On 10/12/2013 09:07 AM, Felipe Contreras wrote:
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com
---
revision.c | 14 ++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/revision.c b/revision.c
index 0173e01..4049867 100644
--- a/revision.c
+++ b/revision.c
@@ -1503,7 +1503,7 @@ struct cmdline_pathspec {
static void append_prune_data(struct cmdline_pathspec *prune, const char
**av)
{
while (*av) {
- ALLOC_GROW(prune-path, prune-nr+1, prune-alloc);
+ ALLOC_GROW(prune-path, prune-nr + 1, prune-alloc);
prune-path[prune-nr++] = *(av++);
}
}
@@ -1515,7 +1515,7 @@ static void read_pathspec_from_stdin(struct rev_info
*revs, struct strbuf *sb,
int len = sb-len;
if (len sb-buf[len - 1] == '\n')
sb-buf[--len] = '\0';
- ALLOC_GROW(prune-path, prune-nr+1, prune-alloc);
+ ALLOC_GROW(prune-path, prune-nr + 1, prune-alloc);
prune-path[prune-nr++] = xstrdup(sb-buf);
}
}
@@ -2118,7 +2118,7 @@ int setup_revisions(int argc, const char **argv, struct
rev_info *revs, struct s
* call init_pathspec() to set revs-prune_data here.
* }
*/
- ALLOC_GROW(prune_data.path, prune_data.nr+1, prune_data.alloc);
+ ALLOC_GROW(prune_data.path, prune_data.nr + 1,
prune_data.alloc);
prune_data.path[prune_data.nr++] = NULL;
parse_pathspec(revs-prune_data, 0, 0,
revs-prefix, prune_data.path);
@@ -2971,7 +2971,7 @@ static struct commit *get_revision_internal(struct
rev_info *revs)
if (revs-max_count) {
c = get_revision_1(revs);
if (c) {
- while (0 revs-skip_count) {
+ while (revs-skip_count 0) {
revs-skip_count--;
c = get_revision_1(revs);
if (!c)
@@ -2986,9 +2986,8 @@ static struct commit *get_revision_internal(struct
rev_info *revs)
if (c)
c-object.flags |= SHOWN;
- if (!revs-boundary) {
+ if (!revs-boundary)
return c;
- }
if (!c) {
/*
@@ -3034,9 +3033,8 @@ struct commit *get_revision(struct rev_info *revs)
if (revs-reverse) {
reversed = NULL;
- while ((c = get_revision_internal(revs))) {
+ while ((c = get_revision_internal(revs)))
commit_list_insert(c, reversed);
- }
While talking about trivia, what is the projects stance on
such constructs here?
while (foo)
bar();
foobar();
I've seen an empty line between the bar(); and the foobar(); often, which suits
readability.
What's the stance on such an empty line here?
revs-commits = reversed;
revs-reverse = 0;
revs-reverse_output_stage = 1;
Thanks,
Stefan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html