[Gimp-developer] Don't think this is a gimp problem
After 4 years on Ubuntu, I am now using Fedora15, but had trouble building both git and the daily tar ball from http://gimptest.flamingtext.com The files libcairo.la and libfreetype.la are not included in the rpms that fedora use and the autogen.sh failed because it couldn't find those la files. This reference; http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Devel_Packages says they are no longer included, and yhis can be confirmed with an rpm query. I also found the same with suse-11.4, but can't find their build guidelines The builds I did on Ubuntu-11.04 had no problems and taking libfreetype.la from that and libcairo.la from a source build and placing into fedora's /usr/lib/ directory fixed my immediate problem. I am pretty sure this is all my problem, but wonder if the .la files are really needed if fedora (and suse?) are no longer packaging them? Owen ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] Unable to use gegl operation
> On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 9:34 AM, Owen wrote: > >> > Hello, >> > >> > When I try to use any gegl operation eg - load on running the file >> i >> > get the >> > error - >> > Message: Module '/usr/local/lib/gegl-0.1/ff-load.so' load error: >> > /usr/local/lib/gegl-0.1/ff-load.so: undefined symbol: >> > avcodec_decode_video2 >> > >> > can anyone help?? >> >> just guessing, but when you ran autogen.sh to configure gegl, did >> you >> have this output. >> >> >> checking for AVFORMAT... yes >> checking libavformat/avformat.h usability... yes >> checking libavformat/avformat.h presence... yes >> checking for libavformat/avformat.h... yes >> checking linux/videodev.h usability... yes >> checking linux/videodev.h presence... yes >> checking for linux/videodev.h... yes >> >> So do you have avformat.h >> >> Do you have videodev.h >> >> As I said, just a guess >> >> >> >> Owen >> >> >> >> I searched for avformat.h and found it on my system - > /usr/include/libavformat/avformat.h > > what actually is this error from?? Do you have videodev.h Again, I am only guessing but avcodec_decode_video2 is a variable or function for decoding video. What system are you using. just install anything that looks like avformat, libavcodec, ffmpeg, anything to do with video then recompile gegl and try again. you are simply missing something. Owen ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] Unable to use gegl operation
> Hello, > > When I try to use any gegl operation eg - load on running the file i > get the > error - > Message: Module '/usr/local/lib/gegl-0.1/ff-load.so' load error: > /usr/local/lib/gegl-0.1/ff-load.so: undefined symbol: > avcodec_decode_video2 > > can anyone help?? just guessing, but when you ran autogen.sh to configure gegl, did you have this output. checking for AVFORMAT... yes checking libavformat/avformat.h usability... yes checking libavformat/avformat.h presence... yes checking for libavformat/avformat.h... yes checking linux/videodev.h usability... yes checking linux/videodev.h presence... yes checking for linux/videodev.h... yes So do you have avformat.h Do you have videodev.h As I said, just a guess Owen ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] How do I build and use help from git source?
> I'd like to use locally the context and indexed help from the same > version as the git trunk. I've been trying to figure it out, but have > failed. Ah, as usual, I didn't read your message correctly. I am not sure that the previous commands I sent were appropriate to the git version. Perhaps ask on the gimp-docs list -- Owen ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] How do I build and use help from git source?
> I'd like to use locally the context and indexed help from the same > version as the git trunk. I've been trying to figure it out, but have > failed. From my notes, try # git clone --depth=0 git://git.gnome.org/gimp-help-2 # cd gimp-help-2 # ./autogen.sh # LINGUAS=en make # LINGUAS=en make pdf-local I did it the other day on another machine, brand new fedora, and had to add heaps of docbook stuff. Produced a 50 MB pdf file -- Owen ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] Detecting "closure" of selection
> Assume I have a selection on small area (for instance a 20px > circle), > and I invert it. Now, if I grow the selection by a sufficient amount > (10px in this case), everything gets selected. > > Is there a practical, fast way, to detect this case, i.e, that the > selection covers the whole layer (or image?) and that no pixels remain > unselected? I assume that inverting the selection again and testing > for > empty would work, but that would be two selection inversions in the > normal case and that may be a bit costly. Select->all? -- Owen ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] Compiling Gimp 2.7.1
> phanisvara das gmail.com> writes: > >> >> On Wednesday, June 30, 2010 22:15:06 Michael Grosberg wrote: >> > Is there an official guide for compiling the latest development >> > release, Gimp 2.7.1, on Linux? >> >> i found this article very helpful: >> <http://www.chromecode.com/2009/12/best-way-to-keep-up-with-gimp-from- >> git_26.html> >> > > > thanks, but these instructions are not for complete beginners and > assumes I know > stuff I don't. Also, they are fro compiling from GIT - not from a > tarball. > > The site is gimpuser.com If you don't know how to unpack your tarball you might need more help >From the tutorial Ignore the git stuff replace ./autogen.sh with ./configure Watch the word wrap http://www.gimpusers.com/news/2009-10-14/compiling-gimp-27-git-ubuntu-904-910.html -- Owen ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] Patch to improve the brush size keyboard shortcuts
On Tue, 25 May 2010 20:06:48 -0500 Dieki N wrote: > On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 8:05 PM, Dieki N > wrote: > > > I've created a patch to improve the behavior of brush size > > increase\decrease keyboard shortcuts, particularly at small sizes > > and large sizes. The old behavior increased\decreased the brush > > size by a fixed value (0.10), which worked fine at medium sizes, > > and reasonably well at large sizes (since you could hold down the > > keyboard shortcut to get a lot of change), but completely broke > > down at sizes underneath 0.20, since you tended to have two > > options; too big or too small. (Or, when under 0.10, none at all!) > > > > This patch sets the increment according to the following rules: > > > > If is greater than 2, it increments by 0.20. > > If is less than 2 but greater than 0.50, it increments > > by 0.10. > > If is less than 0.50 but greater than 0.10, it > > increments by 0.05. > > If is less than 0.10, it increments by 0.01. > > > > I've tested this in my own use over the last couple weeks, and it > > seems most helpful, particularly when masking fine details. This > > patch is against Master. Well I tried that patch and like it. I also thought that the scaling was too aggressive and that patch seems to settle it down nicely. Thanks Owen ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] GIMP Feature List
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:03:49 +0545 Wasik Mursalin Rushafi wrote: > Hi, > > can anyone give me any link to any documentation that contains > description about all the GIMP Features? > Would the manual be of any use? http://docs.gimp.org/2.6/en/ Owen ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] "Quick select" tool
> Currently GIMP has two tools that can smartly select a region of a > real > photo - the scissors tool, and the magic select tool. The magic select > tool > is only useful under very specific circumstances. The scissors tool, > while > useful, is often suboptimal speed-wise. > > I think a better way would be to create a smart brush-style selection > tool, > kind of a combination between quick mask and magic select. It would > select > up to edges in the image, but no farther than a certain distance set > in it's > options. This would allow rapid selection of an object, which could > then > easily be further refined with current methods, e.g. layer mask, quick > mask, > etc. > > Does this sound like a useful feature? > Probably, but does the Foreground select tool meet your requirements? -- Owen ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] GIMP GIT: window hints and text move
> Two questions based on GIT code. > > 1. Is the move feature for the text bounding box in 2.6 to be removed > from 2.7? I got used to being able to click and drag within the > bounding box in 2.6 to position a text layer and found that a nice > feature. Just wondering if that is gone from 2.7 development - I > can't > move it that way anymore, possibly because clicking inside the > bounding > box now acts as text selection. It has changed. I now select the Move tool (Move the active layer) to reposition. -- Owen ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] Reminder please: glib-related environment variables
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:37:52 -0800 Christopher Howard wrote: > Hi. I've got glib 2.20.5 installed on my system through the package > manager, but apparently that is not good enough to build the latest > GIMP. I built the latest glib code from the git repo and installed it, > but when I try to build GIMP the configure script keeps seeing the old > gimp instead of the newer build. > > Could somebody remind me of the proper environment variable settings? > I installed glib with the default options, so I think everything went > to /usr/local/lib and /usr/local/gimp-2.0/include. > Why don't you start again and follow http://www.gimpusers.com/news/2009-10-14/compiling-gimp-27-git-ubuntu-904-910.html According to my INSTALL notes: You need to have installed GTK+ version 2.18.1 or newer. GIMP also need a recent versions of GLib (>= 2.22.0) and Pango (>= 1.20.1). Sources for these can be grabbed from ftp://ftp.gtk.org/. Owen ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] Compiling from git on Ubuntu 9.04
On Sat, 3 Oct 2009 16:39:40 -0500 Chris Mohler wrote: > Well, I installed gtk 2.16.6 into /opt/gtk, then exported my > LD_CONFIG_PATH to there before compiling gimp (and also added to > PKG_CONFIG_PATH), so hopefully I've sidestepped that. If I'm headed > for trouble with this approach, someone please let me know :) > > It seems to be working OK, but it's not picking up the current GTK > settings/devices (like tablet). I think this method will work well > enough for testing purposes though, and my stock 2.6.6 install seems > to be working just fine. This might work and might not. Start gimp from the console, but before you do set the LD_LIBRARY_PATH to /opt/gtk or where ever you installed it Owen ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] Improved brush editing interface mock-up
> On Sunday 26 July 2009 11:02:30 SHIRAKAWA Akira wrote: >> Martin Nordholts wrote: >> > I would just like to point out that the smallest screen size >> supported >> > by GIMP is 1280x1024, so we don't need to make 1024x768 work or >> look >> > good. >> >> Yes, I've read that many times and I would agree with it too since >> anything lower than that resolution is rather old gear. I was >> experimenting (but what about 1440x900 screens though? This seems to >> be >> a common size for smaller monitors and some notebooks. The vertical >> resolution is the problem here). > > Id have to agree with this one. I namely own a laptop with this > resolution. I > havent had any problems using gimp on it tho and I hope it stays that > way. Tut, I have an eeepc, modern computer!!! Run gimp on its 800x480 screen no problems. Here's a screeenshot http://members.pcug.org.au/~rcook/images/eeepc800x480.png But you have to slightly mad, and should only be used as a form of self torture The 7" eeepc will never make the grade as a graphics tool :-) -- Owen ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] New color mode
> Hi > > I'm interested in writing a new color mode for gimp. I find the normal > too saturated and would like to make a new more vivid. > > I'm new to Gimp development and I think I need to discuss this with > someone before starting. Do anyone got any pointers or information > about how I should proceed with this? Are there any changes to the > code structure that will permit this to be done with a plugin > eventually? Hi, Just wondering what you mean by a "new color mode" (like RGB or Grayscale) Or are you thinking about the swatches available. If so, these are just a text file (look at your palettes) and modify to suit. Apolgies if I have you completely wrong -- Owen ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] why do I need babl to UNINSTALL gimp?
> Owen wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I just wanted to clean out multiple gimp installations and went to >>> uninstall a gimp cvs build. >>> >>> make uninstall >> >> >> >> I am not that good at reading Makefiles, but I don't think uninstall >> does anything and you are just doing a make? >> >> Hence the requirement for a newer babl >> > > Thanks Owen, that would explain the error but I thought make reported > something like "no rule for target uninstall" if it got fed crap. > > maybe there's some default target in the gimp Makefiles that matches a > non existent target. :? Well, looking at the my Makefile (recent git build, line 873) it reads; uninstall: uninstall-recursive Which doesn't seem to go anywhere. Just another mystery for me -- Owen ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] why do I need babl to UNINSTALL gimp?
> Hi, > > I just wanted to clean out multiple gimp installations and went to > uninstall a gimp cvs build. > > make uninstall I am not that good at reading Makefiles, but I don't think uninstall does anything and you are just doing a make? Hence the requirement for a newer babl -- Owen ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] How do I save the psd file with precomposite layer.
> I have a program, need to read precomposed layer. the result of mine > is > different from the preview from GIMP. > I have 10 layer if the psd file, and put only 2 layer visible. My > result has > all the 10 layers visible. I wonder how to save the precomposed image > explicitly. Perhaps http://groups.google.fr/group/comp.graphics.apps.gimp/browse_thread/thread/010e01bd0930438a/d796da451195ed1e?lnk=raot -- Owen ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] text box
> Hi, I wasn't sure who to contact, so I joined this list in the hopes I > could reach some developers. > > I'll try to keep this succinct. > > I recently switched to Ubuntu and Gimp with great excitement, finally > free of Satan's Empire! But my happiness was short lived because it > turns out my ability to use Gimp, and therefore Ubuntu, hinged on a > seemingly minor glitch- no text box with word wrap. > > I do simple graphic design- mostly ads for local businesses- usually > with text. In order to play with a body of text, changing fonts and > sizes, etc, you have to have a text box... hitting enter might work > for one line, but formatting a paragraph like that would take... well, > longer than booting up Windows and getting into Photoshop. > > I'm in and out of Photoshop all the time, so booting Windows just to > use it doesn't really work for me- so I just use Windows, which means > I'm not using Ubuntu, all because Gimp doesn't have this feature. > > So that's my story. If I had my way I would never use Windows or > Photoshop again- Adobe ruined Seattle's coolest neighborhood, after > all, and Microsoft ruined, well, everything else. > > So I hope this gets read by someone who has some ability to make text > boxes a feature in future releases. When you select the Text tool, one of the options is to show the editor, tick that. Owen ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] IPTC & EXIF Information
> I have been watching and searching for a while but have not found much > so I decided to ask. > > Is IPTC and EXIF support on the road map for GIMP in the near future? > > It looks like that information is currently stripped out of an image > if > the image is edited in GIMP. > > I would be nice if GIMP supported keeping the IPTC and EXIF > information > along with viewing it. With regard to exif data, there is an option in the jpeg save as dialog to retain or strip out the exif data Out of curiousity I just converted a jpg with exif to png then ran exiftool against it and got out some of the exif data, so I am not sure your "strip out exif data" is a correct statement AFAIK, exif support has been in gimp for years. IPTC is something new, though I think exiftool handles it Owen ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] concurrent 2.4 and 2.5
> Hi, > > I have installed distribution's 2.4 and cvs . I built cvs with > --preifix=/usr/local but there is some conflict with 2.4 which refuses > to > run having detected the conflicting library versions. Here the > beginning > of ldd for 2.4 > bash-3.2#echo $PATH > I think all the paths are getting mixed up /usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/opt/bin:/usr/kde/3.5/sbin:/usr/kde/3.5/bin:/usr/qt/3/bin ^^ before ^^^ > bash-3.2#echo $LD_LIBRARY_PATH > /usr/qt/3/lib It is picking up /usr/local because that is what you path has first (or before /usr/bin ) You are starting Gimp from a console? You need to set the PATH to see /usr/bin first and the same for LD_LIBRARY_PATH.to see /usr/lib first export PATH=/usr/bin:$PATH and export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib and when you start 2.5, do so from another console with the paths set to pick up the 2.5 libraries first. You should actually keep away from /usr/local, the various bashrc and profile files set up paths to include /usr and /usr/local and it can get confusing. Just build in /opt in accordance with the instructions for paths. > I adapted the way I set this up last time but something did not > follow. > > bash-3.2#which gimp4 > /usr/local/bin/gimp4 > bash-3.2#cat `!!` > cat `which gimp4` > #!/bin/sh > > #PATH=/usr/local/bin:$PATH > #export PATH > LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib > export LD_LIBRARY_PATH > > /usr/local/bin/gimp-2.5 "$@" > > > I don't see why 2.4 is pulling from /usr/local/lib ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] thumbnail generation for nautilus via gimp
On Tue, 04 Dec 2007 21:24:56 +0100 "Eckhard M." Jäger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > i started writing the internal Gimp script for looping over the images. > My code is so far the simple: > > # -*- coding: utf-8 -*- > > from gimpfu import * > import os > import os.path > > def python_thumbnailer(this_image, this_path): > a = this_path > > register( > "python-fu-thumbnailer", > "Generating thumbnails", > "Generating thumbnails for Nautilus via Gimp", > "Eckhard M. Jaeger", > "Eckhard M. Jaeger", > "2007", > "/Xtns/Nautilus Thumbnailer...", > "", > [ > (PF_STRING, "this_path", "Directory Path", ""), > ], > [], > python_thumbnailer) > > main() > > this script is copied into ~/.gimp-2.4/plug-ins but didn't appear > anywhere :( > I can't find the bug, please can somebody help me. Thanx. I don't know, but did you get any error messages when you started the Gimp from the command line? If it uses python, do you need to call python #!/usr/bin/python? Does it have the right permissions? When I add those corrections, I get the menu item Owen ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] Help!!! I need a home for my plug-ins
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 21:08:03 -0600 Jim Sabatke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've got a couple of plug-ins in the gimp plug-in registry that I need a > home for. Right now they live at a site that begins charging after > trying them for a month. I've tried putting them in my Yahoo briefcase, > but like Yahoo pictures, some people can see them and some can't, even > though I made everything accessible to the public. > > I'm not going to pay $10/month to host a couple of small files. > > Does anyone have a good idea about where I can put those files? > > I'm really finding writing plug-ins (and learning Python, which I've > wanted an excuse to do for a long time) gives me something I really feel > good about doing. There is a script-fu group on Yahoo, so if you have an account at Yahoo, go to http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/script-fu/ If your ISP has to charge for that, sounds like bad news to me Have a look at http://sdf.lonestar.org/index.cgi they used to have a free (but minimalistic) web account. Try Google for free web account/ shell accounts etc Owen ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] Requests for curves for photo retouching
> Andrea Olivotto wrote: >> Hello to everyone! >> >> I'm Andrea from Italy, this is my first post. >> >> I'm an amateur photographer, and I'm using GIMP to retouch my photos. I >> wrote some articles in italian on the argument, and I'm here to suggest >> some hints for this beautyful program. >> >> Histogram: >> >> - It's an invaluable tool for photo retouching, for valuating contrast, >> brightness, clipping (even channel by channel), posterization. >> > I just want to warn you that using the Curve tool for photo retouching > is not always a good idea because the so-called 'Value' curve is > nothing else than the same curve applied to the Red, Green and Blue > channels. Just select Colour->Curves->Channel value, select Red/Green/Blue or alpha if it exists and adjust. Owen ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] redeye.c and gimp-2.4
On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 17:54:15 +1100 Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Tried updating Robert Merkel and Benoit Drooghaag's redeye.c into gimp-2.4 > but it failed. > > I have 2.4 in /opt and called gimptool with that prefix, didn't set any other > environment variable > > Here is a compile error > > redeye.c: In function ‘remove_redeye’: > redeye.c:380: warning: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code > > And attempting to run the script produces an error dialogue > > > Procedure 'gimp-progress-init' has been called with a wrong value type > for argument 'gdisplay' (#2). Expected GimpDisplayID, got GimpInt32. The script functions in 2.4, just throws the error message above. So for my once in a year red eye removal needs, I don't think I will worry about it. Sorry for the noise Owen ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
[Gimp-developer] redeye.c and gimp-2.4
Tried updating Robert Merkel and Benoit Drooghaag's redeye.c into gimp-2.4 but
it failed.
I have 2.4 in /opt and called gimptool with that prefix, didn't set any other
environment variable
Here is a compile error
redeye.c: In function ‘remove_redeye’:
redeye.c:380: warning: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code
This is line 380
static void remove_redeye (GimpDrawable *drawable,GimpPreview *preview)
{ GimpPixelRgn src_rgn, dest_rgn;
guchar *src, *s;
guchar *dest, *d;
gint progress, max_progress;
const gint red=0, green=1, blue=2;
gint has_alpha, alpha;
gint x1, y1, x2, y2;
gint x, y;
gpointer pr;
And attempting to run the script produces an error dialogue
Procedure 'gimp-progress-init' has been called with a wrong value type
for argument 'gdisplay' (#2). Expected GimpDisplayID, got GimpInt32.
There is a
gimp_progress_init ("Removing Redeye...");
which I presume refers back to the declaration. But I can't find a 'gdisplay'
or 'GimpInt32' so they must be somewhere else
Can anyone give me a clue as to where to look
TIA
Owen
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] GEGL 0.0.12
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 11:10:25 +0100 "Øyvind Kolås" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2/19/07, Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 00:11:02 +0100 > > "Øyvind Kolås" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > GEGL 0.0.12 > > > ⎺⎺⎺ > > FWIW, I tried make(ing) this but was unable to do so until I had > > > #~/gegl-0.0.12/docs/gallery> touch clones.png > > #~/gegl-0.0.12/docs/gallery> touch OpenRaster-00.png > > #~/gegl-0.0.12/docs/gallery> touch OpenRaster-01.png > > #~/gegl-0.0.12/docs/gallery> touch OpenRaster-04.png > > Without the actual error messages you got or other circumstantial > information, that apparently prompted you to touch these, it isn't > worth anything. You do not > state whether GEGL seemed to work after installing it either. Apologies for not providing complete information. make generated these error make[2]: Entering directory `/home/owen/gegl-0.0.12/docs/gallery' --[Updating sample compositions]-- ./clones.xml make[3]: *** [clones.png] Error 255 ./OpenRaster-00.xml make[3]: *** [OpenRaster-00.png] Error 255 ./OpenRaster-01.xml make[3]: *** [OpenRaster-01.png] Error 255 ./OpenRaster-04.xml make[3]: *** [OpenRaster-04.png] Error 255 make[2]: *** [pngs] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/owen/gegl-0.0.12/docs/gallery' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/owen/gegl-0.0.12/docs/gallery' make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 I simply assumed that there were meant to be 4 pngs in the source, hence the touching Owen ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] GEGL 0.0.12
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 00:11:02 +0100 "Øyvind Kolås" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > GEGL 0.0.12 > ⎺⎺⎺ > > GEGL is a graph based image processing framework offering non-destructive > image > processing and compositing on large images. GEGL is suitable for projects > ranging from small one-off projects to interactive applications. FWIW, I tried make(ing) this but was unable to do so until I had #~/gegl-0.0.12/docs/gallery> touch clones.png #~/gegl-0.0.12/docs/gallery> touch OpenRaster-00.png #~/gegl-0.0.12/docs/gallery> touch OpenRaster-01.png #~/gegl-0.0.12/docs/gallery> touch OpenRaster-04.png I'm a bit out of my depth, so you can safely ignore me Owen ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] video tutorial about perspective clone tool
On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 11:41:21 +0100 "Pedro Alonso" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hi, > > I've done a video tutorial about perspective clone tool: > http://www.pedroalonso.es/PerspectiveClone.htm Awesome Thanks Owen ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] app icon update proposal
Jakub Steiner wrote: > Here's what I have for the dialog wilbers (down the bottom): > > http://jimmac.musichall.cz/i.php?i=Tango-GIMP Nice Owen ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] how do I build the latest GIMP on Fedora Core 4?
-- On Wed, 11 Jan 2006, Brannon King wrote: > I'm sorry if this is a stupid question. Traditionally I'm a Windows > programmer though I dual boot Fedora for some rare uses. (I'm open to other > distro options!) I tried to compile GIMP 2.3.6 on FC4 the other day. That > didn't work: I needed the 2.8 GLIB stuff. I downloaded the source code, etc., > for it and compiled GLIB. That worked, but it installed it into usr/local and > the GIMP compile still fails. How do I make the GIMP compile read the > libraries from the correct location? And I'm not real sure the GLIB compile > used the right libraries. Any good references on the matter would be > appreciated. You would have needed the latest glib,atk,pango and gtk They should have been available from Red Hat? If they weren't you should have built them like ./configure --prefix-/usr If you read ./configure --help you will see that unless you do this, it will be built in /usr/local Now that it is in /usr/local you need to set enviroment variables so that it picks up that library Try (presume Fedora is sort of standard linux) export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:/usr/lib export PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/usr/local/lib/pkgconfig/:/usr/lib/pkgconfig/ That way it will look at /usr/local before /usr owen ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] Problem With GLIB
On Mon, 12 Dec 2005, Michael Schumacher wrote: > > You get the files from the same source (or preferably a mirror server), > there is a win32 subdirectory which contains the binaries. > > > I surprised gtk-2.8 went on without glib-2.8 > > Hm? Well that was a comment out of ignorance of the modus operandii of Windows I can't build on my linux unless glib,pango and atk are all there in the appropriate version. Owen ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] Problem With GLIB
On Sun, 11 Dec 2005, Chris Share wrote: > > I'm getting the following error when I run CompileGIMPShellScript.sh: > > > checking for GLIB - version >= 2.8.0... no > *** Could not run GLIB test program, checking why... > *** The test program failed to compile or link. See the file config.log > for the > *** exact error that occured. This usually means GLIB is incorrectly > installed. > configure: error: Test for GLIB failed. See the file 'INSTALL' for help. > OK. Script is finished now. > > > I suspect that the error is because I don't have the correct version of > GLIB. > > What libraries do I need to fix this and where do I put them? Your suspicions are correct and as the program is looking for GLIB - version >= 2.8.0 I guess you best install glib-2.8 or better glib-2.8.4.tar.bz2 is probably the one you are after, found at http://www.gtk.org or direct thru ftp://ftp.gtk.org/pub/gtk/v2.8/ You don't say, but if you are using Windows, then the above advice may not apply. I surprised gtk-2.8 went on without glib-2.8 Owen ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] GIMP Dynamic Text
On Fri, 8 Jul 2005, Andrei Simion wrote: > Sven Neumann wrote: > > > > Andrei Simion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > >>I'd like to use the below GIMP Dynamic Text with Gimp-Perl, but I > >>cannot find any documentation on it. > > > > What is the below GIMP Dynamic Text? > > Is this: http://registry.gimp.org/plugin?id=337 That is a Gimp-1.2 plug-in and if you are using Gimp-2.x?, it will not work. Owen ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] winners movie
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 18:13:37 -0800 Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i finished the movie about the winners and added some additional splash > that got lost in the shuffle. Well if that was your first effort, well done. Some of the text was a bit fast for me, but that's ok, look forward to your next production. -- Owen ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] question regarding Order of Menu items
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004, Sven Neumann wrote: > Owen Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Other corresspondents suggest it can be done through the > > File->Preferences dialogue but as yet I haven't found that > > It's there, in the Tool Options section. Almost all settings that are > found in gimprc are also accessible from the Preferences dialog. My apologies, I could not see the blindingly obvious. Time for a holiday! Owen ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] question regarding Order of Menu items
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004, miriam clinton (iriXx) wrote: > > What i'm questioning here is - does this order of menu mean that one can > set one's own menu preferences? (a piece of functionality I hadn't > realised was there) or is this just a programming issue? If you are on *nix, you can do a 'man gimprc' In my case I wished to have the default interpolation selection set to Cubic (Best) and thanks to Sven, I added this to the bottom of my .gimp-2.2/gimprc file (interpolation-type cubic) Other corresspondents suggest it can be done through the File->Preferences dialogue but as yet I haven't found that Presumeably the Windows version gimprc file can be amended likewise. Owen ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] Order of Menu items (2.2Pre2)
On Sun, 28 Nov 2004, Sven Neumann wrote: > Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Could someone advise me what to edit to get the default menu listing > > for interpolation to show "Cubic (Best)" instead of "Linear" > > You don't need to hack the source to edit your preferences. GIMP has a > dialog for this or you could edit your gimprc: > (interpolation‐type linear) > > Sets the level of interpolation used for scaling and other > transformations. Possible values are none, linear and cubic. > Thank you. Possibly of zero relevance but the installation of 2.2Pre installed a /test/gimp-2.2/etc/gimp/2.0/gimprc I have a number of other installations and the gimprc file seemed to be installed in a sub directory that reflected the version, eg, /opt/etc/gimp/2.1/gimprc Owen ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
[Gimp-developer] Order of Menu items (2.2Pre2)
Could someone advise me what to edit to get the default menu listing for interpolation to show "Cubic (Best)" instead of "Linear" My guess is that it is in one or all of app/base/base-enums.c app/base/base-enums.h libgimp/gimpenums.h libgimp/gimpenums.c But my guesses are usually wrong. There doesn't seem to be any logic to what is written in there and what is displayed, but that is simply a lack of my comprehension of the C coding I would experiment by simply changing the order of the interpolation items in the above files, but with a couple of hours per build it could be a long experiment. TIA -- Owen ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] "Extrude"-filter and lots of triangles
On Mon, 2 Aug 2004 05:39:09 + Markus Triska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > a week or so ago, there was a request on comp.graphics.apps.gimp about the > availability of the PS extrude-filter, used for example in this tutorial: > Current version of the plug-in: http://stud4.tuwien.ac.at/~e0225855/extrude.c > Horrible picture mentioned: http://stud4.tuwien.ac.at/~e0225855/extrude.png > Hello, This was an interesting plug-in, the latest one "more interesting" than the first. Do you intend to have a user Dialogue interface for the plug-in? -- Owen ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
[Gimp-developer] Gimp-2.1.0 and Python
I just built 2.1.0 with --enable-python but there was no python on the menus. So I went and built 2.0.1 --enable-python and configure failed because I didn't have pygtk Installed that and rebuilt both. Python now shows in the menus. Perhaps the configure for 2.1.0 doesn't fail on missing pygtk? -- Owen ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] Problem starting gimp 2.0.0
On Tue, 6 Apr 2004 20:58:54 +0200 Frank Wittemeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ** (gimp:9612): WARNING **: Cannot open font file for font Verdana 10 > Speicherzugriffsfehler I would suggest that this means; a. the font has not installed correctly b. the file format is faulty Unless you *desperately* need verdana 10, ignore the message. Alternatively, you may try reinstalling that font. Owen -- - __0 http://www.pcug.org.au/~rcook/rr.html for rides _ \<,_ (_)./(_) http://weather.smh.com.au/weather/canberra.html --- ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] ANNOUNCE: Pre-releases for Perl bindings, Help pages and GAP + Win32 installer
On Sat, 27 Mar 2004 23:47:22 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have just tested this release and updated my tutorial so that > it works with it. You may see the result at: > http://imagic.weizmann.ac.il/~dov/gimp/perl-tut-2.0/ . I downloaded from ftp://ftp.gimp.org/pub/gimp/plug-ins/v2.0/perl/ but it wouldn't configure/make ERROR from evaluation of /home/owen/Gimp-2.0pre1/UI/Makefile.PL: Can't locate object method "add_define" via package "ExtUtils::Depends" at ./Makefile.PL line 42 In fact a grep of all modules could not locate add_define so I was wondering if that routine has been replaced with something else? -- Owen ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] Get ready for 2.0.0
On 22 Mar 2004 18:30:40 +0100 Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >as most of you probably have noticed already, the 2.0rc1 tarball is >available from ftp://ftp.gimp.org/pub/gimp/v2.0/testing/. > In order to celebrate the GIMP 2.0 release, there are going to be > release parties. So far the Wiki lists two parties: Congratulations, and enjoy the party! -- Owen ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] Path tutorials
On Sat, 24 Jan 2004 01:21:50 +0100 Niklas Mattisson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://scizzo.gimp.org/gimp/Paths_Basics/ > http://scizzo.gimp.org/gimp/Paths_Basics2/ I think they are excellent. maybe you should advise in comp.graphics.apps.gimp also -- Owen ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
[Gimp-developer] gimp-freetype plugin
I just downloaded the freetype plugin from CVS and received
./configure: line 3628: syntax error near unexpected token `1.3.23,'
./configure: line 3628: `AM_PATH_GIMP_2_0(1.3.23, , { { echo "$as_me:$LINENO: error:
Cannot find GIMP-2.0." >&5'
and this is line 3628
AM_PATH_GIMP_2_0(1.3.23, , { { echo "$as_me:$LINENO: error: Cannot find GIMP-2.0." >&5
echo "$as_me: error: Cannot find GIMP-2.0." >&2;}
{ (exit 1); exit 1; }; })
Sorry couldn't work out the syntax error.
The "old" plugin does not work with gimp2.0pre, but was working with 1.3.20?
FWIW
--
Owen
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
[Gimp-developer] Re: [Gimp-user] gimp-help-2 .. xi:include
Organization: The Mdk 9.1 machine (Nr 1) X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.8claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 11 Jan 2004 15:28:45 +0100 Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > cd ../html/C && /usr//bin/xsltproc --xinclude --nonet > > ../../stylesheets/plainhtml.xsl ../../src/gimp.xml > > Writing gimp-xrefs-en.xml for book(GIMP) > > No template matches xi:include in chapter. > > > > and 100s more of No template matches xi:include > > > > The URL here > > http://www.w3.org/2003/XInclude";> Thanks to the corresspondence on both these lists, now have gimp-help-2 working. On this Mdk 9.2 machine, downloaded and installed; libxml2-2.6.4.tar.gz (dated 24 Dec 03) libxslt-1.1.2.tar.gz (dated 24 Dec 03) Now $ xsltproc --version Using libxml 20604, libxslt 10102 and libexslt 802 xsltproc was compiled against libxml 20604, libxslt 10102 and libexslt 802 libxslt 10102 was compiled against libxml 20604 libexslt 802 was compiled against libxml 20604 The only errors in the gimp-help-2 build were a couple like; Error: no ID for constraint linkend: toolbox-colorpicker. Error: no ID for constraint linkend: glossary-modes. Which I presume is known. Thanks,looking good -- Owen ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] Friends of GIMP
On Wed, 24 Dec 2003 16:40:14 +0100 David Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here's the list of names on the Friends of GIMP list > Jay Cox <16 of the 18 friends snipped> > Chris Lahey Only 18 friends? Does the Gimp need more friends? Or does the "Friends of Gimp" have some other meaning that we newbies do not understand? Owen ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: 16 new brushes for the GIMP
On 31 Oct 2003 17:26:46 +0100
Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes on gimpwin-users:
> >
> > > [...] If you are involved in the GIMP v1.3/2.0 project
> > > (ie; the new GIMP), please feel free to include my custom brushes
> > > (or any of my other offerings) with your work (they are GPL'd).
> >
> > > http://www.tuxfiles.com/yourgimp/brushes/tuxfiles_brushes/
>
> I would appreciate if someone could evaluate the quality of these
> brushes and report back here. We could need a better set of default
> brushes.
I would call them a "Boutique" collection of brushes and not really a default set.
They all appear to be called "Pasted Layer". It appears that when you modify the name
of a .gbr file, the name has to be exactly the same number of characters as the
original name ("Pasted Layer" ie 12) otherwise you get a "file has been truncated
error"
Anyway, most of them are pretty good.
Owen
--
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
[Gimp-developer] gimp-freetype-0.3 plugin
I installed Mdk 9.2 and Gimp-1.3.21 went on without any trouble (Hooray!) gimp-freetype-0.3 failed in make main.c:147: error: too few arguments to function `gimp_plugin_help_register' make[2]: *** [main.o] Error 1 Commented out the 3 lines around 147 and it made and installed Ok FWIW -- Owen ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-1.3.21, fontconfig-2.2+ configure problems
On 08 Oct 2003 10:43:26 -0700 Jeff Trefftzs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > configure: error: Library requirements (fontconfig >= 2.2.0) not met; > consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if your > libraries are in a nonstandard prefix so pkg-config can find them. In my case with Mdk 9.1, I downloaded fontconfig-2.2.0.tar.gz but had trouble installing it. 1. I had to configure with --disable-docs 2. It exited in make while trying to do something with /usr/share/fonts/default/ghostscript (possibly because of a sym link in the directory). Removed the ghostscript directory and all was well. 1.3.21 then built normally. 3. I notice I have freetype-2.1.5.tar.bz2 in the build directory, so guess must have needed that as well. So far so good Owen ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] Native English speaking eyeballs requested (and others too)
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 16:41:51 +0200 "Branko Collin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Could those of the English speaking persuasion take a quick look at > bug <http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119210> and post your > comments there (or start a discussion here). It looks like Dave N's suggestion has been incorporated already Owen -- ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: [Gimp-web] Getting Involved section on newsite
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 00:13:33 +0200 "Branko Collin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The photo, you mean? I like it too. It adds a personal touch, and > that's always helpful. Perhaps some names on the photo would enhance its personality? Owen -- ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] writing german online help
On Sun, 27 Jul 2003 12:36:08 +0200 Roman Joost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But, this is not my main intention here - lets speak about german > documentation. I figured out, that the gimp-help will now be written in > docbook sgml. Is there a Gimp document style sheet? Owen -- ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] version numbers
On Wed, 18 Jun 2003 11:41:20 -0400 Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > maybe we can jump it up to 2 simply because everyone seems to be > involved again :) Follow Mr Knuth's technique Call this one 1.4 which would be followed by 1.41 then 1.414 ... 1.4142136 ad infinitum This has the advantages of a. being the square root of 2, the number so many want b. The next version number will always be known.. And when GEGL comes along, this will be an exponential jump, so the numbers will begin at 2.7 (which will the version of GTK+ at the time) 2.71 ... 2.7182818 It's a cold, foggy grey miserable day...not much else to do :-) owen -- ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
[Gimp-developer] Latest GimpCVS
The CVS I downloaded 20030616 (Last Changelog entry was 2003-06-14 Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * app/gui/image-menu.c (image_menu_entries): removed duplicate of Threshold menu entry. ) compiled and installed OK but stalled on start up FWIW 13:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/mnt/hdb8/GimpCVS/gimp]#/usr/local/bin/gimp-1.3 & [3] 14024 13:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/mnt/hdb8/GimpCVS/gimp]#/usr/local/lib/gimp/1.3/plug-ins/tool-safe-mode: fatal error: Segmentation fault /usr/local/lib/gimp/1.3/plug-ins/tool-safe-mode (pid:14026): [E]xit, [H]alt, show [S]tack trace or [P]roceed: S bash: S: command not found [3]+ Stopped /usr/local/bin/gimp-1.3 Removed the plug-in and no other problems The first changelog entry I can find is 2003-01-05 so maybe it is me Owen -- Sylpheed-WARNING **: can't open signature file: /root/.signature ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] Keybindings
On 03 Apr 2003 13:26:08 +0200 Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I've re-updated keybindings.txt,tex and pdf to match the cvs as at > > 31 Mar. > > > > http://www.webone.com.au/~oc/gimp/keybindings.pdf > > http://www.webone.com.au/~oc/gimp/keybindings.tex > > http://www.webone.com.au/~oc/gimp/keybindings.txt > > I've committed the updated keybindings.txt to CVS. I'm not sure what > to do about the PDF version. We already have quick_reference.ps which > serves a similar purpose but is outdated. Do you intend to extend the > PDF to include the information that is in quick_reference.ps now? > Should it perhaps be named gimp-quick-reference.pdf (or similar) then? I have now uploaded the post script file from which the pdf file was made, http://www.webone.com.au/~oc/gimp/keybindings.ps quick_reference.ps (and tex) is a different document all together. It shows mouse combinations and actions etc. I have yet to start on that one. keybindings.pdf was produced as an alternative to the text file, looks better. Anyway, leave it to you. Owen -- ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] Keybindings
On Wed, 2 Apr 2003 08:47:27 +1000 Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I've re-updated keybindings.txt,tex and pdf to match the cvs as at 31 Mar. The text file now lines up is ok in Mozilla and with less and it's is its The keybinding reassignment paragraph rewritten, thanks Raphaël http://www.webone.com.au/~oc/gimp/keybindings.pdf http://www.webone.com.au/~oc/gimp/keybindings.tex http://www.webone.com.au/~oc/gimp/keybindings.txt Owen -- ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
[Gimp-developer] Keybindings
I've updated keybindings.txt,tex and pdf to match the cvs as at 31 Mar http://www.webone.com.au/~oc/gimp/keybindings.pdf http://www.webone.com.au/~oc/gimp/keybindings.tex http://www.webone.com.au/~oc/gimp/keybindings.txt Owen ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
[Gimp-developer] keybindings.txt and cheat_sheet.txt
keybindings.txt has been rewritten. See http://www.webone.com.au/~oc/gimp/kb.html The txt, tex and pdf versions are referenced there for download. The txt version looks awful,varies with editor...see pdf version Some comments are; Conflict of shortcut keys C Clone is shown as C on the main dialogue box and also Image->Tools->Paint Tools->Clone is shown as C Color picker is selected, and shown, byC on the main dialogue box and also Image->Tools->Selection Tools->By Color select Same same for Blur or Sharpen Vs Bezier Conflict ofB Presume these are documented bugs as only one of them works 1.2 stated "The GIMP also comes with a menurc that will implement Adobe Photoshop style keybindings, if you are used to Photoshop, this may prove helpful. To use it, rename ps-menurc to menurc and put it in ~/gimp-1.2, overwriting the one that is already there (you may want to make a backup first)." But seems to be different with GTK2 Path key bindings shown, but do not operate in Channel Ops and path Ops I will look at the "mouse" cheat sheets once I work out how to get my two button mouse working as three button mouse ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] Outdated docs: keybindings.txt andcheat_sheet.txt - any volunteers?
On Mon, 3 Mar 2003 15:43:44 +0100 Raphaël Quinet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > After Sven replaced the Alt-F shortcut by Ctrl-F to be able to reserve > the Alt-... shortcuts for keyboard navigation in the menus (*), I had > a look at some old files: > docs/cheat_sheet.txt > docs/keybindings.txt > docs/quick_reference.ps Is the tex file still around for quick_reference? Otherwise I am prepared to start again from scratch. Owen ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp binary size
On Tue, 28 Jan 2003 10:01:29 +0100 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tino Schwarze) wrote: > > A recent Gimp 1.3.12 was 38551604 from one of the CVS repositories > > > > Why are the binaries of the 1.3 series 15 times the size of 1.2 ? > > Wild guess: They probably still have the debug info attached. Try > using"strip" on the binary (or use "make install-strip"). Thanks, using the strip option reduced the binary size to 2109532. Owen ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
[Gimp-developer] Gimp binary size
I apologize for this question The Gimp 1.2 I have is 2113804 bytes, it came with the MDK 9 distro The Gimp 1.3.11 was 3597994 bytes, officially released 1.3.11 A recent Gimp 1.3.12 was 38551604 from one of the CVS repositories Why are the binaries of the 1.3 series 15 times the size of 1.2 ? TIA Owen ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] Icon artist wanted for GFig plug-in
On 07 Jan 2003 02:19:55 +0100 Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > stock-copy-object.png et al stock-delete.png I used the one found in the build gimp-1.3.11/themes/Default/images/stock-delete-16.png and rescaled x3 to make a stock-delete.png (48x48) http://www.webone.com.au/~oc/gfigiconsxcf.tar.gz holds the above + the xcf file for all icons other than the copy and delete icons(59K) http://www.webone.com.au/~oc/gfigicons.tar.gz has all the icons (12K) With the exception of the delete and copy images, the others are just redrawn gfig figures, no imagination has been applied. For the GFig "About" graphic, do you want something similiar? Owen ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] ANNOUNCE: GIMP 1.3.11
On 30 Dec 2002 22:10:31 +0100 Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > to bring this year to a happy end, here's another development release > of The GIMP: Very good and a painless installation with MDK9. Thank you, Owen ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
[Gimp-developer] gdk_set/get_use_xshm()
The GIMP currently does something a bit peculiar - it calls
gdk_get_use_xshm() and then passes the values it gets from this
to plugins, which call gdk_set_use_xshm().
I suppose the reasoning here is to propagate the command line
--no-xshm to each plugin. If GTK+ is autodetecting the value of
gdk_use_xshm, as it normally does, then the plugins could
do that themselves just as well.
What I'd like to do is one or more of:
- Make gdk_set/get_use_xshm() correspond exactly to the command
line option, instead of a mix of the command line option
and what has been autodetected so far.
- Deprecate gdk_set/get_use_xshm().
- Remove the --no-xshm command line option
I believe that the problems that --no-xshm was added to deal
with have most or all been fixed now and represented bugs in
the GTK+ shm code. It really makes little sense to me to
have a command line option to enable a bug workaround ...
I doubt people want to type gimp --no-xshm all the time, so
I suspect that if we needed a way of enabling a workaround
for this, as an environment variable would make more sense.
Do people use this command line option? Is my understanding
of what the GIMP is doing correct?
Regards,
Owen
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
