[Gimp-developer] Successfull compile, will not run
After successfully compiling gimp-2.3.13, on Mandriva 2007.0, Gimp fails to run with this error message: /usr/local/bin/gimp-2.3: symbol lookup error: /usr/local/bin/gimp-2.3: undefined symbol: gimp_vectors_stroke_type_get_type Should I file a bug report? -- Milos Prudek ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] Successfull compile, will not run
Milos Prudek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: After successfully compiling gimp-2.3.13, on Mandriva 2007.0, Gimp fails to run with this error message: /usr/local/bin/gimp-2.3: symbol lookup error: /usr/local/bin/gimp-2.3: undefined symbol: gimp_vectors_stroke_type_get_type Should I file a bug report? Please try 'ldd /usr/local/bin/gimp-2.3' first to verify that gimp does pick up the correct libraries on startup. I suspect a broken installation here. Bye, Simon -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://simon.budig.de/ ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] Successfull compile, will not run
On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 16:43 +0100, Simon Budig wrote: Milos Prudek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: After successfully compiling gimp-2.3.13, on Mandriva 2007.0, Gimp fails to run with this error message: /usr/local/bin/gimp-2.3: symbol lookup error: /usr/local/bin/gimp-2.3: undefined symbol: gimp_vectors_stroke_type_get_type Should I file a bug report? Please try 'ldd /usr/local/bin/gimp-2.3' first to verify that gimp does pick up the correct libraries on startup. I suspect a broken installation here. And note that you can *not* have gimp 2.2 in /usr and gimp 2.3 in /usr/local. 2.3 is supposed to replace 2.2, and /usr/local is *not* a totally separate prefix. Use something like /opt or get rid of gimp 2.2 in /usr ciao, --mitch ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] neue Hackordnung
gg, I agree with you, in fact I have begun to think about how a complete rewrite using C++ and gtkmm would look, including support for procedural brushes, a good undo/redo system, etc. From my point of view, C does not fit for a GUI application. Core libraries, like GEGL, makes much more sense to write in C, but for such a complex application as an image editor, C++ fits much better. I am so far only in the planning stages of this, and this is still very vaporwarish, but I also belive that sooner or later, we need to take a step forward in terms of language expressiveness. - Martin ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] Successfull compile, will not run
And note that you can *not* have gimp 2.2 in /usr and gimp 2.3 in /usr/local. 2.3 is supposed to replace 2.2, and /usr/local Your advice helped. Gimp starts. Thank you. But the UI is in English, even though my enviro variables are set for Czech. Has Czech been disabled for this dev version? -- Milos Prudek ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
