Re: [PATCH v1 18/25] contrib: remove 'emacs'
David Kågedal wrote: What problem does this removal solve? Please do not top post. a) What problem does it solve by staying? b) Where are the tests? c) Why it cannot be moved to an outside repository like may other git-related tools? 2014-05-09 2:58 GMT+02:00 Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com: No activity since 2012, no tests, and no chance of ever graduating. Also, probably better out-of-tree tools out there. Cc: Alexandre Julliard julli...@winehq.org Cc: David Kågedal dav...@lysator.liu.se Cc: Jakub Narębski jna...@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? -- Felipe Contreras-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH v1 18/25] contrib: remove 'emacs'
David Kågedal wrote: 2014-05-09 10:29 GMT+02:00 Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com: David Kågedal wrote: What problem does this removal solve? Please do not top post. a) What problem does it solve by staying? b) Where are the tests? c) Why it cannot be moved to an outside repository like may other git-related tools? Fair enough. I guess the target should rather be to get it into the emacs distribution. That would be ideal I think. However, I see many tools that already exist in the emacs wiki[1]. Why can't this one be one for those? Cheers. [1] http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/Git -- Felipe Contreras-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH v1 18/25] contrib: remove 'emacs'
Alexandre Julliard wrote: David Kågedal dav...@lysator.liu.se writes: 2014-05-09 10:29 GMT+02:00 Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com: David Kågedal wrote: What problem does this removal solve? Please do not top post. a) What problem does it solve by staying? b) Where are the tests? c) Why it cannot be moved to an outside repository like may other git-related tools? Fair enough. I guess the target should rather be to get it into the emacs distribution. It's already in Emacs in a different form, as part of the generic VC support. And nowadays, users are probably better served by using something like Magit anyway. As far as my code is concerned I have no objections to removing it. All right. Thanks for the clarification. -- Felipe Contreras-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH v1 18/25] contrib: remove 'emacs'
David Kågedal dav...@lysator.liu.se writes: 2014-05-09 10:29 GMT+02:00 Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com: David Kågedal wrote: What problem does this removal solve? Please do not top post. a) What problem does it solve by staying? b) Where are the tests? c) Why it cannot be moved to an outside repository like may other git-related tools? Fair enough. I guess the target should rather be to get it into the emacs distribution. It's already in Emacs in a different form, as part of the generic VC support. And nowadays, users are probably better served by using something like Magit anyway. As far as my code is concerned I have no objections to removing it. -- Alexandre Julliard julli...@winehq.org -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
