Re: [Gimp-developer] features

2011-11-19 Thread gg

On 11/19/11 07:40, M. Al-Bedah wrote:

Dear Gimp Developers
I completely support Open Source applications. Unfortunately I am not a
developer, but I heavily depend  encourage developers  Open Source
OS's  applications. I support by spreading the word, educating people,
 provide financial aids to assist developers enhance their products.

Gimp is a very excellent product. However, as a photographer, I can
confirm that it lacks several features, therefore I end up using
Photoshop, ACDSee, etc. I have seen other Image editing (open source)
apps  I know those features are do-able. I totally understand that all
of you are developing your products for free. What would it take,  more
importantly how much would it cost, to roll out features like:
1) Content Award scale - fill
2) Adjustment layers for non destructive workflow
3) LAB Mode
4) RAW images editor
5) Calculation tool
6) Enhance filters to have more (like photoshop)  especially (fill 50%)
and (Highpass)
7) convert to smart layer / filter for non destructive workflow
8) file browser (like bridge) to classify, tag, organize, photos.

I understand I am asking for a lot. But if Funding is the issue, I
know group of photographer who would like nothing but to contribute.  I
can deliver them. The problem with Gimp now is that it does not offer
those pro tools. Yet some of those tools are available in other open
source apps like Pinta, Rawtherapee, Shotwell, etc.

Thank you for your time  support
Mo Al-Bedah




I'll let core devs answer this excellent initiative. One comment on your 
requests:


 6) Enhance filters to have more (like photoshop)  especially (fill 50%)
 and (Highpass)

Gaussian blur is a low pass , you could presumably do a high-pass 
without too much effort by subtraction. Equally well, that means this 
feature could be implemented with minimal effort.


Having it fully integrated with a preview dlg would be a good feature 
and probably would not cost too much ;)


regards. GG.
___
gimp-developer-list mailing list
gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list


Re: [Gimp-developer] features

2011-11-19 Thread Alexia Death
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine
alexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com wrote:
 8) file browser (like bridge) to classify, tag, organize, photos.

 Do not want :)

To elaborate on that, file management is not graphics editors job.
It's a whole separate tool. For photos I use digikam.  Really nice
tool for managing photo files at least for me.

-- 
--Alexia
___
gimp-developer-list mailing list
gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list


Re: [Gimp-developer] features

2011-11-19 Thread gespert...@gmail.com
 To elaborate on that, file management is not graphics editors job.
 It's a whole separate tool. For photos I use digikam.

A file browser (Adobe Brigde) makes sense in Adobe apps because
they're all inter-connected and having an improved file management
tool to exchange assets between tools (more efficiently than the
questionable windows file explorer) is useful.
Anyway, Bridge as far as I can remember was a heavy slug and it didn't
bring much benefit.
Our design suite applications aren't connected like Adobe's and
won't be in the foreseeable future.

Regarding the rest of the feature requests, most of them are available
as third party plugins.
There are serveral interesting RAW packages. UFRAW has a module that
imports directly to GIMP, pretty much like Adobe Camera Raw does.
Maybe the rest of the available packages (Darktable, Rawtherapee, etc)
could get some similar modules to interface with GIMP.
That would be interesting.

The non-destructive tools would be really welcome.
You seem to miss one important request for photographic workflow:
working with higher bit depth.
Current 8 bpc isn't enough for high quality manipulation.

Fortunately, making GIMP's core less destructive is high in the
priorities list for next versions.
I'm not a developer, but I'd suggest you to focus your effort on
backing the full migration to GEGL which will give much better quality
and non-destructive editing. The rest can and will be constructed on
top of it.

 You really want to stop using Photoshop
 terminology and switch to plain English :)
 Are we talking about smart objects i.e.
 embedding other documents as layers?

@Prokoudine: Smart objects in Adobe are external linked assets. For
instance you can import a vector logo from a different app and the
raster application will rasterize it dinamically. If you change the
external file, the changes will be reflected in the smart layer.
It's an interesting concept and can be also used to convert an
internal layer as a dynamic object, in order to apply the
transformation stack without destroying the original pixels.
iirc that's pretty much the idea with GEGL too, so we're fine :)
___
gimp-developer-list mailing list
gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list