[Gimp-developer] Re: Submited (004756-3463)
Please see the attached file.___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] What happened to the "deceased" features?
Hi, "Joao S. O. Bueno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I am taking a deeper look at the GIMP manual (even when you are > messing with the source itself, the GIMP is so full of surprises, > they neve stop showing up) > > And I noted some features on that manual (which is mostly from GIMP > 1.0 times, I believe) that are missing on the current program. Such > features are marked with an (X) inside a triangle in the manual. > > What is of them? Where they ever implemented? Have they been removed > from 1.2? I don't think we removed any 1.0 features in 1.2. At least I can't remember that we'd have done so. > Examples are the newsprint artistic filter, and a whole "transform" > menu for layers. Both of your examples are available in 1.2 and 1.3. Sven ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
[Gimp-developer] What happened to the "deceased" features?
I am taking a deeper look at the GIMP manual (even when you are messing with the source itself, the GIMP is so full of surprises, they neve stop showing up) And I noted some features on that manual (which is mostly from GIMP 1.0 times, I believe) that are missing on the current program. Such features are marked with an (X) inside a triangle in the manual. What is of them? Where they ever implemented? Have they been removed from 1.2? Examples are the newsprint artistic filter, and a whole "transform" menu for layers. Thank you again, JS -><- ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] running gimp withou't make install?
On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 18:07, Sven Neumann wrote: > Only if you don't have libtool installed. If you are developing from > CVS you need to have libtool in your path anyway. The copy that is > shipped with the tarball is just there to avoid a dependancy on > libtool for everyone who wants to compile the tarball. Thanks, that clarifies it. Brix -- Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] running gimp withou't make install?
Hi, Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, 2003-06-02 at 13:14, Sven Neumann wrote: >> Although this works, it is a little hackish and it will link gimp-1.3 >> against the installed libraries which might differ from the versions >> in your source tree. The correct way to do this is to use libtool: >> >> libtool gdb app/gimp-1.3 > > Shouldn't this be './libtool gdb app/gimp-1.3' ? Only if you don't have libtool installed. If you are developing from CVS you need to have libtool in your path anyway. The copy that is shipped with the tarball is just there to avoid a dependancy on libtool for everyone who wants to compile the tarball. Sven ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] car and cdr
It is not clear from your message if you are reporting a widely known fact, or trying to report a bug. To report bugs, go to http://bugzilla.gnome.org/ so the bugs can be tracked. But since the topic is Lisp, I will jump in. In either case, all shorthand forms of car and cdr are convenience functions for which you can extend all that you want. Generally the predefined ones do indeed stop at about 3. Helvetix On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 12:27:18PM +0400, Alexey V.Chaykin wrote: > Command with more than 3 'd' or 'a' subcommand not work. > > =>(cdddr '(1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13)) > (4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13) > > =>(cr '(1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13)) > ERROR: unbound variable (errobj cr) > > --- > gimp 1.2.3 > > ___ > Gimp-developer mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] running gimp withou't make install?
On Mon, 2003-06-02 at 13:14, Sven Neumann wrote: > Although this works, it is a little hackish and it will link gimp-1.3 > against the installed libraries which might differ from the versions > in your source tree. The correct way to do this is to use libtool: > > libtool gdb app/gimp-1.3 Shouldn't this be './libtool gdb app/gimp-1.3' ? Sincerely, ./Brix -- Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
