Re: [Gimp-developer] scanner support should be File->Acquire
I agree with you, also the other stuff related to creation(button, etc) should go somewhere else in gimp. I too didn´t even know gimp had scanner support ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] Help with new default resources in 2.8
I don´t know if this helps, but there is already the GIMP GPS resources and I heard about GIMP painter, you could check with their authors to use what they have made, They would love having their work on GIMP. Em Qua, 2010-07-07 às 06:58 +0400, Alexandre Prokoudine escreveu: > On 7/6/10, Martin Nordholts wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > If you would like better default resources in GIMP, now is a great > > opportunity to do something about it. We want GIMP 2.8 to ship with a > > good set of default resources, but we need help from our artist > > community with this. > > This is perhaps quite offtopic, but if it was possible to save guides > in GIMP templates, the existing collection of them could be improved > as well. > > Alexandre Prokoudine > http://libregraphicsworld.org > ___ > Gimp-developer mailing list > Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU > https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] remove layer should not force you to last selected layer
I understood gimp 2.7 will fix this kind of problem, if that´s the case, then I will be waiting for 2.7. About Jerry way of doing things I think it makes more sense (at least) to me. I do not know very well how to use your script but I´ll find a way to give it a shot buddy. Em Sex, 2010-03-05 às 15:16 -0300, Joao S. O. Bueno escreveu: > On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Akkana Peck wrote: > > Luiz Felipe Moraes Pereira writes: > >> Also I do not mind much about not having a selected layer after > >> the deletion of a layer. But the forced viewer scroll down( or up ), > >> depending of the last selected layer is a problem. > > > > This used to annoy me a lot, because I frequently want to delete, > > say, the top 5 layers. But once I figured out what it was doing, > > I developed a habit of clicking on the layers I want to delete in > > sequence before deleting. For instance, click on the 5th layer from > > the top, then the 4th, and so on until I get to the top; then click > > Delete 5 times. It sounds tedious but it doesn't take long at all -- > > certainly it's a lot faster than scrolling back up each time. > > Try it -- you may find that it solves the problem. > > > yes, I do that as well. > > The new Layer Groups feature in 2.7 will ease this and several other > workflows a whole lot. > (For example, probably all the layers you are deleting, if more than > one, would not be themselves part of the same group - you just have to > delete the group) > > > js > -><- > > >...Akkana > > ___ > > Gimp-developer mailing list > > Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU > > https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer > > > ___ > Gimp-developer mailing list > Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU > https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp shouldn´t save if no chang es were made( trivial idea )
I see your point...haven´t thought of it, thanks buddy. Now if someone cames with the same idea I can answer accordingly Em Qui, 2010-03-04 às 21:50 -0500, Liam R E Quin escreveu: > On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 23:14 -0300, Luiz Felipe Moraes Pereira wrote: > > Hi, I was advised to post these kind of ideas to developer mailing > > lists, so here I am. > > > > The link to the original post in bugzilla is below: > > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=611765 > > > > What do you think of this? > > What if you save to a USB thumb drive, remove the thumb drive, > then insert another one? > > Or what if you accidentally remove the file in the file manager after > saving? > > Several other programs I use have this feature, but I think it's a > mistake. You can tell from the * in the title bar whether the image > is "dirty" or not. > > Liam > ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
[Gimp-developer] remove layer should not force you to last selected layer
Hi again, the original discussion is in the link below: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=611758 I was advised to present this idea here, what do you think? Also I do not mind much about not having a selected layer after the deletion of a layer. But the forced viewer scroll down( or up ), depending of the last selected layer is a problem. ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
[Gimp-developer] gimp shouldn´t save if no chang es were made( trivial idea )
Hi, I was advised to post these kind of ideas to developer mailing lists, so here I am. The link to the original post in bugzilla is below: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=611765 What do you think of this? Also sorry again Sven ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
