Re: [PATCH] bisect run: die if no command is given

[Junio C Hamano]

Stephan Beyer  writes:

> It was possible to invoke "git bisect run" without any command.
> This considers all commits as good commits since "$@"'s return
> value for empty $@ is 0.
>
> This is most probably not what a user wants (otherwise she would
> invoke "git bisect run true"), so not providing a command now
> results in an error.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephan Beyer 
> ---

Makes sense to me.  Thanks, will queue.

>  git-bisect.sh | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/git-bisect.sh b/git-bisect.sh
> index 0138a8860..a69e43656 100755
> --- a/git-bisect.sh
> +++ b/git-bisect.sh
> @@ -450,6 +450,8 @@ bisect_replay () {
>  bisect_run () {
>   bisect_next_check fail
>  
> + test -n "$*" || die "$(gettext "bisect run failed: no command 
> provided.")"
> +
>   while true
>   do
>   command="$@"

[PATCH] bisect run: die if no command is given

[Stephan Beyer]

It was possible to invoke "git bisect run" without any command.
This considers all commits as good commits since "$@"'s return
value for empty $@ is 0.

This is most probably not what a user wants (otherwise she would
invoke "git bisect run true"), so not providing a command now
results in an error.

Signed-off-by: Stephan Beyer 
---
 git-bisect.sh | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/git-bisect.sh b/git-bisect.sh
index 0138a8860..a69e43656 100755
--- a/git-bisect.sh
+++ b/git-bisect.sh
@@ -450,6 +450,8 @@ bisect_replay () {
 bisect_run () {
bisect_next_check fail
 
+   test -n "$*" || die "$(gettext "bisect run failed: no command 
provided.")"
+
while true
do
command="$@"
-- 
2.15.0.165.g0dc13a7db.dirty