Re: [Gimp-developer] Script-Fu - Batch Mode Problem
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 11:29:08PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I could get a good image, but not to the satisfaction of the customer. It appeared to be the way in which imagemagick scales the image as opposed to Do you have an example image? Really, either you hit a bug in imagemagick itself, or you are simply doing sth. wrong. ImageMagick can use exactly the same algorithm as gimp. gimp. Gimp seems to handle it better. I would think it would be pretty much a wash but based on what i have coded up so farit's not the case. At least not for the client who is really really picky about the pixelation. What, exactly, were you doing (state the command line) with imagemagick? -- -==- | ==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ __ Marc Lehmann +-- --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [EMAIL PROTECTED] |e| -=/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE --+ The choice of a GNU generation | | ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] A Free Software project of interest.
David Hodson wrote: Adam D. Moss wrote: unfortunately the back-end is GPL which scuppers any realistic plans of GIMP's own back-end being able to move to it, I think. Eh? This doesn't appear to make sense. The goal (I thought) was to keep the lowest levels (GEGL etc) of GIMP's back-end LGPL. -- Adam D. Moss . ,,^^ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.foxbox.org/ co:3 ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
[Gimp-developer] libgimpproxy?
Hi, I don't know if this is a silly question, I am quite confused and tired, but could someone tell what the purpose of libgimpproxy is...? Why do the functions it contains have to be duplicated in it and in the GIMP core? Couldn't the GIMP core also use those functions from a library? --tml ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
