Re: [PATCH 0/3] nd/multiple-work-trees updates
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Ephrim Khong dr.kh...@gmail.com wrote: Without having looked into this and nd/multiple-work-trees, but with make multiple checkouts aware of each other in mind: Could this mechanism be re-used to make alternates aware of each other, to mitigate the dangers of having git gc on an alternate remove objects that are used by a referencing repository? If we can turn on ref namespace and make $GIT_DIR/config and hooks per worktree, I think it may have a chance of replacing alternate object mechanism entirely: one object database, one ref database (but refs of each worktree is namespaced so no conflicts), multiple worktrees, multiple config files, multiple hooks. Because some config keys affect object database, having multiple/conflicting config keys imply that this worktree may change object database in a way trhat impacts performance (not correctness) of another worktree. Later on when we have multiple ref backends, if config keys can change ref backend behavior (or even choose the backend), we may run into other problems. This problem might go away if we define that those global config keys can't be per-worktree.. In short, I am good at confusing people. -- Duy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH 0/3] nd/multiple-work-trees updates
Without having looked into this and nd/multiple-work-trees, but with make multiple checkouts aware of each other in mind: Could this mechanism be re-used to make alternates aware of each other, to mitigate the dangers of having git gc on an alternate remove objects that are used by a referencing repository? Thanks - Eph On 03.01.2015 10:41, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote: These patches are on top of what's in 'pu'. They add --ignore-other-worktrees and make a note about current submodule support status. I don't think submodule support is ready yet even with Max Kirillov's series [1]. His 03/03 is already fixed in 'pu' though, so only 01/03 and 02/03 are new. [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/261107 Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy (3): checkout: pass whole struct to parse_branchname_arg instead of individual flags checkout: add --ignore-other-wortrees git-checkout.txt: a note about multiple checkout support for submodules Documentation/git-checkout.txt | 9 + builtin/checkout.c | 19 +++ t/t2025-checkout-to.sh | 7 +++ 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH 0/3] nd/multiple-work-trees updates
On do, 2015-02-12 at 14:57 -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy pclo...@gmail.com writes: These patches are on top of what's in 'pu'. They add --ignore-other-worktrees and make a note about current submodule support status. I don't think submodule support is ready yet even with Max Kirillov's series [1]. His 03/03 is already fixed in 'pu' though, so only 01/03 and 02/03 are new. [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/261107 With the understanding (perhaps a strongly-worded paragraph in the release notes) that this is not suitable for submodule users yet, is this in a good enough shape to go to 'next'? I've been using this for a while and really like it. However, it needs a few fixups to merge with next as there are a few merge conflicts. (A version of this branch that I stuck on top of next last week can be found at https://github.com/seveas/git/tree/nd/multiple-work-trees ) -- Dennis Kaarsemaker http://www.kaarsemaker.net -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH 0/3] nd/multiple-work-trees updates
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 5:57 AM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy pclo...@gmail.com writes: These patches are on top of what's in 'pu'. They add --ignore-other-worktrees and make a note about current submodule support status. I don't think submodule support is ready yet even with Max Kirillov's series [1]. His 03/03 is already fixed in 'pu' though, so only 01/03 and 02/03 are new. [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/261107 With the understanding (perhaps a strongly-worded paragraph in the release notes) that this is not suitable for submodule users yet, is this in a good enough shape to go to 'next'? I'm not aware of any problems on this series (except submodules). So, yes. -- Duy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH 0/3] nd/multiple-work-trees updates
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy pclo...@gmail.com writes: These patches are on top of what's in 'pu'. They add --ignore-other-worktrees and make a note about current submodule support status. I don't think submodule support is ready yet even with Max Kirillov's series [1]. His 03/03 is already fixed in 'pu' though, so only 01/03 and 02/03 are new. [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/261107 With the understanding (perhaps a strongly-worded paragraph in the release notes) that this is not suitable for submodule users yet, is this in a good enough shape to go to 'next'? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH 0/3] nd/multiple-work-trees updates
Am 13.02.2015 um 11:57 schrieb Junio C Hamano: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy pclo...@gmail.com writes: These patches are on top of what's in 'pu'. They add --ignore-other-worktrees and make a note about current submodule support status. I don't think submodule support is ready yet even with Max Kirillov's series [1]. His 03/03 is already fixed in 'pu' though, so only 01/03 and 02/03 are new. [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/261107 With the understanding (perhaps a strongly-worded paragraph in the release notes) that this is not suitable for submodule users yet, is this in a good enough shape to go to 'next'? No objections from my side (and maybe we should also add a warning that *all* worktree-related configuration - e.g. EOL options - are currently always shared between all worktrees). Adding submodule support can then be done in another series (and renaming core.worktree to something else is definitely *not* the way to do that! ;-). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH 0/3] nd/multiple-work-trees updates
On 02/12/2015 06:51 PM, Jens Lehmann wrote: Am 13.02.2015 um 11:57 schrieb Junio C Hamano: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy pclo...@gmail.com writes: These patches are on top of what's in 'pu'. They add --ignore-other-worktrees and make a note about current submodule support status. I don't think submodule support is ready yet even with Max Kirillov's series [1]. His 03/03 is already fixed in 'pu' though, so only 01/03 and 02/03 are new. [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/261107 With the understanding (perhaps a strongly-worded paragraph in the release notes) that this is not suitable for submodule users yet, is this in a good enough shape to go to 'next'? No objections from my side (and maybe we should also add a warning that *all* worktree-related configuration - e.g. EOL options - are currently always shared between all worktrees). Adding submodule support can then be done in another series (and renaming core.worktree to something else is definitely *not* the way to do that! ;-). I concur the patch series is good enough for next. Better multiple worktree support for submodules is, I think, a sizeable topic that will take a while to settle, so should be worked after this base is integrated. Mark -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[PATCH 0/3] nd/multiple-work-trees updates
These patches are on top of what's in 'pu'. They add --ignore-other-worktrees and make a note about current submodule support status. I don't think submodule support is ready yet even with Max Kirillov's series [1]. His 03/03 is already fixed in 'pu' though, so only 01/03 and 02/03 are new. [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/261107 Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy (3): checkout: pass whole struct to parse_branchname_arg instead of individual flags checkout: add --ignore-other-wortrees git-checkout.txt: a note about multiple checkout support for submodules Documentation/git-checkout.txt | 9 + builtin/checkout.c | 19 +++ t/t2025-checkout-to.sh | 7 +++ 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) -- 2.2.0.84.ge9c7a8a -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
