[Gimp-user] Error saving in gimp
I'm using FC4, when trying to save in gimp I get the following error message: (script-fu:23202): LibGimpBase-WARNING **: script-fu: wire_read(): error Segmentation fault Does anyone know what this is, and how to fix it? Cheers, Clair. ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] gimp -?
Hi, Gert Cuykens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > thx gimp-remote works > > Would it not be better if gimp could do this too ? Sure. IIRC, there's a long-standing bug report on this. Patches are welcome. Sven ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Making GIMP a little more tablet friendly, maybe?
Hi, "Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Yes. There is a reason for me to ignore this request: One of the few > things in the world that requires a single button to operate is a > toaster. An Image manipulation Program is no toaster, and it does > need preferences settings to work in an optimal way. > > No one needs to find, learn and set to an optimal state the program's > preferences in the first use, or even in the first month of use. I > don't see any need to artifically keep the preferences down - a user > who doesn't have a clue about why computer programs differ from a > toaster will have a feeling of "looking at things under the hood" > when using the preferences dialog in the first place - it won't hurt > if all the preferences needed are there. There are two aspects here. One is the user point of view: a cluttered preferences dialog makes it very hard to locate the option you are looking for. We have frequent complaints from users who claim that a preferences option doesn't exist. Even it is definitely there, it is simply not found. That alone is a good reason to keep the number of preference options to a minimum. But of course they can't be avoided entirely. I never asked for that. I would simply like to keep them to the current number. The second reason is maintainability. Any option you add is doubles the amount of possible configurations which all need to be tested regularily. > But since you really want it, the "Save Keyboard Shortcuts on Exit" > is something I never turned off - so as far as I am concerned it > could be gone and remain always on. I admit that this option can be confusing but I find it very useful. It allows you to assign dynamic keyboard shortcuts for this particular session only. I wouldn't want to miss that. Sven ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] gimp -?
On 6/22/05, Patrick Shanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Gert Cuykens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [06-22-05 14:30]: > > thx gimp-remote works > > > > Would it not be better if gimp could do this too ? > > How would you indicate to gimp that you wanted to open a "new" > instance or add to an "existing" instance? > > *That* is the reason to have "gimp-remote". gimp -e or some other -parameter that you can look up in man gimp? ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] gimp -?
* Gert Cuykens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [06-22-05 14:30]: > thx gimp-remote works > > Would it not be better if gimp could do this too ? How would you indicate to gimp that you wanted to open a "new" instance or add to an "existing" instance? *That* is the reason to have "gimp-remote". -- Patrick ShanahanRegistered Linux User #207535 http://wahoo.no-ip.org@ http://counter.li.org HOG # US1244711 Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] gimp -?
thx gimp-remote works Would it not be better if gimp could do this too ? ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] gimp -?
It's something like 'gimp-remote' Try searching for that or similar. -- Adam Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
[Gimp-user] gimp -?
What do i need to put in the command line of gnome to open a image when clicking on it ? When i just put gnome it works except it loads a new gimp for each image instead of opening the image in the already running gimp. ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Making GIMP a little more tablet friendly, maybe?
On Wednesday 22 June 2005 05:22, Sven Neumann wrote: > Hi, > > "Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > So, I fired up the preferences dialog, and the first place I > > would search fo this is in the tab "input devices". And lo - > > there is some space to spare there. There could be a couple > > radiobuttons to configure this behavior just above the "extended > > input devices", what do you think? > > I asked you to propose a preference to remove in exchange for the > new one. You don't like that deal or is there another reason you > are ignoring this request? > Yes. There is a reason for me to ignore this request: One of the few things in the world that requires a single button to operate is a toaster. An Image manipulation Program is no toaster, and it does need preferences settings to work in an optimal way. No one needs to find, learn and set to an optimal state the program's preferences in the first use, or even in the first month of use. I don't see any need to artifically keep the preferences down - a user who doesn't have a clue about why computer programs differ from a toaster will have a feeling of "looking at things under the hood" when using the preferences dialog in the first place - it won't hurt if all the preferences needed are there. Besides, as I wrote clearly before - the first place I would search for such an option would be in "Input Devices" - even it is not the "right" place to put it in. There is space in the input devices section for this option to be added without removing anything else - so I thought that removing anything else just to keep the preferences coutn down would not be needed. But since you really want it, the "Save Keyboard Shortcuts on Exit" is something I never turned off - so as far as I am concerned it could be gone and remain always on. Joao ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp / C86 / Mac
On Wednesday 22 June 2005 10:34, Richard Nagle wrote: > Judging my the lack of responses, there must be no-one using a Mac > Gimp and a epson C86 printer. > > I surely could use some help, and finding out why Gimp 2.2.6, > with Gimp-Print 4.2.7 will not print. > Hi - also, you should check if in the printing dialog, configure printer sub-dialog, where the "printing command" is displayed, if there is no "-oraw" option. I fit is there, erase taht option, and try printign again. Regards, JS -><- > > Richard > ___ > Gimp-user mailing list > Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu > http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp / C86 / Mac
On Wednesday 22 June 2005 14:34, Richard Nagle wrote: > Gimp 2.2.6, > with Gimp-Print 4.2.7 hi, i really have no idea but this page suggests if the problem is not addressed in their faq to ask in the gimp-print project forum, have you tried there ? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/MacOSX.php3 sammi ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
[Gimp-user] Gimp / C86 / Mac
Judging my the lack of responses, there must be no-one using a Mac Gimp and a epson C86 printer. I surely could use some help, and finding out why Gimp 2.2.6, with Gimp-Print 4.2.7 will not print. Richard ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] side-bar script-fu
On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 11:04:07AM +0200, Sven G?rsmann wrote: > > I have a question: What happened to the side-bar.scm Script-Fu by Mike > Oliphant? I used it in the older versions of GIMP (1.x), but now with > the new 2.x GIMP versions the older scripts are unfunctional cause the > Script-Fu engine changed. > > Does anybody know where i can find an updated version of this ( and > maybe other ) script ? Or can anybody tell me where to find a "manual" > which shows how to update the old scripts to work again in the new Gimp? > i can tell you two places where it is not, in cvs. i grabbed a checkout of gimp-1.2 and gimp-1.0 and it is not there. perhaps it is stuck in the attic in cvs? for updating old scripts, since gimp-1.2 most of the changes have been logical. i have done some updating of a few python and perl scripts, it is generally just a few calls that need to be changed. i am not certain how to document this more than telling you to run the script and see what sort of error message you get. the error message and the scripting tools are in most cases enough to figure out what changes need to be made. carol ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
[Gimp-user] side-bar script-fu
Hello! I have a question: What happened to the side-bar.scm Script-Fu by Mike Oliphant? I used it in the older versions of GIMP (1.x), but now with the new 2.x GIMP versions the older scripts are unfunctional cause the Script-Fu engine changed. Does anybody know where i can find an updated version of this ( and maybe other ) script ? Or can anybody tell me where to find a "manual" which shows how to update the old scripts to work again in the new Gimp? Thanks in advance, Sven Goersmann ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Making GIMP a little more tablet friendly, maybe?
Hi, "Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > So, I fired up the preferences dialog, and the first place I would > search fo this is in the tab "input devices". And lo - there is some > space to spare there. There could be a couple radiobuttons to > configure this behavior just above the "extended input devices", > what do you think? I asked you to propose a preference to remove in exchange for the new one. You don't like that deal or is there another reason you are ignoring this request? Sven ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
