Re: Superclasses
I'm rather incapacitated at the moment as I just got out of major surgery, so I'm not in a good place to check particulars right now. I can definitely say I'd like some way to attain an equivalent result, but I accept that it may not be possible with the machinery we have. -Edward On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 10:16 AM, Simon Peyton Joneswrote: > Edward > > In comment:23 of https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/11523 I claim > that there is an infinite tower of superclasses, so that GHC can > legitimately spin. > > You have not responded for nearly a year. > > Do you agree? > > Simon > ___ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
MSYS2 update (those who build on Windows please read)
Hi Windows devs, February comes with a major change in behavior for MSYS2/Cygwin. Tools such as awk/sed etc now use binary mode unless on a text mount: https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-announce/2017-02/msg00036.html This is problematic because GHC etc only use the underlying OS to determine how to output line endings. As such we output \r\n but in sed et al $ will no longer match line endings. Which means out scripts are currently broken. Do not upgrade your MSYS2 install until a workaround for this is in place or you will be unable to compile GHC. If you have updated your MSYS2 then using a text mount may be the easiest option to get a working build again. As it seems just downgrading the tools alone is not enough. Thanks, Tamar ___ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
Superclasses
Edward In comment:23 of https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/11523 I claim that there is an infinite tower of superclasses, so that GHC can legitimately spin. You have not responded for nearly a year. Do you agree? Simon ___ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs