RE: Wildcard refactor

2015-11-18 Thread Simon Peyton Jones 
It does, yes. It’s on 0d157fe, which is the head of wip/spj-wildcard-refactor 
in the haddock repo
Is that what get checked out by ‘git submodule update”?

Simon

From: Alan & Kim Zimmerman [mailto:alan.z...@gmail.com]
Sent: 18 November 2015 10:57
To: Simon Peyton Jones
Subject: Re: Wildcard refactor

I found the haddock library did not compile, but I am skipping straight to the 
tests.
Does it compile for you at the moment?

On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Simon Peyton Jones 
<simo...@microsoft.com<mailto:simo...@microsoft.com>> wrote:
Thank you!

From: Alan & Kim Zimmerman 
[mailto:alan.z...@gmail.com<mailto:alan.z...@gmail.com>]
Sent: 18 November 2015 10:04
To: Simon Peyton Jones
Cc: ghc-devs@haskell.org<mailto:ghc-devs@haskell.org>
Subject: Re: Wildcard refactor

ok.
I have been waiting to jump in and help.
Alan

On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Simon Peyton Jones 
<simo...@microsoft.com<mailto:simo...@microsoft.com>> wrote:
Alan
I’m really close on wip/spj-wildcard-refactor, that I really want to get into 
HEAD asap.
Could you possibly checkout wip/spj-wildcard-refactor, and validate?  I get two 
failures I don’t understand:
   ghc-api/annotations  listcomps [bad stdout] (normal)
   ghc-api/landmineslandmines [bad stderr] (normal)
The output is not wildly different but I just don’t know how to interpret it, 
so I don’t even know what the problem is exactly.
NB: you’’ll need to do a ‘git submodule update’ because the haddock submodule 
changes.
Thank you!
Simon



___
ghc-devs mailing list
ghc-devs@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs

RE: Wildcard refactor

2015-11-18 Thread Simon Peyton Jones 
Oh sorry, no I think I’d been skipping it too.  I’ll fix that!  Meanwhile, skip!

From: ghc-devs [mailto:ghc-devs-boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of Simon Peyton 
Jones
Sent: 18 November 2015 11:18
To: Alan & Kim Zimmerman
Cc: ghc-devs@haskell.org
Subject: RE: Wildcard refactor

It does, yes. It’s on 0d157fe, which is the head of wip/spj-wildcard-refactor 
in the haddock repo
Is that what get checked out by ‘git submodule update”?

Simon

From: Alan & Kim Zimmerman [mailto:alan.z...@gmail.com]
Sent: 18 November 2015 10:57
To: Simon Peyton Jones
Subject: Re: Wildcard refactor

I found the haddock library did not compile, but I am skipping straight to the 
tests.
Does it compile for you at the moment?

On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Simon Peyton Jones 
<simo...@microsoft.com<mailto:simo...@microsoft.com>> wrote:
Thank you!

From: Alan & Kim Zimmerman 
[mailto:alan.z...@gmail.com<mailto:alan.z...@gmail.com>]
Sent: 18 November 2015 10:04
To: Simon Peyton Jones
Cc: ghc-devs@haskell.org<mailto:ghc-devs@haskell.org>
Subject: Re: Wildcard refactor

ok.
I have been waiting to jump in and help.
Alan

On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Simon Peyton Jones 
<simo...@microsoft.com<mailto:simo...@microsoft.com>> wrote:
Alan
I’m really close on wip/spj-wildcard-refactor, that I really want to get into 
HEAD asap.
Could you possibly checkout wip/spj-wildcard-refactor, and validate?  I get two 
failures I don’t understand:
   ghc-api/annotations  listcomps [bad stdout] (normal)
   ghc-api/landmineslandmines [bad stderr] (normal)
The output is not wildly different but I just don’t know how to interpret it, 
so I don’t even know what the problem is exactly.
NB: you’’ll need to do a ‘git submodule update’ because the haddock submodule 
changes.
Thank you!
Simon



___
ghc-devs mailing list
ghc-devs@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs

Re: Wildcard refactor

2015-11-18 Thread Alan & Kim Zimmerman 
This is what I get locally

unexpected results from:
TEST="landmines listcomps T7861 T5837 T4896 T3064"

OVERALL SUMMARY for test run started at Wed Nov 18 10:48:00 2015 UTC
 0:27:16 spent to go through
4802 total tests, which gave rise to
   18143 test cases, of which
   13285 were skipped

  77 had missing libraries
4667 expected passes
 108 expected failures

   0 caused framework failures
   0 unexpected passes
   5 unexpected failures
   1 unexpected stat failures

Unexpected failures:
   deriving/should_compile  T4896 [exit code non-0] (normal)
   ghc-api/annotations  listcomps [bad stdout] (normal)
   ghc-api/landmineslandmines [bad stderr] (normal)
   perf/compilerT5837 [stderr mismatch] (normal)
   typecheck/should_run T7861 [bad stderr] (normal)

Unexpected stat failures:
   perf/compiler  T3064 [stat not good enough] (normal)



I will look into the two ghc-api ones.


On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Simon Peyton Jones <simo...@microsoft.com>
wrote:

> Oh sorry, no I think I’d been skipping it too.  I’ll fix that!  Meanwhile,
> skip!
>
>
>
> *From:* ghc-devs [mailto:ghc-devs-boun...@haskell.org] *On Behalf Of *Simon
> Peyton Jones
> *Sent:* 18 November 2015 11:18
> *To:* Alan & Kim Zimmerman
> *Cc:* ghc-devs@haskell.org
> *Subject:* RE: Wildcard refactor
>
>
>
> It does, yes. It’s on 0d157fe, which is the head of
> wip/spj-wildcard-refactor in the haddock repo
>
> Is that what get checked out by ‘git submodule update”?
>
>
>
> Simon
>
>
>
> *From:* Alan & Kim Zimmerman [mailto:alan.z...@gmail.com
> <alan.z...@gmail.com>]
> *Sent:* 18 November 2015 10:57
> *To:* Simon Peyton Jones
> *Subject:* Re: Wildcard refactor
>
>
>
> I found the haddock library did not compile, but I am skipping straight to
> the tests.
>
> Does it compile for you at the moment?
>
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Simon Peyton Jones <
> simo...@microsoft.com> wrote:
>
> Thank you!
>
>
>
> *From:* Alan & Kim Zimmerman [mailto:alan.z...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* 18 November 2015 10:04
> *To:* Simon Peyton Jones
> *Cc:* ghc-devs@haskell.org
> *Subject:* Re: Wildcard refactor
>
>
>
> ok.
>
> I have been waiting to jump in and help.
>
> Alan
>
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Simon Peyton Jones <
> simo...@microsoft.com> wrote:
>
> Alan
>
> I’m really close on wip/spj-wildcard-refactor, that I really want to get
> into HEAD asap.
>
> Could you possibly checkout wip/spj-wildcard-refactor, and validate?  I
> get two failures I don’t understand:
>
>ghc-api/annotations  listcomps [bad stdout] (normal)
>
>ghc-api/landmineslandmines [bad stderr] (normal)
>
> The output is not wildly different but I just don’t know how to interpret
> it, so I don’t even know what the problem is exactly.
>
> NB: you’’ll need to do a ‘git submodule update’ because the haddock
> submodule changes.
>
> Thank you!
>
> Simon
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
___
ghc-devs mailing list
ghc-devs@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs

Re: Wildcard refactor

2015-11-18 Thread Alan & Kim Zimmerman 
ok.

I have been waiting to jump in and help.

Alan

On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Simon Peyton Jones 
wrote:

> Alan
>
> I’m really close on wip/spj-wildcard-refactor, that I really want to get
> into HEAD asap.
>
> Could you possibly checkout wip/spj-wildcard-refactor, and validate?  I
> get two failures I don’t understand:
>
>ghc-api/annotations  listcomps [bad stdout] (normal)
>
>ghc-api/landmineslandmines [bad stderr] (normal)
>
> The output is not wildly different but I just don’t know how to interpret
> it, so I don’t even know what the problem is exactly.
>
> NB: you’’ll need to do a ‘git submodule update’ because the haddock
> submodule changes.
>
> Thank you!
>
> Simon
>
>
>
___
ghc-devs mailing list
ghc-devs@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs