peter

http://www.holidays4heroes.org/make-an-impression

On 18 January 2013 09:20, Jon Davies  wrote:
> On 17 January 2013 23:45, Peter S Kirk  wrote:
>> I up BBC radio to TPB now.
>
> Admitting in a public forum that you're acting in a way that's clearly
> contrary to the law isn't such a good idea.
>
> get_iplayer is intended for personal use within the law:  I'm not a
> lawyer (though I do a fair amount of contract/commercial stuff in my
> day job) but my interpretation of both copyright law and the terms and
> conditions for accessing the BBC website leads me to conclude that
> get_iplayer enables legitimate uses of data from the BBC.
>
> Sharing the programmes you download is contrary to both copyright law
> (which allows timeshifting of broadcasts, amongst other things) and
> the BBC's terms and conditions.  get_iplayer is not intended for such
> uses.  Please desist.
>
> Regards
> Jon

___
get_iplayer mailing list
get_iplayer@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/get_iplayer


Re: RadioArchive.cc - RIP

2013-01-18 Thread Christopher Woods (CM)


On 18/01/2013 10:20, Jon Davies wrote:

On 18 January 2013 09:57, Chris Marriott  wrote:

Actually, Jon, British copyright law is surprisingly lax when it comes to
radio broadcasts.  Here's what Wikipedia has to say about the copyright on UK
radio broadcasts, in its article "Copyright Law of the United Kingdom" [snip]

Hence recording or copying a radio broadcast for non-commercial purposes is
not a copyright infringement.

Two things:
(a) note that there's a distinction between a broadcast and making an
audio or video stream available on the net. Loosely speaking it's a
broadcast if it's the same as what's currently being broadcast over
terrestrial or satellite.  So the live streams on the BBC site are
broadcasts, the iPlayer content is not.
(b) quoting a wikipedia articel whose factual accuracy is noted as
"disputed" doesn't make a strong argument

 From the Act itself, the right to issue copies of a work to the public
is reserved to the copyright owner.  The fair dealing provisions
enable certain archiving, academic and personal uses, but don't allow
public distribution.  Uploading to TPB feels like public distribution
to me.

Anything that's no longer in (or was never in) copyright is clearly a
different matter.


It may of course be against the iPlayer terms
of service, but that's a different matter.

different to copyright, but still one of the points of my email.
"Live broadcast" and "on-demand" mostly apply in the context of the TV 
tax; for copyright purposes there's little distinction - both are 
handled in the same way and treated as sound recordings. Public 
performance clauses cover all broadcast scenarios in addition to 
existing sound recording copyright.


Jon and others have it right here; do not conflate the right of 
recording with the right of distribution. By distributing a copyright 
worked you are reproducing the work where you do not have permission to 
do so. In law, this is defined as 'making available' and is viewed far 
more harshly than downloading whatever from wherever to hoard without 
ever sharing it with anyone else.


See also the EU rights of communication, reproduction and fixation, 
which works alongside the right of distribution and also dealt with in 
part by clauses in the rental and lending rights clauses of the EU 
Copyright Directive (as enacted in the Copyright, Designs and Patents 
Act as amended). EU's copyright laws now are almost entirely harmonised 
so the EU Copyright Directive can be viewed as authoritative on this matter.


I quote,

7. Restricted acts
It is an offence to perform any of the following acts without the 
consent of the owner:


Copy the work.
Rent, lend or issue copies of the work to the public.
Perform, broadcast or show the work in public.
Adapt the work.

[http://www.copyrightservice.co.uk/copyright/p01_uk_copyright_law]

And this isn't even considering that seeding torrents is a cross-border, 
and therefore cross-territory infringement! It has the potential to piss 
off original copyright owners as well as licensees and is generally 
Something To Avoid Doing.


Essentially, redistribution or reissuing is a breach of European 
copyright law. Broadcasters' copyrights on all broadcasts exist for 50 
years (from end of that calendar year; to increase to 70 years for all 
new sound recordings from 2014 onwards) in which a broadcast was first 
made. Also consider that there will always be exceptions to the rule -- 
not all BBC programmes have cleared music for all media (e.g. they have 
rights for broadcast and specifically the iPlayer, but no other format 
hence why podcasts hardly ever have music in as they would need to seek 
coupling - compilation - licenses for each podcast or just blanket 
licence for both publishing and mechanical as they currently do for TV 
sync). Samples from other sound recordings also fall into this bracket.


Complex copyright and licensing agreements are reasons why the iPlayer's 
geolocked... Never mind potential technical issues like 'clogging the 
tubes' if worldwide unfettered access was available. It's also how 
broadcasters continue to cover their costs. Brazen disregard of EU 
copyright and wilful copyright infringement will only result in Bad 
Times For You should you stick your head over the parapet too noisily. 
Nobody likes a civil conviction.


___
get_iplayer mailing list
get_iplayer@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/get_iplayer


Re: RadioArchive.cc - RIP

2013-01-18 Thread Jon Davies
On 18 January 2013 09:57, Chris Marriott  wrote:
> Actually, Jon, British copyright law is surprisingly lax when it comes to
> radio broadcasts.  Here's what Wikipedia has to say about the copyright on UK
> radio broadcasts, in its article "Copyright Law of the United Kingdom" [snip]
>
> Hence recording or copying a radio broadcast for non-commercial purposes is
> not a copyright infringement.

Two things:
(a) note that there's a distinction between a broadcast and making an
audio or video stream available on the net. Loosely speaking it's a
broadcast if it's the same as what's currently being broadcast over
terrestrial or satellite.  So the live streams on the BBC site are
broadcasts, the iPlayer content is not.
(b) quoting a wikipedia articel whose factual accuracy is noted as
"disputed" doesn't make a strong argument

>From the Act itself, the right to issue copies of a work to the public
is reserved to the copyright owner.  The fair dealing provisions
enable certain archiving, academic and personal uses, but don't allow
public distribution.  Uploading to TPB feels like public distribution
to me.

Anything that's no longer in (or was never in) copyright is clearly a
different matter.

> It may of course be against the iPlayer terms
> of service, but that's a different matter.
different to copyright, but still one of the points of my email.

Regards
Jon

___
get_iplayer mailing list
get_iplayer@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/get_iplayer


Re: RadioArchive.cc - RIP

2013-01-18 Thread Shevek
On 18 January 2013 10:12, Jonathan Wiltshire  wrote:
> On 2013-01-18 09:57, Chris Marriott wrote:
>>
>> Actually, Jon, British copyright law is surprisingly lax when it comes to
>> radio broadcasts. Here's what Wikipedia has to say about the copyright on
>> UK
>> radio broadcasts, in its article "Copyright Law of the United Kingdom".
>
>
> It also says:
>
> "This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these
> issues on the talk page.
>  - This article needs additional citations for verification. (January 2009)
>  - This article includes a list of references, related reading or external
> links, but its sources remain unclear because it lacks inline citations.
> (April 2012)
>  - This article's factual accuracy is disputed. (January 2009)"
>

http://xkcd.com/978/

___
get_iplayer mailing list
get_iplayer@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/get_iplayer


Re: RadioArchive.cc - RIP

2013-01-18 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire

On 2013-01-18 09:57, Chris Marriott wrote:
Actually, Jon, British copyright law is surprisingly lax when it 
comes to
radio broadcasts. Here's what Wikipedia has to say about the 
copyright on UK
radio broadcasts, in its article "Copyright Law of the United 
Kingdom".


It also says:

"This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss 
these issues on the talk page.
 - This article needs additional citations for verification. (January 
2009)
 - This article includes a list of references, related reading or 
external links, but its sources remain unclear because it lacks inline 
citations. (April 2012)

 - This article's factual accuracy is disputed. (January 2009)"

Hence recording or copying a radio broadcast for non-commercial 
purposes is
not a copyright infringement. It may of course be against the iPlayer 
terms

of service, but that's a different matter.


A different matter perhaps, but one that is very pertinent to this 
discussion. I refer you to a previous similar discussion in the list 
archives.



--
Jonathan Wiltshire  j...@debian.org
Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw

4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC  74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51

 i have six years of solaris sysadmin experience, from
8->10. i am well qualified to say it is made from bonghits
layered on top of bonghits

___
get_iplayer mailing list
get_iplayer@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/get_iplayer


Re: RadioArchive.cc - RIP

2013-01-18 Thread Chris Marriott

Actually, Jon, British copyright law is surprisingly lax when it comes to
radio broadcasts. Here's what Wikipedia has to say about the copyright on UK
radio broadcasts, in its article "Copyright Law of the United Kingdom".

-

Under the terms of the 1956 Act, copyright in a radio broadcast is not
infringed by recording it for non-commercial use. The Act only prohibits
recording a broadcast if done other than for private purposes, and it also
prohibits causing a broadcast (if it is a television broadcast) to be seen
in public by a paying audience: section 14(4), Copyright Act 1956.

In respect of the first point, a recording is not made for a commercial
purpose (i.e. a non-private purpose) unless it is offered for sale; so where
a recording was made for home use, and is not subsequently offered for sale,
at no stage is it used for a commercial purpose. In respect of the second
point, where the broadcast is radio, not television, it does not fall within
the terms of the restriction.

The effect is that it is not an infringement of copyright to record or copy
a broadcast made on or after 1 January 1959, unless it is done for
commercial purposes (i.e. for payment).

The copyright law of the United Kingdom was not amended further until 1988;
and the 1988 Act has no application to a broadcast made before it came into
force, on 1 August 1989: section 170 and Schedule 1 paragraph 5(1),
Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988.

The 1988 Act is relevant to an earlier broadcast only in that it now
expressly permits the making of a copy for private study: section 29,
Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988. This strengthens the previous
provision, in section 14 of the 1956 Act, that permits a broadcast to be
recorded for private purposes.

-

Hence recording or copying a radio broadcast for non-commercial purposes is
not a copyright infringement. It may of course be against the iPlayer terms
of service, but that's a different matter.

Chris



-Original Message- 
From: Jon Davies

Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 9:20 AM
To: get_iplayer@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: Fw: RadioArchive.cc - RIP

On 17 January 2013 23:45, Peter S Kirk  wrote:

I up BBC radio to TPB now.


Admitting in a public forum that you're acting in a way that's clearly
contrary to the law isn't such a good idea.

get_iplayer is intended for personal use within the law:  I'm not a
lawyer (though I do a fair amount of contract/commercial stuff in my
day job) but my interpretation of both copyright law and the terms and
conditions for accessing the BBC website leads me to conclude that
get_iplayer enables legitimate uses of data from the BBC.

Sharing the programmes you download is contrary to both copyright law
(which allows timeshifting of broadcasts, amongst other things) and
the BBC's terms and conditions.  get_iplayer is not intended for such
uses.  Please desist.

Regards
Jon


___
get_iplayer mailing list
get_iplayer@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/get_iplayer


Re: Fw: RadioArchive.cc - RIP

2013-01-18 Thread Jon Davies
On 17 January 2013 23:45, Peter S Kirk  wrote:
> I up BBC radio to TPB now.

Admitting in a public forum that you're acting in a way that's clearly
contrary to the law isn't such a good idea.

get_iplayer is intended for personal use within the law:  I'm not a
lawyer (though I do a fair amount of contract/commercial stuff in my
day job) but my interpretation of both copyright law and the terms and
conditions for accessing the BBC website leads me to conclude that
get_iplayer enables legitimate uses of data from the BBC.

Sharing the programmes you download is contrary to both copyright law
(which allows timeshifting of broadcasts, amongst other things) and
the BBC's terms and conditions.  get_iplayer is not intended for such
uses.  Please desist.

Regards
Jon

___
get_iplayer mailing list
get_iplayer@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/get_iplayer


Re: Fw: RadioArchive.cc - RIP

2013-01-17 Thread Peter S Kirk
LiquidNet? Wasn't that the host for superseeds who went down on ~3 Jan 
2013?

I stopped unloading to RadioArchive when admin changed from helpful to 
obstructive jobsworths who insisted all unloads had full meta-data in 
description. I asked who cared or was interested in it and suggested they 
make things easy for those sharing and add it themselves if they believed 
it was so essential. Result: torrents deleted. I up BBC radio to TPB now.

On 17 Jan 2013 at 15:30, Chris J Brady Chris J Brady 
 wrote:

> This talking radio site has been offline since before Christmas. It is 
> rumoured that the Beeb took legal action to
> close it down. It was hosted by LiquidNet Ltd - who decline to say whether 
> the site is still active. It was a great
> resource for talking radio - plays, documentaries, OTR (of otherwise 'lost' 
> or wiped programmes), etc. CJB



___
get_iplayer mailing list
get_iplayer@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/get_iplayer


Fw: RadioArchive.cc - RIP

2013-01-17 Thread Chris J Brady
This talking radio site has been offline since before Christmas. It is rumoured 
that the Beeb took legal action to close it down. It was hosted by LiquidNet 
Ltd - who decline to say whether the site is still active. It was a great 
resource for talking radio - plays, documentaries, OTR (of otherwise 'lost' or 
wiped programmes), etc. CJB

___
get_iplayer mailing list
get_iplayer@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/get_iplayer