[Gimp-user] Re: What's Wrong with this Image?
As it works with (seemingly) all forms of *nix, I think the problem may be an OS conversion problem, but the following is only a guess. On my Windows 98 box, none of the graphics show up correctly in Opera 6.05 or Netscape 7.0, but almost all show up in IE 6 (gasp, IE seems to actually be MORE compatible for once). My guess is that it could be that you're creating these images on a *nix box, and then someone viewed them with Windows or a Mac, and the difference between the newline characters (or some other such oddity between the OSes) made the images not work. And when viewing the jpg of the logo, all of the browsers generate a parse error when loading the image. I've never seen a parse error on an image, I didn't know that could happen. But to actually help, it would be useful to know why you think that these images don't work properly. --- To err is human To really screw up you need a computer pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: [Gimp-user] [Fwd: Gimp interface streamlining]
Hi there. On Sun, 2003-09-07 at 13:24, Sven Neumann wrote: > Hi, > > "Adam D. Moss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Willie Sippel wrote: > > > Check my new mockup, I've changed this. It's available at > > > http://www.zeitgeistmedia.net/gimp/gimpstreamline2.png . > > > > I rather like the way this is going. > > Well, surely the screenshot looks nice. The question is if this is a > useable interface that is both intuitive to newbies as well as > productive for experts. The mockup brings up a couple of good points. > However none of them are really new. A lot of this is implemented in > the 1.3 series, some points are scheduled for implementation, some > were dropped. > > I just want to point out that it doesn't make any sense to say yes or > no to the mockup. It just raises a couple of ideas that need to be > discussed (and eventually coded). > These suggestions were never about reinventing the wheel, and most of these 'enhancements' were inspired by some other, professional applications - so I think most of them are indeed productive. On the other hand, I don't know about the newbies. But the problem is - as I see it right now - , that the Gimp is too 'intuitive' for professionals, and too 'productive' for newbies. Don't get me wrong, I really like the Gimp, and especially the way it's going, e.g. gegl. I really admire the work that is done, and I care for this project - that's why I wanted to give something back. My mockups and suggestions are intended as a base for discussing those aforementioned issues. The basic question is: For what kind of users is/ was Gimp designed? Judging by the very advanced technical possibilities and the current roadmap, I would think the project is aimed at professional users... I would like this thread to become a pool for suggestions, collecting ideas to improve the usability of the Gimp, and discuss those changes with the developers. So, if someone replies to this thread, explain what suggestions you like (or dislike) and why, and add your own ideas and concerns. Thank you. > > Sven > ___ > Gimp-user mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user -- Willie Sippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ z ] ! ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Colour -> Alpha
On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 12:59, chris.danx wrote: > Hi, > > Is it possible to make all pixels of a given colour transparent? I've > just started playing with the gimp and am a bit stuck. Basically I want > to duplicate a selection in the background layer, put it in a > transparent layer with only the non-white pixels opaque. Maybe there's > a better way to do this? Sorry for the delay - it's now Sunday and this post only just arrived. Short answer: Image/Select/Select by Color should do it. If you want to make the selected (or not selected) pixels transparent, make sure you have an alpha channel. You can't do this on the background layer. An alternative is the Image/Filters/Colors/Color_to_alpha plug-in. Experiment with both of these and see what works for you. -- --Jeff Jeff Trefftzs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.tcsn.net/trefftzsHome Page http://gug.sunsite.dk/gallery.php?artist=68 Gimp Gallery http://trefftzs.topcities.com/ Photo Gallery ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Colour -> Alpha
chris.danx wrote: > Hi, > > Is it possible to make all pixels of a given colour transparent? I've > just started playing with the gimp and am a bit stuck. Basically I want > to duplicate a selection in the background layer, put it in a > transparent layer with only the non-white pixels opaque. Maybe there's > a better way to do this? Add layer mask, Select by colour on layer, activate mask, fill selection with black. Or, select by colour, quickmask, copy the mask (in the channels dialog), and apply that mask as a layer mask. Cheers, Dave. -- David Neary, Lyon, France E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
[Gimp-user] gimprc gamma and gamma_convert
Hi. I'm looking at the gimprc file and wondering how GIMP handles gamma. # Set the gamma correction values for the display # 1.0 corresponds to no gamma correction. For most displays, # gamma correction should be set to between 2.0 and 2.6 # Run the utility "gamma_correct" to determine appropriate values # for your display. # # One important item to keep in mind: Many images that you might # get from outside sources will in all likelihood already be # gamma-corrected. In these cases, the image will look washed-out # if the gimp has gamma-correction turned on. If you are going # to work with images of this sort, turn gamma correction off # by removing this line, or setting the values to 1.0. # gamma-correction 1.0 # gamma-correction 2.0 # (gamma-correction 1.0) This came from a GIMP 1.2.3 Windows gimprc. Setting a gamma value of 2.2 or 1.0 in gimprc had no visible effect. How is this feature enabled? Is there a gamma setting somewhere in the preferences dialog? Where is the gamma_correct tool mentioned in gimprc? Thanks, Robin --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hollywood, California www.CinePaint.org Free motion picture and still image editing software ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] select at 0,0 + px to mm
Jeff Trefftzs wrote: On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 15:38, Sven Neumann wrote: Hi, you are aware that you can set a fixed size or aspect ratio in the rectangular selection tool-options? Just a hint, your script is surely useful for special cases. If I remember correctly, I had a project where I needed to keep anchoring selections at the same coordinates. I don't think I've used this script since. -- Jeff ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user Thanks for the extra info Dave ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Multi-Page Banner (i.e. one image printed to multiple physical pages)
Em Sex 05 Set 2003 12:54 AM, Allan Wind escreveu: > [Gimp-user] Multi-Page Banner (i.e. one image printed to multiple > physical pages) Date: Yesterday 12:54:40 am > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Allan Wind) > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Message was signed with unknown key. > The validity of the signature cannot be verified. > Problem: OpenPGP plug-in was not specified. > Use the 'Settings->Configure KMail->Security' dialog to specify the > plug-in or ask your system administrator to do that for you. > > > I was trying (on Debian/Linux) to create a multi-page banner, you > know ~2000 px letters running over multiple physical pages, however > gimp seem to scale my page down to the media size (letter). Any > ideas how to pull this one off without resorting to splitting > things manually? Try this, if avaliable: Save your image in the GIMP, open it in Open Office, by inserting it on an empty Open Office drawing document. (insert->graphics). Zoom out, and scale your image up to the desired size. On open office print dialog box, click on the options button at the lower left corner. There is an option to tile the image. Good printing. I hope we can see tiled printing on the GIMP anytime soon. I don't know if it is ont he enhacement requests, is it? Regards, JS -><- > > > /Allan -- ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
[Gimp-user] character sets
Last year I created a graphic using the Forte font that had some accented characters in it. This year I need to make a change to the words so I'm trying to re-create it. My problem is that this year the accented characters do not display, in fact all letters on a line after an accented character disappear. I am now using version 1.2.3 (debian linux) but I don't know what version I was using previously. What has changed on my system? How can I get accented characters (cut-n-pasted from a text window) to display? -- "I like the word 'indolence'. It makes my laziness seem classy." -- Bern Williams Rick Pasotto[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.niof.net ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Fonts #2
Hi, Jim Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In addition, I have many fonts that display in my selector that when I > click on them say The Selected font is not available. Then why are they > listed there? How do I get rid of them...and I have done an xset fp rehash. Sounds like the problem dealed with in http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58848 Basically the problem is that the font is generally available but cannot be provided at the size that GIMP tries to use. This is a problem with the old text tool that is unlikely to ever get fixed. You can work around it by using scaleable fonts only. Sven ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Colour -> Alpha
Hi, "chris.danx" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is it possible to make all pixels of a given colour transparent? Yes, select by color and clear that selection. There is a tool to select pixels by color. Sven ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: [Gimp-user] [Fwd: Gimp interface streamlining]
Hi, "Adam D. Moss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Willie Sippel wrote: > > Check my new mockup, I've changed this. It's available at > > http://www.zeitgeistmedia.net/gimp/gimpstreamline2.png . > > I rather like the way this is going. Well, surely the screenshot looks nice. The question is if this is a useable interface that is both intuitive to newbies as well as productive for experts. The mockup brings up a couple of good points. However none of them are really new. A lot of this is implemented in the 1.3 series, some points are scheduled for implementation, some were dropped. I just want to point out that it doesn't make any sense to say yes or no to the mockup. It just raises a couple of ideas that need to be discussed (and eventually coded). Sven ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] What's Wrong with this Image?
On Wednesday 03 September 2003 09:07, Nick Wilson wrote: > These images will not show up in a browser? > http://www.cookaholics.com/images/ > > I just saved by extension to .gif and .jpg but they will not show as you > can see from this page: > http://www.cookaholics.com/test.html Works here on SuSE8.1pro, KDE 3.0.3 with Konqueror. What kinda System and Browser are you using? Hansen -- Powered by SuSE 8.1pro - KDE 3.0.3 - KMail 1.4.3 At least, try asking smart questions: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html The difference between Linux and Microsoft is the difference between trust and anti-trust. - anon ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] What's Wrong with this Image?
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003 09:07:04 +0200 Nick Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > These images will not show up in a browser? > http://www.cookaholics.com/images/ > > I just saved by extension to .gif and .jpg but they will not show as you > can see from this page: > http://www.cookaholics.com/test.html Presumeably you have fix this as they show up in Mozilla. Owen -- ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] What's Wrong with this Image?
Hi Nick, I accessed your websight twice, once with Konqueror 3.1-12 RedHat using KDE 3.1-10 and then with Mozilla/5.0(X-11;U;Linuxi686;en;rv:1.2.1)Gecko/20030225. On both browsers the websight image directory listing the images came right up. Clicking on the .gif & .jpg images brought them up withot difficulty. Did you expect them to come up without clicking on them? I hope this helps, John Dietsch On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Nick Wilson wrote: > Hi all, > > These images will not show up in a browser? > http://www.cookaholics.com/images/ > > I just saved by extension to .gif and .jpg but they will not show as you > can see from this page: > http://www.cookaholics.com/test.html > > The .xcf is in the image dir too. > > Could someone please put me on the right path here? > > Many, many thanks... > > ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] moving around a selection
> Hold down the Alt key, then move the selection frame. Note that Alt is > often > bound to a different action - in Gnome, check your keybindings, in KDE - > ditto I use IceWM and this is also the case (alt-click moves the entire window in IceWM). Does anyone know a way to reassign this in IceWM? I asked this a while ago on the IceWM list, but didn't receive a reply. Thanks, Eric Pierce > (not sure of the details for KDE). > >> On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, "Vittorio" == Vittorio wrote: > > Vittorio> How can I move a selection around a picture, that is (and more > Vittorio> precisely), move the frame of the selection only not its > content > - > Timothy Jedlicka, [EMAIL PROTECTED], 1-630-713-4436, AOL-IM=bonzowork > Network Entomologist, Lucent Technologies, Testers For Hire ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
[Gimp-user] Fonts #2
In addition, I have many fonts that display in my selector that when I click on them say The Selected font is not available. Then why are they listed there? How do I get rid of them...and I have done an xset fp rehash. Thanks again. Jim Clark ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
[Gimp-user] Fonts again.....
I have just moved to a new RH 9 (a customized by my company distribution) box, with a newly compiled GIMP 1.2.5. I haven't played with it much, but I would very much like to remove about 100 of the fonts in my text tool. My font path includes the unix:/7100, but how do I remove fonts from that location? Everything I find on the web is about adding the font server, but I want much less of it. How do I do that? I have successfully added y old friend fonts from my old box. There was a very nice tutorial mentioned a few months ago, but it is now gone. I can't believe I'm the only one struggling with hordes of unwanted fonts (or fonts that make GIMP crash) Thanks- Jim Clark ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] How can I add custom buttons to the toolbox? (1.3.x)
Hi, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > How can I add new buttons to the toolbox? > > I would really like to have e.g. the 'Curves' tool on a button in the > GIMP's toolbox. You cannot do this. At least not without changing the code. We will certainly make the toolbox configurable at some point but most likely not for 2.0. > I remember there used to be a file somewhere around, was it? No, there never was. Sven ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] What's Wrong with this Image?
Hi, Nick Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > These images will not show up in a browser? > http://www.cookaholics.com/images/ > > I just saved by extension to .gif and .jpg but they will not show as you > can see from this page: > http://www.cookaholics.com/test.html They show up just fine in Mozilla Firebird 0.6.1 on GNU/Linux. Sven ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] What's Wrong with this Image?
Nick Wilson wrote: > These images will not show up in a browser? > http://www.cookaholics.com/images/ > > I just saved by extension to .gif and .jpg but they will not show as you > can see from this page: > http://www.cookaholics.com/test.html Sorry - works fine for me (Mozilla 1.4 on Linux). Dave. -- David Neary, Lyon, France E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] What's Wrong with this Image?
Everything including the test page, displays fine on Mozilla Firebird, Netscape 4 and Opera 6. Tested on Solaris 2.8. On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 09:07:04AM +0200, Nick Wilson wrote: > Hi all, > > These images will not show up in a browser? > http://www.cookaholics.com/images/ > > I just saved by extension to .gif and .jpg but they will not show as you > can see from this page: > http://www.cookaholics.com/test.html > > The .xcf is in the image dir too. > > Could someone please put me on the right path here? > > Many, many thanks... > > -- > Nick W > > > ___ > Gimp-user mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user -- Daniel Carrera, Math PhD student at UMD. PGP KeyID: 9AF77A88 .-"~~~"-. / O O \ Warning label on a blanket from Taiwan: :s: \ \___/ / "Not to be used as protection from a tornado". `-.___.-' ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] What's Wrong with this Image?
I see two images on the tset.html page Nick Wilson wrote: Hi all, These images will not show up in a browser? http://www.cookaholics.com/images/ I just saved by extension to .gif and .jpg but they will not show as you can see from this page: http://www.cookaholics.com/test.html The .xcf is in the image dir too. Could someone please put me on the right path here? Many, many thanks... -- Until later: Geoffrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] The latest, most widespread virus? Microsoft end user agreement. Think about it... ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
[Gimp-user] Colour -> Alpha
Hi, Is it possible to make all pixels of a given colour transparent? I've just started playing with the gimp and am a bit stuck. Basically I want to duplicate a selection in the background layer, put it in a transparent layer with only the non-white pixels opaque. Maybe there's a better way to do this? Cheers, Chris ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
[Gimp-user] Screenshot plug-in status
Hi all, I recently replaced a large part of the screenshot plug-in (plug-ins/common/screenshot.c) - now it no longer depend on the external 'xwd' utility from XFree86 to work. I have prepared the screenshot plug-in for compilation on different GDK back ends than X11, but I have no means experience coding for these back ends nor the means to test the plug-in on them. It would be nice if someone on say... win32 ;)... would have a go at writing the missing win32 part of the select_window() function. It really should be simple. As a matter of fact that someone could look at the win32 specific winsnap plug-in to see how it is done there. The comments in plug-ins/common/screenshot.c explains pretty much what the code should do. When the win32 specific part of select_window() has been written and committed I plan to retire the win32 specific winsnap plug-in in favor of the new screenshot plug-in. If you have any questions don't hesitate to write me - or follow up on the list. Sincerely, ./Brix -- Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] moving around a selection
On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 15:43, Vittorio wrote: > Context: Linux and the Gimp. > > How can I move a selection around a picture, that is (and more > precisely), move the frame of the selection only not its content (in > order to e.g. "better center" the image the selection will contain)? In 1.3, but it is probably the same in 1.2, you use Alt+mousedrag to move the selection without its content. Some window managers like Gnome2's metacity, however, bind Alt+drag to moving windows around, so you need to press Ctrl along. cheers -- Jakub Steiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] moving around a selection
Hi, Vittorio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > How can I move a selection around a picture, that is (and more > precisely), move the frame of the selection only not its content (in > order to e.g. "better center" the image the selection will contain)? You can adjust and re-place a selection by using Alt-drag. (This sentence is taken from the tips shown at startup and also reachable from the Help menu. There are some more nice tips there...) Sven ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] select at 0,0 + px to mm
Hi, David selby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 2. Is there a way to get the measure tool to read out in mm, I have to > convert from px with a calculator. If you look at the image in real-world size, that is "Dot for Dot" switched off in the View menu, all distances are reported in the image's unit instead of in pixels. If you prefer this mode, you can make it the default in the Preferences dialog. Sven ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] moving around a selection
On Monday 01 September 2003 10:43 am, Vittorio wrote: > [Gimp-user] moving around a selection > Date: Yesterday 10:43:58 am > From: Vittorio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Nonexistent) > To: gimp-user <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Message was signed with unknown key. > The validity of the signature cannot be verified. > Problem: OpenPGP plug-in was not specified. > Use the 'Settings->Configure KMail->Security' dialog to specify the > plug-in or ask your system administrator to do that for you. > > > Context: Linux and the Gimp. > > How can I move a selection around a picture, that is (and more > precisely), move the frame of the selection only not its content > (in order to e.g. "better center" the image the selection will > contain)? Hi there... All you have to do is hold ALT and click and drag the selection. However, if you are in KDE, it´s default behavior is to captue this event (alt + click and drag) to drag the window. You have to disable this behavior in the kde control center (kcontrol), Under LookNFeel, Window Behavior, modifier key + buttons -> set them all to "Nothing". > > Ciao > > Vittorio > > > End of signed message ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] select at 0,0 + px to mm
On Sunday 31 August 2003 2:56 pm, David selby wrote: > I am getting the hang of Gimp1.2. I use it mainly to print out > speciality cards via my inkjet. > When I start a fresh "canvas" I can and do define it in mm, set the > dpi & off I go. My questions are > > 1. Is there an easy way to move selections to the exact edge of the > canvas ? I end up zooming in and twitching the mouse till I get > 0,0. Is there a quicker way ? Yes. You can place guides at 0 X and 0 Y coordinates. To use guides, just click on the rulers at the window margin, and drag the guides to your image. The default behaviour for object placement is snap to these guides. > > 2. Is there a way to get the measure tool to read out in mm, I have > to convert from px with a calculator. No, there is not. However, I think it is still feasible for 2.0. I just wonder if anyone has asked for this enhancemnet on bugzilla... > > Many thanks > Dave > > ___ > Gimp-user mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user -- Este e-mail é, exceto pelas partes citadas de outros e-mails, copyright(c) de João Sebastião de Oliveira Bueno. Nenhuma cópia deste e-mail ou parte do mesmo pode existir nas dependências de, ou em posse de funcionários, de associações protetoras de direitos autorais Brasileiras, dos Estados Unidos da América, ou de outros países. Em particular essa exceção do direito de leitura e posse deste e-mail se extende à ABRA, ABPI, ABES, BSA, RIAA e MPAA. Violadores estão infringindo as leis internacionais de direitos autorais e sujeitos às penalidades cabíveis. Você pode re-utilizar, emendar, acrescentar suas palavras e citar e re-enviar qualquer parte do mesmo, desde que essa nota seja preservada e se não pertencer a alguma das entidades supracitadas. ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] What's Wrong with this Image?
* and then John Dietsch declared > Hi Nick, I accessed your websight twice, once with Konqueror 3.1-12 RedHat > using KDE 3.1-10 and then with > Mozilla/5.0(X-11;U;Linuxi686;en;rv:1.2.1)Gecko/20030225. On both browsers > the websight image directory listing the images came right up. Clicking on > the .gif & .jpg images brought them up withot difficulty. Did you expect > them to come up without clicking on them? > I hope this helps, Sure does, I'm dreadfully sorry but it appears to have just beena programming error with .htacees ;-) THanks for the help guys! -- Nick W ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
