On 08/08, Paul-Sebastian Ungureanu wrote:
> This commit replaces spawning `git write-tree` with API calls.
> ---
> builtin/stash.c | 40
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
Nice reduction in lines here!
>
> diff --git a/builtin/stash.c b/builtin/stash.c
> index 4d5c0d16e..46e76a34e 100644
> --- a/builtin/stash.c
> +++ b/builtin/stash.c
> @@ -949,9 +949,8 @@ static int save_untracked_files(struct stash_info *info,
> struct strbuf *msg)
> {
> int ret = 0;
> struct strbuf untracked_msg = STRBUF_INIT;
> - struct strbuf out2 = STRBUF_INIT;
> struct child_process cp = CHILD_PROCESS_INIT;
> - struct child_process cp2 = CHILD_PROCESS_INIT;
> + struct index_state state = { NULL };
We often call this 'istate' throughout the codebase. Would be nice to
call it that here as well, to reduce the cognitive load for people
already familiar with the codebase.
>
> cp.git_cmd = 1;
> argv_array_pushl(, "update-index", "--add",
> @@ -966,15 +965,11 @@ static int save_untracked_files(struct stash_info
> *info, struct strbuf *msg)
> goto done;
> }
>
> - cp2.git_cmd = 1;
> - argv_array_push(, "write-tree");
> - argv_array_pushf(_array, "GIT_INDEX_FILE=%s",
> - stash_index_path.buf);
> - if (pipe_command(, NULL, 0, , 0,NULL, 0)) {
> + if (write_index_as_tree(>u_tree, , stash_index_path.buf, 0,
> + NULL)) {
> ret = -1;
> goto done;
> }
> - get_oid_hex(out2.buf, >u_tree);
>
> if (commit_tree(untracked_msg.buf, untracked_msg.len,
> >u_tree, NULL, >u_commit, NULL, NULL)) {
> @@ -984,7 +979,6 @@ static int save_untracked_files(struct stash_info *info,
> struct strbuf *msg)
>
> done:
> strbuf_release(_msg);
> - strbuf_release();
> remove_path(stash_index_path.buf);
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -994,11 +988,10 @@ static struct strbuf patch = STRBUF_INIT;
> static int stash_patch(struct stash_info *info, const char **argv)
> {
> int ret = 0;
> - struct strbuf out2 = STRBUF_INIT;
> struct child_process cp0 = CHILD_PROCESS_INIT;
> struct child_process cp1 = CHILD_PROCESS_INIT;
> - struct child_process cp2 = CHILD_PROCESS_INIT;
> struct child_process cp3 = CHILD_PROCESS_INIT;
> + struct index_state state = { NULL };
>
> remove_path(stash_index_path.buf);
>
> @@ -1023,17 +1016,12 @@ static int stash_patch(struct stash_info *info, const
> char **argv)
> goto done;
> }
>
> - cp2.git_cmd = 1;
> - argv_array_push(, "write-tree");
> - argv_array_pushf(_array, "GIT_INDEX_FILE=%s",
> - stash_index_path.buf);
> - if (pipe_command(, NULL, 0, , 0,NULL, 0)) {
> + if (write_index_as_tree(>w_tree, , stash_index_path.buf, 0,
> + NULL)) {
> ret = -1;
> goto done;
> }
>
> - get_oid_hex(out2.buf, >w_tree);
> -
> cp3.git_cmd = 1;
> argv_array_pushl(, "diff-tree", "-p", "HEAD",
>oid_to_hex(>w_tree), "--", NULL);
> @@ -1046,7 +1034,6 @@ static int stash_patch(struct stash_info *info, const
> char **argv)
> }
>
> done:
> - strbuf_release();
> remove_path(stash_index_path.buf);
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -1056,11 +1043,10 @@ static int stash_working_tree(struct stash_info *info,
> {
> int ret = 0;
> struct child_process cp2 = CHILD_PROCESS_INIT;
> - struct child_process cp3 = CHILD_PROCESS_INIT;
> - struct strbuf out3 = STRBUF_INIT;
> struct argv_array args = ARGV_ARRAY_INIT;
> struct strbuf diff_output = STRBUF_INIT;
> struct rev_info rev;
> + struct index_state state = { NULL };
>
> set_alternate_index_output(stash_index_path.buf);
> if (reset_tree(>i_tree, 0, 0)) {
> @@ -1103,20 +1089,18 @@ static int stash_working_tree(struct stash_info *info,
> goto done;
> }
>
> - cp3.git_cmd = 1;
> - argv_array_push(, "write-tree");
> - argv_array_pushf(_array, "GIT_INDEX_FILE=%s",
> - stash_index_path.buf);
> - if (pipe_command(, NULL, 0, , 0,NULL, 0)) {
> + if (write_index_as_tree(>w_tree, , stash_index_path.buf, 0,
> + NULL)) {
> +
> ret = -1;
> goto done;
> }
>
> - get_oid_hex(out3.buf, >w_tree);
> + discard_cache();
> + read_cache();
This 'discard_cache()'/'read_cache()' pair surprises me a bit, and I
can't figure out why it's necessary now. 'write_index_as_tree()' reads
and writes from the index file at 'stash_index_path', while
'{discard,read}_cache()' operate on 'the_index', which should always be
distinct from the temporary index we are using here. So this
shouldn't be needed, at least not because of the changes we are making
in this patch.
>
>
