[Gimp-user] photoshop's "plastic wrap" effect in GIMP

How to achieve it?


___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user

[Gimp-user] Translation update

[cedric]

Other things,
I've just compiled 2.1.4 (starting as failed but this is nothing), and 
it seems that many GUI labels are not translating into my precious 
french. Is there any help needed for this, and if yes how to do ?

Cedric
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user

[Gimp-user] Thoughts about channels

[cedric]

May be someone has another feeling, but i've found today strange behaviors.
1. Copy Visible does not copie visible, but the visible of layer aspect. 
Explanation : just deactivate a channel (R for exemple) the copy visible 
picture is the same as if they were all activated. Is there any way to 
overpass that ?

2. It seems that is is not possible to delete a primary channel 
(contextual menuitem is always grayed). What about if I want to do a 
2-channel picture, particularly for 'professional' print ?

3. Strange behavior also, it can't succeed in pasting a channel or layer 
content on another channel (for exemple, pasting R content on G).  Shall 
I need to use  the Channel Mixer to do this ?

4. I've used Decompose to CMYK to get a black channel and increase 
contrast on a document. But i've been surprise, because after doing the 
same in Adobe Photoshop, the black channels were different ? Is that 
normal ? What have I bas done, if any ?

As I always do, some special congratulations to David for his Batch 
Processor that should really be included in GIMP, and to Damien Genet 
 for the Rollover Perl script (unhappily it 
is not updated for 2.x).

Thanks a lot.
Cedric
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user

Re: [Gimp-user] Thoughts about channels

[Sven Neumann]

Hi,

cedric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> 1. Copy Visible does not copie visible, but the visible of layer
>aspect. Explanation : just deactivate a channel (R for exemple) the
>copy visible picture is the same as if they were all activated. Is
>there any way to overpass that ?

Well, you could try to improve the "Copy Visible" script. But perhaps
it should simply be renamed since "Copy Visible" is not exactly what
it does.
 
> 2. It seems that is is not possible to delete a primary channel
>(contextual menuitem is always grayed). What about if I want to do
>a 2-channel picture, particularly for 'professional' print ?

GIMP images are either gray or RGB. If you want to do duotone, the GUM
explains how to do that with GIMP.

> 4. I've used Decompose to CMYK to get a black channel and increase
>contrast on a document. But i've been surprise, because after doing
>the same in Adobe Photoshop, the black channels were different ? Is
>that normal ? What have I bas done, if any ?

There are an infinite amount of results for decomposing an RGB image
into CMYK. The conversion depends on the amount of black pullout as
well as on the properties of the printer, the inks and the paper that
is being used. The decompose plug-in takes a rather naive approach so
it is not surprising that you don't get the same result.


Sven
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user

Re: [Gimp-user] Translation update

[Sven Neumann]

Hi,

cedric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> I've just compiled 2.1.4 (starting as failed but this is nothing), and
> it seems that many GUI labels are not translating into my precious
> french. Is there any help needed for this, and if yes how to do ?

As explained in README.i18n, the translations are handled by the GTP.
Most translators have not yet started to update the translations in
the 2.1 tree and have concentrated on the 2.0 tree for now. This is
likely going to change soon. If you want to help, please coordinate
with the GTP.


Sven
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user

Re: [Gimp-user] photoshop's "plastic wrap" effect in GIMP

[Dave Neary]

Hi,

Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> How to achieve it?

What does it look like?

Dave.

--
Dave Neary
Lyon, France
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user

Re: [Gimp-user] Translation update

[Dave Neary]

Salut Cedric,


Quoting cedric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I've just compiled 2.1.4 (starting as failed but this is nothing), and
> it seems that many GUI labels are not translating into my precious
> french. Is there any help needed for this, and if yes how to do ?

The procedure for helping out with a translation is more or less

1: Mail the translator first, to ensure he just hasn't committed an updated
translation - the French coordinator is Christophe Merlet 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.

2: If you get the all clear, translate the various po*/fr.po files - there is an
active French translation community based around traduc.org, which can get you
started using some of the utilities which parse .po files and make it easier to
find untranslated strings or fuzzy translations (translations whose key string
has changed since they were translated).

3: Send Christophe your updated translation, he will check it over or have
someone else do so to ensure that translations are consistent (the same people
who translate the GIMP translate GNOME, so they have been busy recently), and
he will commit your changes.

Cheers,
Dave.

--
Dave Neary
Lyon, France
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user

Re: [Gimp-user] photoshop's "plastic wrap" effect in GIMP

[Dave Neary]

Hi,

Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> see attach
> 1.jpg is original
> 2.jpg is filtered

Nice effect. I'm afraid I don't know what plug-ins you need to string together,
but I imagine it would be possible. Perhaps someone could come up with a
script-fu?

Cheers,
Dave.

--
Dave Neary
Lyon, France
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user

[Gimp-user] Re: photoshop's "plastic wrap" effect in GIMP

[GSR - FR]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2004-09-13 at 1539.56 +0200):
> but I imagine it would be possible. Perhaps someone could come up with a
> script-fu?

http://wingimp.hp.infoseek.co.jp/files/script/wrap-effect.html

GSR
 
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user

[Gimp-user] dpi from 75 -> 300 ??

[Geoffrey]

So here's a question which will demonstrate my ignorance.  I've got some 
digital photos I took that, when opened with GIMP are identified as 
being 75dpi x72dpi.  I need images that are 300 dpi, so is it possible 
to convert the 75dpi image to 300 dpi??  I selected to scale the image 
and happened to notice that I can make this change at this point.  Is 
this doing what I'm expecting?

--
Until later, Geoffrey   Registered Linux User #108567
AT&T Certified UNIX System Programmer - 1995
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user

Re: [Gimp-user] dpi from 75 -> 300 ??

[William Skaggs]

Geoffrey wrote:
> So here's a question which will demonstrate my ignorance.  I've got some
> digital photos I took that, when opened with GIMP are identified as
> being 75dpi x72dpi.  I need images that are 300 dpi, so is it possible
> to convert the 75dpi image to 300 dpi??  I selected to scale the image
> and happened to notice that I can make this change at this point.  Is
> this doing what I'm expecting?

That is a question that only a mind reader can answer.  (Sorry :-))

Here's the thing:  a resolution in dpi is not a property of the image
per se, it's a property of the way the image is displayed, on the
screen or on paper.  When you see a resolution of 72x72 dpi for an
image, what those numbers represent is somebody's judgement that the
image will look good when displayed with 72 pixels per inch; and 
usually this means "look good when displayed on a monitor", because
nothing looks very good when it is printed at 72 dots per inch.

Now suppose you have a 300 x 300 pixel image, with a nominal resolution
of 72 dpi, and suppose you want to convert it to 300 dpi for printing.
There are two approaches you could take.  (Actually more, but let's keep
it simple for the moment.)

(1) You caould say, okay, 300 pixels is about 4 inches at 72 dpi.  I
want my print to have the same size.  So, I will scale the image
to 1200 x 1200 pixels, and set the resolution to 300 dpi.

(2) You could say, okay, I don't want to make the image look blurry
by scaling up the number of pixels, so I will simply set the resolution
to 300 dpi without changing the pixel dimensions, thereby getting a
print about 1 inch across.

Both of these are legitimate choices, and so are many others.  The best
way to do it depends on your image and your printer.  What makes it
complicated is the fact that printer dots have much poorer color resolution
than monitor dots.  On most modern systems, a monitor dot encodes 24 bits
of color information.  On a typical high-quality printer, a single dot encodes
about 6 bits of color information.  Thus, simply changing the resolution so
that a single monitor dot becomes a single printer dot is usually not the
best thing to do.

Best,
  -- Bill
 

 
__ __ __ __
Sent via the KillerWebMail system at primate.ucdavis.edu


 
   
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user

Re: [Gimp-user] Thoughts about channels

[Carol Spears]

hello, this was an interesting list.
On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 01:02:28PM +0200, cedric wrote:
> May be someone has another feeling, but i've found today strange behaviors.
> 
> 1. Copy Visible does not copie visible, but the visible of layer aspect. 
> Explanation : just deactivate a channel (R for exemple) the copy visible 
> picture is the same as if they were all activated. Is there any way to 
> overpass that ?
> 
the most reliable "Copy Visible" for me has always been and will
continue to be this:
   -->Image -->Merge Visible Layers (think about those options
  that you are presented, depending on what you need from this
  special layer each of them are useful)
   -->Edit -->Copy
   -->Edit -->Undo
this gives you just as much as the original Copy Visible script did.

the original script was written in perl.  perhaps installing perl will
also fix your problems with the current script.  i havent investigated
this yet.  what you find confusing is a script-fu that some guy took
about 2 minutes to write one evening on #gimp.  he said it was two
lines.

this one suffers because the people who use gimp a lot and work on the
core dont use it.  i dont know if anyone should even say they are sorry
for your confusion or not even.

> As I always do, some special congratulations to David for his Batch 
> Processor that should really be included in GIMP, and to Damien Genet 
>  for the Rollover Perl script (unhappily it 
> is not updated for 2.x).
> 
i have yet to try davids batch processor.  and i am sorry about this.
however, this rollover script is something that the linux people
probably wouldnt use -- although it would be sort of interesting to
write.  this script was not included in the gimp tarball nor in the
gimp-perl tarball.  also, have you tried to use css for this instead of
javascript?  or, does this use css?

carol

___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user

Re: [Gimp-user] dpi from 75 -> 300 ??

[Carol Spears]

On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 02:22:24PM -0400, Geoffrey wrote:
> So here's a question which will demonstrate my ignorance.  I've got some 
> digital photos I took that, when opened with GIMP are identified as 
> being 75dpi x72dpi.  I need images that are 300 dpi, so is it possible 
> to convert the 75dpi image to 300 dpi??  I selected to scale the image 
> and happened to notice that I can make this change at this point.  Is 
> this doing what I'm expecting?
> 
open up one of the images in gimp and tell how many pixels each image
has in its width and height.

carol

___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user

Re: [Gimp-user] dpi from 75 -> 300 ??

[Geoffrey]

William Skaggs wrote:
Geoffrey wrote:
So here's a question which will demonstrate my ignorance.  I've got some
digital photos I took that, when opened with GIMP are identified as
being 75dpi x72dpi.  I need images that are 300 dpi, so is it possible
to convert the 75dpi image to 300 dpi??  I selected to scale the image
and happened to notice that I can make this change at this point.  Is
this doing what I'm expecting?

That is a question that only a mind reader can answer.  (Sorry :-))
Good point.  The request I received was to provide an image that was 
4"x5" at 300 dpi, thus I chose option #2 below, which did give me what I 
want, I guess. :) I say that because the image size (as in WxH) was 
dramatically reduced when I changed the dpi, which makes sense.  I'm 
just not sure that this change is 'part of the image,' or was this just 
an example the guy was giving me?  In other words, was I wasting my time 
changing the dpi and then saving the file.  Did I change anything?  It 
appears not, based on your next paragraph.

Here's the thing:  a resolution in dpi is not a property of the image
per se, it's a property of the way the image is displayed, on the
screen or on paper.  When you see a resolution of 72x72 dpi for an
image, what those numbers represent is somebody's judgement that the
image will look good when displayed with 72 pixels per inch; and 
usually this means "look good when displayed on a monitor", because
nothing looks very good when it is printed at 72 dots per inch.

Now suppose you have a 300 x 300 pixel image, with a nominal resolution
of 72 dpi, and suppose you want to convert it to 300 dpi for printing.
There are two approaches you could take.  (Actually more, but let's keep
it simple for the moment.)
(1) You caould say, okay, 300 pixels is about 4 inches at 72 dpi.  I
want my print to have the same size.  So, I will scale the image
to 1200 x 1200 pixels, and set the resolution to 300 dpi.
(2) You could say, okay, I don't want to make the image look blurry
by scaling up the number of pixels, so I will simply set the resolution
to 300 dpi without changing the pixel dimensions, thereby getting a
print about 1 inch across.
Both of these are legitimate choices, and so are many others.  The best
way to do it depends on your image and your printer.  What makes it
complicated is the fact that printer dots have much poorer color resolution
than monitor dots.  On most modern systems, a monitor dot encodes 24 bits
of color information.  On a typical high-quality printer, a single dot encodes
about 6 bits of color information.  Thus, simply changing the resolution so
that a single monitor dot becomes a single printer dot is usually not the
best thing to do.
The actual image is going to a professional shop to be placed in an ad.
Thanks for your feedback.
--
Until later, Geoffrey   Registered Linux User #108567
AT&T Certified UNIX System Programmer - 1995
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user

Re: [Gimp-user] dpi from 75 -> 300 ??

[mcbeth]

Quoting Geoffrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
The actual image is going to a professional shop to be placed in an ad.
Thanks for your feedback.
A lot of printers (companies, not cheap piece of hardware on your desk) 
read the
DPI information out of the file to know what size to print the file at, so it
is an important, if not an integral part of an "image".

I work a lot with machine vision, and as part of our project, we make 
sure that
the DPI information is properly filled in the images we acquire, so we can
easily convert between physical and pixel coordinates in our processing. (a
trivial and silly example, as there are other ways of doing it)

Jeff
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user

Re: [Gimp-user] Thoughts about channels

[Sven Neumann]

Hi,

Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> the most reliable "Copy Visible" for me has always been and will
> continue to be this:
>-->Image -->Merge Visible Layers (think about those options
>   that you are presented, depending on what you need from this
>   special layer each of them are useful)
>-->Edit -->Copy
>-->Edit -->Undo
> this gives you just as much as the original Copy Visible script did.

This is basically what the Copy Visible script is doing. Well, more
precisely what it does is:

1. Duplicate the image
2. Merge Visible Layers
3. Copy
4. Delete the duplicate

> the original script was written in perl.  perhaps installing perl will
> also fix your problems with the current script.  i havent investigated
> this yet.  what you find confusing is a script-fu that some guy took
> about 2 minutes to write one evening on #gimp.  he said it was two
> lines.

I don't even remember a perl version of this script. Are you certain
that one exists?


Sven
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user

Re:[Gimp-user] Re: photoshop's "plastic wrap" effect in GIMP

would you mail me that script, I can't load that page here. Thank you! 

ÔÚÄúµÄÀ´ÐÅÖÐÔø¾­Ìáµ½:
>From: GSR - FR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: 
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: [Gimp-user] Re: photoshop's "plastic wrap" effect in GIMP
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2004-09-13 at 1539.56 +0200):
> > but I imagine it would be possible. Perhaps someone could come up with a
> > script-fu?
> 
> http://wingimp.hp.infoseek.co.jp/files/script/wrap-effect.html
> 
> GSR
>  
> ___
> Gimp-user mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
>


___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user

Re: [Gimp-user] dpi from 75 -> 300 ??

[BandiPat]

On Monday 13 September 2004 02:22 pm, Geoffrey wrote:
> So here's a question which will demonstrate my ignorance.  I've got
> some digital photos I took that, when opened with GIMP are identified
> as being 75dpi x72dpi.  I need images that are 300 dpi, so is it
> possible to convert the 75dpi image to 300 dpi??  I selected to scale
> the image and happened to notice that I can make this change at this
> point.  Is this doing what I'm expecting?
=

Geoffrey,

In the last Linux Journal magazine, October 2004, Issue 126, there is a 
wonderful article on Gimp and using it for professional photography!  
One of the best articles I've read and more than helpful and 
encouraging about the abilities of Gimp.  The article itself is not 
online, but the resources are listed there.  The author, RW Hawkins, 
has his site there as well and would be very helpful should you have 
detailed questions.

That's not to say people on this list are not just as qualified to 
answer you, because they are!  I just thought this might be of some 
interest to you and others, since you brought up digital photos and I 
know there is a lot of interest about that and the Gimp's ability to 
work with them effectively.  

Here is your resources site:
http://www.linuxjournal.com/article.php?sid=7704

Hope that helps and if you don't have a copy of the mag, go get one, 
it's a nice article for info and on the Gimp!

Patrick
-- 
--- KMail v1.7 --- SuSE Linux Pro v9.1 ---
  Registered Linux User #225206
  Those Who Dance Are Considered Insane, 
   by Those Who Cannot Hear the Music!
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user

Re: [Gimp-user] Thoughts about channels

[Carol Spears]

happy birthday, Sven, btw.  are you old enough to drink alcohol in the
united states legally yet?

On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 12:48:26AM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> > the most reliable "Copy Visible" for me has always been and will
> > continue to be this:
> >-->Image -->Merge Visible Layers (think about those options
> >   that you are presented, depending on what you need from this
> >   special layer each of them are useful)
> >-->Edit -->Copy
> >-->Edit -->Undo
> > this gives you just as much as the original Copy Visible script did.
> 
> This is basically what the Copy Visible script is doing. Well, more
> precisely what it does is:
> 
> 1. Duplicate the image
> 2. Merge Visible Layers
> 3. Copy
> 4. Delete the duplicate
> 
Merge Visible is a script-fu or a C plug-in?  I only know that it is
only a plug-in and not a tool.  just because it is more fun to guess
than it is to look it up, i guess that merge visible was a script-fu
that got written to help with jtl's logos?

> > the original script was written in perl.  perhaps installing perl will
> > also fix your problems with the current script.  i havent investigated
> > this yet.  what you find confusing is a script-fu that some guy took
> > about 2 minutes to write one evening on #gimp.  he said it was two
> > lines.
> 
> I don't even remember a perl version of this script. Are you certain
> that one exists?
> 
funny.  this is not an argument or even an incorrect statement but it is
so deceptive in its ability to state the truth and almost sidetrack from
things.  i do get to play with the giants of bull, dont i?

i must ask you, did you ever install gimp-perl, much less use it?  i
don't remember this ever occuring.  maybe some solemn vows and promises
to never use it but at no time can i recall you ever installing
gimp-perl and using it.

i agree, you would not remember that which you never used.

when was the current one written? i think at the beginning of the last
third of gimp-1.3 development.

i didnt really like this one.

carol



___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user

Re: [Gimp-user] dpi from 75 -> 300 ??

[Bob Long]

On Tuesday, September 14, 2004 4:22 AM [GMT+1=CET],
Geoffrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> So here's a question which will demonstrate my ignorance.  I've got
> some digital photos I took that, when opened with GIMP are identified
> as being 75dpi x72dpi.  I need images that are 300 dpi, so is it
> possible to convert the 75dpi image to 300 dpi??  I selected to scale
> the image and happened to notice that I can make this change at this
> point.  Is this doing what I'm expecting?

This series may be useful:
http://www.scantips.com/basics01.html

Bob Long

___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user

Re: [Gimp-user] dpi from 75 -> 300 ??

[Carol Spears]

On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 01:39:09PM -0700, Carol Spears wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 02:22:24PM -0400, Geoffrey wrote:
> > So here's a question which will demonstrate my ignorance.  I've got some 
> > digital photos I took that, when opened with GIMP are identified as 
> > being 75dpi x72dpi.  I need images that are 300 dpi, so is it possible 
> > to convert the 75dpi image to 300 dpi??  I selected to scale the image 
> > and happened to notice that I can make this change at this point.  Is 
> > this doing what I'm expecting?
> > 
> open up one of the images in gimp and tell how many pixels each image
> has in its width and height.
> 
okay, i am replying to my own posting, and there is some rule against
this, i am fairly certain.

i would really like to know how many pixels you are working with.
please?

carol

___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user

Re: [Gimp-user] Re: photoshop's "plastic wrap" effect in GIMP

[GNATT]

IhaveNoName wrote:
(B
(B>would you mail me that script, I can't load that page here. Thank you! 
(B>
(B>[EMAIL PROTECTED]>-La5=(B:
(B>>From: GSR - FR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(B>>Reply-To: 
(B>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(B>>Subject: [Gimp-user] Re: photoshop's "plastic wrap" effect in GIMP
(B>>
(B>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2004-09-13 at 1539.56 +0200):
(B>> > but I imagine it would be possible. Perhaps someone could come up with a
(B>> > script-fu?
(B>> 
(B>> http://wingimp.hp.infoseek.co.jp/files/script/wrap-effect.html
(B>> 
(B>> GSR
(B
(B
(B
(BThe following is from:   http://wingimp.hp.infoseek.co.jp/sub/other/2001.html
(B
(B(Actually, you should be able to load this page,
(B
(B just ignore the unreadable Japanese comments ---  
(B
(B they're totally obvious ennyhow.)
(B
(B
(B
(B
(B
(BScript-Fu
(B
(B$B%i%C%W(B(?)$B8z2L$r(BScript-Fu$B0lH/$G$G$-$k$h$&$K$7$F$_$h$&!*(B
(B; TRANS> WRAP (?) EFFECT 
(B
(B; GIMP wrap effect Script  for GIMP 1.2
(B;   /Script-Fu/Alchemy/Wrap Effect...
(B
(B(define (script-fu-wrap-effect  inImage
(BinLayer
(BinRadius
(BinGamma1
(BinGamma2
(BinSmooth
(B)
(B
(B(gimp-undo-push-group-start inImage)
(B
(B; $B?7$7$$%l%$%d!<$NDI2C(B
(B(set! theNewlayer (car (gimp-layer-copy inLayer 1)))
(B
(B; $B?7$7$$%l%$%d!<$KL>A0IU$1(B
(B(gimp-layer-set-name theNewlayer "Wrap effect")
(B
(B; $B?7$7$$%l%$%d!<$K%$%a!<%8$rF~$l$k(B
(B(gimp-image-add-layer inImage theNewlayer 0)
(B
(B; $B%l%$%d!<$r$\$+$9(B
(B(plug-in-gauss-iir2 TRUE inImage theNewlayer inRadius inRadius)
(B
(B; $B%l%$%d!<$NNX3TCj=P(B ($BNX3T8!=P(B)
(B(plug-in-edge TRUE inImage theNewlayer 10.0 1)
(B
(B; $B%l%$%d!<$N%b!<%I$rJQ$($k(B
(B(gimp-layer-set-mode theNewlayer 0)
(B
(B; $B%l%$%d!<$rC&?'!"?'$rH?E>(B
(B(gimp-desaturate theNewlayer)
(B(gimp-invert theNewlayer)
(B
(B; $B%7%c%.!<$rL\N)$?$;$J$/$9$k$?$a$\$+$9(B
(B(if (= inSmooth TRUE)
(B(plug-in-gauss-iir2 TRUE inImage theNewlayer 5 5))
(B
(B; $B%l%$%d!<$r%/%j%C%W%\!<%I$K%3%T!<(B
(B(gimp-edit-copy theNewlayer)
(B
(B; $B%l%$%d!<$N%,%s%^$rJQ99(B
(B(gimp-levels theNewlayer 0 0 255 (/ inGamma1 10) 0 255)
(B(gimp-levels theNewlayer 0 0 255 (/ inGamma1 10) 0 255)
(B
(B; $B%l%$%d!<%^%9%/$NDI2C(B
(B(set! theLayermask (car (gimp-layer-create-mask theNewlayer 0)))
(B(gimp-image-add-layer-mask inImage theNewlayer theLayermask)
(B
(B; $B%l%$%d!<%^%9%/$K2hA|$rDI2C(B
(B(gimp-floating-sel-anchor (car (gimp-edit-paste theLayermask 0)))
(B
(B; $B%l%$%d!<%^%9%/$N%,%s%^$rJQ99(B
(B(gimp-levels theLayermask 0 0 255 (/ inGamma2 10) 0 255)
(B(gimp-levels theLayermask 0 0 255 (/ inGamma2 10) 0 255)
(B
(B(gimp-undo-push-group-end inImage)
(B
(B; $BI=<($KH?1G(B
(B(gimp-displays-flush)
(B
(B)
(B
(B(script-fu-register
(B"script-fu-wrap-effect"
(B"/Script-Fu/Alchemy/Wrap Effect..."
(B"draw with wrap effect"
(B"Iccii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
(B"Copyright 2001, Iccii"
(B"Jan, 2001"
(B"RGB**"
(BSF-IMAGE"Image" 0
(BSF-DRAWABLE "Layer" 0
(BSF-ADJUSTMENT   "Randomness"'(10 0 32 1 10 0 0)
(BSF-ADJUSTMENT   "Highlight Balance" '(3.0 1.0 10 0.5 0.1 1 0)
(BSF-ADJUSTMENT   "Edge Amount"   '(3.0 1.0 10 0.5 0.1 1 0)
(BSF-TOGGLE   "Smooth"FALSE
(B)
(B
(B
(BLast updated 1/26/2001
(B
(B
(B
(B
(BHope this works for you.
(B
(Bg
(B
(B
(B [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(B___
(BGimp-user mailing list
(B[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Bhttp://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user

Re: [Gimp-user] Thoughts about channels

[Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris]

On Monday 13 September 2004 19:48, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > the most reliable "Copy Visible" for me has always been and will
> > continue to be this:
> >-->Image -->Merge Visible Layers (think about those
> > options that you are presented, depending on what you need from
> > this special layer each of them are useful)
> >-->Edit -->Copy
> >-->Edit -->Undo
> > this gives you just as much as the original Copy Visible script
> > did.
>
> This is basically what the Copy Visible script is doing. Well, more
> precisely what it does is:
>
> 1. Duplicate the image
> 2. Merge Visible Layers
> 3. Copy
> 4. Delete the duplicate
>
> > the original script was written in perl.  perhaps installing perl
> > will also fix your problems with the current script.  i havent
> > investigated this yet.  what you find confusing is a script-fu
> > that some guy took about 2 minutes to write one evening on #gimp.
> >  he said it was two lines.
>
> I don't even remember a perl version of this script. Are you
> certain that one exists?
HAH... I could do it in Python and it would take me two minutes and 
two lines

Just kidding... Most likely It'd take me about half an hour at 
least..I have to write this stuff browsing every detail on the PDB 
browsers, and it is time consuming. And of course, it takes at least 
as many lines as actions (4 + undo/redo/register overhead) , unless 
someone is really wanting some obfuscated python.

However,  I am writing it because if cedric really wants it... 
(Cedric, you there)? I could do it in python with an extra call to 
the curves tool to make the copy respect the visible channels.

Regards...

JS
-><-


>
>
> Sven
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user

Re: [Gimp-user] Re: photoshop's "plastic wrap" effect in GIMP

thanks,but a problem using it:
I execute this script in gimp-2.0.4
with following error
(script-fu-wrap-effect 1 2 10 3 3 FALSE)
ERROR: too few arguments (see errobj)

any idea?

ÔÚÄúµÄÀ´ÐÅÖÐÔø¾­Ìáµ½:
>From: Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: 
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Re: photoshop's "plastic wrap" effect in GIMP
>
>sorry, i get grumpy.
> 
> http://carol.gimp.org/gimp/techniques/wrap-effect.scm
> http://carol.gimp.org/gimp/techniques/wrap-effect.scm.txt
> 
> i send mail from a different computer than my website and home computer.
> moving files around is much more complicated.  if you cannot get this, i
> will move the file to the mail server when i return.
> 
> carol
> 
> 
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 10:47:01AM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > 
> > Thanks,carol! but I think that it not the browser's problem.
> > I am behind a firewall. Some websites are filtered.
> > can you mail me that script?
> > 
> > :
> > >From: Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >Reply-To: 
> > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Re: photoshop's "plastic wrap" effect in GIMP
> > >
> > >i am at the beginning of writing a tutorial for this script.  it should
> > > be available on cgo soon, i guess.
> > > 
> > > i am going to ask that you consider using mozilla web browser and if you
> > > are already using this browser or are unable to because of size
> > > constraints on your computer, perhaps trying to get it with different
> > > software, such as lynx:
> > > http://lynx.browser.org/
> > > which, in theory at least, should work for any language of web page.
> > > 
> > > thanks,
> > > carol
> > > 
> > > On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 08:59:38AM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > would you mail me that script, I can't load that page here. Thank you! 
> > > > 
> > > > :
> > > > >From: GSR - FR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > >Reply-To: 
> > > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >Subject: [Gimp-user] Re: photoshop's "plastic wrap" effect in GIMP
> > > > >
> > > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2004-09-13 at 1539.56 +0200):
> > > > > > but I imagine it would be possible. Perhaps someone could come up with
a
> > > > > > script-fu?
> > > > > 
> > > > > http://wingimp.hp.infoseek.co.jp/files/script/wrap-effect.html
> > > > > 
> > > > > GSR
> > > > >  
> > > > > ___
> > > > > Gimp-user mailing list
> > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
> > > > >
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > ___
> > > > Gimp-user mailing list
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
> > >
> > 
> > 
>


___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user

Re: [Gimp-user] Re: photoshop's "plastic wrap" effect in GIMP

I discover:
this function lacks one parameter
(plug-in-edge 1 inImage theNewlayer 10.0 1)
where parameters are:
run_mode image drawable amount wrapmode edgemode


>From: "" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Re: photoshop's "plastic wrap" effect in GIMP
>
>thanks,but a problem using it:
> I execute this script in gimp-2.0.4
> with following error
> (script-fu-wrap-effect 1 2 10 3 3 FALSE)
> ERROR: too few arguments (see errobj)
> 
> any idea?
> 
> >From: Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: 
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Re: photoshop's "plastic wrap" effect in GIMP
> >
> >sorry, i get grumpy.
> > 
> > http://carol.gimp.org/gimp/techniques/wrap-effect.scm
> > http://carol.gimp.org/gimp/techniques/wrap-effect.scm.txt
> > 
> > i send mail from a different computer than my website and home computer.
> > moving files around is much more complicated.  if you cannot get this, i
> > will move the file to the mail server when i return.
> > 
> > carol
> > 
> > 


___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user