Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp and PSD files
Been there, done that. It says that I should recieve an e-mail, but I have not got it yet. It's 2 weeks since I requested it. - Original Message - From: "Patrick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 2:46 AM Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp and PSD files On Thursday 12 December 2002 04:54 am, Thomas Lund wrote: > Is it impossible to get off this list? > > thomas > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Jakub Steiner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 1:13 AM > > Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp and PSD files > > > > > On Čt, 2002-12-12 at 00:30, gerald wrote: > > > > With the 1.2.3 version of The Gimp I can read PSD files but I > > > > can't write in the PSD format is there a way to do so ? > > > > > > try http://registry.gimp.org/plugin?id=481 > > > > > > -- > > > Jakub Steiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > ___ > > > Gimp-user mailing list > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user > > ___ > Gimp-user mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user - No not really, if you failed to keep your welcome to mails when joining the list, then all you need is to click on the gimp url included in the mail to get to the unsubscribe site. Patrick --- KMail v1.4.3 --- SuSE Linux Pro v8.1 --- Registered Linux User #225206 ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp and PSD files
Is it impossible to get off this list? thomas > - Original Message - > From: "Jakub Steiner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 1:13 AM > Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp and PSD files > > > > On Čt, 2002-12-12 at 00:30, gerald wrote: > > > With the 1.2.3 version of The Gimp I can read PSD files but I can't > > > write in the PSD format is there a way to do so ? > > > > try http://registry.gimp.org/plugin?id=481 > > > > -- > > Jakub Steiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > ___ > > Gimp-user mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user > > > > > ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Two Questions...
I'm really mad now, it's fucking impossible to get of this mailing list. I have recieved this unsubscribe mail, and I have confirmed it. Still I get mail from this list. Get me off, or I'm going to spam you like you spam me.. thomas - Original Message - From: "Pat Suwalski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "David Burren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, December 14, 2002 5:25 AM Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Two Questions... > On Sat, 14 Dec 2002, David Burren wrote: > > This is where you'd get into religious bunfights if you took away the > > current interface. If a single-window interface was available, it > > should be selectable. The multi-window interface is one of the things I > > love about the Gimp. I already have a window manager running which can > > take care of them, so why not use it? > > Because it's cleaner and more uniform throughout (and from computer to > computer, window manager to window manager) to let he program handle it. > And yes, I can't imagine it would be hard to make selectable. But for a > PhotoPaint poweruser, who is used to a much better UI than even PhotoShop > because of the way it handles its MDI interface, it should be considered. > PhotoShop doesn't do MDI/toolbar usage justice. PhotoPaint does. > > The other point regarding this is that desktop managers are becoming ever > more popular on UNIX. The icons seeping through between my dialogs is > quite distracting. A solid gray is preferable. > > > I'm one of those people who use virtual workspaces (10 of them in fact). > > I often have Gimp windows clustered in one workspace, but it's useful to > > have Gimp windows pop up in other workspaces and in fact sometimes I > > have Gimp windows appearing in multiple workspaces. > > This is just fine. I have used Gimp on its own desktop, and it was better. > Again, I don't like the fact that alt-tab would select the individual > windows (I know, wm); I think it would be great if it could be made so > that the GIMP "mother-window" would take care of its children for me. :) > > > When you talk about each window "show[ing] up in the task list when > > alt-tabbing", that would be a function of your window manager (or are > > you running under "Windows"?). You may be able to configure your WM > > to be more helpful (e.g. by dropping some window names from the list). > > No, no, this is Gnome2 with Metacity. As I was typing that last eMail, I > did consider that possibility of hiding windows. This would work great > with some wm's, but Metacity doesn't do that (to the best of my > knowledge). Again, going back to the uniform design concept, this would > ideally be controlled by the gimp, and not the window manager. > > Note how both PhotoShop and PhotoPaint have their own dock design with > smaller title bars and custom roll-up buttons, not relying on Windows' > (lacking) window manager. > > > BTW, my comments are based on experience with 1.2.x - can't comment on 1.3. > > In terms of window handling, 1.3 is the same as 1.2. I was kind of hoping > this would change somewhere along the way. > > --Pat > > ___ > Gimp-user mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user > > ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Re: New Gimp FAQ: Call for questions
GET ME OFF THIS LIST! And no, the unsubscribe-mail don't work. Tried it many times. - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED] ( Marc) (A.) (Lehmann )> To: "GIMP Users" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 5:31 AM Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Re: New Gimp FAQ: Call for questions > On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 03:28:17PM -0500, Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > At what point is it better to use The GIMP for batch processing over > > Image Magick? > > For one, whenever you want to interactively adjust sth. ImageMagick is a > blind flight, with gimp you can more easily change parameters, retry etc.. > > Also, Gimp might have that "effect of the day" you really need. In this > case ImageMagick simply isn't an option. And the Gimp has _lots_ of > effects ;) The same is true for any script or function that is available > for the gimp but not ImageMagick. > > Last not least, ImageMagick can be a memory hog and almost always is > extremely slow in everything. Gimp can be a lot faster, and when you have > to process 20,000+ images that might save a lot of hours. > > > nicer than Image Magick. I read from someone (jlbec on #gimp) that The > > GIMP hands saving as png much much better than Image Magick. so i would > > Well, we'd like to know in what respect ;) > > -- > -==- | > ==-- _ | > ---==---(_)__ __ __ Marc Lehmann +-- > --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [EMAIL PROTECTED] |e| > -=/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE --+ > The choice of a GNU generation | > | > ___ > Gimp-user mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user > > > ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] FAQ answers
FAQ: How to get of this list? - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED] ( Marc) (A.) (Lehmann )> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, December 22, 2002 11:40 AM Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] FAQ answers > > First of all, please don't quote such a long mail without replying to > it. Believe us, we _did_ reeceive the original mail, too ;) > > On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 04:26:26PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >>> *) How does the "Xtns/Script-Fu" menu differ from the "Script-Fu" > > pop-up > > >>> menu? > > > > When I right-click on an image and get the context menu, there is a > > "Script-Fu" option at the bottom. That is the "Script-Fu pop-up" I was > > referring to. :) > > Well, they are completey different. Or, put another way: > > The right-click-menu (image menu) contains operations/plug-ins that work > on the active/current image. The filters and script-fu entries use the > underlying image as one of their arguments. > > The Xnts-menu (the whole toolbox, actually) contains effects and plug-ins > (and other operations) that work without images (for example, there is no > file/save). Most plug-ins in the toolbox or xtns-menu create new images. > > As a sidenote, the fully artificial distinction between script-fu-plug-ins > and other plug-ins confuses a lot of users (the same is true for the xtns > menu. I fail to see why a user must memorize that a specific plug-in is > wirtten in C, Perl, or script-fu, just to _use_it). All of these should > just be moved to their correct location, ending this confusig double-life. > > -- > -==- | > ==-- _ | > ---==---(_)__ __ __ Marc Lehmann +-- > --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [EMAIL PROTECTED] |e| > -=/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE --+ > The choice of a GNU generation | > | > ___ > Gimp-user mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user > > ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
