Re: Hoopl 3.9 not on hackage
Right - I made a lot of changes while working on the new codegen. Norman signed off on them (in principle at least) so it should be fine to upload the package. I should admit I did very limited testing outside of GHC's use case, and GHC even contains a copy of some of the hoopl code with its own specialisations (the core dataflow algorithm in particular). Cheers, Simon On 31/07/13 22:37, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote: No I think it's just oversight. Do upload it! thanks Simon | -Original Message- | From: ghc-devs [mailto:ghc-devs-boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of Thomas | Schilling | Sent: 31 July 2013 19:53 | To: ghc-devs@haskell.org | Subject: Hoopl 3.9 not on hackage | | I just noticed that the latest version of hoopl (shipped with 7.6.3) is not on | Hackage. Is there a reason for this (other than oversight)? | | / Thomas ___ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs ___ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
RE: Hoopl 3.9 not on hackage
I’m copying Norman so that he can speak for himself. Indeed the hoopl.cabal file lists him as the Maintainer. But I believe that he is not *actively* working on Hoopl, and would be content for others to contribute to it (ideas, patches). Norman? Simon From: ghc-devs [mailto:ghc-devs-boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of Carter Schonwald Sent: 31 July 2013 22:18 To: Thomas Schilling Cc: ghc-devs@haskell.org Subject: Re: Hoopl 3.9 not on hackage relatedly: is norman ramsey (pro)actively maintaining it? based upon remarks on #ghc earlier today, it sounded like a number of people have warts/wishes about how to improve hoopl or make it nicer if they could. (or at least that was my take away from their remarks, i'll leave them to clarify further) On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Thomas Schilling mailto:nomin...@googlemail.com>> wrote: I just noticed that the latest version of hoopl (shipped with 7.6.3) is not on Hackage. Is there a reason for this (other than oversight)? / Thomas ___ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org<mailto:ghc-devs@haskell.org> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs ___ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
RE: Hoopl 3.9 not on hackage
No I think it's just oversight. Do upload it! thanks Simon | -Original Message- | From: ghc-devs [mailto:ghc-devs-boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of Thomas | Schilling | Sent: 31 July 2013 19:53 | To: ghc-devs@haskell.org | Subject: Hoopl 3.9 not on hackage | | I just noticed that the latest version of hoopl (shipped with 7.6.3) is not on | Hackage. Is there a reason for this (other than oversight)? | | / Thomas ___ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
Re: Hoopl 3.9 not on hackage
relatedly: is norman ramsey (pro)actively maintaining it? based upon remarks on #ghc earlier today, it sounded like a number of people have warts/wishes about how to improve hoopl or make it nicer if they could. (or at least that was my take away from their remarks, i'll leave them to clarify further) On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Thomas Schilling wrote: > I just noticed that the latest version of hoopl (shipped with 7.6.3) is > not on Hackage. Is there a reason for this (other than oversight)? > > / Thomas > > ___ > ghc-devs mailing list > ghc-devs@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs > > ___ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
