Re: variety in letters

2000-09-15 Thread Ben FrantzDale


- Original Message -
From: Jim Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: GIMP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 15, 2000 12:50 PM
Subject: variety in letters


> Well, I made my own bullet, one pixel at a time, but it looks really
> good.  Now, here's another question.  I am putting black text on white,
> and using the same font at the same size I get 3 very different letter
> e's.  Take a look at :
> http://www.bsmanagement.com/llywelyn/images/e.gif
> Note how different each final e is.  Is there a reason for this?  This
> is at 8X display, but it is a little visible at 1X display too.  I'm
> only using 20 pt font.  However, reagardless, it does seem as if it
> should do the same thing every time.  Or does it?


That would be true except for the fact that the font is anti-aliased.
Basicly what gimp does (though it may actually do it slightly differently)
is draw a big copy of the font into memory, then scale it down smoothly and
draw that. Your font isn't monospaced so the e isn't an intigral number of
pixels from where that line of text started. That's why they look different.

(I think.)

--Ben




variety in letters

2000-09-15 Thread Jim Clark

Well, I made my own bullet, one pixel at a time, but it looks really
good.  Now, here's another question.  I am putting black text on white,
and using the same font at the same size I get 3 very different letter
e's.  Take a look at :
http://www.bsmanagement.com/llywelyn/images/e.gif
Note how different each final e is.  Is there a reason for this?  This
is at 8X display, but it is a little visible at 1X display too.  I'm
only using 20 pt font.  However, reagardless, it does seem as if it
should do the same thing every time.  Or does it?
-- 
Thanks!
Jim Clark