RE: abi-depends field

2018-05-22 Thread Edward Z. Yang 
The unexpected failures are benign; they are what you'd expect
with the fix.  I recommend accepting all of the changes.

Edward

Excerpts from Ben Gamari's message of 2018-05-21 09:09:13 -0400:
> Simon Peyton Jones via ghc-devs  writes:
> 
> > Hello, anyone?
> > At the moment I am doing a manual-diff on this batch of unexpected 
> > failures, which is jolly annoying.
> > Should we just revert some patch for now?
> >
> Sigh, this is due to 1cdc14f9c014f1a520638f7c0a01799ac6d104e6, which I
> applied as a bug-fix for 8.4.3. We likely ought to revert it if it is
> causing trouble.
> 
> Edward, do you know why GHC's testsuite might be triggering this warning?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> - Ben
___
ghc-devs mailing list
ghc-devs@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs

RE: abi-depends field

2018-05-21 Thread Ben Gamari 
Simon Peyton Jones via ghc-devs  writes:

> Hello, anyone?
> At the moment I am doing a manual-diff on this batch of unexpected failures, 
> which is jolly annoying.
> Should we just revert some patch for now?
>
Sigh, this is due to 1cdc14f9c014f1a520638f7c0a01799ac6d104e6, which I
applied as a bug-fix for 8.4.3. We likely ought to revert it if it is
causing trouble.

Edward, do you know why GHC's testsuite might be triggering this warning?

Cheers,

- Ben


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
ghc-devs mailing list
ghc-devs@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs