Re: [PATCH 1/2] test-lib: add LIBPCRE1 & LIBPCRE2 prerequisites
On Wed, Nov 22 2017, Jonathan Nieder jotted: > Hi, > > Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: > >> Add LIBPCRE1 and LIBPCRE2 prerequisites which are true when git is >> compiled with USE_LIBPCRE1=YesPlease or USE_LIBPCRE2=YesPlease, >> respectively. >> >> The syntax of PCRE1 and PCRE2 isn't the same in all cases (see >> pcresyntax(3) and pcre2syntax(3)). If test are added that test for >> those they'll need to be guarded by these new prerequisites. >> >> Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason>> --- >> t/README | 12 >> t/test-lib.sh | 2 ++ >> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/t/README b/t/README >> index 4b079e4494..599cd9808c 100644 >> --- a/t/README >> +++ b/t/README >> @@ -808,6 +808,18 @@ use these, and "test_set_prereq" for how to define your >> own. >> Git was compiled with support for PCRE. Wrap any tests >> that use git-grep --perl-regexp or git-grep -P in these. >> >> + - LIBPCRE1 >> + >> + Git was compiled with PCRE v1 support via >> + USE_LIBPCRE1=YesPlease. Wrap any PCRE using tests that for some >> + reason need v1 of the PCRE library instead of v2 in these. > > Are there plans to use the LIBPCRE1 prereq? It might be simpler to > only have LIBPCRE2, and LIBPCRE1 can still be expressed as > > PCRE,!LIBPCRE2 > > which I think is clearer about the intent. I prefer to keep it as it is. It's more obvious to me to have a 1=1 mapping between the ${USE,NO}_* variables and the prerequisites, and it's future-proof if there's ever a PCRE v3, since tests that use this will mean v1 specifically, not just any non-v2 version (although now v1 is the only one).
Re: [PATCH 1/2] test-lib: add LIBPCRE1 & LIBPCRE2 prerequisites
Hi, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: > Add LIBPCRE1 and LIBPCRE2 prerequisites which are true when git is > compiled with USE_LIBPCRE1=YesPlease or USE_LIBPCRE2=YesPlease, > respectively. > > The syntax of PCRE1 and PCRE2 isn't the same in all cases (see > pcresyntax(3) and pcre2syntax(3)). If test are added that test for > those they'll need to be guarded by these new prerequisites. > > Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason> --- > t/README | 12 > t/test-lib.sh | 2 ++ > 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/t/README b/t/README > index 4b079e4494..599cd9808c 100644 > --- a/t/README > +++ b/t/README > @@ -808,6 +808,18 @@ use these, and "test_set_prereq" for how to define your > own. > Git was compiled with support for PCRE. Wrap any tests > that use git-grep --perl-regexp or git-grep -P in these. > > + - LIBPCRE1 > + > + Git was compiled with PCRE v1 support via > + USE_LIBPCRE1=YesPlease. Wrap any PCRE using tests that for some > + reason need v1 of the PCRE library instead of v2 in these. Are there plans to use the LIBPCRE1 prereq? It might be simpler to only have LIBPCRE2, and LIBPCRE1 can still be expressed as PCRE,!LIBPCRE2 which I think is clearer about the intent. Thanks, Jonathan
[PATCH 1/2] test-lib: add LIBPCRE1 & LIBPCRE2 prerequisites
Add LIBPCRE1 and LIBPCRE2 prerequisites which are true when git is compiled with USE_LIBPCRE1=YesPlease or USE_LIBPCRE2=YesPlease, respectively. The syntax of PCRE1 and PCRE2 isn't the same in all cases (see pcresyntax(3) and pcre2syntax(3)). If test are added that test for those they'll need to be guarded by these new prerequisites. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason--- t/README | 12 t/test-lib.sh | 2 ++ 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+) diff --git a/t/README b/t/README index 4b079e4494..599cd9808c 100644 --- a/t/README +++ b/t/README @@ -808,6 +808,18 @@ use these, and "test_set_prereq" for how to define your own. Git was compiled with support for PCRE. Wrap any tests that use git-grep --perl-regexp or git-grep -P in these. + - LIBPCRE1 + + Git was compiled with PCRE v1 support via + USE_LIBPCRE1=YesPlease. Wrap any PCRE using tests that for some + reason need v1 of the PCRE library instead of v2 in these. + + - LIBPCRE2 + + Git was compiled with PCRE v2 support via + USE_LIBPCRE2=YesPlease. Wrap any PCRE using tests that for some + reason need v2 of the PCRE library instead of v1 in these. + - CASE_INSENSITIVE_FS Test is run on a case insensitive file system. diff --git a/t/test-lib.sh b/t/test-lib.sh index 116bd6a70c..e7065df2bb 100644 --- a/t/test-lib.sh +++ b/t/test-lib.sh @@ -1028,6 +1028,8 @@ test -z "$NO_PERL" && test_set_prereq PERL test -z "$NO_PTHREADS" && test_set_prereq PTHREADS test -z "$NO_PYTHON" && test_set_prereq PYTHON test -n "$USE_LIBPCRE1$USE_LIBPCRE2" && test_set_prereq PCRE +test -n "$USE_LIBPCRE1" && test_set_prereq LIBPCRE1 +test -n "$USE_LIBPCRE2" && test_set_prereq LIBPCRE2 test -z "$NO_GETTEXT" && test_set_prereq GETTEXT # Can we rely on git's output in the C locale? -- 2.15.0.403.gc27cc4dac6