Re: [Gimp-user] [Gimp-developer] changes in the mailing list etiquette
Hello Alexandre. Code of conduct is concise enough and quite understandable. Neat, clean, perfect. If you don't mind one comment I'd just have written Stick to plain text instead of Stick to standards (which besides is a plural form while what is requested leaves only one option, which I'm perfectly fine with, that said.) Kind regards, Vince C. ... Hi, We've just introduced a short code of conduct for all of our mailing lists instead of the long netiquette guidelines we used to have. Please read it at http://www.gimp.org/mail_lists.html. The changes take effect immediately. Alexandre Prokoudine, on behalf of the GIMP team ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
[Gimp-user] Re : [Gimp-developer] download.dk - malicious or just sub-par?
--- En date de : Jeu 20.12.12, Michael Schumacher schum...@gmx.de a écrit : Hi, we've been approached by download.dk about an award GIMP seems to have won on their site. They suggested to add this award to www.gimp.org with the usual link back to their site... Upon inspecting their GIMP download page, I'm not really sure if this is an elaborate scam, or just a sub-par try of implementing a downloads site: A strange driver update setup called installer.exe is more likely to be downloaded from their downloads page than the software the user intends to get. The link to this software is much more prominent. I tried to send them a mail about this problem, but that message was returned with a no mail exchangers for that domain, and the message shows some mailmarketing.com forwarding addresses. Has anyone got opinions about or experiences with this site? The most probable explanation is some [hacked or] malicious web site trying to gain from the reputation of a renown product to spread malicious software instead of the true Gimp installer. Least I'd expect from a third party web site is to link or at most proxy download requests. In this very case it's obvious they didn't. Plus the fact that the domain has no mail exchanger shall trigger an alarm lamp string and put the threat level in maximum DEFCON. My 2¢. Vince C. Reagrds, Michael ___ gimp-developer-list mailing list gimp-developer-l...@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
