Re: better way to update site?
> could you remove /www/incubator.apache.org/giraph_ directory? Done. thanks for the update.
Re: better way to update site?
There is a typo error. The following is correct: could you remove /www/incubator.apache.org/giraph_ directory? -- Hyunsik Choi On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Hyunsik Choi wrote: > Jakob, > > To update the site, I moved /www/incubator.apache.org/giraph to giraph_. > This is because I could not remove the original site of giraph due to > permission but I could move it. For clear, could you remove /var/www/ > incubator.apache.org/giraph_ directory? > > Thank you, > -- > Hyunsik Choi > > > On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Hyunsik Choi wrote: > >> Thank you for the nice instruction. >> I've updated the rsync command for group permission. >> >> -- >> Hyunsik Choi >> >> >> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: >> >>> I've added a page to the wiki with instructions on how I did it: >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GIRAPH/Committer+notes >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 8:18 PM, Hyunsik Choi >>> wrote: >>> > +1 >>> > >>> > This way is the best for us :) >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Hyunsik Choi >>> > >>> > On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 12:48 PM, Jakob Homan >>> wrote: >>> > >>> >> Cool. I've got ahead and deleted the generated site from the repo and >>> >> copied in the latest version (post GIRAPH-75). Thanks. >>> >> >>> > >>> >> >> >
Re: better way to update site?
Jakob, To update the site, I moved /www/incubator.apache.org/giraph to giraph_. This is because I could not remove the original site of giraph due to permission but I could move it. For clear, could you remove /var/www/ incubator.apache.org/giraph_ directory? Thank you, -- Hyunsik Choi On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Hyunsik Choi wrote: > Thank you for the nice instruction. > I've updated the rsync command for group permission. > > -- > Hyunsik Choi > > > On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: > >> I've added a page to the wiki with instructions on how I did it: >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GIRAPH/Committer+notes >> >> >> On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 8:18 PM, Hyunsik Choi wrote: >> > +1 >> > >> > This way is the best for us :) >> > >> > -- >> > Hyunsik Choi >> > >> > On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 12:48 PM, Jakob Homan >> wrote: >> > >> >> Cool. I've got ahead and deleted the generated site from the repo and >> >> copied in the latest version (post GIRAPH-75). Thanks. >> >> >> > >> > >
Re: better way to update site?
Thank you for the nice instruction. I've updated the rsync command for group permission. -- Hyunsik Choi On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: > I've added a page to the wiki with instructions on how I did it: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GIRAPH/Committer+notes > > > On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 8:18 PM, Hyunsik Choi wrote: > > +1 > > > > This way is the best for us :) > > > > -- > > Hyunsik Choi > > > > On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 12:48 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: > > > >> Cool. I've got ahead and deleted the generated site from the repo and > >> copied in the latest version (post GIRAPH-75). Thanks. > >> > > >
Re: better way to update site?
I've added a page to the wiki with instructions on how I did it: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GIRAPH/Committer+notes On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 8:18 PM, Hyunsik Choi wrote: > +1 > > This way is the best for us :) > > -- > Hyunsik Choi > > On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 12:48 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: > >> Cool. I've got ahead and deleted the generated site from the repo and >> copied in the latest version (post GIRAPH-75). Thanks. >> >
Re: better way to update site?
+1 This way is the best for us :) -- Hyunsik Choi On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 12:48 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: > Cool. I've got ahead and deleted the generated site from the repo and > copied in the latest version (post GIRAPH-75). Thanks. >
Re: better way to update site?
Cool. I've got ahead and deleted the generated site from the repo and copied in the latest version (post GIRAPH-75). Thanks.
Re: better way to update site?
+1. Having the pre-generated files in svn is good enough for me. Avery On 11/11/11 1:36 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: As Avery documented in GIRAPH-36 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-35?focusedCommentId=13107195&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13107195) it's pretty painful to update the site currently. This is due to the fact that we're keeping the site within the src tree (as dictated by mvn), so we can't just check it out, as other, ant/forrest projects do. The other project I found that does this is hbase, which avoids the whole mess by not keeping their site (ie the contents of people.apache.org/www/incubator/giraph) in svn, but rather generating the site locally and then copying straight to that directory. I think this may be a better approach since it avoids the huge churn of rming and re-creating the whole site structure each time. In this schema, once the site is updated, run mvn site:site to generate its contents, verify its correctness, then scp it to people.apache.org and replace the current directory. (or rsync it and be done). We'll still have all the history of the site, etc., just none of the hassle. What do people think?
better way to update site?
As Avery documented in GIRAPH-36 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-35?focusedCommentId=13107195&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13107195) it's pretty painful to update the site currently. This is due to the fact that we're keeping the site within the src tree (as dictated by mvn), so we can't just check it out, as other, ant/forrest projects do. The other project I found that does this is hbase, which avoids the whole mess by not keeping their site (ie the contents of people.apache.org/www/incubator/giraph) in svn, but rather generating the site locally and then copying straight to that directory. I think this may be a better approach since it avoids the huge churn of rming and re-creating the whole site structure each time. In this schema, once the site is updated, run mvn site:site to generate its contents, verify its correctness, then scp it to people.apache.org and replace the current directory. (or rsync it and be done). We'll still have all the history of the site, etc., just none of the hassle. What do people think?
