Re: SPAM :-(
Yeah, me too. That's the second or third spam I've gotten now. Still, it's not the lists fault... -Lea. Alan Buxey wrote: hi, sorry, but if I keep getting SPAM from this mailling list (the last supposedly coming from "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" - it only takes 2 seconds to look at the headers and see scam.xcf.berkeley.edu) then I'll have to remove myself from this mailing list :-( alan
Re: SPAM :-(
Lea Anthony wrote: I agree, this is better. Can we not get the s/w updated rather than miss out on the list altogether? What advantages does hosting this list at the present site have vis. a vis. hosting this mailing list at egroups.com? egroups.com offers all such facilities, plus all mails remain archived. -- Regards, Harshdeep Singh Jawanda.
Re: SPAM :-(
egroups bad idea. too many ads
Re: SPAM :-(
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2000-09-27 at 2214.14 +0530): What advantages does hosting this list at the present site have vis. a vis. hosting this mailing list at egroups.com? egroups.com offers all such facilities, plus all mails remain archived. Advertisment? If we are gonna change to another place, I would ask help to GNU or SourceForge, they give lists to open source projects without ads. But I guess that the only thing needed is to change a setting in the current list config. And as with the website, the problem is to find the person that can do it. GSR
Re: SPAM :-(
Just FYI, the ads can be removed for 48.00 per year. I would hazzard to guess that many would gladly chip in a coupl ebucks for that. Harshdeep S Jawanda wrote: Lea Anthony wrote: I agree, this is better. Can we not get the s/w updated rather than miss out on the list altogether? What advantages does hosting this list at the present site have vis. a vis. hosting this mailing list at egroups.com? egroups.com offers all such facilities, plus all mails remain archived. -- Regards, Harshdeep Singh Jawanda. -- Steve Rogers, CCNA, Prince of Darkness Evil Overlord of 3D Network Engineer, Lightwave Animator since 1990 "Proud member of PETA (People Eating Tasty Animals)"
Re: SPAM :-(
Harshdeep S Jawanda wrote: Lea Anthony wrote: I agree, this is better. Can we not get the s/w updated rather than miss out on the list altogether? What advantages does hosting this list at the present site have vis. a vis. hosting this mailing list at egroups.com? egroups.com offers all such facilities, plus all mails remain archived. egroups spams each message themselves, by appending crap at the bottom. At least that was my experience with the oracle list hosted there. egroups sucks, don't go that way. -- Regards, Harshdeep Singh Jawanda. -- Until later: Geoffrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Great spirits have always found violent opposition from mediocre minds. The latter cannot understand it when a man does not thoughtlessly submit to hereditary prejudices but honestly and courageously uses his intelligence." - Albert Einstein
Making persistient keybindings in channels, layers, paths dialogbox?
Hi! Is there a way to make keybindings to blending modes (sorry if I'm using the wrong terms here...that's how they're expressed in Photo$hop) in the Layers, Channels Paths dialog persistent? I can dynamically bind them (by virtue of gtk's dynamic binding feature), but these bindings never persist from gimp session to gimp session. If none of that made any sense, I'm looking to make it so the blending modes (normal, dissolve, multiply, screen, divide, etc) to the keypad...that is, KP_0 (0) to normal KP_1 to multiply (I never seem to have any use for dissolve), and on up to KP_9 for lighten only. Then with the blending modes for which there are no keys left (hue, saturation, color and value) use ALT+KP_1 ALT+KP_2 etc. It might sound like a lot of "sugar for a nickel" as my dad used to put it, but I find these bindings incredibly useful because I'm constantly blending layers...but I find that I have to reset them everytime I use the gimp. The gimp has no preset keybindings from anything in the keypad, and since these are only bound to the layers, channels paths dialog box, they don't interfere with anything else...but at any rate, as it is now, nothing will bind to these blending modes. Perhaps this could be added to a wish list? Or perhaps there's something I could define somewhere in ~/.gimp ? I've looked pretty carefully but as yet have found nothing there. Thank you for any help or suggestions! Vince Frost
Re: SPAM :-(
I've got to say that annoying as spam is htting the delete button isn't that hard :) Tal On Wed, 27 Sep 2000 16:41:00 +0100 (BST), Alan Buxey said: hi, sorry, but if I keep getting SPAM from this mailling list (the last supposedly coming from "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" - it only takes 2 seconds to look at the headers and see scam.xcf.berkeley.edu) then I'll have to remove myself from this mailing list :-( alan -- -- | Tal Danzig [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Linux by Libranet| | Homepage: | The TOP Desktop Distribution | | http://www.muhri.net/~tal | http://www.libranet.com | -- A Friendly .sig!!! (TM)
SPAM :-(
hi, sorry, but if I keep getting SPAM from this mailling list (the last supposedly coming from "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" - it only takes 2 seconds to look at the headers and see scam.xcf.berkeley.edu) then I'll have to remove myself from this mailing list :-( alan
Re: SPAM :-(
hi, Yeah, me too. That's the second or third spam I've gotten now. Still, it's not the lists fault... other lists operate on a 'subscriber only' basis and check the from/to flags of posters. alan
