[Gimp-developer] Selections to shapes

2015-03-20 Thread Joseph Bupe
Hi,

It would be nice to have controls for tweaking rectangle and ellipse
selections into different shapes for designing pixel-based graphics with
easy. Currently, the rectangle selections can only be tweaked into a
rounded-corners shape. This should be extended further to allow shaping
selections into different forms based on the type of the starting selection.

Such design shapes can then be filled with colour, stroked, beveled,
embossed etc.

Regards.

Joseph
___
gimp-developer-list mailing list
List address:gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list


Re: [Gimp-developer] Selections to shapes

2015-03-20 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno
Try using Select-To Path --
Everything you describe is already possible.

Although, maybe, selection-To path could have more usability if it
would change to the Path Tool, with the new path as active, so that
its nodes are displayed at once. Currently, one has to manually go to
the Paths dockable, set the path as visible, select the Path Tool and
click on the path (4 separate actions) before being able to see the
handles.


   js
  --


On 20 March 2015 at 06:01, Joseph Bupe joseph.b...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi,

 It would be nice to have controls for tweaking rectangle and ellipse
 selections into different shapes for designing pixel-based graphics with
 easy. Currently, the rectangle selections can only be tweaked into a
 rounded-corners shape. This should be extended further to allow shaping
 selections into different forms based on the type of the starting selection.

 Such design shapes can then be filled with colour, stroked, beveled,
 embossed etc.

 Regards.

 Joseph
 ___
 gimp-developer-list mailing list
 List address:gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
 List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
 List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list
___
gimp-developer-list mailing list
List address:gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list


Re: [Gimp-developer] Selections to shapes

2015-03-20 Thread Joseph Bupe
Hi Joao.

I know about the selection to paths, but it's not as rich and interactive
as I am proposing.

What I had in mind is something like Arakne's Path-Shape-Creator here
http://www.arakne.es/en/dessign/gimp-python-script-shape-creator-shapes/

In fact, Ajay Ramanathan's proposed combined-selection tool here :
https://git.gnome.org/browse/gimp/log/?h=soc-2013-combined-selection-tool
contains some possibility to create n-polygon shapes, just working with
selections (not paths). I just thought from that angle it would be nice to
consider other possible design shapes as well.

Regards.

Joseph
___
gimp-developer-list mailing list
List address:gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list


Re: [Gimp-developer] MWG composite functions gexiv2

2015-03-20 Thread Alan Pater
I have gone ahead with the first patch of the series, adding the
xmp.dc.description property to the get_comment function in gexiv2.
Comments and testers are very welcome.

 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=746424

On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 12:41 AM, Alan Pater alan.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
 I have been talking with Jim Nelson about adding composite functions
 to gexiv2. These would be based on Metadata Working Group guidelines
 with the addition of a couple of commonly-requested formats.

https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=712429

 I can do a lot of the grunt work and testing, but need a hand with
 some of the conversions, from xml for example. Who would like to
 volunteer to give me a hand?

 I think it makes sense to do this work in gexiv2, that way all the
 individual applications don't have to maintain duplicate code for
 these functions themselves. And by abiding to MWG standards, everyone
 doesn't have to reinvent the wheel and come up their own set of common
 metadata properties.

 Here is a link to the MWG Guidelines:
 http://www.metadataworkinggroup.org/pdf/mwg_guidance.pdf

 My thoughts are to also include support for reading proprietary
 metadata from ACDSee, as there appears to be a lot of requests from
 users of that Windows app to migrate to a Free Software alternative.

 Volunteers?

 Cheers,
 Alan

 On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 10:19 PM, Jim Nelson j...@yorba.org wrote:
 Alan,

 I would like to ask if I should jump and provide patches for MWG composite
 tag functions in gexiv2?


 That would be great.  I agree with your comment there, this seems to be a
 no-brainer.

 My coding skills are quite basic, but this work looks like a reasonable
 match for me. I would need a bit of help with some of the more complex data
 conversions. Is this something likely to be incorporated on a timely basis?
 Are there resources available to test my work?


 Unfortunately, the time I can offer toward gexiv2 is extremely limited.  If
 you need help, I would recommend reaching out to other contributors (either
 directly or on the gexiv2 mailing  list) for guidance.  In particular, the
 GIMP project may be interested in your work, now that GIMP has a hard
 dependency on gexiv2.  Michael Natterer and Jehan Pages are the first people
 I would contact.

 I have gone ahead and added a couple of fields to the existing set_comment
 function in gexiv2.


 I'll take a look at your patch.

 -- Jim
___
gimp-developer-list mailing list
List address:gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list


Re: [Gimp-developer] ABOUT GIMP SOFTWARE

2015-03-20 Thread Michael Schumacher


On 03/20/2015 03:40 PM, SEDA AYDIN wrote:

 Dear Authoried,

Hi,

 I’m working in Şişecam IT department as technology development
 specialist. We have to learn some detail before installation approval
 for Gimp software. If you you are not related person, can you direct it
 to related person?

you have reached a mailing list, so this will be available to everyone
who is interested.

Now let's see...


 1) How the program will be established (CD, *.iso, *.exe, URL etc.)?

Depends on the platform - the choices imply that you are using a
Microsoft Windows platform, so *.exe is probably what you want. The
downloads are at http://www.gimp.org/downloads/


 2) The program runs on the server? Or just making installation on the
 client PC is enough?

GIMP can certainly run on a server, but the usual installation method is
on client PCs.


 3) What are the requirement for the program will be
 installed in server and / or PC? (for example: Internet Explorer
 version must be xxx, for opening documents Foxit / Acrobat Reader
 version must be xxx,  * .iso / *. Exe file as the file to open the
 installation will be required as prerequisites Is there a tool or
 software, if the installation will make with * .iso / *. exe file do
 we need extra tool or software as prerequisites, etc.)?

I can't think of any special requirements here.


 4) How will licensing? User-based licensing or? Which has been
 received as the number of licenses such simultaneous use? For
 example: 4 given license, a person who will use as 5th person,
 somebody have to be close the program?

This is easy - GIMP is licensed under the GNU GPL, and this license puts
no restrictions on usage: https://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html

Note that you can be required to pay attention to its terms regarding
distribution, see
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#InternalDistribution


 5) Can the program be installed by a normal user? Or need to give
 admin rights?

No, a normal user can't install the program- the installers available
from http://www.gimp.org require admin rights (again, assuming this is
about a Windows platform)


 6) Did the program run with admin rights?

It doesn't admin right to be run, but it can be run with admin rights
(no sure if I get that questions correctly).


 7) İs there any problem for running with McAfee?

None that we know of.


 8) İs there any particular security needs (will software need given
 special permission on pc firewall, corporate firewall, proxy etc.)
 for during usage or making license activation or update?

Not really - you might want to make sue that the online help is
accessible unless you plan to install that locally, but that is just
HTTP on standard ports.


 9) How we can update ( from internet, will you make it, etc.) the software?

The usual method is to download from http://www.gimp.org/downloads/


 10) In order to run the software, do we need to install additional tool or 
 software?

No.


-- 
Regards,
Michael
GPG: 96A8 B38A 728A 577D 724D 60E5 F855 53EC B36D 4CDD
___
gimp-developer-list mailing list
List address:gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list


[Gimp-developer] Huge performance improvement idea

2015-03-20 Thread Chandana Bandara
Greetings from Chandana,

I have an idea that can make a huge impact on performance increase on GIMP
image manipulations. This idea occurred to me when I was working on a large
banner which I had to do some experiments (Colour changes, layer movements,
Font changes, etc...)

The problem was, it took so long time to do even a small change in the
image. I do not have huge memory. What I thought was, what if I can
1. Get a copy of the current image (with all layer details)
2. Resize it to a smaller version
3. Do all the modifications I do in the small version
4. Apply all changes I did in the smaller version to the larger version

This way, computer resources required are much less than what needed in the
original image. We need to implement a way so that GIMP will remember all
the modifications we do in the small image and from a single click GIMP
should be able to do it to the larger image. Another good version of this
idea would be to

1. Create a small image
2. Do whatever we want in to the small image
3. From a single click, GIMP create scaled up image and apply all the
things we did to the small image to the large image

Please take this idea into consideration.

Thank you,
Chandana Bandara
Coolbit Software Solutions (Pvt) Ltd
www.coolbitsoftware.com

Web applications | Web designing | Web hosting | Product/Commercial
photography
___
gimp-developer-list mailing list
List address:gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list


[Gimp-developer] ABOUT GIMP SOFTWARE

2015-03-20 Thread SEDA AYDIN
Dear Authoried,

I’m working in Şişecam IT department as technology development specialist. We 
have to learn some detail before installation approval for Gimp software. If 
you you are not related person, can you direct it to related person?

1)How the program will be established (CD, *.iso, *.exe, URL etc.)?
2)The program runs on the server? Or just making installation on 
the client PC is enough?
3)What are the requirement for the program will be installed in 
server and / or PC? (for example: Internet Explorer version must be xxx, for 
opening documents Foxit / Acrobat Reader version must be xxx,  * .iso / *. Exe 
file as the file to open the installation will be required as prerequisites Is 
there a tool or software, if the installation will make with * .iso / *. exe 
file do we need extra tool or software as prerequisites, etc.)?
4)How will licensing? User-based licensing or? Which has been 
received as the number of licenses such simultaneous use? For example: 4 given 
license, a person who will use as 5th person, somebody have to be close the 
program?
5)Can the program be installed by a normal user? Or need to give 
admin rights?
6)Did the program run with admin rights?
7)İs there any problem for running with McAfee?
8)İs there any particular security needs (will software need given 
special permission on pc firewall, corporate firewall, proxy etc.) for during 
usage or making license activation or update?
9)How we can update ( from internet, will you make it, etc.) the 
software?
10)  In order to run the software, do we need to install additional 
tool or software?

Please inform me urgently.

Kind Regards,

SEDA AYDIN
___
gimp-developer-list mailing list
List address:gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list


Re: [Gimp-developer] Huge performance improvement idea

2015-03-20 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno
On 20 March 2015 at 13:43, Chandana Bandara cbsoftw...@gmail.com wrote:
 Greetings from Chandana,

Hi Chandana -
welcome to this group.

Thank you for your suggestions.
In fact the workflow you suggest could be made explicitly possible in
the future as we move GIMP to
a non-destructive editing paradgim using GEGL

That will take a lot of time, however - as there is a huge lot of work
for such fundamental changes.

However, the good news is that the underlying image processing in GIMP
- GEGL - was conceived
to allow preview renderings - that would behave just like you suggest
(working on the
zoomed out part of an image as if it were a smaller image, for
example) - and just this week
Pippin sent an e-mail detailing how the final pieces are being put in
place so that this starts working.

So - it is not so simple, or explicit for the final users as you have
it in your e-mail, but it is basically the same idea -
just search the list developer list archives for a message from Øyvind
Kolås on March the 18th to see the details.

  js
 --



 I have an idea that can make a huge impact on performance increase on GIMP
 image manipulations. This idea occurred to me when I was working on a large
 banner which I had to do some experiments (Colour changes, layer movements,
 Font changes, etc...)

 The problem was, it took so long time to do even a small change in the
 image. I do not have huge memory. What I thought was, what if I can
 1. Get a copy of the current image (with all layer details)
 2. Resize it to a smaller version
 3. Do all the modifications I do in the small version
 4. Apply all changes I did in the smaller version to the larger version

 This way, computer resources required are much less than what needed in the
 original image. We need to implement a way so that GIMP will remember all
 the modifications we do in the small image and from a single click GIMP
 should be able to do it to the larger image. Another good version of this
 idea would be to

 1. Create a small image
 2. Do whatever we want in to the small image
 3. From a single click, GIMP create scaled up image and apply all the
 things we did to the small image to the large image

 Please take this idea into consideration.

 Thank you,
 Chandana Bandara
 Coolbit Software Solutions (Pvt) Ltd
 www.coolbitsoftware.com

 Web applications | Web designing | Web hosting | Product/Commercial
 photography
 ___
 gimp-developer-list mailing list
 List address:gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
 List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
 List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list
___
gimp-developer-list mailing list
List address:gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list