Re: [Gimp-developer] What next after sourceforge.net?

2015-05-30 Thread Michael Schumacher


On 05/30/2015 03:46 AM, Sam Gleske wrote:

 In fact, the direct download link for Windows is a tiny this link
 at the end of the description paragraph underneath the GIANT torrent 
 link.

As you can see in the thread I linked to, this is going to change - with
both links to be more prominent than they have been before.

 There are plenty of trusted binary hosting services for open source
 projects.  One not need look far for alternate hosting if the worry is GIMP
 infrastructure overload.

I'm actually not sure if it ever was a real overload, could also jut be
that the web server config we have limited the connections.

Nowadays, this does not seem to be an issue - probably due to the fact
that there are tons of torrent seeders for the current downloads, and
many people use it.

Changing to the current server was not entirely voluntary - we had our
previous one failing, and now GNOME generously provides a virtual
machine in one of the data centers the use themselves.

 Personally I feel the Download button on the front page should
 actually download the software (detecting your browser language and
 platform).

For that to work, it will have to be easy to switch between different
platforms.

 Regardless of the way in which the downloads are presented.  I do think the
 downloads page is pretty busy.  My friends need someone like me to help
 them sort it out when they're getting their copy of GIMP.  I feel that flow
 is in need of improvement.

I guess the new layout will make it easier for them.


-- 
Regards,
Michael
GPG: 96A8 B38A 728A 577D 724D 60E5 F855 53EC B36D 4CDD
___
gimp-developer-list mailing list
List address:gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list


Re: [Gimp-developer] What next after sourceforge.net?

2015-05-29 Thread Hanno Böck
Hi,

I'm not a GIMP dev or involved in any way, but a quick comment from me.

One obvious thing: The easier you make it to find the legitimate / real
download the less likely people will look for it elsewhere.

Now let's assume I'm a windows user, not super skilled, but I heared
that GIMP is a good graphics tool and I want to get it.

Right now if I go to the gimp webpage I see a big download button. That
looks good.
However then it gets murky. I get to a download page that will offer me
a bunch of stuff I don't need and don't understand.

I have to scroll down quite a bit to read this:
Nightly builds for Windows are available at darkrefraction.com. This
is unstable software, please use it at your own risk.

Ok, I as a poor user read: This is something I don't understand (a
nightly build) and it's dangerous, because they talk about risk.

There is no offer of a windows download that doesn't sound scary.

No wonder people will go elsewhere to get the GIMP.

Make it easier and non-scary to find the right download and you'll take
away downloads from the badware-bundlers.

cu,
-- 
Hanno Böck
http://hboeck.de/

mail/jabber: ha...@hboeck.de
GPG: BBB51E42


pgp60MlNLM5ej.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
gimp-developer-list mailing list
List address:gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list


Re: [Gimp-developer] What next after sourceforge.net?

2015-05-29 Thread Michael Schumacher


On 05/29/2015 07:51 PM, Hanno Böck wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I'm not a GIMP dev or involved in any way, but a quick comment from me.
 
 One obvious thing: The easier you make it to find the legitimate / real
 download the less likely people will look for it elsewhere.
 
 Now let's assume I'm a windows user, not super skilled, but I heared
 that GIMP is a good graphics tool and I want to get it.
 
 Right now if I go to the gimp webpage I see a big download button. That
 looks good.
 However then it gets murky. I get to a download page that will offer me
 a bunch of stuff I don't need and don't understand.

See
https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list/2015-May/msg00034.html
(the mail thread gets constructive beyond the first post).

In this thread, there is work on proposal for the downloads pages that
makes both the torrent link and the direct link (to e.g. the Windows
.exe file) more obvious. The reason for emphasizing the torrent file
over the direct link was to spread knowledge of BitTorrent and put less
load on our server, but having both as equals should work just as fine.

There has been another proposal on our #gimp IRC channel to make the
platform selection available again, I'm currently checking the status of
that.


-- 
Regards,
Michael
GPG: 96A8 B38A 728A 577D 724D 60E5 F855 53EC B36D 4CDD
___
gimp-developer-list mailing list
List address:gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list


Re: [Gimp-developer] What next after sourceforge.net?

2015-05-29 Thread Sam Gleske
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 2:35 PM, Michael Schumacher schum...@gmx.de wrote:

 See
 https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list/2015-May/msg00034.html
 (the mail thread gets constructive beyond the first post).

 In this thread, there is work on proposal for the downloads pages that
 makes both the torrent link and the direct link (to e.g. the Windows
 .exe file) more obvious. The reason for emphasizing the torrent file
 over the direct link was to spread knowledge of BitTorrent and put less
 load on our server, but having both as equals should work just as fine.

 There has been another proposal on our #gimp IRC channel to make the
 platform selection available again, I'm currently checking the status of
 that.


Yeah... most non-technical people haven't heart of torrents (except for
maybe the ones downloading illegal software, movies, and music).  The
largest link for Windows on that page is a misleading .torrent link (as a
normal person would expect to download the software to install it rather
than download a file that requires them to install other software to
install it).  In fact, the direct download link for Windows is a tiny this
link at the end of the description paragraph underneath the GIANT torrent
link.

There are plenty of trusted binary hosting services for open source
projects.  One not need look far for alternate hosting if the worry is GIMP
infrastructure overload.  Personally I feel the Download button on the
front page should actually download the software (detecting your browser
language and platform).  Then perhaps make the link on the right called
Downloads or More Downloads where users can find the comprehensive list
of items to download to their heart's content.

Regardless of the way in which the downloads are presented.  I do think the
downloads page is pretty busy.  My friends need someone like me to help
them sort it out when they're getting their copy of GIMP.  I feel that flow
is in need of improvement.

SAM

-- 
I prefer to encrypt my email

GPG FINGERPRINT 4096 KEY
8D8B F0E2 42D8 A068 572E
BF3C E8F7 3234 7257 E65F
https://keybase.io/samrocketman

Learn how to encrypt your email with the Email Self Defense guide:
https://emailselfdefense.fsf.org/en/
___
gimp-developer-list mailing list
List address:gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list